The interface to redact sensitive information in the trace output
has been simplified.
* jt/redact-all-cookies:
http: redact all cookies, teach GIT_TRACE_REDACT=0
The record size used in the git svn storage is four bytes plus the
length of the binary hash. Pass the hash length into our Perl
invocation and use it to compute the size of the records.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `diff-files' command and related commands which call the function
`cmd_diff_files()', consider the "intent-to-add" files as a part of the
index when comparing the work-tree against it. This was previously
addressed in commits [1] and [2] by turning the option
`--ita-invisible-in-index' (introduced in [3]) on by default.
For `diff-files' (and `add -p' as a consequence) to show the i-t-a
files as as new, `ita_invisible_in_index' will be enabled by default
here as well.
[1] 0231ae71d3 (diff: turn --ita-invisible-in-index on by default,
2018-05-26)
[2] 425a28e0a4 (diff-lib: allow ita entries treated as "not yet exist
in index", 2016-10-24)
[3] b42b451919 (diff: add --ita-[in]visible-in-index, 2016-10-24)
Signed-off-by: Srinidhi Kaushik <shrinidhi.kaushik@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
get_worktrees() accepts a 'flags' argument, however, there are no
existing flags (the lone flag GWT_SORT_LINKED was recently retired) and
no behavior which can be tweaked. Therefore, drop the 'flags' argument.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of hard-coding the object ID for our test .gitignore file, let's
compute it.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The size of a record in the database used by git svn is four bytes plus
the length of the binary hash. Instead of hard-coding 24, compute this
value based on the size of the hash in use.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Compute the relevant tree objects for SHA-256 and use those when
appropriate instead of using the SHA-1 ones.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of stripping off the first 41 characters of git log output,
let's just strip off the first space-separated component, which will
work for any size hash.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of stripping off the first 41 characters of git log output,
let's just strip off the first space-separated component, which will
work for any size hash.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of stripping off the first 41 characters of git log output,
let's just strip off the first space-separated component, which will
work for any size hash.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using an algorithm other than SHA-1, we need the remote helper to
advertise support for the object-format extension and provide
information back to us so that we can properly parse refs and return
data. Ensure that the test remote helper understands these extensions.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git index-pack by default reads the repository to determine the object
format. However, when outside of a repository, it's necessary to specify
the hash algorithm in use so that the pack can be properly indexed. Add
an --object-format argument when invoking git index-pack outside of a
repository.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we speak protocol v2 in this test, we must pass the object-format
header if the algorithm is not SHA-1. Otherwise, git upload-pack fails
because the hash algorithm doesn't match and not because we've failed to
speak the protocol correctly. Pass the header so that our assertions
test what we're really interested in.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we're using an algorithm other than SHA-1, we need to specify the
algorithm in use so we don't get a failure with an "unknown format"
message. Add a wrapper function that specifies this header if required.
Skip specifying this header for SHA-1 to test that it works both with an
without this header.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to make this test work with SHA-256, offer an object-format
capability so that both sides use the same algorithm.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test-sha1-array uses the_hash_algo under the hood. Since t0064 wants to
use the value that is correct for the hash algorithm that we're testing,
make sure the test helper initializes the repository to set
the_hash_algo correctly.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When outside a repository, git index-pack is unable to guess the hash
algorithm in use for a pack, since packs don't contain any information
on the algorithm in use. Pass an option to index-pack to help it out in
this test.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When reading the info/refs file for a repository, we have no explicit
way to detect which hash algorithm is in use because the file doesn't
provide one. Detect the hash algorithm in use by the size of the first
object ID.
If we have an empty repository, we don't know what the hash algorithm is
on the remote side, so default to whatever the local side has
configured. Without doing this, we cannot clone an empty repository
since we don't know its hash algorithm. Test this case appropriately,
since we currently have no tests for cloning an empty repository with
the dumb HTTP protocol.
We anonymize the URL like elsewhere in the function in case the user has
decided to include a secret in the URL.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The low-level reference transactions used to update references are
currently completely opaque to the user. While certainly desirable in
most usecases, there are some which might want to hook into the
transaction to observe all queued reference updates as well as observing
the abortion or commit of a prepared transaction.
One such usecase would be to have a set of replicas of a given Git
repository, where we perform Git operations on all of the repositories
at once and expect the outcome to be the same in all of them. While
there exist hooks already for a certain subset of Git commands that
could be used to implement a voting mechanism for this, many others
currently don't have any mechanism for this.
The above scenario is the motivation for the new "reference-transaction"
hook that reaches directly into Git's reference transaction mechanism.
The hook receives as parameter the current state the transaction was
moved to ("prepared", "committed" or "aborted") and gets via its
standard input all queued reference updates. While the exit code gets
ignored in the "committed" and "aborted" states, a non-zero exit code in
the "prepared" state will cause the transaction to be aborted
prematurely.
Given the usecase described above, a voting mechanism can now be
implemented via this hook: as soon as it gets called, it will take all
of stdin and use it to cast a vote to a central service. When all
replicas of the repository agree, the hook will exit with zero,
otherwise it will abort the transaction by returning non-zero. The most
important upside is that this will catch _all_ commands writing
references at once, allowing to implement strong consistency for
reference updates via a single mechanism.
In order to test the impact on the case where we don't have any
"reference-transaction" hook installed in the repository, this commit
introduce two new performance tests for git-update-refs(1). Run against
an empty repository, it produces the following results:
Test origin/master HEAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1400.2: update-ref 2.70(2.10+0.71) 2.71(2.10+0.73) +0.4%
1400.3: update-ref --stdin 0.21(0.09+0.11) 0.21(0.07+0.14) +0.0%
The performance test p1400.2 creates, updates and deletes a branch a
thousand times, thus averaging runtime of git-update-refs over 3000
invocations. p1400.3 instead calls `git-update-refs --stdin` three times
and queues a thousand creations, updates and deletes respectively.
