Now that we've removed "git-add--interactive.perl" let's replace
mentions of it with "add-interactive.c". In the case of the "git add"
documentation we were using it as an example filename, so the mention
wasn't wrong, but using a dead file is slightly confusing.
The "borrowed" comment here likewise isn't wrong, but let's mention
the successor file instead. In the case of pathspec.c the implied TODO
item should refer to the current code (and the comment may not even be
current, I didn't check).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since [1] first released with Git v2.37.0 the built-in version of "add
-i" has been the default. That built-in implementation was added in
[2], first released with Git v2.25.0.
At this point enough time has passed to allow for finding any
remaining bugs in this new implementation, so let's remove the
fallback code.
As with similar migrations for "stash"[3] and "rebase"[4] we're
keeping a mention of "add.interactive.useBuiltin" in the
documentation, but adding a warning() to notify any outstanding users
that the built-in is now the default. As with [5] and [6] we should
follow-up in the future and eventually remove that warning.
1. 0527ccb1b5 (add -i: default to the built-in implementation,
2021-11-30)
2. f83dff60a7 (Start to implement a built-in version of `git add
--interactive`, 2019-11-13)
3. 8a2cd3f512 (stash: remove the stash.useBuiltin setting,
2020-03-03)
4. d03ebd411c (rebase: remove the rebase.useBuiltin setting,
2019-03-18)
5. deeaf5ee07 (stash: remove documentation for `stash.useBuiltin`,
2022-01-27)
6. 9bcde4d531 (rebase: remove transitory rebase.useBuiltin setting &
env, 2021-03-23)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Doc update to ls-files.
* en/ls-files-doc-update:
ls-files: guide folks to --exclude-standard over other --exclude* options
ls-files: clarify descriptions of status tags for -t
ls-files: clarify descriptions of file selection options
ls-files: add missing documentation for --resolve-undo option
"git rebase" often ignored incompatible options instead of
complaining, which has been corrected.
* en/rebase-incompatible-opts:
rebase: provide better error message for apply options vs. merge config
rebase: put rebase_options initialization in single place
rebase: fix formatting of rebase --reapply-cherry-picks option in docs
rebase: clarify the OPT_CMDMODE incompatibilities
rebase: add coverage of other incompatible options
rebase: fix incompatiblity checks for --[no-]reapply-cherry-picks
rebase: fix docs about incompatibilities with --root
rebase: remove --allow-empty-message from incompatible opts
rebase: flag --apply and --merge as incompatible
rebase: mark --update-refs as requiring the merge backend
Clarify column-padding operators in the pretty format string.
* po/pretty-format-columns-doc:
doc: pretty-formats note wide char limitations, and add tests
doc: pretty-formats describe use of ellipsis in truncation
doc: pretty-formats document negative column alignments
doc: pretty-formats: delineate `%<|(` parameter values
doc: pretty-formats: separate parameters from placeholders
Clarify how "checkout -b/-B" and "git branch [-f]" are similar but
different in the documentation.
* jc/doc-checkout-b:
checkout: document -b/-B to highlight the differences from "git branch"
Document that "branch -f <branch>" disables only the safety to
avoid recreating an existing branch.
* jc/doc-branch-update-checked-out-branch:
branch: document `-f` and linked worktree behaviour
When config which selects the merge backend (currently,
rebase.autosquash=true or rebase.updateRefs=true) conflicts with other
options on the command line (such as --whitespace=fix), make the error
message specifically call out the config option and specify how to
override that config option on the command line.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit ce5238a690 ("rebase --keep-base: imply --reapply-cherry-picks",
2022-10-17) accidentally added some blank lines that cause extra
paragraphs about --reapply-cherry-picks to be considered not part of
the documentation of that option. Remove the blank lines to make it
clear we are still discussing --reapply-cherry-picks.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--edit-todo was documented as being incompatible with any of the options
for the apply backend. However, it is also incompatible with any of the
options for the merge backend, and is incompatible with any options that
are not backend specific as well. The same can be said for --continue,
--skip, --abort, --quit, etc.
This is already somewhat implicitly covered by the synopsis, but since
"[<options>]" in the first two variants are vague it might be easy to
miss this. That might not be a big deal, but since the rebase manpage
has to spend so much verbiage about incompatibility of options, making
a separate section for these options that are incompatible with
everything else seems clearer. Do that, and remove the needless
inclusion of --edit-todo in the explicit incompatibility list.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--[no-]reapply-cherry-picks was traditionally only supported by the
sequencer. Support was added for the apply backend, when --keep-base is
also specified, in commit ce5238a690 ("rebase --keep-base: imply
--reapply-cherry-picks", 2022-10-17). Make the code error out when
--[no-]reapply-cherry-picks is specified AND the apply backend is used
AND --keep-base is not specified. Also, clarify a number of comments
surrounding the interaction of these flags.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In commit 5dacd4abdd ("git-rebase.txt: document incompatible options",
2018-06-25), I added notes about incompatibilities between options for
the apply and merge backends. Unfortunately, I inverted the condition
when --root was incompatible with the apply backend. Fix the
documentation, and add a testcase that verifies the documentation
matches the code.
