The names conflict_rename_rename and conflict_rename_rename_2 did not make
it clear what they were handling. Since the first of these handles one
file being renamed in both branches to different files, while the latter
handles two different files being renamed to the same thing, add a little
'1to2' and '2to1' suffix on these and an explanatory comment to make their
intent clearer.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
process_renames() had a variable named "stage" and derived variables
src_other and dst_other whose purpose was not immediately obvious; also,
I want to extend the scope of this variable and use it later, so it should
have a more descriptive name. Do so, and add a brief comment explaining
how it is used and what it relates to.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If merging two lines of development involves a rename/add conflict, and two
different people make such a merge but resolve it differently, and then
someone tries to merge the resulting two merges, then they should clearly
get a conflict due to the different resolutions from the previous
developers. However, in some such cases the conflict would not be detected
and git would silently accept one of the two versions being merged as the
final merge resolution.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
c94736a (merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashes
2009-07-30) added t6036 with a testcase that involved dual renames and a
criss-cross merge. Add a test that is nearly identical, but which also
involves content modification -- a case git currently does not merge
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
c94736a (merge-recursive: don't segfault while handling rename clashes
2009-07-30) added this testcase with an interesting corner case test,
which previously had cased git to segfault. This test ensures that the
segfault does not return and that the merge correctly fails; just add
some checks that verify the state of the index and worktree after the merge
are correct.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add tests where one file is renamed to two different paths in different
sides of history, and where each of the new files matches the name of a
directory from the opposite side of history. Include tests for both the
case where the merge results in those directories not being cleanly
removed, and where those directories are cleanly removed during the merge.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An interesting testcase is having two files each in their own subdirectory
getting renamed to the toplevel at the directory pathname of the other.
Questions arise as to whether the order of operations matters and whether
the directories can correctly get out of the way and make room for the
new files.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Having the source of a rename be involved in a directory/file conflict does
not currently pose any difficulties to the current merge-recursive
algorithm (in contrast to destinations of renames and D/F conflicts).
However, combining the two seemed like good testcases to include for
completeness.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When merging two branches with some path involved in a D/F conflict, the
choice of which branch to merge into the other matters for (at least) two
reasons: (1) whether the working copy has a directory full of files that
is in the way of a file, or a file exists that is in the way of a
directory of files, (2) when the directory full of files does not disappear
due to the merge, what files at the same paths should be renamed to
(e.g. filename~HEAD vs. filename~otherbranch).
Add some tests that reverse the merge order of two other tests, and which
verify the contents are as expected (namely, that the results are identical
other than modified-for-uniqueness filenames involving branch names).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add testing of the various ways that a renamed file to a path involved in
a directory/file conflict may be involved in. This includes whether or not
there are conflicts of the contents of the renamed file (if the file was
modified on both sides of history), and whether the directory from the
other side of the merge will disappear as a result of the merge or not.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previous D/F fixes I submitted (5a2580d and ae74548) had caused merge to
become excessively spammy, which was fixed in 96ecac6 (merge-recursive:
Avoid excessive output for and reprocessing of renames 2010-08-20). Add a
new test to avoid repeating that mistake with my several upcoming changes.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 3734893 (merge-recursive: Fix D/F conflicts 2010-07-09),
process_df_entry() was added to process_renames() and process_entry() but
in a somewhat restrictive manner. Modify the code slightly to make it
clearer how we could chain more such functions if necessary, and alter
process_df_entry() to handle such chaining.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
d5af510 (RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical
2010-09-01) avoided erroring out in a rename/add conflict when the contents
were identical. A simpler fix could have handled that particular testcase,
but it would not correctly handle the case where a symlink is involved.
Add another testcase using symlinks, to avoid breaking that case.
Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We need to get the correct mode when blame reads the source from the
working tree, the index, or trees. This allows us to omit running
textconv filters on symbolic links.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git blame --textconv is wrongly calling the textconv filter on
symlinks: symlinks are stored as blobs whose content is the target of
the link, and blame calls the textconv filter on a temporary file
filled-in with the content of this blob.
For example:
$ git blame -C -C regular-file.pdf
Error: May not be a PDF file (continuing anyway)
Error: PDF file is damaged - attempting to reconstruct xref table...
Error: Couldn't find trailer dictionary
Error: Couldn't read xref table
Warning: program returned non-zero exit code #1
fatal: unable to read files to diff
That errors come from pdftotext run on symlink.pdf being extracted to
/tmp/ with one-line plain-text content pointing to link destination.
So several failures are demonstrated here:
- git cat-file --textconv :symlink.bin # also HEAD:symlink.bin
- git blame --textconv symlink.bin
- git blame -C -C --textconv regular-file # but also looks on symlink.bin
At present they all fail with something like.
E: /tmp/j3ELEs_symlink.bin is not "binary" file
NOTE: git diff doesn't try to textconv the pathnames, it runs the
textual diff without textconv, which is the expected behavior.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The textconv filter is sometimes incorrectly ran on a temporary file
whose content is the target of a symbolic link, instead of actual file
content. Prepare to test this by marking the content of the file to
convert with "bin:", and let the helper die if "bin:" is not found in
the file content.