As expected, p1400.3 consistently shows no noticeable impact, as for
each batch of updates there's a single call to access(3P) for the
negative hook lookup. On the other hand, for p1400.2, one can see an
impact caused by this patchset. But doing five runs of the performance
tests where each one was run with GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT=10, the overhead
ranged from -1.5% to +1.1%. These inconsistent performance numbers can
be explained by the overhead of spawning 3000 processes. This shows that
the overhead of assembling the hook path and executing access(3P) once
to check if it's there is mostly outweighed by the operating system's
overhead.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git branches have been qualified as topic branches, integration branches,
development branches, feature branches, release branches and so on.
Git has a branch that is the master *for* development, but it is not
the master *of* any "slave branch": Git does not have slave branches,
and has never had, except for a single testcase that claims otherwise. :)
Independent of any future change to the naming of the "master" branch,
removing this sole appearance of the term is a strict improvement: it
avoids divisive language, and talking about "feature branch" clarifies
which developer workflow the test is trying to emulate.
Reported-by: Till Maas <tmaas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use of negative pathspec, while collecting paths including
untracked ones in the working tree, was broken.
* en/do-match-pathspec-fix:
dir: fix treatment of negated pathspecs
The behaviour of "sparse-checkout" in the state "git clone
--no-checkout" left was changed accidentally in 2.27, which has
been corrected.
* en/sparse-checkout:
sparse-checkout: avoid staging deletions of all files
The reflog entries for "git clone" and "git fetch" did not
anonymize the URL they operated on.
* js/reflog-anonymize-for-clone-and-fetch:
clone/fetch: anonymize URLs in the reflog
14ba97f8 (alloc: allow arbitrary repositories for alloc functions,
2018-05-15) introduced parsed_object_pool->commit_count to keep count of
commits per repository and was used to assign commit->index.
However, commit-slab code requires commit->index values to be unique
and a global count would be correct, rather than a per-repo count.
Let's introduce a static counter variable, `parsed_commits_count` to
keep track of parsed commits so far.
As commit_count has no use anymore, let's also drop it from the struct.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the "--set-upstream-to" and "--unset-upstream" tests, specific error
conditions are being tested. However, there is no way of ensuring that a
test case is failing because of some specific error.
Check stderr of failing commands to ensure that they are failing in the
expected way.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Clean up style of test by changing some filenames from "expected" to
"expect", which follows typical test convention.
Also, change a space-indent into a tab-indent.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Preliminary clean-ups around refs API, plus file format
specification documentation for the reftable backend.
* hn/refs-cleanup:
reftable: define version 2 of the spec to accomodate SHA256
reftable: clarify how empty tables should be written
reftable: file format documentation
refs: improve documentation for ref iterator
t: use update-ref and show-ref to reading/writing refs
refs.h: clarify reflog iteration order
Since all invocations of test_submodule_forced_switch() are git
commands, automatically prepend "git" before invoking
test_submodule_switch_common().
Similarly, many invocations of test_submodule_switch() are also git
commands so automatically prepend "git" before invoking
test_submodule_switch_common() as well.
Finally, for invocations of test_submodule_switch() that invoke a custom
function, rename the old function to test_submodule_switch_func().
This is necessary because in a future commit, we will be adding some
logic that needs to distinguish between an invocation of a plain git
comamnd and an invocation of a test helper function.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach upload-pack to send part of its packfile response as URIs.
An administrator may configure a repository with one or more
"uploadpack.blobpackfileuri" lines, each line containing an OID, a pack
hash, and a URI. A client may configure fetch.uriprotocols to be a
comma-separated list of protocols that it is willing to use to fetch
additional packfiles - this list will be sent to the server. Whenever an
object with one of those OIDs would appear in the packfile transmitted
by upload-pack, the server may exclude that object, and instead send the
URI. The client will then download the packs referred to by those URIs
before performing the connectivity check.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach http-fetch the ability to download packfiles directly, given a
URL, and to verify them.
The http_pack_request suite has been augmented with a function that
takes a URL directly. With this function, the hash is only used to
determine the name of the temporary file.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree add" takes special care to avoid creating a new worktree
at a location already registered to an existing worktree even if that
worktree is missing (which can happen, for instance, if the worktree
resides on removable media). "git worktree move", however, is not so
careful when validating the destination location and will happily move
the source worktree atop the location of a missing worktree. This leads
to the anomalous situation of multiple worktrees being associated with
the same path, which is expressly forbidden by design. For example:
$ git clone foo.git
$ cd foo
$ git worktree add ../bar
$ git worktree add ../baz
$ rm -rf ../bar
$ git worktree move ../baz ../bar
$ git worktree list
.../foo beefd00f [master]
.../bar beefd00f [bar]
.../bar beefd00f [baz]
$ git worktree remove ../bar
fatal: validation failed, cannot remove working tree:
'.../bar' does not point back to '.git/worktrees/bar'
Fix this shortcoming by enhancing "git worktree move" to perform the
same additional validation of the destination directory as done by "git
worktree add".
While at it, add a test to verify that "git worktree move" won't move a
worktree atop an existing (non-worktree) path -- a restriction which has
always been in place but was never tested.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git worktree prune" detects when multiple entries are associated with
the same path and prunes the duplicates, however, it does not detect
when a linked worktree points at the path of the main worktree.
Although "git worktree add" disallows creating a new worktree with the
same path as the main worktree, such a case can arise outside the
control of Git even without the user mucking with .git/worktree/<id>/
administrative files. For instance:
$ git clone foo.git
$ git -C foo worktree add ../bar
$ rm -rf bar
$ mv foo bar
$ git -C bar worktree list
.../bar deadfeeb [master]
.../bar deadfeeb [bar]
Help the user recover from such corruption by extending "git worktree
prune" to also detect when a linked worktree is associated with the path
of the main worktree.