While at it, the documentation for --root also tried to cover some of
the backend differences between the apply and merge backends in relation
to reapplying cherry picks. The information:
* assumed that the apply backend was the default (it isn't anymore)
* was written before --reapply-cherry-picks became an option
* was written before the detailed information on backend differences
All of these factors make the sentence under --root about reapplying
cherry picks contradict information that is now available elsewhere in
the manual, and the other references are correct. So just strike this
sentence.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--allow-empty-message was turned into a no-op and even documented
as such; the flag is simply ignored. Since the flag is ignored, it
shouldn't be documented as being incompatible with other flags.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--update-refs is built in terms of the sequencer, which requires the
merge backend. It was already marked as incompatible with the apply
backend in the git-rebase manual, but the code didn't check for this
incompatibility and warn the user. Check and error now.
While at it, fix a typo in t3422...and fix some misleading wording
(most options which used to be am-specific have since been implemented
in the merge backend as well).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git check-attr" learned to take an optional tree-ish to read the
.gitattributes file from.
* kn/attr-from-tree:
attr: add flag `--source` to work with tree-ish
t0003: move setup for `--all` into new block
Three hyphens are rendered verbatim in documentation, so "--" has to be
used to produce a dash. Fix asciidoc output for dashes. This is
similar to previous commits f0b922473e (Documentation: render special
characters correctly, 2021-07-29) and de82095a95 (doc
hash-function-transition: fix asciidoc output, 2021-02-05).
Signed-off-by: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Document ORIG_HEAD a bit more.
* pb/doc-orig-head:
git-rebase.txt: add a note about 'ORIG_HEAD' being overwritten
revisions.txt: be explicit about commands writing 'ORIG_HEAD'
git-merge.txt: mention 'ORIG_HEAD' in the Description
git-reset.txt: mention 'ORIG_HEAD' in the Description
git-cherry-pick.txt: do not use 'ORIG_HEAD' in example
The cURL one hasn't cooked for a week in 'next', but let's fast
track it so that linux-musl CI job would be happy.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commits added clarifications to the column alignment
placeholders, note that the spaces are optional around the parameters.
Also, a proposed extension [1] to allow hard truncation (without
ellipsis '..') highlighted that the existing code does not play well
with wide characters, such as Asian fonts and emojis.
For example, N wide characters take 2N columns so won't fit an odd number
column width, causing misalignment somewhere.
Further analysis also showed that decomposed characters, e.g. separate
`a` + `umlaut` Unicode code-points may also be mis-counted, in some cases
leaving multiple loose `umlauts` all combined together.
Add some notes about these limitations, and add basic tests to demonstrate
them.
The chosen solution for the tests is to substitute any wide character
that overlaps a splitting boundary for the unicode vertical ellipsis
code point as a rare but 'obvious' substitution.
An alternative could be the substitution with a single dot '.' which
matches regular expression usage, and our two dot ellipsis, and further
in scenarios where the bulk of the text is wide characters, would be
obvious. In mainly 'ascii' scenarios a singleton emoji being substituted
by a dot could be confusing.
It is enough that the tests fail cleanly. The final choice for the
substitute character can be deferred.
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20221030185614.3842-1-philipoakley@iee.email/
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit a7f01c6b4d (pretty: support truncating in %>, %< and %><,
2013-04-19) added the use of ellipsis when truncating placeholder
values.
Show our 'two dot' ellipsis, and examples for the left, middle and
right truncation to avoid any confusion as to which end of the string
is adjusted. (cf justification and sub-string).
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 066790d7cb (pretty.c: support <direction>|(<negative number>) forms,
2016-06-16) added the option for right justified column alignment without
updating the documentation.
Add an explanation of its use of negative column values.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit a57523428b (pretty: support padding placeholders, %< %> and %><,
2013-04-19) introduced column width place holders. It also added
separate column position `%<|(` placeholders for display screen based
placement.
Change the display screen parameter reference from 'N' to 'M' and
corresponding descriptives to make the distinction clearer.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit a57523428b (pretty: support padding placeholders, %< %> and %><,
2013-04-19) introduced columnated place holders. These placeholders
can be confusing as they contain `<` and `>` characters as part
of their placeholders adjacent to the `<N>` parameters.
