Commit Graph

101 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Junio C Hamano
7b9b634ca5 Merge branch 'ab/doc-synopsis-and-cmd-usage'
The short-help text shown by "git cmd -h" and the synopsis text
shown at the beginning of "git help cmd" have been made more
consistent.

* ab/doc-synopsis-and-cmd-usage: (34 commits)
  tests: assert consistent whitespace in -h output
  tests: start asserting that *.txt SYNOPSIS matches -h output
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "worktree" consistent
  worktree: define subcommand -h in terms of command -h
  reflog doc: list real subcommands up-front
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "commit" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "diff-tree" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: use "[<label>...]" for "zero or more"
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "annotate" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "stash" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: add missing options
  doc txt & -h consistency: use "git foo" form, not "git-foo"
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "bundle" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "read-tree" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: make "rerere" consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: add missing options and labels
  doc txt & -h consistency: make output order consistent
  doc txt & -h consistency: add or fix optional "--" syntax
  doc txt & -h consistency: fix mismatching labels
  doc SYNOPSIS & -h: use "-" to separate words in labels, not "_"
  ...
2022-10-28 11:26:54 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
179eb1d967 Merge branch 'ab/coding-guidelines-c99'
Update CodingGuidelines to clarify what features to use and avoid
in C99.

* ab/coding-guidelines-c99:
  CodingGuidelines: recommend against unportable C99 struct syntax
  CodingGuidelines: mention C99 features we can't use
  CodingGuidelines: allow declaring variables in for loops
  CodingGuidelines: mention dynamic C99 initializer elements
  CodingGuidelines: update for C99
2022-10-19 15:38:05 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
6584fcc5c8 CodingGuidelines: update and clarify command-line conventions
Edit the section which explains how to create a good SYNOPSIS section
for clarity and accuracy, it was mostly introduced in
c455bd8950 (CodingGuidelines: Add a section on writing documentation,
2010-11-04):

 * Change "extra" example to "file", which now naturally follows from
   previous "<file>..." example (one or more) to "[<file>...]" (zero or
   more).

 * Explain how we prefer spacing around "[]()" tokens and "|"
   alternatives, this is not a new policy, but just codifies what's
   already the pattern in the most wide use in the documentation.

Having a space around " | " for flags, but not for flag values is
inconsistent, but this style guide codifies existing
patterns. Grepping shows that we don't have any instance matching the
second "Don't" example:

	git grep -E -h -o '=\([^)]+\)' -- builtin Documentation/

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-13 09:32:54 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
438c2f859b CodingGuidelines: recommend against unportable C99 struct syntax
Per 33665d98e6 (reftable: make assignments portable to AIX xlc
v12.01, 2022-03-28) forms like ".a.b = *c" can be replaced by using
".a = { .b = *c }" instead.

We'll probably allow these sooner than later, but since the workaround
is trivial let's note it among the C99 features we'd like to hold off
on for now.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-11 08:55:01 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
d7d850e2b9 CodingGuidelines: mention C99 features we can't use
The C99 section of the CodingGuidelines is a good overview of what we
can use, but is sorely lacking in what we can't use. Something that
comes up occasionally is the portability of %z.

Per [1] we couldn't use it for the longest time due to MSVC not
supporting it, but nowadays by requiring C99 we rely on the MSVC
version that does, but we can't use it yet because a C library that
MinGW uses doesn't support it.

1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/a67e0fd8-4a14-16c9-9b57-3430440ef93c@gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-10 13:41:12 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
82dd01d81b CodingGuidelines: allow declaring variables in for loops
Since 44ba10d671 (revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for()
loop, 2021-11-14) released with v2.35.0 we've had a variable declared
with in a for loop.

Since then we've had inadvertent follow-ups to that with at least
cb2607759e (merge-ort: store more specific conflict information,
2022-06-18) released with v2.38.0.

As November 2022 is within the window of this upcoming release,
let's update the guideline to allow this.  We can have the promised
"revisit" discussion while this patch cooks, and drop it if it turns
out that it is still premature, which is not expected to happen at
this moment.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-10 13:41:11 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
442c27dde7 CodingGuidelines: mention dynamic C99 initializer elements
The first use of variables in initializer elements appears to have
been 2b6854c863 (Cleanup variables in cat-file, 2007-04-21) released
with v1.5.2.

Some of those caused portability issues, and e.g. that "cat-file" use
was changed in 66dbfd55e3 (Rewrite dynamic structure initializations
to runtime assignment, 2010-05-14) which went out with v1.7.2.

