When cloning to a directory "C:\foo\bar" from Windows' cmd.exe where
"foo" does not exist yet, Git would throw an error like
fatal: could not create work tree dir 'c:\foo\bar'.: No such file or directory
Fix this by not hard-coding a platform specific directory separator
into safe_create_leading_directories().
This patch, including its entire commit message, is derived from a
patch by Sebastian Schuberth.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Thomas Rast noticed the docs have a mix of styles when
it comes to options with multiple spellings. Standardize
the couple in git-p4.txt that are odd.
Instead of:
-n, --dry-run::
Do this:
-n::
--dry-run::
See
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/219936/focus=219945
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The p4 server can enforce file locking, so that only one user
can edit a file at a time. Git p4 is unable to submit changes
to locked files. Currently it exits poorly. Ideally it would
notice the locked condition and clean up nicely.
Add a bunch of tests that describe the problem, hoping that
fixes appear in the future.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "p4 where" fails, for whatever reason, the error message tries to
show an undefined variable. This minor bug applies only when using a
client spec, and was introduced recently in 9d57c4a (git p4: implement
view spec wildcards with "p4 where", 2013-08-30).
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 9d7d446 (git p4: submit files with wildcards, 2012-04-29)
fixed problems with handling files that had p4 wildcard
characters, like "@" and "*". But it missed one case, that of
RCS keyword scrubbing, which uses "p4 fstat" to extract type
information. Fix it by calling wildcard_encode() on the raw
filename.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Generating the submit template for p4 uses tempfile.mkstemp(),
which by default puts files in /tmp. For a test that fails,
possibly on purpose, this is not cleaned up. Run with TMPDIR
pointing into the trash directory so the temp files go away
with the test results.
To do this required some other minor changes. First, the editor
is launched using system(editor + " " + template_file), using
shell expansion to build the command string. This doesn't work
if editor has a space in it. And is generally unwise as it's
easy to fool the shell into doing extra work. Exec the args
directly, without shell expansion.
Second, without shell expansion, the trick of "P4EDITOR=:" used
in the tests doesn't work. Use a real command, true, as the
non-interactive editor for testing.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The tests use author@example.com as the canonical submitter,
but he does not have an entry in the p4 users database.
This causes the generated change description to complain
that the git and p4 users disagree. The complaint message
is still valid, but isn't useful in tests. It was introduced
in 848de9c (git-p4: warn if git authorship won't be retained,
2011-05-13).
Fix t9813 to use @example.com instead of @localhost due to
change in p4_add_user(). Move the function into the git p4
test library so author can be added at initialization time.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit e9df0f9 (git p4: cygwin p4 client does not mark read-only,
2013-01-26) fixed a problem with "test -w" on cygwin, but mistakenly
marked the new test as failing. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There was no test where p4 deleted a file with a wildcard
character. Make sure git p4 applies the wildcard decoding
properly when importing a delete that includes a wildcard.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Damien Gérard highlights an interesting problem. Some p4
repositories end up with symlinks that have an empty target. It
is not possible to create this with current p4, but they do
indeed exist.
The effect in git p4 is that "p4 print" on the symlink returns an
empty string, confusing the curret symlink-handling code.
Such broken repositories cause problems in p4 as well, even with
no git involved. In p4, syncing to a change that includes a
bogus symlink causes errors:
//depot/empty-symlink - updating /home/me/p4/empty-symlink
rename: /home/me/p4/empty-symlink: No such file or directory
and leaves no symlink.
In git, replicate the p4 behavior by ignoring these bad symlinks.
If, in a later p4 revision, the symlink happens to point to
something non-null, the symlink will be replaced properly.
Add a big test for all this too.
This happens to be a regression introduced by 1292df1 (git-p4:
Fix occasional truncation of symlink contents., 2013-08-08) and
appeared first in 1.8.5. But it shows up only in p4 repositories
of dubious character, so can wait for a proper release.
Tested-by: Damien Gérard <damien@iwi.me>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Write the gitk config data to $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/gitk ($HOME/.config/git/gitk
by default) in line with the XDG specification. This makes it consistent with
git which also follows the spec.
If $HOME/.gitk already exists use that for backward compatibility, so only new
installations are affected.
Signed-off-by: Astril Hayato <astrilhayato@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
While this happens to work, there was no test to make sure
that the basic importing of a symlink from p4 to git functioned.
Add a simple test to create a symlink in p4 and import it into git,
then verify that the symlink exists and has the correct target.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 9d57c4a (git p4: implement view spec wildcards with "p4
where", 2013-08-30), all the wildcard types should be supported.
