When we are parsing approxidate strings and we find three
numbers separate by one of ":/-.", we guess that it may be a
date. We feed the numbers to match_multi_number, which
checks whether it makes sense as a date in various orderings
(e.g., dd/mm/yy or mm/dd/yy, etc).
One of the checks we do is to see whether it is a date more
than 10 days in the future. This was added in 38035cf (date
parsing: be friendlier to our European friends.,
2006-04-05), and lets us guess that if it is currently April
2014, then "10/03/2014" is probably March 10th, not October
3rd.
This has a downside, though; if you want to be overly
generous with your "--until" date specification, we may
wrongly parse "2014-12-01" as "2014-01-12" (because the
latter is an in-the-past date). If the year is a future year
(i.e., both are future dates), it gets even weirder. Due to
the vagaries of approxidate, months _after_ the current date
(no matter the year) get flipped, but ones before do not.
This patch drops the "in the future" check for dates of this
form, letting us treat them always as yyyy-mm-dd, even if
they are in the future. This does not affect the normal
dd/mm/yyyy versus mm/dd/yyyy lookup, because this code path
only kicks in when the first number is greater than 70
(i.e., it must be a year, and cannot be either a date or a
month).
The one possible casualty is that "yyyy-dd-mm" is less
likely to be chosen over "yyyy-mm-dd". That's probably OK,
though because:
1. The difference happens only when the date is in the
future. Already we prefer yyyy-mm-dd for dates in the
past.
2. It's unclear whether anybody even uses yyyy-dd-mm
regularly. It does not appear in lists of common date
formats in Wikipedia[1,2].
3. Even if (2) is wrong, it is better to prefer ISO-like
dates, as that is consistent with what we use elsewhere
in git.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_representation_by_country
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we "git checkout $tree", we pull paths from $tree into
the index, and then check the resulting entries out to the
worktree. Our method for the first step is rather
heavy-handed, though; it clobbers the entire existing index
entry, even if the content is the same. This means we lose
our stat information, leading checkout_entry to later
rewrite the entire file with identical content.
Instead, let's see if we have the identical entry already in
the index, in which case we leave it in place. That lets
checkout_entry do the right thing. Our tests cover two
interesting cases:
1. We make sure that a file which has no changes is not
rewritten.
2. We make sure that we do update a file that is unchanged
in the index (versus $tree), but has working tree
changes. We keep the old index entry, and
checkout_entry is able to realize that our stat
information is out of date.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The approxidate functions accept an extra "now" parameter to
avoid calling time() themselves. We use this in our test
suite to make sure we have a consistent time for computing
relative dates. However, deep in the bowels of approxidate,
we also call time() to check whether possible dates are far
in the future. Let's make sure that the "now" override makes
it to that spot, too, so we can consistently test that
feature.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git status' doesn't output leading '#'s these days.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test misused a URL "file://." to mean "relative to here",
which we no longer accept.
In a file:// URL, typically there is no host, and RFC1738 says that
file:///<path> should be used.
Update t5705 to use a working URL.
Reported-by: Michael Blume <blume.mike@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In an earlier part there is:
"re-send it with "To:" set to the maintainer [*1*] and "cc:" the list [*2*]"
for the final submission, but later we see
"Send it to the list and cc the maintainer."
Fix the later one to match the previous.
Signed-off-by: Slavomir Vlcek <svlc@inventati.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In particular, git-fast-import and -export link to each
other, and gitremote-helpers links to existing remote
helpers, and vice versa. Also link to fast-import from the
remote helper spec, as this is relevant for remote helpers
using the fast-import format.
Signed-off-by: Max Horn <max@quendi.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Explicitly declare that git_atexit_dispatch() and git_atexit_clear()
take no parameters instead of leaving their parameter list empty and
thus unspecified.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a missing article at the beginning of a sentence, and rephrase
slightly.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Quinot <thomas@quinot.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Initialize the struct child_process variable cp at declaration time.
This is shorter, saves a function call and prevents using the variable
before initialization by mistake.
Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Trailers passed to the parse_trailer() function often have
a trailing newline. When erroring out, we should display
the invalid trailer properly, that means without any
trailing newline.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise trailers that are commented out might be
processed. We would also error out if the comment line
char is also a separator.
This means that comments inside a trailer block will
disappear, but that was already the case anyway.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two tests recently added to t1410 create branches "a" and
"a/b" to test d/f conflicts on reflogs. Earlier, unrelated
tests in that script create the path "A/B" in the working
tree. There's no conflict on a case-sensitive filesystem,
but on a case-insensitive one, "git log" will complain that
"a/b" is both a revision and a working tree path.
