When we're using an algorithm other than SHA-1, we need to specify the
algorithm in use so we don't get a failure with an "unknown format"
message. Add a wrapper function that specifies this header if required.
Skip specifying this header for SHA-1 to test that it works both with an
without this header.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In order to make this test work with SHA-256, offer an object-format
capability so that both sides use the same algorithm.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
test-sha1-array uses the_hash_algo under the hood. Since t0064 wants to
use the value that is correct for the hash algorithm that we're testing,
make sure the test helper initializes the repository to set
the_hash_algo correctly.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Normally, the remote-curl transport helper is aware of the hash
algorithm we're using because we're in a repo with the appropriate hash
algorithm set. However, when using git ls-remote outside of a
repository, we won't have initialized the hash algorithm properly, so
use hash_to_hex_algop to print the ref corresponding to the algorithm
we've detected.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When outside a repository, git index-pack is unable to guess the hash
algorithm in use for a pack, since packs don't contain any information
on the algorithm in use. Pass an option to index-pack to help it out in
this test.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git index-pack is usually run in a repository, but need not be. Since
packs don't contains information on the algorithm in use, instead
relying on context, add an option to index-pack to tell it which one
we're using in case someone runs it outside of a repository. Since
using --stdin necessarily implies a repository, don't allow specifying
an object format if it's provided to prevent users from passing an
option that won't work. Add documentation for this option.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When reading the info/refs file for a repository, we have no explicit
way to detect which hash algorithm is in use because the file doesn't
provide one. Detect the hash algorithm in use by the size of the first
object ID.
If we have an empty repository, we don't know what the hash algorithm is
on the remote side, so default to whatever the local side has
configured. Without doing this, we cannot clone an empty repository
since we don't know its hash algorithm. Test this case appropriately,
since we currently have no tests for cloning an empty repository with
the dumb HTTP protocol.
We anonymize the URL like elsewhere in the function in case the user has
decided to include a secret in the URL.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
strbuf_write_fd was only used in bugreport.c. Since that file now uses
write_in_full, this method is no longer needed. In addition, strbuf_write_fd
did not guard against exceeding MAX_IO_SIZE for the platform, nor
provided error handling in the event of a failure if only partial data
was written to the file descriptor. Since already write_in_full has this
capability and is in general use, it should be used instead. The change
impacts strbuf.c and strbuf.h.
Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The strbuf_write_fd method did not provide checks for buffers larger
than MAX_IO_SIZE. Replacing with write_in_full ensures the entire
buffer will always be written to disk or report an error and die.
Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
cmd_pull() builds a commit_list to pass a single potential ancestor to
is_descendant_of(). The latter leaves the list intact. Release the
allocated memory after the call.
Leaking in cmd_*() isn't a big deal, but sets a bad example for other
users of is_descendant_of().
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ref_newer() builds a commit_list to pass a single potential ancestor to
is_descendant_of(). The latter leaves the list intact. Release the
allocated memory after the call.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The low-level reference transactions used to update references are
currently completely opaque to the user. While certainly desirable in
most usecases, there are some which might want to hook into the
transaction to observe all queued reference updates as well as observing
the abortion or commit of a prepared transaction.
One such usecase would be to have a set of replicas of a given Git
repository, where we perform Git operations on all of the repositories
at once and expect the outcome to be the same in all of them. While
there exist hooks already for a certain subset of Git commands that
could be used to implement a voting mechanism for this, many others
currently don't have any mechanism for this.
The above scenario is the motivation for the new "reference-transaction"
hook that reaches directly into Git's reference transaction mechanism.
The hook receives as parameter the current state the transaction was
moved to ("prepared", "committed" or "aborted") and gets via its
standard input all queued reference updates. While the exit code gets
ignored in the "committed" and "aborted" states, a non-zero exit code in
the "prepared" state will cause the transaction to be aborted
prematurely.
Given the usecase described above, a voting mechanism can now be
implemented via this hook: as soon as it gets called, it will take all
of stdin and use it to cast a vote to a central service. When all
replicas of the repository agree, the hook will exit with zero,
otherwise it will abort the transaction by returning non-zero. The most
important upside is that this will catch _all_ commands writing
references at once, allowing to implement strong consistency for
reference updates via a single mechanism.
In order to test the impact on the case where we don't have any
"reference-transaction" hook installed in the repository, this commit
introduce two new performance tests for git-update-refs(1). Run against
an empty repository, it produces the following results:
Test origin/master HEAD
--------------------------------------------------------------------
1400.2: update-ref 2.70(2.10+0.71) 2.71(2.10+0.73) +0.4%
1400.3: update-ref --stdin 0.21(0.09+0.11) 0.21(0.07+0.14) +0.0%
The performance test p1400.2 creates, updates and deletes a branch a
thousand times, thus averaging runtime of git-update-refs over 3000
invocations. p1400.3 instead calls `git-update-refs --stdin` three times
and queues a thousand creations, updates and deletes respectively.