NOTE: I've changed $@ to $1 in helper becase textconv program "should
take a single argument" (see Documentation/gitattributes.txt), so
making this more explicit makes sense and also helps to avoid
problems with feeding arguments to echo.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@landau.phys.spbu.ru>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/grep-header-all-match-fix:
log --author: take union of multiple "author" requests
grep: move logic to compile header pattern into a separate helper
* jc/pickaxe-grep:
diff/log -G<pattern>: tests
git log/diff: add -G<regexp> that greps in the patch text
diff: pass the entire diff-options to diffcore_pickaxe()
gitdiffcore doc: update pickaxe description
* rr/fmt-merge-msg:
t6200-fmt-merge-msg: Exercise '--log' to configure shortlog length
t6200-fmt-merge-msg: Exercise 'merge.log' to configure shortlog length
merge: Make 'merge.log' an integer or boolean option
merge: Make '--log' an integer option for number of shortlog entries
fmt_merge_msg: Change fmt_merge_msg API to accept shortlog_len
Conflicts:
builtin/merge.c
On case insensitive filesystems, "tags" and "TAGS" target will try to
overwrite the same file. Allow MinGW to use "ETAGS" instead.
These two targets do produce real files; do not put them on .PHONY target
list.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The option argument is either after the equal sign in --output=... or in
the next command-line argument. optarg is the reliable way to access it.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's a minor annoyance when you take the painstaking time to setup To:
headers for each patch in a large series, and then go out to send the
series with git-send-email and watch git ignore the To: headers in the
patch files.
Therefore, always add To: headers from a patch file to the To: headers
for that message. Keep the prompt for the blanket To: header so as to
not break scripts (and user expectations). This means even if a patch
has a To: header, git will prompt for the To: address. Otherwise, we'll
need to introduce interface breakage to either request the header for
each patch missing a To: header or default the header to whatever To:
address is found first (be it in a patch or from user input). Both of
these options don't seem very obvious/useful.
Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the anchor name to
Finding-commits-With-given-Content
so that it corresponds to the actual content there.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since we use a-b-c for mywork commits in one place, I think it would be
logical to also use a-b-c too in other illustration on this topic.
Signed-off-by: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@mns.spb.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch simplifies Brian's fix for the recent regression by:
* eliminating the extra loop
* eliminating use of git rev-parse for parsing flags
* making use of the for opt idiom for the retained loop
* eliminating the redundant -- case
The patch has been tested with the tests in current maint.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add new long-form options --detect-renames[=<n>], --detect-copies[=<n>],
and --break-rewrites[=[<n>][/<m>]] as synonyms for the -M, -C, and -B
options (respectively).
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recursive merge strategy turns on rename detection but leaves the
rename threshold at the default. Add a strategy option to allow the user
to specify a rename threshold to use.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Ballard <kevin@sb.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The original vimdiff/gvimdiff configuration is now available by using
'vimdiff2' or 'gvimdiff2' as the preferred merge tool.
Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git stash branch <branch> <stash>" started discarding the stash
when the branch creation fails. It should have kept the stash
intact when aborting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This bug was disovered by someone on IRC when he tried to
$ git stash branch <branch> <stash>
while <branch> already existed. In that case the stash is dropped even
though it isn't applied on any branch, so the stash is effectively lost.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the host has more than one interfaces, daemon can listen to all
of them by not giving any --listen option, or listen to only one.
Teach it to accept more than one --listen options.
Remove the hostname information form the die, if no socket could be
created. It would only trigger when no interface out of either all
interface or the ones specified on the command line with --listen
options, can be listened to and so the user does know which "host" was
asked.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add named_sock_setup as helper function for socksetup to make it
easier to create more than one listen sockets. named_sock_setup could
be called more than one time and add the new sockets to the supplied
socklist_p.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sulfrian <alexander@sulfrian.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a small remark about how to recompress all existing objects after
changing the compression level for pack files.
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 479b56ba ('make "repack -f" imply "pack-objects --no-reuse-object"'),
git repack -f was changed to include recompressing all objects on the
zlib level on the assumption that if the user wants to spend that much
time already, some more time won't hurt (and recompressing is useful if
the user changed the zlib compression level).
However, "some more time" can be quite long with very big repositories,
so some users are going to appreciate being able to choose. If we are
going to give them the choice, --no-reuse-object will probably be
interesting a lot less frequently than --no-reuse-delta. Hence, this
reverts -f to the old behaviour (--no-reuse-delta) and adds a new -F
option that replaces the current -f.
Measurements taken using this patch on a current clone of git.git
indicate a 17% decrease in time being made available to users:
git repack -Adf 34.84s user 0.56s system 145% cpu 24.388 total
git repack -AdF 38.79s user 0.56s system 133% cpu 29.394 total
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the Perl scripts to turn on lexical warnings instead of setting
the global $^W variable via the -w switch.
The -w sets warnings for all code that interpreter runs, while "use
warnings" is lexically scoped. The former is probably not what the
authors wanted.
As an auxiliary benefit it's now possible to build Git with:
PERL_PATH='/usr/bin/env perl'
Which would previously result in failures, since "#!/usr/bin/env perl -w"
doesn't work as a shebang.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
