This basically does a few things that are sadly somewhat interdependent,
and nontrivial to split out
- get rid of "struct log_tree_opt"
The fields in "log_tree_opt" are moved into "struct rev_info", and all
users of log_tree_opt are changed to use the rev_info struct instead.
- add the parsing for the log_tree_opt arguments to "setup_revision()"
- make setup_revision set a flag (revs->diff) if the diff-related
arguments were used. This allows "git log" to decide whether it wants
to show diffs or not.
- make setup_revision() also initialize the diffopt part of rev_info
(which we had from before, but we just didn't initialize it)
- make setup_revision() do all the "finishing touches" on it all (it will
do the proper flag combination logic, and call "diff_setup_done()")
Now, that was the easy and straightforward part.
The slightly more involved part is that some of the programs that want to
use the new-and-improved rev_info parsing don't actually want _commits_,
they may want tree'ish arguments instead. That meant that I had to change
setup_revision() to parse the arguments not into the "revs->commits" list,
but into the "revs->pending_objects" list.
Then, when we do "prepare_revision_walk()", we walk that list, and create
the sorted commit list from there.
This actually cleaned some stuff up, but it's the less obvious part of the
patch, and re-organized the "revision.c" logic somewhat. It actually paves
the way for splitting argument parsing _entirely_ out of "revision.c",
since now the argument parsing really is totally independent of the commit
walking: that didn't use to be true, since there was lots of overlap with
get_commit_reference() handling etc, now the _only_ overlap is the shared
(and trivial) "add_pending_object()" thing.
However, I didn't do that file split, just because I wanted the diff
itself to be smaller, and show the actual changes more clearly. If this
gets accepted, I'll do further cleanups then - that includes the file
split, but also using the new infrastructure to do a nicer "git diff" etc.
Even in this form, it actually ends up removing more lines than it adds.
It's nice to note how simple and straightforward this makes the built-in
"git log" command, even though it continues to support all the diff flags
too. It doesn't get much simpler that this.
I think this is worth merging soonish, because it does allow for future
cleanup and even more sharing of code. However, it obviously touches
"revision.c", which is subtle. I've tested that it passes all the tests we
have, and it passes my "looks sane" detector, but somebody else should
also give it a good look-over.
[jc: squashed the original and three "oops this too" updates, with
another fix-up.]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes things that include revision.h build again.
Blame is also built, but I am not sure how well it works (or how
well it worked to begin with) -- it was relying on tree-diff to
be using whatever pathspec was used the last time, which smells
a bit suspicious.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The parent rewriting feature caused us to create the whole history in one
go, and then simplify it later, because of how rewrite_parents() had been
written. However, with a little tweaking, it's perfectly possible to do
even that one incrementally.
Right now, this doesn't really much matter, because every user of
"--parents" will probably generally _also_ use "--topo-order", which will
cause the old non-incremental behaviour anyway. However, I'm hopeful that
we could make even the topological sort incremental, or at least
_partially_ so (for example, make it incremental up to the first merge).
In the meantime, this at least moves things in the right direction, and
removes a strange special case.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Not only do we do it in both rev-list.c and git.c, the revision walking
code will soon want to know whether we should rewrite parenthood
information or not.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
With the new --boundary flag, the output from rev-list includes
the UNINTERESING commits at the boundary, which are usually not
shown. Their object names are prefixed with '-'.
For example, with this graph:
C side
/
A---B---D master
You would get something like this:
$ git rev-list --boundary --header --parents side..master
D B
tree D^{tree}
parent B
... log message for commit D here ...
\0-B A
tree B^{tree}
parent A
... log message for commit B here ...
\0
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
prune_fn in the rev_info structure is called in place of
try_to_simplify_commit. This makes it possible to do rename tracking
with a custom try_to_simplify_commit-like function.
This commit also introduces init_revisions which initialises the rev_info
structure with default values.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This ports the following options from rev-list based git-log
implementation:
* -<n>, -n<n>, and -n <n>. I am still wondering if we want
this natively supported by setup_revisions(), which already
takes --max-count. We may want to move them in the next
round. Also I am not sure if we can get away with not
setting revs->limited when we set max-count. The latest
rev-list.c and revision.c in this series do not, so I left
them as they are.
* --pretty and --pretty=<fmt>.
* --abbrev=<n> and --no-abbrev.
The previous commit already handles time-based limiters
(--since, --until and friends). The remaining things that
rev-list based git-log happens to do are not useful in a pure
log-viewing purposes, and not ported:
* --bisect (obviously).
* --header. I am actually in favor of doing the NUL
terminated record format, but rev-list based one always
passed --pretty, which defeated this option. Maybe next
round.
* --parents. I do not think of a reason a log viewer wants
this. The flag is primarily for feeding squashed history
via pipe to downstream tools.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Well, assuming breaking --merge-order is fine, here's a patch (on top of
the other ones) that makes
git log <filename>
actually work, as far as I can tell.
I didn't add the logic for --before/--after flags, but that should be
pretty trivial, and is independent of this anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This actually moves the "meat" of the revision walking from rev-list.c
to the new library code in revision.h. It introduces the new functions
void prepare_revision_walk(struct rev_info *revs);
struct commit *get_revision(struct rev_info *revs);
to prepare and then walk the revisions that we have.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes the rewrite easier to validate in that revision flag
parsing and warlking part are now all in rev_info structure.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This really just splits things up partially, and creates the
interface to set things up by parsing the command line.
No real code changes so far, although the parsing of filenames is a bit
stricter. In particular, if there is a "--", then we do not accept any
filenames before it, and if there isn't any "--", then we check that _all_
paths listed are valid, not just the first one.
The new argument parsing automatically also gives us "--default" and
"--not" handling as in git-rev-parse.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Also, make it a fatal error to pass in a non-commit object. The callers
never checked, so better check here.
This simplifies merge-base further. It's now so trivial that it's almost
ridiculous.
- mark_reachable() can be more generic, marking the reachable revisions
with an arbitrary mask.
- date parsing will parse to a date of 0 rather than ULONG_MAX for the
bad old case, sorting the dates correctly.
This also drops the old-style date parsing. We just don't care
enough, since we dropped that format pretty early.
Yes, this could do with some cleanup, and a common library file.
Some day.
It's really a very generic thing: the notion of one sha1 revision
referring to another one. "fsck" uses it for all nodes, and "rev-tree"
only tracks commit-node relationships, but the code was already
the same - now we just make that explicit by moving it to a common
header file.