Reported-by: Jonathan Müller <jonathanmueller.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A fundamental restriction of linked working trees is that there must
only ever be a single worktree associated with a particular path, thus
"git worktree add" explicitly disallows creation of a new worktree at
the same location as an existing registered worktree. Nevertheless,
users can still "shoot themselves in the foot" by mucking with
administrative files in .git/worktree/<id>/. Worse, "git worktree move"
is careless[1] and allows a worktree to be moved atop a registered but
missing worktree (which can happen, for instance, if the worktree is on
removable media). For instance:
$ git clone foo.git
$ cd foo
$ git worktree add ../bar
$ git worktree add ../baz
$ rm -rf ../bar
$ git worktree move ../baz ../bar
$ git worktree list
.../foo beefd00f [master]
.../bar beefd00f [bar]
.../bar beefd00f [baz]
Help users recover from this form of corruption by teaching "git
worktree prune" to detect when multiple worktrees are associated with
the same path.
[1]: A subsequent commit will fix "git worktree move" validation to be
more strict.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The autosquash-and-exec test used "git diff HEAD^!" to mean
"git diff HEAD^ HEAD". Use these directly instead of relying
on the undefined but actual-current behavior of "HEAD^!".
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rewrite support for GIT_CURL_VERBOSE in terms of GIT_TRACE_CURL.
Looking good.
* jt/curl-verbose-on-trace-curl:
http, imap-send: stop using CURLOPT_VERBOSE
t5551: test that GIT_TRACE_CURL redacts password
The code to parse "git bisect start" command line was lax in
validating the arguments.
* cb/bisect-helper-parser-fix:
bisect--helper: avoid segfault with bad syntax in `start --term-*`
On-the-wire protocol v2 easily falls into a deadlock between the
remote-curl helper and the fetch-pack process when the server side
prematurely throws an error and disconnects. The communication has
been updated to make it more robust.
* dl/remote-curl-deadlock-fix:
stateless-connect: send response end packet
pkt-line: define PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END
remote-curl: error on incomplete packet
pkt-line: extern packet_length()
transport: extract common fetch_pack() call
remote-curl: remove label indentation
remote-curl: fix typo
Code simplification and test coverage enhancement.
* bc/filter-process:
t2060: add a test for switch with --orphan and --discard-changes
builtin/checkout: simplify metadata initialization
The check in "git fsck" to ensure that the tree objects are sorted
still had corner cases it missed unsorted entries.
* rs/fsck-duplicate-names-in-trees:
fsck: detect more in-tree d/f conflicts
t1450: demonstrate undetected in-tree d/f conflict
t1450: increase test coverage of in-tree d/f detection
fsck: fix a typo in a comment
As FreeBSD is not the only platform whose regexp library reports
a REG_ILLSEQ error when fed invalid UTF-8, add logic to detect that
automatically and skip the affected tests.
* cb/t4210-illseq-auto-detect:
t4210: detect REG_ILLSEQ dynamically and skip affected tests
t/helper: teach test-regex to report pattern errors (like REG_ILLSEQ)
"git log -L..." now takes advantage of the "which paths are touched
by this commit?" info stored in the commit-graph system.
* ds/line-log-on-bloom:
line-log: integrate with changed-path Bloom filters
line-log: try to use generation number-based topo-ordering
line-log: more responsive, incremental 'git log -L'
t4211-line-log: add tests for parent oids
line-log: remove unused fields from 'struct line_log_data'
In 48a8c26c62 (Documentation: avoid poor-man's small caps GIT,
2013-01-21), the documentation was amended to spell Git's name as Git
when talking about the system as a whole. However, t/README was skipped
over when the treatment was applied.
Bring t/README into conformance with the CodingGuidelines by casing
"Git" properly.
While we're at it, fix a small typo. Change "the git internal" to "the
Git internals".
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In trace output (when GIT_TRACE_CURL is true), redact the values of all
HTTP cookies by default. Now that auth headers (since the implementation
of GIT_TRACE_CURL in 74c682d3c6 ("http.c: implement the GIT_TRACE_CURL
environment variable", 2016-05-24)) and cookie values (since this
commit) are redacted by default in these traces, also allow the user to
inhibit these redactions through an environment variable.
Since values of all cookies are now redacted by default,
GIT_REDACT_COOKIES (which previously allowed users to select individual
cookies to redact) now has no effect.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
do_match_pathspec() started life as match_pathspec_depth_1() and for
correctness was only supposed to be called from match_pathspec_depth().
match_pathspec_depth() was later renamed to match_pathspec(), so the
invariant we expect today is that do_match_pathspec() has no direct
callers outside of match_pathspec().
Unfortunately, this intention was lost with the renames of the two
functions, and additional calls to do_match_pathspec() were added in
commits 75a6315f74 ("ls-files: add pathspec matching for submodules",
2016-10-07) and 89a1f4aaf7 ("dir: if our pathspec might match files
under a dir, recurse into it", 2019-09-17). Of course,
do_match_pathspec() had an important advantge over match_pathspec() --
match_pathspec() would hardcode flags to one of two values, and these
new callers needed to pass some other value for flags. Also, although
calling do_match_pathspec() directly was incorrect, there likely wasn't
any difference in the observable end output, because the bug just meant
that fill_diretory() would recurse into unneeded directories. Since
subsequent does-this-path-match checks on individual paths under the
directory would cause those extra paths to be filtered out, the only
difference from using the wrong function was unnecessary computation.