As expected, p1400.3 consistently shows no noticeable impact, as for
each batch of updates there's a single call to access(3P) for the
negative hook lookup. On the other hand, for p1400.2, one can see an
impact caused by this patchset. But doing five runs of the performance
tests where each one was run with GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT=10, the overhead
ranged from -1.5% to +1.1%. These inconsistent performance numbers can
be explained by the overhead of spawning 3000 processes. This shows that
the overhead of assembling the hook path and executing access(3P) once
to check if it's there is mostly outweighed by the operating system's
overhead.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git branches have been qualified as topic branches, integration branches,
development branches, feature branches, release branches and so on.
Git has a branch that is the master *for* development, but it is not
the master *of* any "slave branch": Git does not have slave branches,
and has never had, except for a single testcase that claims otherwise. :)
Independent of any future change to the naming of the "master" branch,
removing this sole appearance of the term is a strict improvement: it
avoids divisive language, and talking about "feature branch" clarifies
which developer workflow the test is trying to emulate.
Reported-by: Till Maas <tmaas@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A comment in cmd_diff() states that if one tree-ish and no blobs are
provided, (the "N=1, M=0" case), it will provide a diff between the tree
and the cache. This is incorrect because a diff happens between the
tree-ish and the working tree. Remove the `--cached` in the comment so
that the correct behavior is shown. Add a new section describing the
"N=1, M=0, --cached" behavior.
Next, describe the "N=0, M=0, --cached" case, similar to the above since
it is undocumented.
Finally, fix some spacing issues. Add spaces between each section for
consistency and readability. Also, change tabs within the comment into
spaces.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some of the early feedback of folks trying out sparse-checkouts at
$dayjob is that sparse checkouts can sometimes be disorienting; users
can forget that they had a sparse-checkout and then wonder where files
went. Add some output to 'git status' in the form of a simple line that
states:
You are in a sparse checkout with 35% of files present.
where, obviously, the exact figure changes depending on what percentage
of files from the index do not have the SKIP_WORKTREE bit set.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use of negative pathspec, while collecting paths including
untracked ones in the working tree, was broken.
* en/do-match-pathspec-fix:
dir: fix treatment of negated pathspecs
The behaviour of "sparse-checkout" in the state "git clone
--no-checkout" left was changed accidentally in 2.27, which has
been corrected.
* en/sparse-checkout:
sparse-checkout: avoid staging deletions of all files
The reflog entries for "git clone" and "git fetch" did not
anonymize the URL they operated on.
* js/reflog-anonymize-for-clone-and-fetch:
clone/fetch: anonymize URLs in the reflog
Reduce memory usage during "diff --quiet" in a worktree with too
many stat-unmatched paths.
* jk/diff-memuse-optim-with-stat-unmatch:
diff: discard blob data from stat-unmatched pairs
In an earlier patch, multiple struct acccesses to `graph_pos` and
`generation` were auto-converted to multiple method calls.
Since the values are fixed and commit-slab access costly, we would be
better off with storing the values as a local variable and reusing it.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We remove members `graph_pos` and `generation` from the struct commit.
The default assignments in init_commit_node() are no longer valid,
which is fine as the slab helpers return appropriate default values and
the assignments are removed.
We will replace existing use of commit->generation and commit->graph_pos
by commit_graph_data_slab helpers using
`contrib/coccinelle/commit.cocci'.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The struct commit is used in many contexts. However, members
`generation` and `graph_pos` are only used for commit-graph related
operations and otherwise waste memory.
This wastage would have been more pronounced as we transition to
generation number v2, which uses 64-bit generation number instead of
current 32-bits.
As they are often accessed together, let's introduce struct
commit_graph_data and move them to a commit_graph_data slab.
While the overall test suite runs just as fast as master,
(series: 26m48s, master: 27m34s, faster by 2.87%), certain commands
like `git merge-base --is-ancestor` were slowed by 40% as discovered
by Szeder Gábor [1]. After minimizing commit-slab access, the slow down
persists but is closer to 20%.
Derrick Stolee believes the slow down is attributable to the underlying
algorithm rather than the slowness of commit-slab access [2] and we will
follow-up in a later series.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200607195347.GA8232@szeder.dev/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/13db757a-9412-7f1e-805c-8a028c4ab2b1@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
14ba97f8 (alloc: allow arbitrary repositories for alloc functions,
2018-05-15) introduced parsed_object_pool->commit_count to keep count of
commits per repository and was used to assign commit->index.
However, commit-slab code requires commit->index values to be unique
and a global count would be correct, rather than a per-repo count.
Let's introduce a static counter variable, `parsed_commits_count` to
keep track of parsed commits so far.
As commit_count has no use anymore, let's also drop it from the struct.
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Kumar <abhishekkumar8222@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The repo_is_descendant_of() method is aware of the existence of the
commit-graph file. It checks for generation_numbers_enabled() before
deciding on using can_all_from_reach() or repo_in_merge_bases()
depending on the situation. The reason here is that can_all_from_reach()
uses a depth-first search that is limited by the minimum generation
number of the target commits, and that algorithm can be very slow when
generation numbers are not present. The alternative uses
paint_down_to_common() which will walk the entire merge-base boundary,
which is typically slower.
