These are tests which are missing a link in their &&-chain,
but during a setup phase. We may fail to notice failure in
commands that build the test environment, but these are
typically not expected to fail at all (but it's still good
to double-check that our test environment is what we
expect).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
GnuPG >= 2.1.0 no longer supports RFC1991, so skip these tests.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hesse <mail@eworm.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It was reported that the allocated stack space was too small for
some archs openSUSE buildfarm runs the tests on. Double it while
also doubling the amount of data to be handled.
Reported-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Tested-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add support for configuring default sort ordering for git tags. Command
line option will override this configured value, using the exact same
syntax.
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --sort tests should use the better format for >expect to maintain
indenting and ensure that no substitution is occurring. This makes
parsing and understanding the tests a bit easier.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In large repos, the recursion implementation of contains(commit,
commit_list) may result in a stack overflow. Replace the recursion with
a loop to fix it.
This problem is more apparent on Windows than on Linux, where the stack
is more limited by default.
See also this thread on the msysGit list:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/msysgit/FqT6boJrb2g/discussion
[jes: re-written to imitate the original recursion more closely]
Thomas Braun pointed out several documentation shortcomings.
Tests are run only if ulimit -s is available. This means they cannot
be run on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Lafay <jeanjacques.lafay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--sort=version:refname (or --sort=v:refname for short) sorts tags as
if they are versions. --sort=-refname reverses the order (with or
without ":version").
versioncmp() is copied from string/strverscmp.c in glibc commit
ee9247c38a8def24a59eb5cfb7196a98bef8cfdc, reformatted to Git coding
style. The implementation is under LGPL-2.1 and according to [1] I can
relicense it to GPLv2.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git tag --force" mentions what old tag object is being replaced
when it is used to update an existing tag, but it shows the same
message when creating a new one. Stop doing that, as it does not
add any information.
Add a test for this and also to ensure --force can replace tags at
all.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These tests themselves are properly protected by the GPG
prerequisite, but one of the set-up steps outside the
test_expect_success block unconditionally assumed that there is a
gpghome/ directory, which is not true if GPG is not being used.
It may be a good idea to move the whole set-up steps in the test but
that is a follow-up topic.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/maint-tag-show-fixes:
tag: do not show non-tag contents with "-n"
tag: die when listing missing or corrupt objects
tag: fix output of "tag -n" when errors occur
Conflicts:
t/t7004-tag.sh
"git tag -n" did not check the type of the object it is reading the top n
lines from. At least, avoid showing the beginning of trees and blobs when
dealing with lightweight tags that point at them.
As the payload of a tag and a commit look similar in that they both start
with a header block, which is skipped for the purpose of "-n" output,
followed by human readable text, allow the message of commit objects to be
shown just like the contents of tag objects. This avoids regression for
people who have been using "tag -n" to show the log messages of commits
that are pointed at by lightweight tags.
Test script is from Jeff King.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This filters the list for tags of the given object.
Example,
john$ git tag v1.0-john v1.0
john$ git tag -l --points-at v1.0
v1.0-john
v1.0
Signed-off-by: Tom Grennan <tmgrennan@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Other test scripts may want to look at or verify signed
tags, and the setup is non-trivial. Let's factor this out
into lib-gpg.sh for other tests to use.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Until now, "git tag -l foo* bar*" would silently ignore the
second argument, showing only refs starting with "foo". It's
not just unfriendly not to take a second pattern; we
actually generated subtly wrong results (from the user's
perspective) because some of the requested tags were
omitted.
This patch allows an arbitrary number of patterns on the
command line; if any of them matches, the ref is shown.
While we're tweaking the documentation, let's also make it
clear that the pattern is fnmatch.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mark the tag_template message as translatable with N_() and then use
it later with _(). We need to skip a test under GETTEXT_POISON that
relies on the output having a leading newline.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mg/maint-tag-rfc1991:
tag: recognize rfc1991 signatures
tag: factor out sig detection for tag display
tag: factor out sig detection for body edits
verify-tag: factor out signature detection
t/t7004-tag: test handling of rfc1991 signatures
Split the "message in editor has initial comment" test into three
tests. The motivation is to be able to only skip the middle part under
NO_GETTEXT_POISON.