The second of those bad calls to do_match_pathspec() was involved -- via
either direct movement or via copying+editing -- into a number of later
refactors. See commits 777b420347 ("dir: synchronize
treat_leading_path() and read_directory_recursive()", 2019-12-19),
8d92fb2927 ("dir: replace exponential algorithm with a linear one",
2020-04-01), and 95c11ecc73 ("Fix error-prone fill_directory() API; make
it only return matches", 2020-04-01). The last of those introduced the
usage of do_match_pathspec() on an individual file, and thus resulted in
individual paths being returned that shouldn't be.
The problem with calling do_match_pathspec() instead of match_pathspec()
is that any negated patterns such as ':!unwanted_path` will be ignored.
Add a new match_pathspec_with_flags() function to fulfill the needs of
specifying special flags while still correctly checking negated
patterns, add a big comment above do_match_pathspec() to prevent others
from misusing it, and correct current callers of do_match_pathspec() to
instead use either match_pathspec() or match_pathspec_with_flags().
One final note is that DO_MATCH_LEADING_PATHSPEC needs special
consideration when working with DO_MATCH_EXCLUDE. The point of
DO_MATCH_LEADING_PATHSPEC is that if we have a pathspec like
*/Makefile
and we are checking a directory path like
src/module/component
that we want to consider it a match so that we recurse into the
directory because it _might_ have a file named Makefile somewhere below.
However, when we are using an exclusion pattern, i.e. we have a pathspec
like
:(exclude)*/Makefile
we do NOT want to say that a directory path like
src/module/component
is a (negative) match. While there *might* be a file named 'Makefile'
somewhere below that directory, there could also be other files and we
cannot pre-emptively rule all the files under that directory out; we
need to recurse and then check individual files. Adjust the
DO_MATCH_LEADING_PATHSPEC logic to only get activated for positive
pathspecs.
Reported-by: John Millikin <jmillikin@stripe.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, extensions were recognized regardless of repository format
version. If the user sets an undefined "extensions" value on a
repository of version 0 and that value is used by a future git version,
they might get an undesired result.
Because all extensions now also upgrade repository versions, tightening
the check would help avoid this for future extensions.
Signed-off-by: Xin Li <delphij@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'extensions' configuration variable gets special meaning in the new
repository version, so when enabling the extension we should upgrade the
repository to version 1.
Signed-off-by: Xin Li <delphij@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Retroactively adding a filter can be useful for existing shallow clones as
they allow users to see earlier change histories without downloading all
git objects in a regular --unshallow fetch.
Without this patch, users can make a clone partial by editing the
repository configuration to convert the remote into a promisor, like:
git config core.repositoryFormatVersion 1
git config extensions.partialClone origin
git fetch --unshallow --filter=blob:none origin
Since the hard part of making this work is already in place and such
edits can be error-prone, teach Git to perform the required configuration
change automatically instead.
Note that this change does not modify the existing git behavior which
recognizes setting extensions.partialClone without changing
repositoryFormatVersion.
Signed-off-by: Xin Li <delphij@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
sparse-checkout's purpose is to update the working tree to have it
reflect a subset of the tracked files. As such, it shouldn't be
switching branches, making commits, downloading or uploading data, or
staging or unstaging changes. Other than updating the worktree, the
only thing sparse-checkout should touch is the SKIP_WORKTREE bit of the
index. In particular, this sets up a nice invariant: running
sparse-checkout will never change the status of any file in `git status`
(reflecting the fact that we only set the SKIP_WORKTREE bit if the file
is safe to delete, i.e. if the file is unmodified).
Traditionally, we did a _really_ bad job with this goal. The
predecessor to sparse-checkout involved manual editing of
.git/info/sparse-checkout and running `git read-tree -mu HEAD`. That
command would stage and unstage changes and overwrite dirty changes in
the working tree.
The initial implementation of the sparse-checkout command was no better;
it simply invoked `git read-tree -mu HEAD` as a subprocess and had the
same caveats, though this issue came up repeatedly in review comments
and workarounds for the problems were put in place before the feature
was merged[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6; especially see 4 & 6].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFT9A5n=_bx5LsjCvbogqwSjiwgr5amcjgbU1iAk4KLJg@mail.gmail.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BEmwSwg4tgJg6nVG8a3Hpn_g-=ZjApZF4EiJO+qVgu4uw@mail.gmail.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BFV7TA0qwZCQpHCqx9N+JifyRyuBQ-pZ_oGfe-NOgyh7A@mail.gmail.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BHYCCD+Vx5fq35jH82eHc1-P53Lz_aGNpHJNcx9kg2K-A@mail.gmail.com/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BF+JWYZfDqp2Tn4AEKVp4b0YMA=Mbz4Nz62D-gGgiduYQ@mail.gmail.com/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20191121163706.GV23183@szeder.dev/
However, these workarounds, in addition to disabling the feature in a
number of important cases, also missed one special case. I'll get back
to it later.
In the 2.27.0 cycle, the disabling of the feature was lifted by finally
replacing the internal equivalent of `git read-tree -mu HEAD` with
something that did what we wanted: the new update_sparsity() function in
unpack-trees.c that only ever updates SKIP_WORKTREE bits in the index
and updates the working tree to match. This new function handles all
the cases that were problematic for the old implementation, except that
it breaks the same special case that avoided the workarounds of the old
implementation, but broke it in a different way.
So...that brings us to the special case: a git clone performed with
--no-checkout. As per the meaning of the flag, --no-checkout does not
check out any branch, with the implication that you aren't on one and
need to switch to one after the clone. Implementationally, HEAD is
still set (so in some sense you are partially on a branch), but
* the index is "unborn" (non-existent)
* there are no files in the working tree (other than .git/)
* the next time git switch (or git checkout) is run it will run
unpack_trees with `initial_checkout` flag set to true.
It is not until you run, e.g. `git switch <somebranch>` that the index
will be written and files in the working tree populated.