We could fix this by using a "--" to disambiguate, but we
are probably better off using names that are less confusing
to make it more clear that they are unrelated to the working
tree files. This patch turns "a/b" into "one/two".
Reported-by: Michael Blume <blume.mike@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the original phrasing, it is possible to misunderstand as if
the contents in the index for only the specified paths are made into
the new commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Corner-case bugfixes for "git fetch" around reflog handling.
* jk/fetch-reflog-df-conflict:
ignore stale directories when checking reflog existence
fetch: load all default config at startup
* rs/use-child-process-init-more:
bundle: split out ref writing from bundle_create
bundle: split out a helper function to compute and write prerequisites
bundle: split out a helper function to create pack data
use child_process_init() to initialize struct child_process variables
The code to use cache-tree trusted the on-disk data too much
and fell into an infinite loop.
* jk/cache-tree-protect-from-broken-libgit2:
cache-tree: avoid infinite loop on zero-entry tree
The option name "--store" was used early in development, but
never even made it into an applied patch, let alone a
released version of git. I forgot to update the matching
documentation at the time, though.
Noticed-by: Jesse Hopkins <jesse.hopkins@lmco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While using diff-highlight with other tools, I have discovered that Python
ignores SIGPIPE by default. Unfortunately, this also means that tools
attempting to launch a pager under Python--and don't realize this is
happening--means that the subprocess inherits this setting. In this case, it
means diff-highlight will be launched with SIGPIPE being ignored. Let's work
with those broken scripts by restoring the default SIGPIPE handler.
Signed-off-by: John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In addition to fixing trivial and obvious typos, be careful about
the following points:
- Spell ASCII, URL and CRC in ALL CAPS;
- Spell Linux as Capitalized;
- Do not omit periods in "i.e." and "e.g.".
Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
line-log tries to access all parents of a commit, but only the first
parent has been loaded if "--first-parent" is specified, resulting
in a crash.
Limit the number of parents to one if "--first-parent" is specified.
Reported-by: Eric N. Vander Weele <ericvw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tzvetan Mikov <tmikov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we update a ref, we have two rules for whether or not
we actually update the reflog:
1. If the reflog already exists, we will always append to
it.
2. If log_all_ref_updates is set, we will create a new
reflog file if necessary.
We do the existence check by trying to open the reflog file,
either with or without O_CREAT (depending on log_all_ref_updates).
If it fails, then we check errno to see what happened.
If we were not using O_CREAT and we got ENOENT, the file
doesn't exist, and we return success (there isn't a reflog
already, and we were not told to make a new one).
If we get EISDIR, then there is likely a stale directory
that needs to be removed (e.g., there used to be "foo/bar",
it was deleted, and the directory "foo" was left. Now we
want to create the ref "foo"). If O_CREAT is set, then we
catch this case, try to remove the directory, and retry our
open. So far so good.
But if we get EISDIR and O_CREAT is not set, then we treat
this as any other error, which is not right. Like ENOENT,
EISDIR is an indication that we do not have a reflog, and we
should silently return success (we were not told to create
it). Instead, the current code reports this as an error, and
we fail to update the ref at all.
Note that this is relatively unlikely to happen, as you
would have to have had reflogs turned on, and then later
turned them off (it could also happen due to a bug in fetch,
but that was fixed in the previous commit). However, it's
quite easy to fix: we just need to treat EISDIR like ENOENT
for the non-O_CREAT case, and silently return (note that
this early return means we can also simplify the O_CREAT
case).
Our new tests cover both cases (O_CREAT and non-O_CREAT).
The first one already worked, of course.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we start the git-fetch program, we call git_config to
load all config, but our callback only processes the
fetch.prune option; we do not chain to git_default_config at
all.
This means that we may not load some core configuration
which will have an effect. For instance, we do not load
core.logAllRefUpdates, which impacts whether or not we
create reflogs in a bare repository.
Note that I said "may" above. It gets even more exciting. If
we have to transfer actual objects as part of the fetch,
then we call fetch_pack as part of the same process. That
function loads its own config, which does chain to
git_default_config, impacting global variables which are
used by the rest of fetch. But if the fetch is a pure ref
update (e.g., a new ref which is a copy of an old one), we
skip fetch_pack entirely. So we get inconsistent results
depending on whether or not we have actual objects to
transfer or not!
Let's just load the core config at the start of fetch, so we
know we have it (we may also load it again as part of
fetch_pack, but that's OK; it's designed to be idempotent).
Our tests check both cases (with and without a pack). We
also check similar behavior for push for good measure, but
it already works as expected.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Translate 62 new messages (2296t0f0u) for git v2.2.0-rc0. Also changed
the translation of bare (repository).
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