But curiously 66dbfd55e3 missed some of them, e.g. an archive.c use
added in d5f53d6d6f (archive: complain about path specs that don't
match anything, 2009-12-12), and another one in merge-index.c (later
builtin/merge-index.c) in 0077138cd9 (Simplify some instances of
run_command() by using run_command_v_opt()., 2009-06-08).

As far as I can tell there's been no point since 2b6854c863 in 2007
where a compiler that didn't support this has been able to compile
git. Presumably 66dbfd55e3 was an attempt to make headway with wider
portability that ultimately wasn't completed.

In any case, we are thoroughly reliant on this syntax at this point,
so let's update the guidelines, see
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy1tunjgp.fsf@gitster.g/ for the
initial discussion.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-10 13:41:11 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
e88a2d02dc CodingGuidelines: update for C99
Since 7bc341e21b (git-compat-util: add a test balloon for C99
support, 2021-12-01) we've had a hard dependency on C99, but the prose
in CodingGuidelines was written under the assumption that we were
using C89 with a few C99 features.

As the updated prose notes we'd still like to hold off on novel C99
features, but let's make it clear that we target that C version, and
then enumerate new C99 features that are safe to use.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-10-10 13:41:11 -07:00
Đoàn Trần Công Danh
2e092725e6 CodingGuidelines: allow grep -E
Despite forbidden by CodingGuidelines, our usage of 'grep -E' has been
increased over the years, and noone has come and complained.

Let's lift the restriction.

Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-09-21 11:00:18 -07:00
Jacob Stopak
c9dba103dd Documentation: fix various repeat word typos
Inspired by 24966cd982 ("doc: fix repeated words", 08-09-2019),
I ran "egrep -R "\<([a-zA-Z]+)\> \<\1\>" ./Documentation/*" to
find current cases of repeated words such as "the the" that were
quite clearly typos.

There were many false positives reported, such as "really really"
or valid uses of "that that" which I left alone.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Stopak <jacob@initialcommit.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-09-12 11:04:55 -07:00
COGONI Guillaume
7a06a854ee Documentation/ToolsForGit.txt: Tools for developing Git
This document gathers tips, scripts and configuration file to help
people working on Git’s codebase use their favorite tools while
following Git’s coding style.

Move the part about Emacs configuration from CodingGuidelines to
ToolsForGit.txt because it's the purpose of the new file centralize the
information about tools.

But, add a mention to Documentation/ToolsForGit.txt in CodingGuidelines
because there is also information about the coding style in it.

Helped-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@univ-lyon1.fr>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: COGONI Guillaume <cogoni.guillaume@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-04-21 09:50:25 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
77ceb11342 Merge branch 'jc/coding-guidelines-decl-in-for-loop'
Coding Guidelines clarification.

* jc/coding-guidelines-decl-in-for-loop:
  CodingGuidelines: give deadline for "for (int i = 0; ..."
2022-04-04 10:56:24 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
6563706568 CodingGuidelines: give deadline for "for (int i = 0; ..."
We raised the weather balloon to see if we can allow the construct
in 44ba10d6 (revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for()
loop, 2021-11-14), which was shipped as a part of Git v2.35.
Document that fact in the coding guidelines, and more importantly,
give ourselves a deadline to revisit and update.

Let's declare that we will officially adopt the variable declaration
in the initializaiton part of "for ()" statement this winter, unless
we find that a platform we care about does not grok it.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-03-31 13:12:26 -07:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
56a29d2c97 C99: remove hardcoded-out !HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS code
Remove the "else" branches of the HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS macro, which
have been unconditionally omitted since 765dc16888 (git-compat-util:
always enable variadic macros, 2021-01-28).

Since were always omitted, anyone trying to use a compiler without
variadic macro support to compile a git since version
git v2.31.0 or later would have had a compilation error. 10 months
across a few releases since then should have been enough time for
anyone who cared to run into that and report the issue.

In addition to that, for anyone unsetting HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS we've
been emitting extremely verbose warnings since at least
ee4512ed48 (trace2: create new combined trace facility,
2019-02-22). That's because there is no such thing as a
"region_enter_printf" or "region_leave_printf" format, so at least
under GCC and Clang everything that includes trace.h (almost every
file) emits a couple of warnings about that.