With this special --no-checkout case, the traditional `read-tree -mu
HEAD` behavior would have done the equivalent of acting like checkout --
switch to the default branch (HEAD), write out an index that matches
HEAD, and update the working tree to match. This special case slipped
through the avoid-making-changes checks in the original sparse-checkout
command and thus continued there.
After update_sparsity() was introduced and used (see commit f56f31af03
("sparse-checkout: use new update_sparsity() function", 2020-03-27)),
the behavior for the --no-checkout case changed: Due to git's
auto-vivification of an empty in-memory index (see do_read_index() and
note that `must_exist` is false), and due to sparse-checkout's
update_working_directory() code to always write out the index after it
was done, we got a new bug. That made it so that sparse-checkout would
switch the repository from a clone with an "unborn" index (i.e. still
needing an initial_checkout), to one that had a recorded index with no
entries. Thus, instead of all the files appearing deleted in `git
status` being known to git as a special artifact of not yet being on a
branch, our recording of an empty index made it suddenly look to git as
though it was definitely on a branch with ALL files staged for deletion!
A subsequent checkout or switch then had to contend with the fact that
it wasn't on an initial_checkout but had a bunch of staged deletions.
Make sure that sparse-checkout changes nothing in the index other than
the SKIP_WORKTREE bit; in particular, when the index is unborn we do not
have any branch checked out so there is no sparsification or
de-sparsification work to do. Simply return from
update_working_directory() early.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even if we strongly discourage putting credentials into the URLs passed
via the command-line, there _is_ support for that, and users _do_ do
that.
Let's scrub them before writing them to the reflog.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The following lines were not covered in a recent line-coverage test
against Git:
builtin/commit-graph.c
5b6653e5 244) progress = start_delayed_progress(
5b6653e5 268) stop_progress(&progress);
These statements are executed when both '--stdin-commits' and
'--progress' are passed. Introduce a trio of tests that exercise various
combinations of these options to ensure that these lines are covered.
More importantly, this is exercising a (somewhat) previously-ignored
feature of '--stdin-commits', which is that it respects '--progress'.
Prior to 5b6653e523 (builtin/commit-graph.c: dereference tags in
builtin, 2020-05-13), dereferencing input from '--stdin-commits' was
done inside of commit-graph.c.
Now that an additional progress meter may be generated from outside of
commit-graph.c, add a corresponding test to make sure that it also
respects '--[no]-progress'.
The other location that generates progress meter output (from d335ce8f24
(commit-graph.c: show progress of finding reachable commits,
2020-05-13)) is already covered by any test that passes '--reachable'.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A handful of tests in t5318 use 'test_line_count = 0 ...' to make sure
that some command does not write any output. While correct, it is more
idiomatic to use 'test_must_be_empty' instead. Switch the former
invocations to use the latter instead.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some repositories in the wild have commits that record nonsense
committer timezone (e.g. rails.git); "git fast-import" learned an
option to pass these nonsense timestamps intact to allow recreating
existing repositories as-is.
* en/fast-import-looser-date:
fast-import: add new --date-format=raw-permissive format
The error message from "git checkout -b foo -t bar baz" was
confusing.
* rs/checkout-b-track-error:
checkout: improve error messages for -b with extra argument
checkout: add tests for -b and --track
There are multiple repositories in the wild with random, invalid
timezones. Most notably is a commit from rails.git with a timezone of
"+051800"[1]. A few searches will find other repos with that same
invalid timezone as well. Further, Peff reports that GitHub relaxed
their fsck checks in August 2011 to accept any timezone value[2], and
there have been multiple reports to filter-repo about fast-import
crashing while trying to import their existing repositories since they
had timezone values such as "-7349423" and "-43455309"[3].
The existing check on timezone values inside fast-import may prove
useful for people who are crafting fast-import input by hand or with a
new script. For them, the check may help them avoid accidentally
recording invalid dates. (Note that this check is rather simplistic and
there are still several forms of invalid dates that fast-import does not
check for: dates in the future, timezone values with minutes that are
not divisible by 15, and timezone values with minutes that are 60 or
greater.) While this simple check may have some value for those users,
other users or tools will want to import existing repositories as-is.
Provide a --date-format=raw-permissive format that will not error out on
these otherwise invalid timezones so that such existing repositories can
be imported.
[1] 4cf94979c9
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200521195513.GA1542632@coredump.intra.peff.net/
[3] https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo/issues/88
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
f1e3df3169 (t: increase test coverage of signature verification output,
2020-03-04) adds GPG dependent tests to t4202 and t6200 that were found
problematic with at least OpenBSD 6.7.
Using an escaped '|' for alternations works only in some implementations
of grep (e.g. GNU and busybox).
It is not part of POSIX[1] and not supported by some BSD, macOS, and
possibly other POSIX compatible implementations.
Use `grep -E`, and write it using extended regular expression.
[1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap09.html#tag_09_03
Helped-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --orphan option is used to create a local branch which is detached
from the current history. In git switch, it always resets to the empty
tree, and thus the only completion we can provide is a branch name.
Follow the same rules for -c/-C (and -b/-B) when completing the argument
to --orphan.
In the case of git switch, after we complete the argument, there is
nothing more we can complete for git switch, so do not even try. Nothing
else would be valid.
In the case of git checkout, --orphan takes a start point which it uses
to determine the checked out tree, even though it created orphaned
history.
Update the previously added test cases as they are now passing.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A previous commit added several test cases highlighting the subpar
completion logic for -c/-C and -b/-B when completing git switch and git
checkout.
In order to distinguish completing the argument vs the start-point for
this option, we now use the wordlist to determine the previous full word
on the command line.
If it's -c or -C (-b/-B for checkout), then we know that we are
completing the argument for the branch name.
Given that a user who already knows the branch name they want to
complete will simply not use completion, it makes sense to complete the
small subset of local branches when completing the argument for -c/-C.
