At the end of filter-branch in a non-bare repository, the work tree is
updated with "read-tree -m -u HEAD", to carry the change forward in case
the current branch was rewritten. In order to avoid losing any local
change during this step, filter-branch refuses to work when there are
local changes in the work tree.
This "read-tree -m -u HEAD" operation does not affect what commit is
checked out in a submodule (iow, it does not touch .git/HEAD in a
submodule checkout), and checking if there is any local change to the
submodule is not useful.
Staged submodules _are_ considered to be 'dirty', however, as the
"read-tree -m -u HEAD" could result in loss of staged information
otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After the git-core package was renamed to git, git help -w was still looking
for files in /usr/share/doc/git-core-$VERSION instead of
/usr/share/doc/git-$VERSION.
Signed-off-by: David J. Mellor <dmellor@whistlingcat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git blame misaligns output if a author's name has a differing display width and
strlen; for instance, an accented Latin letter that takes two bytes to encode
will cause the rest of the line to be shifted to the left by one. To fix this,
use utf8_strwidth instead of strlen (and compute the padding ourselves, since
printf doesn't know about UTF-8).
Signed-off-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I'm about to use this pattern more than once, so make it a common function.
Signed-off-by: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.0:
builtin-mv.c: check for unversionned files before looking at the destination.
Add a testcase for "git mv -f" on untracked files.
Missing && in t/t7001.sh.
The previous code was failing in the case where one moves an
unversionned file to an existing destination, with mv -f: the
"existing destination" was checked first, and the error was cancelled
by the force flag.
We now check the unrecoverable error first, which fixes the bug.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this, the exit status is only the one of the last line.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git remote rm <repo>" happily removes non-remote refs and their reflogs.
This may be okay if the repository truely is a mirror, but if the user
had done "git remote add --mirror <repo>" by accident and was just
undoing their mistake, then they are left in a situation that is
difficult to recover from.
After this commit, "git remote rm" skips over non-remote refs. The user
is advised on how remove branches using "git branch -d", which itself
has nice safety checks wrt to branch removal lacking from "git remote rm".
Non-remote non-branch refs are skipped silently.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.6.0:
User-manual: "git stash <comment>" form is long gone
add test-dump-cache-tree in Makefile
fix typo in Documentation
apply: fix access to an uninitialized mode variable, found by valgrind
These days you must explicitly say "git stash save <comment>".
Signed-off-by: William Pursell <bill.pursell@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
5c5ba73 (Makefile: Use generic rule to build test programs,
2007-05-31) tried to use generic rule to build test programs, but it
misses the file 'dump-cache-tree.c', since its name is not prefixed by
'test-'. This commit solves this little problem by renaming this file
instead of carrying out an explicit rule in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Guanqun Lu <guanqun.lu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 'tpatch' was initialized successfully, st_mode was already taken
from the previous diff. We should not try to override it with data
from an lstat() that was never called.
This is a companion patch to 7a07841(git-apply: handle a patch that
touches the same path more than once better).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git filter-branch is run on a bare repository, it prints out a fatal
error message:
$ git filter-branch branch
Rewrite 476c4839280c219c2317376b661d9d95c1727fc3 (9/9)
WARNING: Ref 'refs/heads/branch' is unchanged
fatal: This operation must be run in a work tree
Note that this fatal error message doesn't prevent git filter-branch from
exiting successfully. (Why doesn't git filter-branch actually exit with an
error when a shell command fails? I'm not sure why it was designed this
way.)
This error message is caused by the following section of code at the end of
git-filter-branch.sh:
if [ "$(is_bare_repository)" = false ]; then
unset GIT_DIR GIT_WORK_TREE GIT_INDEX_FILE
test -z "$ORIG_GIT_DIR" || {
GIT_DIR="$ORIG_GIT_DIR" && export GIT_DIR
}
... elided ...
git read-tree -u -m HEAD
fi
The problem is the call to $(is_bare_repository), which is made before
GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE are restored. This call always returns "false",
even when we're running in a bare repository. But this means that we will
attempt to call 'git read-tree' even in a bare repository, which will fail
and print an error.
This patch modifies git-filter-branch.sh to restore the original
environment variables before trying to call is_bare_repository.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"i" is a loop counter and should not be used to hold a return value; use
"result" instead which is consistent with the rest of builtin-remote.c.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The parameter n of unpack_callback() can have a value of up to
MAX_UNPACK_TREES. The check at the top of unpack_trees() (its only
(indirect) caller) makes sure it cannot exceed this limit.
unpack_callback() passes it and the array src to unpack_nondirectories(),
which has this loop:
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
/* ... */
src[i + o->merge] = o->df_conflict_entry;
o->merge can be 0 or 1, so unpack_nondirectories() potentially accesses
the array src at index MAX_UNPACK_TREES. This patch makes it big enough.
Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The size of the content we are adding may be larger than
2.1G (i.e., "git add gigantic-file"). Most of the code-path
to do so uses size_t or unsigned long to record the size,
but write_loose_object uses a signed int.