There's a large benefit to being able to have a hard dependency rely
on variadic macros, the code surrounding usage.c is hard to maintain
if we need to write two implementations of everything, and by relying
on "__FILE__" and "__LINE__" along with "__VA_ARGS__" we can in the
future make error(), die() etc. log where they were called from. We've
also recently merged d67fc4bf0b (Merge branch 'bc/require-c99',
2021-12-10) which further cements our hard dependency on C99.

So let's delete the fallback code, and update our CodingGuidelines to
note that we depend on this. The added bullet-point starts with
lower-case for consistency with other bullet-points in that section.

The diff in "trace.h" is relatively hard to read, since we need to
retain the existing API docs, which were comments on the code used if
HAVE_VARIADIC_MACROS was not defined.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-02-21 19:14:19 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
607817a3c8 CodingGuidelines: hint why we value clearly written log messages
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2022-01-27 17:50:04 -08:00
Eric Sunshine
e258eb4800 CodingGuidelines: document which output goes to stdout vs. stderr
It has long been practice on this project for a command to emit its
primary output to stdout so that it can be captured to a file or sent
down a pipe, and to emit "chatty" messages (such as those reporting
progress) to stderr so that they don't interfere with the primary
output. However, this practice is not necessarily universal; another
common practice is to send only error messages to stderr, and all other
messages to stdout. Therefore, help newcomers out by documenting how
stdout and stderr are used on this project.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-12-04 17:26:41 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
546adc4950 Merge branch 'ds/gender-neutral-doc-guidelines'
A guideline for gender neutral documentation has been added.

* ds/gender-neutral-doc-guidelines:
  CodingGuidelines: recommend gender-neutral description
2021-07-28 13:18:02 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
5b1cd37e44 CodingGuidelines: recommend gender-neutral description
Technical writing seeks to convey information with minimal
friction. One way that a reader can experience friction is if they
encounter a description of "a user" that is later simplified using a
gendered pronoun. If the reader does not consider that pronoun to
apply to them, then they can experience cognitive dissonance that
removes focus from the information.

Give some basic tips to guide us avoid unnecessary uses of gendered
description.

Using a gendered pronoun is appropriate when referring to a specific
person.

There are acceptable existing uses of gendered pronouns within the
Git codebase, such as:

* References to real people (e.g. Linus Torvalds, "the Git maintainer").
  Do not misgender real people. If there is any doubt to the gender of a
  person, then avoid using pronouns.

* References to fictional people with clear genders (e.g. Alice and
  Bob).

* Sample text used in test cases (e.g t3702, t6432).

* The official text of the GPL license contains uses of "he or she",
  but using singular "they" (or modifying the text in some other
  way) is not within the scope of the Git project.

* Literal email messages in Documentation/howto/ should not be edited
  for grammatical concerns such as this, unless we update the entire
  document to fit the standard documentation format. If such an effort is
  taken on, then the authorship would change and no longer refer to the
  exact mail message.

* External projects consumed in contrib/ should not deviate solely for
  style reasons. Recommended edits should be contributed to those
  projects directly.

Other cases within the Git project were cleaned up by the previous
changes.

Co-authored-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-07-16 11:35:46 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
0b77301bf4 Merge branch 'jc/test-allows-local'
Document that our test can use "local" keyword.

* jc/test-allows-local:
  CodingGuidelines: explicitly allow "local" for test scripts
2021-05-11 15:27:22 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
a84fd3bcc6 CodingGuidelines: explicitly allow "local" for test scripts
01d3a526 (t0000: check whether the shell supports the "local"
keyword, 2017-10-26) raised a test balloon to see if those who build
and test Git use a platform with a shell that lacks support for the
"local" keyword.  After two years, 7f0b5908 (t0000: reword comments
for "local" test, 2019-08-08) documented that "local" keyword, even
though is outside POSIX, is allowed in our test scripts.

Let's write it in the CodingGuidelines, too.  It might be tempting
to allow it in scripted Porcelains (we have avoided getting them
contaminiated by "local" so far), but they are on their way out and
getting rewritten in C.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-05-03 14:24:11 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
151b6c2dd7 doc: clarify "do not capitalize the first word" rule
The same "do not capitalize the first word" rule is applied to both
our patch titles and error messages, but the existing description
was fuzzy in two aspects.

 * For error messages, it was not said that this was only about the
   first word that begins the sentence.