Change must-fail tests to mark that they now pass.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rev-list is given a command-line like:
git rev-list --objects $commit --not --all
the most accurate answer is the difference between the set
of objects reachable from $commit and the set reachable from
all of the existing refs. However, we have not historically
provided that answer, because it is very expensive to
calculate. We would have to open every tree of every commit
in the entire history.
Instead, we find the accurate set difference of the
reachable commits, and then mark the trees at the boundaries
as uninteresting. This misses objects which appear in the
trees of both the interesting commits and deep within the
uninteresting history.
Commit fbd4a70 (list-objects: mark more commits as edges in
mark_edges_uninteresting, 2013-08-16) noticed that we miss
those objects during pack-objects, and added code to examine
the trees of all of the "--not" refs given on the
command-line. Note that this is still not the complete set
difference, because we look only at the tips of the
command-line arguments, not all of their reachable commits.
But it increases the set of boundary objects we consider,
which is especially important for shallow fetches. So we
are trading extra CPU time for a larger set of boundary
objects, which can improve the resulting pack size for a
--thin pack.
This tradeoff probably makes sense in the context of
pack-objects, where we have set revs->edge_hint to have the
traversal feed us the set of boundary objects. For a
regular rev-list, though, it is probably not a good
tradeoff. It is true that it makes our list slightly closer
to a true set difference, but it is a rare case where this
is important. And because we do not have revs->edge_hint
set, we do nothing useful with the larger set of boundary
objects.
This patch therefore ties the extra tree examination to the
revs->edge_hint flag; it is the presence of that flag that
makes the tradeoff worthwhile.
Here is output from the p0001-rev-list showing the
improvement in performance:
Test HEAD^ HEAD
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0001.1: rev-list --all 0.69(0.65+0.02) 0.69(0.66+0.02) +0.0%
0001.2: rev-list --all --objects 3.22(3.19+0.03) 3.23(3.20+0.03) +0.3%
0001.4: rev-list $commit --not --all 0.04(0.04+0.00) 0.04(0.04+0.00) +0.0%
0001.5: rev-list --objects $commit --not --all 0.27(0.26+0.01) 0.04(0.04+0.00) -85.2%
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We time a straight "rev-list --all" and its "--object"
counterpart, both going all the way to the root. However, we
do not time a partial history walk. This patch adds an
extreme case: a walk over a very small slice of history, but
with a very large set of UNINTERESTING tips. This is similar
to the connectivity check run by git on a small fetch, or
the walk done by any pre-receive hooks that want to check
incoming commits.
This test reveals a performance regression in git v1.8.4.2,
caused by fbd4a70 (list-objects: mark more commits as edges
in mark_edges_uninteresting, 2013-08-16):
Test fbd4a703^ fbd4a703
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0001.1: rev-list --all 0.69(0.67+0.02) 0.69(0.68+0.01) +0.0%
0001.2: rev-list --all --objects 3.47(3.44+0.02) 3.48(3.44+0.03) +0.3%
0001.4: rev-list $commit --not --all 0.04(0.04+0.00) 0.04(0.04+0.00) +0.0%
0001.5: rev-list --objects $commit --not --all 0.04(0.03+0.00) 0.27(0.24+0.02) +575.0%
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The @{-N} syntax always referred to the N-th last thing checked out,
which can be either a branch or a commit (for detached HEAD cases).
However, the documentation only mentioned branches.
Edit in a "/commit" in the appropriate places.
Reported-by: Kevin <ikke@ikke.info>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If safe_create_leading_directories() fails because a file along the
path unexpectedly vanished, try again from the beginning. Try at most
4 times.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This doesn't seem to be a likely error, but we've got the counter
anyway, so we might as well use it for an added bit of safety.
Please note that the first call to rename() is optimistic, and it is
normal for it to fail if there is a directory in the way. So bump the
total number of allowed attempts to 4, to be sure that we can still
have at least 3 retries in the case of a race.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a directory vanishes while renaming the temporary reflog file,
retry (up to 3 times). This could happen if another process deletes
the directory created by safe_create_leading_directories() just before
we rename the file into the directory.
As far as I can tell, this race could not occur internal to git. The
only time that a directory under $GIT_DIR/logs is deleted is if room
has to be made for a log file for a reference with the same name;
for example, in the following sequence:
git branch foo/bar # Creates file .git/logs/refs/heads/foo/bar
git branch -d foo/bar # Deletes file but leaves .git/logs/refs/heads/foo/
git branch foo # Deletes .git/logs/refs/heads/foo/
But the only reason the last command deletes the directory is because
it wants to create a file with the same name. So if another process
(e.g.,
git branch foo/baz
) wants to create that directory, one of the two is doomed to failure
anyway because of a D/F conflict.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a file or directory that we are trying to remove disappears (e.g.,
because another process has pruned it), do not consider it an error.