In addition the return value of 'git tag' was being returned. We now
check that it's non-zero. I used ! instead of test_must_fail so that
the GIT_EDITOR variable was only used in this command invocation, and
because the surrounding tests use this style.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have always been creating rfc1991 signatures for users with "rfc1991"
in their gpg config but failed to recognize them (tag -l -n largenumber)
and verify them (tag -v, verify-tag).
Make good use of the refactored signature detection and let us recognize
and verify those signatures also.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, git expects "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----" at the beginning of a
signature. But gpg uses "MESSAGE" instead of "SIGNATURE" when used with
the "rfc1991" option. This leads to git's failing to verify it's own
signed tags, among other problems.
Add tests for all code paths (tag -v, tag -l -n largenumber, tag -f
without -m) where signature detection matters.
Reported-by: Stephan Hugel <urschrei@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Same rules as before: this patch only adds " &&" to the end of
some lines in the test suite.
Intended to be applied on top of or squashed with the last
batch if they look okay.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
SKIP messages are now part of the TAP plan. A TAP harness now knows
why a particular test was skipped and can report that information. The
non-TAP harness built into Git's test-lib did nothing special with
these messages, and is unaffected by these changes.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests are skipped if no gpg was found or if gpg is version 1.0.6.
Previously, the latter condition was checked a bit later in the test file
so that the tag verification tests would be exercised. These are now
skipped as well, but only because we would need a facility to revoke a
test prerequisite, which we do not have.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
On Windows, there is an unfortunate interaction between the MSYS bash and
git's command line processing:
- Since Windows's CMD does not do the wildcard expansion, but passes
arguments like path* through to the programs, the programs must do the
expansion themselves. This happens in the startup code before main() is
entered.
- bash, however, passes the argument "path*" to git, assuming that git will
see the unquoted word unchanged as a single argument.
But actually git expands the unquoted word before main() is entered.
In t2200, not all names that the test case is interested in exist as files
at the time when 'git ls-files' is invoked. git expands "path?" to only
the subset of files the exist, and only that subset was listed, so that the
test failed. We now list all interesting paths explicitly.
In t7004, git exanded the pattern "*a*" to "actual" (the file that stdout
was redirected to), which is not what the was tested for. We fix it by
renaming the output file (and removing any existing files matching *a*).
This was originally fixed by Johannes Schindelin.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Some tests report that some tests will be skipped. They used
'test_expect_success' with a trivially successful test. Nowadays we have
the helper function 'say' for this purpose.
In on case, 'say_color skip' is replaced by 'say' because the former is
not intended as a public API.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
This functions similarly to "git branch --contains"; it will show all
tags that contain the specified commit, by sharing the same logic.
The patch also adds documentation and tests for the new option.
Signed-off-by: Jake Goulding <goulding@vivisimo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many test scripts assumed that they will start in a 'trash' subdirectory
that is a single level down from the t/ directory, and referred to their
test vector files by asking for files like "../t9999/expect". This will
break if we move the 'trash' subdirectory elsewhere.
To solve this, we earlier introduced "$TEST_DIRECTORY" so that they can
refer to t/ directory reliably. This finally makes all the tests use
it to refer to the outside environment.
With this patch, and a one-liner not included here (because it would
contradict with what Dscho really wants to do):
| diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
| index 70ea7e0..60e69e4 100644
| --- a/t/test-lib.sh
| +++ b/t/test-lib.sh
| @@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ fi
| . ../GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS
|
| # Test repository
| -test="trash directory"
| +test="trash directory/another level/yet another"
| rm -fr "$test" || {
| trap - exit
| echo >&5 "FATAL: Cannot prepare test area"
all the tests still pass, but we would want extra sets of eyeballs on this
type of change to really make sure.
[jc: with help from Stephan Beyer on http-push tests I do not run myself;
credits for locating silly quoting errors go to Olivier Marin.]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running "git commit -F file" and "git tag -F file" from a
subdirectory, we should take it as relative to the directory we started
from, not relative to the top-level directory.