 * For both, it was not clear when a capital letter there was not an
   error.  We avoid capitalizing the first word when the only reason
   you would capitalize it is because it happens to be the first
   word in the sentence.  If a proper noun, which is usually spelled
   in capital letters, happens to come at the beginning of the
   sentence, it should be kept in capital letters.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2021-04-14 23:41:00 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
6361eb73c6 Merge branch 'dl/python-2.7-is-the-floor-version'
Document that we do not support Python 2.6 or older.

* dl/python-2.7-is-the-floor-version:
  CodingGuidelines: specify Python 2.7 is the oldest version
2020-06-17 21:54:05 -07:00
Denton Liu
45a87a83bb CodingGuidelines: specify Python 2.7 is the oldest version
In 0b4396f068 (git-p4: make python2.7 the oldest supported version,
2019-12-13), git-p4 was updated to only support 2.7 and newer. Since
Python 2.6 is pretty much ancient history, update CodingGuidelines to
show that 2.7 is the oldest version supported.

Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-06-08 10:32:42 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
73d9f96b47 Merge branch 'jc/codingstyle-compare-with-null'
Doc update.

* jc/codingstyle-compare-with-null:
  CodingGuidelines: do not ==/!= compare with 0 or '\0' or NULL
2020-05-14 14:39:42 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
6d4bf5813c Merge branch 'jk/arith-expansion-coding-guidelines'
The coding guideline for shell scripts instructed to refer to a
variable with dollar-sign inside arithmetic expansion to work
around a bug in old versions of dash, which is a thing of the past.
Now we are not forbidden from writing $((var+1)).

* jk/arith-expansion-coding-guidelines:
  CodingGuidelines: drop arithmetic expansion advice to use "$x"
2020-05-08 14:25:07 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
5c7bb0146e CodingGuidelines: do not ==/!= compare with 0 or '\0' or NULL
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-08 11:25:12 -07:00
Jeff King
32b5fe7f0e CodingGuidelines: drop arithmetic expansion advice to use "$x"
The advice to use "$x" rather than "x" in arithmetric expansion was
working around a dash bug fixed in 0.5.4. Even Debian oldstable has
0.5.8 these days. And in the meantime, we've added almost two dozen
instances of the "x" form which you can find with:

  git grep '$(([a-z]'

and nobody seems to have complained. Let's declare this workaround
obsolete and simplify our style guide.

Helped-by: Danh Doan <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-05-04 12:36:07 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
7d28d69174 Merge branch 'jc/allow-strlen-substitution-in-shell-scripts'
Coding guideline update.

* jc/allow-strlen-substitution-in-shell-scripts:
  CodingGuidelines: allow ${#posix} == strlen($posix)
2020-04-22 13:42:48 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
78725ebda9 CodingGuidelines: allow ${#posix} == strlen($posix)
The construct has been in POSIX for the past 10+ years, and we have
used in t9xxx (subversion) series of the tests, so we know it is at
portable across systems that people have run those tests, which is
almost everything we'd care about.

Let's loosen the rule; luckily, the check-non-portable-shell script
does not have any rule to find its use, so the only change needed is
a removal of one paragraph from the documentation.

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-03-29 08:41:54 -07:00
Elijah Newren
031fd4b93b Documentation: fix a bunch of typos, both old and new
Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-11-07 13:42:00 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
fe9dc6b08c Merge branch 'jc/post-c89-rules-doc'
We have been trying out a few language features outside c89; the
coding guidelines document did not talk about them and instead had
a blanket ban against them.

* jc/post-c89-rules-doc:
  CodingGuidelines: spell out post-C89 rules
2019-07-25 13:59:23 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
cc0c42975a CodingGuidelines: spell out post-C89 rules
Even though we have been sticking to C89, there are a few handy
features we borrow from more recent C language in our codebase after
trying them in weather balloons and saw that nobody screamed.

Spell them out.

While at it, extend the existing variable declaration rule a bit to
read better with the newly spelled out rule for the for loop.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-07-18 15:16:04 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
7df94cd1f6 Merge branch 'es/git-debugger-doc'
Doc update.

* es/git-debugger-doc:
  doc: hint about GIT_DEBUGGER in CodingGuidelines
2019-06-17 10:15:14 -07:00
Emily Shaffer
f547101b26 doc: hint about GIT_DEBUGGER in CodingGuidelines
We check for a handy environment variable GIT_DEBUGGER when running via
bin-wrappers/, but this feature is undocumented. Add a hint to how to
use it into the CodingGuidelines (which is where other useful
environment settings like DEVELOPER are documented).