However, if REMOVE_DIR_KEEP_TOPLEVEL is set, and the toplevel
directory is missing, then consider it an error (like before).
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If opendir() fails on the top-level directory, it makes sense to try
to delete it anyway--but only if the failure was due to EACCES.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If hold_lock_file_for_update() fails with errno==ENOENT, it might be
because somebody else (for example, a pack-refs process) has just
deleted one of the lockfile's ancestor directories. So if this
condition is detected, try again (up to 3 times).
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If safe_create_leading_directories() fails because a file along the
path unexpectedly vanished, try again (up to 3 times).
This can occur if another process is deleting directories at the same
time as we are trying to make them. For example, "git pack-refs
--all" tries to delete the loose refs and any empty directories that
are left behind. If a pack-refs process is running, then it might
delete a directory that we need to put a new loose reference in.
If safe_create_leading_directories() thinks this might have happened,
then take its advice and try again (maximum three attempts).
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The -L option is the same as for git-log, so the entire block is just
copied from git-log.txt. However, until the parser is fixed we add a
caveat that gitk only understands the stuck form.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <tr@thomasrast.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Users often find that "next" and "prev" do the opposite of what they
expect. For example, "next" moves to the next match down the list, but
that is almost always backwards in time. Replacing the text with arrows
makes it clear where the buttons will take the user.
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The Makefile only runs it using tclsh, but because the fallback po2msg
script has the usual tcl preamble starting with #!/bin/sh it can also
be run directly.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The Makefile only runs po/po2msg.sh using tclsh, but because the
script has the usual tcl preamble starting with #!/bin/sh it can also
be run directly.
The Windows git-gui wrapper is usable in-place for the same reason.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
Since 918dbf58, git-gui crashes if started with Tk 8.4. The reason is that
tk < 8.5 does not support -stretch option for panedwindow.
Without the option it's not possible to properly expand the right half -
the commit area is expanded, while desired behavior is to expand the diff
area. So the whole feature should be disabled with Tk
version less than 8.5.
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Signed-off-by: Pat Thoyts <patthoyts@users.sourceforge.net>
"submodule.*.update=checkout", when propagated from .gitmodules to
.git/config, turned into a "submodule.*.update=none", which did not
make much sense.
* fp/submodule-checkout-mode:
git-submodule.sh: 'checkout' is a valid update mode
Fetching from a shallow-cloned repository used to be forbidden,
primarily because the codepaths involved were not carefully vetted
and we did not bother supporting such usage. This attempts to allow
object transfer out of a shallow-cloned repository in a controlled
way (i.e. the receiver become a shallow repository with truncated
history).
* nd/shallow-clone: (31 commits)
t5537: fix incorrect expectation in test case 10
shallow: remove unused code
send-pack.c: mark a file-local function static
git-clone.txt: remove shallow clone limitations
prune: clean .git/shallow after pruning objects
clone: use git protocol for cloning shallow repo locally
send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone via http
receive-pack: support pushing to a shallow clone via http
smart-http: support shallow fetch/clone
remote-curl: pass ref SHA-1 to fetch-pack as well
send-pack: support pushing to a shallow clone
receive-pack: allow pushes that update .git/shallow
connected.c: add new variant that runs with --shallow-file
add GIT_SHALLOW_FILE to propagate --shallow-file to subprocesses
receive/send-pack: support pushing from a shallow clone
receive-pack: reorder some code in unpack()
fetch: add --update-shallow to accept refs that update .git/shallow
upload-pack: make sure deepening preserves shallow roots
fetch: support fetching from a shallow repository
clone: support remote shallow repository
...
Since 0b6806b9 ("xread, xwrite: limit size of IO to 8MB"), this
wrapper is no longer needed, as read and write are already split
into small chunks.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our xwrite wrapper already deals with a few potential hazards, and
are as such more robust. Prefer it instead of write to get the
robustness benefits everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Reviewed-and-improved-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Finishing touches so that an expected error message will not leak to
the UI.
* jk/pull-rebase-using-fork-point:
pull: suppress error when no remoteref is found
Commit 48059e4 (pull: use merge-base --fork-point when appropriate,
2013-12-08) incorrectly assumes that get_remote_merge_branch will either
yield a non-empty string or return an error, but there are circumstances
where it will yield an empty string.
The previous code then invoked git-rev-list with no arguments, which
results in an error suppressed by redirecting stderr to /dev/null. Now
we invoke git-merge-base with an empty branch name, which also results
in an error. Suppress this in the same way.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