In all other cases, if -c/-C are on the command line but are not the
most recent option, then we must be completing a start-point, and should
allow completing against all references.
Update the -c/-C and -b/-B tests to indicate they now pass.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Current completion for the --track option of git switch and git checkout
is sub par. In addition to the DWIM logic of a bare branch name, --track
has DWIM logic to convert specified remote/branch names into a local
branch tracking that remote. For example
$git switch --track origin/master
This will create a local branch name master, that tracks the master
branch of the origin remote.
In fact, git switch --track on its own will not accept other forms of
references. These must instead be specified manually via the -c/-C/-b/-B
options.
Introduce __git_remote_heads() and the "remote-heads" mode for
__git_complete_refs. Use this when the --track option is provided while
completing in _git_switch and _git_checkout. Just as in the --detach
case, we never enable DWIM mode for --track, because it doesn't make
sense.
It should be noted that completion support is still a bit sub par when
it comes to handling -c/-C and --orphan. This will be resolved in
a future change.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Just like git switch, we should not complete DWIM remote branch names
if --detach has been specified. To avoid this, refactor _git_checkout in
a similar way to _git_switch.
Note that we don't simply clear dwim_opt when we find -d or --detach, as
we will be adding other modes and checks, making this flow easier to
follow.
Update the previously failing tests to show that the breakage has been
resolved.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new --mode option to __git_complete_refs, which allows changing
the behavior to call __git_heads instead of __git_refs.
By passing --mode=heads, __git_complete_refs will only output local
branches. This enables using "--mode=heads --dwim" to enable listing
local branches and the remote unique branch names for DWIM.
Refactor completion support to use the new mode option, rather than
calling __git_heads directly. This has the advantage that we can now
correctly allow local branches along with suitable DWIM refs, rather
than only allowing DWIM when we complete all references.
Choose what mode it uses when calling __git_complete_refs. If -d or
--detach have been provided, then simply complete all refs, but
*without* the DWIM option as these DWIM names won't work properly in
--detach mode.
Otherwise, call __git_complete_refs with the default dwim_opt value and
use the new "heads" mode.
In this way, the basic support for completing just "git switch <TAB>"
will result in only local branches and remote unique names for DWIM.
The basic no-options tests for git switch, as well as several of the
-c/-C tests now pass, so remove the known breakage tags.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A new helper, __git_find_last_on_cmdline is introduced, similar to the
already existing __git_find_on_cmdline, but which operates in reverse,
finding the *last* matching word of the provided wordlist.
Use this in a new __git_checkout_default_dwim_mode() function that will
determine when to enable listing of DWIM remote branches.
The __git_find_last_on_cmdline() function is used to determine which
--guess or --no-guess is in effect. If either one is provided, then we
unconditionally enable or disable the DWIM mode based on the last
provided option.
If neither --guess nor --no-guess is provided, then we check for
--no-track, and finally for GIT_COMPLETION_CHECKOUT_NO_GUESS=1.
This function is then used in _git_switch and _git_checkout to improve
the handling for when we enable listing of these DWIM remote branches.
This new logic is more robust, as we will correctly identify superseded
options, and ensure that both _git_switch and _git_checkout enable DWIM
in similar ways.
We can now update a few tests to indicate they pass. A few of the tests
previously added to highlight issues with the old DWIM logic still fail.
This is because of a separate issue related to the default completion
behavior of git switch, which will be addressed in a future change.
Additionally, due to this change, a few tests for the -b/-B handling of
git checkout now fail. This is a minor regression, and will be fixed by
a following change that improves the overall handling of -b/-B. Mark
these tests as known breakages for now.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar to -c/-C, --orphan takes an argument which is the branch name to
use. We ought to complete this branch name using similar rules as to how
we complete new branch names for -c/-C and -b/-B. Namely, limit the
total number of options provided by completing to the local branches.
Additionally, git switch --orphan does not take any start point and will
always create using the empty-tree. Thus, after the branch name is
completed, git switch --orphan should not complete any references.
Add test cases showing the expected behavior of --orphan, for both the
argument and starting point.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using the branch creation argument for git switch or git checkout
(-c/-C or -b/-B), the commands switch to a different mode: `git switch
-c <branch> <some-referance>` means to create a branch named <branch> at
the commit referred to by <some-reference>.
When completing git switch or git checkout, it makes sense to complete
the branch name differently from the start point.
When completing a branch, one might consider that we do not have
anything worth completing. After all, a new branch must have an entirely
new name. Consider, however, that if a user names branches using some
similar scheme, they might wish to name a new branch by modifying the
name of an existing branch.
To avoid overloading completion for the argument, it seems reasonable to
complete only the local branch names and the valid "Do What I Mean"
remote branch names.
Add tests for the completion of the argument to -c/-C and -b/-B,
highlighting this preferred completion behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using the branch creation argument for git switch or git checkout,
-c/-C or -b/-B, the commands operate in a different mode: `git switch -c
<branch> <some-reference>` means to create a branch named <branch> at
the commit referred to by <some-reference>.
When completing the start-point, we ought to always complete all valid
references.
Add tests for the completion of the start-point to -c/-C and -b/-B.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the --track option is provided to git switch or git checkout, and
no branch is specified by -c or -b, git will interpret the tracking
branch to determine the local branch name to use. This "Do What I Mean"
logic is similar but distinct from the default DWIM logic of
interpreting a unique remote branch name as a request to create and
track that branch.
For example, `git switch --track origin/master` is interpreted as
a request to create a local branch named master that is tracking
origin/master.
The current completion for git checkout in this regard is only somewhat
poor:
$git checkout --track <TAB>
HEAD
master
matching-branch
matching-tag
other/branch-in-other
other/master-in-other
At least it still includes remote references. The clutter from including
all references isn't too bad.