This adds a helper function "parse_options_fix_filename()" to make it more
convenient to fix this class of issues. Ideally, parse_options() should
support a new type of option, "OPT_FILENAME", to do this uniformly, but
this patch is meant to go to 'maint' to fix it minimally.
One thing to note is that value for "commit template file" that comes from
the command line is taken as relative to $cwd just like other parameters,
but when it comes from the configuration varilable 'commit.template', it
is taken as relative to the working tree root as before. I think this
difference actually is sensible (not that I particularly think
commit.template itself is sensible).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".
This is useful to
- make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
e.g. SIGSEGV, and
- advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the
results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not
know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the
cute hack of "git diff --no-index".
Rather use test_cmp for that purpose.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This form is not portable across all shells, so replace instances of:
export FOO=bar
with:
FOO=bar
export FOO
Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test was already careful enough to skip signed tag tests if gpg
is not available, but it must also skip all verify tests, even those
that are about non-signed tags, because they also invoke gpg.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:
test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
what is to be tested
'
And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.
This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:
test_expect_success 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
! this command should fail
'
test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:
test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
rm -f bar &&
git foo &&
test -f bar
'
This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The command itself takes an optional <pattern> argument that
limits the shown tags to the ones that match when in listing
mode that is triggered with '-l' option. The <pattern> is not
an optional option-argument to '-l'.
With this fix, "git tag -l -n 4 v0.99" works as expected.
It also removes a few bogus tests in t7004.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 3968658599 broke signed tags using
the "-u" flag when it made builtin-tag.c use parse_options() to parse its
arguments (but it quite possibly was broken even before that, by the
builtin rewrite).
It used to be that passing the signing ID with the -u parameter also
(obviously!) implied that you wanted to sign and annotate the tag, but
that logic got dropped. It also totally ignored the actual key ID that was
passed in.
This reinstates it all.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This detects a regression introduced while moving git-tag to a C
builtin.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also, this removes those tests ensuring that repeated
-m options don't allocate memory more than once, because now
this is done after parsing options, using the last one
when more are given. The same for -F.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Brown paper bag fix to avoid using non portable sed syntax. The
test by itself didn't catch what it was supposed to, anyways.
The new test first checks if git-tag correctly errors out when
the user exited the editor without editing the file. Then it
checks if what the user was presented in the editor was any
useful, which we define as the following:
* It begins with a single blank line, where the invoked editor
would typically place the editing curser at, so that the user
can immediately start typing;
* It has some instruction but that comes after that initial
blank line, all lines prefixed with "#". We specifically do
not check for the wording of this instruction.
* And it has nothing else, as the expected behaviour is "Hey
you did not leave any message".
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These tests check whether git-tag properly sends a comment into the
editor, and whether it reuses previous annotation when overwriting
an existing tag.
Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of this patch code and message was written by Shawn O. Pearce.
I made some tests to know what the problem was, and then I changed
the code related with the SIGPIPE signal.
If the user has misconfigured `user.signingkey` in their .git/config
or just doesn't have any secret keys on their keyring and they ask
for a signed tag with `git tag -s` we better make sure the resulting
tag was actually signed by gpg.
Prior versions of builtin git-tag allowed this failure to slip
by without error as they were not checking the return value of
the finish_command() so they did not notice when gpg exited with
an error exit status. They also did not fail if gpg produced an
empty output or if read_in_full received an error from the read
system call while trying to read the pipe back from gpg.
Finally, we did not actually honor any return value from the do_sign
function as it returns ssize_t but was being stored into an unsigned
long. This caused the compiler to optimize out the die condition,
allowing git-tag to continue along and create the tag object.
However, when gpg gets a wrong username, it exits before any read was done
and then the writing process receives SIGPIPE and program is terminated.
By ignoring this signal, anyway, the function write_or_die gets EPIPE from
write_in_full and exits returning 0 to the system without a message.
Here we better call to write_in_full directly so we can fail
printing a message and return safely to the caller.
With these issues fixed `git-tag -s` will now fail to create the
tag and will report a non-zero exit status to its caller, thereby
allowing automated helper scripts to detect (and recover from)
failure if gpg is not working properly.
Proposed-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Rica <jasampler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