Signed-off-by: Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-05-28 13:42:33 -07:00
Corentin BOMPARD
0dbd305fe7 doc/CodingGuidelines: URLs and paths as monospace
The current documentation uses both quotes (italics) and backquotes
(monospace) to render URLs and pathnames, which is inconsistent.
Document a best practice in CodingGuidelines to help reduce
inconsistencies in the future.

We set the best practice to using backquotes, since:

* It is already an established practice. For exemple:

  $ git grep "'[^']/*[^']'" | wc -l
  206

  $ git grep '`[^`]/*[^`]`' | wc -l
  690

  There are false positives on both sides, but after a cursory look at
  the output of both, it doesn't seem the false positive rate is really
  higher in the second case.

  At least, this shows that the existing documentation uses
  inconsistent formatting, and that it would be good to do
  something about it.

* It may be debatable whether path names need to be typed in
  monospace but having them in italics is really unusual.

Signed-off-by: Corentin BOMPARD <corentin.bompard@etu.univ-lyon1.fr>
Signed-off-by: Nathan BERBEZIER <nathan.berbezier@etu.univ-lyon1.fr>
Signed-off-by: Pablo CHABANNE <pablo.chabanne@etu.univ-lyon1.fr>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu MOY <matthieu.moy@univ-lyon1.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2019-03-13 11:14:10 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
0d4f473a98 Merge branch 'jc/how-to-document-api'
Doc update.

* jc/how-to-document-api:
  CodingGuidelines: document the API in *.h files
2018-10-19 13:34:05 +09:00
Matthew DeVore
a378fee5b0 Documentation: add shell guidelines
Add the following guideline to Documentation/CodingGuidelines:

	Break overlong lines after "&&", "||", and "|", not before
	them; that way the command can continue to subsequent lines
	without backslash at the end.

And the following to t/README (since it is specific to writing tests):

	Pipes and $(git ...) should be avoided when they swallow exit
	codes of Git processes

Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-10-07 08:51:17 +09:00
Junio C Hamano
d9f079ad1a CodingGuidelines: document the API in *.h files
It makes it harder to let the API description and the reality drift
apart if the doc is kept close to the implementation or the header
of the API.  We have been slowly migrating API docs out of the
Documentation/technical/api-* to *.h files, and the development
community generally considers that how inline docs in strbuf.h is
done the best current practice.

We recommend documenting in the header over documenting near the
implementation to encourage people to write the docs that are
readable without peeking at the implemention.

Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-09-29 11:18:01 -07:00
Jeff King
89a9f2c862 CodingGuidelines: mention "static" and "extern"
It perhaps goes without saying that file-local stuff should
be marked static, but it does not hurt to remind people.

Less obvious is that we are settling on "do not include
extern in function declarations". It is already the default
unless the function was previously declared static (but if
you are following a static declaration with an unmarked one,
you should think about why you are declaring the thing
twice). And so it just becomes an extra noise-word in our
header files.

We used to give the opposite advice, so there are quite a
few "extern" markers in early Git code. But this at least
makes a concrete suggestion that we can follow going
forward.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-02-08 14:20:43 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
c5da34c124 Merge branch 'ab/c-translators-comment-style'
Update the C style recommendation for notes for translators, as
recent versions of gettext tools can work with our style of
multi-line comments.

* ab/c-translators-comment-style:
  C style: use standard style for "TRANSLATORS" comments
2017-06-04 09:55:44 +09:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
66f5f6dca9 C style: use standard style for "TRANSLATORS" comments
Change all the "TRANSLATORS: [...]" comments in the C code to use the
regular Git coding style, and amend the style guide so that the
example there uses that style.

This custom style was necessary back in 2010 when the gettext support
was initially added, and was subsequently documented in commit
cbcfd4e3ea ("i18n: mention "TRANSLATORS:" marker in
Documentation/CodingGuidelines", 2014-04-18).

GNU xgettext hasn't had the parsing limitation that necessitated this
exception for almost 3 years. Since its 0.19 release on 2014-06-02
it's been able to recognize TRANSLATOR comments in the standard Git
comment syntax[1].

Usually we'd like to keep compatibility with software that's that
young, but in this case literally the only person who needs to be
using a gettext newer than 3 years old is Jiang Xin (the only person
who runs & commits "make pot" results), so I think in this case we can
make an exception.

This xgettext parsing feature was added after a thread on the Git
mailing list[2] which continued on the bug-gettext[3] list, but we
never subsequently changed our style & styleguide, do so.