However, git switch completion is terrible:
$git switch --track <TAB>
master
matching-branch
It only shows local branches, not even allowing any form of completion
of the remote references!
Add tests which highlight the expected behavior of completing --track on
its own.
Note that when -c/-C or -b/-B are provided we do expect completing more
references, but this will be discussed in a future change that addresses
these options specifically.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When completing words for git switch, the completion function correctly
disables the DWIM remote branch names when in the '--detach' mode. These
DWIM remote branch names will not work when the --detach option is
specified, so it does not make sense to complete them.
git checkout, however, does not disable the completion of DWIM remote
branch names in this case.
Add test cases for both git switch and git checkout showing the expected
behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When provided with a single argument that is the name of a remote branch
that does not yet exist locally, both git switch and git checkout can
interpret this as a request to create a local branch that tracks that
remote branch. We call this behavior "Do What I Mean", or DWIM for
short.
To aid in using this DWIM, it makes sense for completion to list these
unique remote branch names when completing possible arguments for git
switch and git checkout. Indeed, both _git_checkout and _git_switch
implement support for completing such DWIM branch names.
In other words, in addition to the usual completions provided for git
switch, this "DWIM" logic means completion will include the names of
branches on remotes that are unique and thus there can be no ambiguity
of which remote to track when creating the local branch.
However, the DWIM logic is not always active. Many options, such as
--no-guess, --no-track, and --track disable this DWIM logic, as they
cause git switch and git checkout to behave in different modes.
Additionally, some completion users do not wish to have tab completion
include these remote names by default, and thus introduced
GIT_COMPLETION_CHECKOUT_NO_GUESS as an optional way to configure the
completion support to disable this feature of completion support.
For this reason, _git_checkout and _git_switch have many rules about
when to enable or disable completing of these remote refs. The two
commands follow similar but not identical rules.
Set aside the question of command modes that do not accept this DWIM
logic (--track, -c, --orphan, --detach) for now. Thinking just about the
main mode of git checkout and git switch, the following guidelines will
help explain the basic rules we ought to support when deciding whether
to list the remote branches for DWIM in completion.
1. if --guess is enabled, we should list DWIM remote branch names, even
if something else would disable it
2. if --no-guess, --no-track or GIT_COMPLETION_CHECKOUT_NO_GUESS=1,
then we should disable listing DWIM remote branch names.
3. Since the '--guess' option is a boolean option, a later --guess
should override --no-guess, and a later --no-guess should override
--guess.
Putting all of these together, add some tests that highlight the
expected behavior of this DWIM logic.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When provided with no options, git switch only allows switching between
branches. The one exception to this is the "Do What I Mean" logic that
allows a unique remote branch name to be interpreted as a request to
create a branch of the same name that is tracking that remote branch.
Unfortunately, the logic for the completion of git switch results in
completing not just branch names, but also pseudorefs like HEAD, tags,
and fully specified <remote>/<branch> references.
For example, we currently complete the following:
$git switch <TAB>
HEAD
branch-in-other
master
master-in-other
matching-branch
matching-tag
other/branch-in-other
other/master-in-other
Indeed, if one were to attempt to use git switch with some of these
provided options, git will reject the request:
$git switch HEAD
fatal: a branch is expected, got 'HEAD
$git switch matching-tag
fatal: a branch is expected, got tag 'matching-tag'
$git switch other/branch-in-other
fatal: a branch is expected, got remote branch 'other/branch-in-other'
Ideally, git switch without options ought to complete only words which
will be accepted. Without options, this means to list local branch names
and the unique remote branch names without their remote name pre-pended.
$git switch <TAB>
branch-in-other
master
master-in-other
matching-branch
Add a test case that highlights this subpar completion. Also add
a similar test for git checkout completion that shows that due to the
complex nature of git checkout, it must complete all references.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The original patch selection code was written for `git add -p`, and the
fundamental unit on which it works is a hunk.
We hacked around that to handle deletions back in 24ab81ae4d
(add-interactive: handle deletion of empty files, 2009-10-27). But `git
add -p` would never see a new file, since we only consider the set of
tracked files in the index.
However, since the same machinery was used for `git checkout -p` &
friends, we can see new files.
Handle this case specifically, adding a new prompt for it that is
modeled after the `deleted file` case.
This also fixes the problem where added _empty_ files could not be
staged via `git checkout -p`.
Reported-by: Merlin Büge <toni@bluenox07.de>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test has hard-coded pkt-lines with object IDs. The pkt-line
lengths necessarily differ between hash algorithms, so generate these
lines with the packetize helper so they're always the right size. In
addition, we will require an object-format capability for SHA-256, so
pass that capability on to the upload-pack process.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to communicate the protocol supported by the server side, add
support for advertising the object-format capability. We check that the
client side sends us an identical algorithm if it sends us its own
object-format capability, and assume it speaks SHA-1 if not.
In the test, when we're using an algorithm other than SHA-1, we need to
specify the algorithm in use so we don't get a failure with an "unknown
format" message. Add a test that we handle a mismatched algorithm.
Remove the test_oid_init call since it's no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using SHA-256, we need to take advantage of the extensions section
in the config file, so we need to use repository format version 1.
Update the test to look for the correct value.
Note that test_oid produces a value without a trailing newline, so use
echo to ensure we print a trailing newline to compare it correctly
against the actual results.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our style these days is to place the description and the opening quote
of the body on the same line as test_expect_success (if it fits), to
place the trailing quote on a line by itself after the body, and to use
tabs. Since we're going to be making several significant changes to
this test, modernize the style to aid in readability of the subsequent
patches.
This patch should have no functional change.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of the test assertions in this test checks that git branch -m works
even without a .git/config file. However, if the repository requires
configuration extensions, such as because it uses a non-SHA-1 algorithm,
this assertion will fail. Mark the assertion as requiring SHA-1.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ensure that we pass the object-format capability in the synthesized test
data so that this test works with algorithms other than SHA-1.