On platforms where "int" is 32-bits (which includes x86_64
Linux platforms), we end up passing malloc a negative size.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After you resolve a conflicted merge to remove the path, "git add -u"
failed to record the removal. Instead it errored out by saying that the
removed path is not found in the work tree, but that is what the user
already knows, and the wanted to record the removal as the resolution,
so the error does not make sense.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also as suggested by Junio, in order to try to catch other MIME
problems, test cases from the "8. Examples" section of RFC2047 are added
to t5100 testsuite as well.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru>
Actually, I think the issue is pretty independent of submodules; when
"git commit" gets an empty parameter, it misinterprets it as a file.
So avoid passing an empty parameter to "git commit".
Actually, this is a nice cleanup, as MSG_FILE and EDIT_COMMIT were mutually
exclusive; use one variable instead
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Attempting to rebase three-commit series (two regular changes, followed by
one commit that changes what commit is bound for a submodule path) to
squash the first two results in a failure; not just the first two commits
squashed, but the change to the submodule is also included in the result.
This failure causes the subsequent step to "pick" the change that actually
changes the submodule to be applied, because there is no change left to be
applied.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to simply try calling execvp(); if it succeeded, then we were done
and the new program was running. If it didn't, then we knew that it wasn't
a valid command.
Unfortunately, this interacted badly with the new pager handling. Now that
git remains the parent process and the pager is spawned, git has to hang
around until the pager is finished. We install an atexit handler to do
this, but that handler never gets called if we successfully run execvp.
You could see this behavior by running any dashed external using a pager
(e.g., "git -p stash list"). The command finishes running, but the pager
is still going. In the case of less, it then gets an error reading from
the terminal and exits, potentially leaving the terminal in a broken state
(and not showing the output).
This patch just uses run_command() to try running the dashed external. The
parent git process then waits for the external process to complete and
then handles the pager cleanup as it would for an internal command.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
run_command() returns a single integer specifying either an
error code or the exit status of the spawned program. The
only way to tell the difference is that the error codes are
outside of the allowed range of exit status values.
Rather than make each caller implement the test against a
magic limit, let's provide a macro.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When run_command() was asked to run a non-existant command, its behavior
varied depending on the platform:
- on POSIX systems, we would fork, and then after the execvp call
failed, we could call die(), which prints a message to stderr and
exits with code 128.
- on Windows, we do a PATH lookup, realize the program isn't there, and
then return ERR_RUN_COMMAND_FORK
The goal of this patch is to make it clear to callers that the specific
error was a missing command. To do this, we will return the error code
ERR_RUN_COMMAND_EXEC, which is already defined in run-command.h, checked
for in several places, but never actually gets set.
The new behavior is:
- on POSIX systems, we exit the forked process with code 127 (the same
as the shell uses to report missing commands). The parent process
recognizes this code and returns an EXEC error. The stderr message is
silenced, since the caller may be speculatively trying to run a
command. Instead, we use trace_printf so that somebody interested in
debugging can see the error that occured.
- on Windows, we check errno, which is already set correctly by
mingw_spawnvpe, and report an EXEC error instead of a FORK error
Thus it is safe to speculatively run a command:
int r = run_command_v_opt(argv, 0);
if (r == -ERR_RUN_COMMAND_EXEC)
/* oops, it wasn't found; try something else */
else
/* we failed for some other reason, error is in r */
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is a static function called run_command which
conflicts with the library function in run-command.c; this
isn't a problem currently, but prevents including
run-command.h in git.c.
This patch just renames the static function to something
more specific and non-conflicting.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the existing codepaths were meant to treat missing uninteresting
objects to be a silently ignored non-error, but there were a few places
in handle_commit() and add_parents_to_list(), which are two key functions
in the revision traversal machinery, that cared:
- When a tag refers to an object that we do not have, we barfed. We
ignore such a tag if it is painted as UNINTERESTING with this change.
- When digging deeper into the ancestry chain of a commit that is already
painted as UNINTERESTING, in order to paint its parents UNINTERESTING,
we barfed if parse_parent() for a parent commit object failed. We can
ignore such a parent commit object.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
v1.6.1 introduced ".have" extension to the protocol to allow the receiving
side to advertise objects that are reachable from refs in the repositories
it borrows from. This was meant to be used by the sending side to avoid
sending such objects; they are already available through the alternates
mechanism.
The client side implementation in v1.6.1, which was introduced with
40c155f (push: prepare sender to receive extended ref information from the
receiver, 2008-09-09) aka v1.6.1-rc1~203^2~1, were faulty in that it did
not consider the possiblity that the repository receiver borrows from
might have objects it does not know about.
This fixes it by refraining from passing missing commits to underlying
pack-objects. Revision machinery may need to be tightened further to
treat missing uninteresting objects as non-error events, but this is an
obvious and safe fix for a maintenance release that is almost good enough.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When normalizing an absolute path, we might have to add a slash _and_ a
NUL to the buffer, so the buffer was one too small.
Let's just future proof the code and alloc PATH_MAX + 1 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When get_sha1_basic() is passed a buffer of len 0, it should not
check if buf[len-1] is a curly bracket.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