There are already longstanding changes in git that use the standard
comment style & have their TRANSLATORS comments extracted properly
without getting the literal "*"'s mixed up in the text, as would
happen before xgettext 0.19.

Commit 7ff2683253 ("builtin-am: implement -i/--interactive",
2015-08-04) added one such comment, which in commit df0617bfa7 ("l10n:
git.pot: v2.6.0 round 1 (123 new, 41 removed)", 2015-09-05) got picked
up in the po/git.pot file with the right format, showing that Jiang
already runs a modern xgettext.

The xgettext parser does not handle the sort of non-standard comment
style that I'm amending here in sequencer.c, but that isn't standard
Git comment syntax anyway. With this change to sequencer.c & "make
pot" the comment in the pot file is now correct:

     #. TRANSLATORS: %s will be "revert", "cherry-pick" or
    -#. * "rebase -i".
    +#. "rebase -i".

1. http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gettext.git/commit/?id=10af7fe6bd
2. <2ce9ec406501d112e032c8208417f8100bed04c6.1397712142.git.worldhello.net@gmail.com>
   (https://public-inbox.org/git/2ce9ec406501d112e032c8208417f8100bed04c6.1397712142.git.worldhello.net@gmail.com/)
3. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2014-04/msg00016.html

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-31 08:01:42 +09:00
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2e477d8d71 doc: replace a couple of broken gmane links
Replace a couple of broken links to gmane with links to other
archives. See commit 54471fdcc3 ("README: replace gmane link with
public-inbox", 2016-12-15) for prior art.

With this change there's still 4 references left in the code:

    $ git grep -E '(article|thread)\.gmane.org' -- |grep -v RelNotes|wc -l
    4

I couldn't find alternative links for those.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-05-08 10:29:30 +09:00
Jeff King
1797dc5176 CodingGuidelines: clarify multi-line brace style
There are some "gray areas" around when to omit braces from
a conditional or loop body. Since that seems to have
resulted in some arguments, let's be a little more clear
about our preferred style.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-01-17 14:32:47 -08:00
Matthieu Moy
57103dbf70 CodingGuidelines: formatting HEAD in documentation
The current practice is:

git/Documentation$ git grep "'HEAD'" | wc -l
24
git/Documentation$ git grep "\`HEAD\`" | wc -l
66

Let's adopt the majority as a guideline.

Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-28 08:36:45 -07:00
Tom Russello
41f5b21f84 doc: clearer rule about formatting literals
Make the guideline text that we want for our documentation clearer.

Signed-off-by: Tom Russello <tom.russello@grenoble-inp.org>
Signed-off-by: Erwan Mathoniere <erwan.mathoniere@grenoble-inp.org>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Groot <samuel.groot@grenoble-inp.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <matthieu.moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-08 12:04:37 -07:00
Lars Schneider
658df95a4a add DEVELOPER makefile knob to check for acknowledged warnings
We assume Git developers have a reasonably modern compiler and recommend
them to enable the DEVELOPER makefile knob to ensure their patches are
clear of all compiler warnings the Git core project cares about.

Enable the DEVELOPER makefile knob in the Travis-CI build.

Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-02-25 12:49:45 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
638cbf5f0f Merge branch 'jg/cguide-we-cannot-count'
* jg/cguide-we-cannot-count:
  CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count
2015-04-14 09:55:29 -07:00
Julian Gindi
6c3b2afe6f CodingGuidelines: update 'rough' rule count
Changed inaccurate count of "rough rules" from three to the more
generic 'a few'.

Signed-off-by: Julian Gindi <juliangindi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-04-14 09:50:31 -07:00
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
da0005b885 *config.txt: stick to camelCase naming convention
This should improve readability. Compare "thislongname" and
"thisLongName". The following keys are left in unchanged. We can
decide what to do with them later.

 - am.keepcr
 - core.autocrlf .safecrlf .trustctime
 - diff.dirstat .noprefix
 - gitcvs.usecrlfattr
 - gui.blamehistoryctx .trustmtime
 - pull.twohead
 - receive.autogc
 - sendemail.signedoffbycc .smtpsslcertpath .suppresscc

Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-03-13 22:13:46 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
9a9c1f1fdf Merge branch 'jc/conf-var-doc'
Longstanding configuration variable naming rules has been added to
the documentation.

* jc/conf-var-doc:
  CodingGuidelines: describe naming rules for configuration variables
  config.txt: mark deprecated variables more prominently
  config.txt: clarify that add.ignore-errors is deprecated
2015-02-22 12:28:31 -08:00