In addition, add an additional test using the old data for when we're
using SHA-1 so that we can be sure that we preserve backwards
compatibility with servers not offering the object-format capability.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, remote-curl acts as a proxy and blindly forwards packets
between an HTTP server and fetch-pack. In the case of a stateless RPC
connection where the connection is terminated before the transaction is
complete, remote-curl will blindly forward the packets before waiting on
more input from fetch-pack. Meanwhile, fetch-pack will read the
transaction and continue reading, expecting more input to continue the
transaction. This results in a deadlock between the two processes.
This can be seen in the following command which does not terminate:
$ git -c protocol.version=2 clone https://github.com/git/git.git --shallow-since=20151012
Cloning into 'git'...
whereas the v1 version does terminate as expected:
$ git -c protocol.version=1 clone https://github.com/git/git.git --shallow-since=20151012
Cloning into 'git'...
fatal: the remote end hung up unexpectedly
Instead of blindly forwarding packets, make remote-curl insert a
response end packet after proxying the responses from the remote server
when using stateless_connect(). On the RPC client side, ensure that each
response ends as described.
A separate control packet is chosen because we need to be able to
differentiate between what the remote server sends and remote-curl's
control packets. By ensuring in the remote-curl code that a server
cannot send response end packets, we prevent a malicious server from
being able to perform a denial of service attack in which they spoof a
response end packet and cause the described deadlock to happen.
Reported-by: Force Charlie <charlieio@outlook.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a future commit, we will use PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END to separate
messages proxied by remote-curl. To prepare for this, add the
PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END enum value.
In switch statements that need a case added, die() or BUG() when a
PACKET_READ_RESPONSE_END is unexpected. Otherwise, mirror how
PACKET_READ_DELIM is implemented (especially in cases where packets are
being forwarded).
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, remote-curl acts as a proxy and blindly forwards packets
between an HTTP server and fetch-pack. In the case of a stateless RPC
connection where the connection is terminated with a partially written
packet, remote-curl will blindly send the partially written packet
before waiting on more input from fetch-pack. Meanwhile, fetch-pack will
read the partial packet and continue reading, expecting more input. This
results in a deadlock between the two processes.
For a stateless connection, inspect packets before sending them and
error out if a packet line packet is incomplete.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `diff.relative` boolean option set to `true` shows only changes in
the current directory/value specified by the `path` argument of the
`relative` option and shows pathnames relative to the aforementioned
directory.
Teach `--no-relative` to override earlier `--relative`
Add for git-format-patch(1) options documentation `--relative` and
`--no-relative`
Signed-off-by: Laurent Arnoud <laurent@spkdev.net>
Acked-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Printing a message directly to stdout could affect TAP processing
and is not really needed, as there is a standard way to skip all
tests that could be used instead, while printing an equivalent
message.
While at it; update the message to better reflect that since
a85efb5985 (t5608-clone-2gb.sh: turn GIT_TEST_CLONE_2GB into a bool,
2019-11-22), the enabling variable should be a recognized boolean
(ex: true, false, 1, 0) and get rid of the prerequisite that used
to guard all the tests, since "skip_all" is just much faster and
idempotent.
Helped-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we try to create a branch "foo" based on "origin/master" and give
git commit -b an extra unsupported argument "bar", it confusingly
reports:
$ git checkout -b foo origin/master bar
fatal: 'bar' is not a commit and a branch 'foo' cannot be created from it
$ git checkout --track -b foo origin/master bar
fatal: 'bar' is not a commit and a branch 'foo' cannot be created from it
That's wrong, because it very well understands that "origin/master" is
supposed to be the start point for the new branch and not "bar". Check
if we got a commit and show more fitting messages in that case instead:
$ git checkout -b foo origin/master bar
fatal: Cannot update paths and switch to branch 'foo' at the same time.
$ git checkout --track -b foo origin/master bar
fatal: '--track' cannot be used with updating paths
Original-patch-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test git checkout -b with and without --track and demonstrate unexpected
error messages when it's given an extra (i.e. unsupported) path
argument. In both cases it reports:
$ git checkout -b foo origin/master bar
fatal: 'bar' is not a commit and a branch 'foo' cannot be created from it
The problem is that the start point we gave for the new branch is
"origin/master" and "bar" is just some extra argument -- it could even
be a valid commit, which would make the message even more confusing. We
have more fitting error messages in git commit, but get confused; use
the text of the rights ones in the tests.
Reported-by: Dana Dahlstrom <dahlstrom@google.com>
Original-test-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
06f5608c14 (bisect--helper: `bisect_start` shell function partially in C,
2019-01-02) adds a lax parser for `git bisect start` which could result
in a segfault under a bad syntax call for start with custom terms.
Detect if there are enough arguments left in the command line to use for
--term-{old,good,new,bad} and abort with the same syntax error the original
implementation will show if not.
While at it, remove an unnecessary (and incomplete) check for unknown
arguments and make sure to add a test to avoid regressions.
Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the conflict candidate file name from the top of the stack is not a
prefix of the current candiate directory then we can discard it as no
matching directory can come up later. But we are not done checking the
candidate directory -- the stack might still hold a matching file name,
so stay in the loop and check the next candidate file name.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Exercise the case of putting a conflict candidate file name back on the
stack because a matching directory might yet come up later.
Do that by factoring out the test code into a function to allow for more
concise notation in the form of parameters indicating names of trees
(with trailing slash) and blobs (without trailing slash) in no
particular order (they are sorted by git mktree). Then add the new test
case as a second function call.
Fix a typo in the test title while at it ("dublicate").
Reported-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have several code paths in the checkout code which are traversed only
in this case, due to switch having different defaults from checkout.
Let's add a test that the combination of options works and produces the
expected behavior.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