Add spaces either side of the `<N>` parameters in the title line.
The code (strtol) will consume any spaces around the number values
(assuming they are passed as a quoted string with spaces).
Note that the spaces are optional.
Subsequent commits will clarify other confusions.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The existing text read as if "git checkout -b/-B name" were
equivalent to "git branch [-f] name", which clearly was not
what we wanted to say.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch -f name start" forces to recreate the named branch, but
the forcing does not defeat the "do not touch a branch that is
checked out elsewhere" safety valve.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With Asciidoctor, all of the '+' introduced in a797c0ea04 ("cat-file:
add mailmap support to --batch-check option", 2022-12-20) render
literally rather than functioning as list continuations. With asciidoc,
this renders just fine. It's not too surprising that there is room for
ambiguity and surprises here, since we have lists within lists.
Simply replacing all of these '+' with empty lines makes this render
fine using both tools. Except, in the third hunk, where after this inner
'*' list ends, we want to continue with more contents of the outer list
item (`--batch-command=<format>`). We can solve any ambiguity here and
make this clear to both tools by wrapping the inner list in an open
block (using "--").
For consistency, let's wrap all three of these inner lists from
a797c0ea04 in open blocks. This also future-proofs us a little -- if we
ever gain more contents after any of those first two lists, as we did
already in a797c0ea04 for the third list, we're prepared and should
render fine with both asciidoc and Asciidoctor from the start.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce an optional configuration to allow the trailing hash that
protects the index file from bit flipping.
* ds/omit-trailing-hash-in-index:
features: feature.manyFiles implies fast index writes
test-lib-functions: add helper for trailing hash
read-cache: add index.skipHash config option
hashfile: allow skipping the hash function
Conditionally skip the pre-applypatch and applypatch-msg hooks when
applying patches with 'git am'.
* tr/am--no-verify:
am: allow passing --no-verify flag
The contents of the .gitattributes files may evolve over time, but "git
check-attr" always checks attributes against them in the working tree
and/or in the index. It may be beneficial to optionally allow the users
to check attributes taken from a commit other than HEAD against paths.
Add a new flag `--source` which will allow users to check the
attributes against a commit (actually any tree-ish would do). When the
user uses this flag, we go through the stack of .gitattributes files but
instead of checking the current working tree and/or in the index, we
check the blobs from the provided tree-ish object. This allows the
command to also be used in bare repositories.
Since we use a tree-ish object, the user can pass "--source
HEAD:subdirectory" and all the attributes will be looked up as if
subdirectory was the root directory of the repository.
We cannot simply use the `<rev>:<path>` syntax without the `--source`
flag, similar to how it is used in `git show` because any non-flag
parameter before `--` is treated as an attribute and any parameter after
`--` is treated as a pathname.
The change involves creating a new function `read_attr_from_blob`, which
given the path reads the blob for the path against the provided source and
parses the attributes line by line. This function is plugged into
`read_attr()` function wherein we go through the stack of attributes
files.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Co-authored-by: toon@iotcl.com
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace non-existent `branch.<name>.fetch` to `remote.<repository>.fetch`, in
the first example in `git-fetch` doc, which was introduced in
d504f6975d (modernize fetch/merge/pull examples, 2009-10-21).
Rename placeholder `<name>` to `<repository>`, to be consistent with all other
uses in git docs, except that `git-config.txt` uses `remote.<name>.fetch` in
its "Variables" section.
Also add missing monospace markups.
Signed-off-by: Yukai Chou <muzimuzhi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, in the git-log documentation, the reference to generating
patches does not match the section title. This can make the section
"Generating patch text with -p" hard to find, since typically readers of
the documentation will copy and paste to search the page.
Let's make this more convenient for readers by linking it directly to
the section.
Since git-log pulls in diff-generate-patch.txt, we can provide a direct
link to the section. Otherwise, change the verbiage to match exactly
what the section title is, to at least make searching for it an easier
task.
Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit d656218a83 (docs/bisect-lk2009: update nist report link,
2017-04-20) replaced a dead link to news release on nist.gov. However,
this might be confusing to the reader (like myself) because the article
git-bisect-lk2009.txt quotes from the news release but the exact quote
cannot be found in the full report. In addition to that, the link added
in 2017 is also dead in 2023.
Replace the reference to nist.gov with an version of the original NIST
news release archived to the Wayback Machine. Include also an updated
link to a live version of the full report.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A reference to Java Code Conventions in git-bisect-lk2009.txt uses an
outdated URL that redirects to table of contents for the conventions.
The actual claim about "80%" that this reference backs up is on the
first page of the conventions:
https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javase/codeconventions-introduction.html
Use this newer URL and its title in the reference.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Rybak <rybak.a.v@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