This method is used by commands like "git tag --contains" and "git
branch --contains" for very fast results when a commit-graph file
exists. Unfortunately, it is _not_ used in commands like "git merge-base
--is-ancestor" which is doing an even simpler request.
This issue was raised recently [1] with respect to a change to how
generation numbers are stored, but was also reported much earlier [2]
before commit-reach.c existed to simplify these reachability queries.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200607195347.GA8232@szeder.dev/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/git/87608bawoa.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com/
The root cause is that builtin/merge-base.c has a method
handle_is_ancestor() that calls in_merge_bases(), an older version of
repo_in_merge_bases(). It would be better if we have every caller to
in_merge_bases() use the logic in can_all_from_reach() when possible.
This is where things get a little tricky: repo_is_descendant_of() calls
repo_in_merge_bases() in the non-generation numbers enabled case! If we
simply update repo_in_merge_bases() to call repo_is_descendant_of()
instead of repo_in_merge_bases_many(), then we will get a recursive call
loop. Thankfully, this is caught by the test suite in the default mode
(i.e. GIT_TEST_COMMIT_GRAPH=0).
The trick, then, is to make the non-generation number case for
repo_is_descendant_of() call repo_in_merge_bases_many() directly,
skipping the non-_many version. This allows us to take advantage of this
faster code path, when possible.
The easiest way to measure the performance impact is to test the
following command on the Linux kernel repository:
git merge-base --is-ancestor <A> <B>
| A | B | Time Before | Time After |
|------|------|-------------|------------|
| v3.0 | v5.7 | 0.459s | 0.028s |
| v4.0 | v5.7 | 0.267s | 0.021s |
| v5.0 | v5.7 | 0.074s | 0.013s |
Note that each of these samples return success. The old code performed
the same operation when <A> and <B> are swapped. However,
can_all_from_reach() will return immediately if the generation numbers
show that <A> has larger generation number than <B>. Thus, the time for
the swapped case is universally 0.004s in each case.
Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The next change will make repo_in_merge_bases() depend on the logic in
is_descendant_of(), but we need to make the method independent of
the_repository first.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git branch` accepts `--edit-description` in conjunction with other
arguments. However, `--edit-description` is its own mode, similar to
`--set-upstream-to`, which is also made mutually exclusive with other
modes. Prevent `--edit-description` from being mixed with other modes.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the "--set-upstream-to" and "--unset-upstream" tests, specific error
conditions are being tested. However, there is no way of ensuring that a
test case is failing because of some specific error.
Check stderr of failing commands to ensure that they are failing in the
expected way.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Clean up style of test by changing some filenames from "expected" to
"expect", which follows typical test convention.
Also, change a space-indent into a tab-indent.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 6b1db43109 ("clean: teach clean -d to preserve ignored paths",
2017-05-23) added the following code block (among others) to git-clean:
if (remove_directories)
dir.flags |= DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO | DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS;
The reason for these flags is well documented in the commit message, but
isn't obvious just from looking at the code. Add some explanations to
the code to make it clearer.
Further, it appears git-2.26 did not correctly handle this combination
of flags from git-clean. With both these flags and without
DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO_MODE_MATCHING set, git is supposed to recurse into
all untracked AND ignored directories. git-2.26.0 clearly was not doing
that. I don't know the full reasons for that or whether git < 2.27.0
had additional unknown bugs because of that misbehavior, because I don't
feel it's worth digging into. As per the huge changes and craziness
documented in commit 8d92fb2927 ("dir: replace exponential algorithm
with a linear one", 2020-04-01), the old algorithm was a mess and was
thrown out. What I can say is that git-2.27.0 correctly recurses into
untracked AND ignored directories with that combination.
However, in clean's case we don't need to recurse into ignored
directories; that is just a waste of time. Thus, when git-2.27.0
started correctly handling those flags, we got a performance regression
report. Rather than relying on other bugs in fill_directory()'s former
logic to provide the behavior of skipping ignored directories, make use
of the DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO_MODE_MATCHING value specifically added in
commit eec0f7f2b7 ("status: add option to show ignored files
differently", 2017-10-30) for this purpose.
Reported-by: Brian Malehorn <bmalehorn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I spent a long time trying to figure out how and whether the code worked
with different values of ignore, ignore_only, and remove_directories.
After lots of time setting up lots of testcases, sifting through lots of
print statements, and walking through the debugger, I finally realized
that one piece of code related to how it was all setup was found in
clean.c rather than dir.c. Make a change that would have made it easier
for me to do the extra testing by putting this handling in one spot.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
dir.h documented quite clearly that DIR_SHOW_IGNORED and
DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO are mutually exclusive, with a big comment to this
effect by the definition of both enum values. However, a command like
git clean -fx $DIR
would set both values for dir.flags. I _think_ it happened to work
because:
* As dir.h points out, DIR_KEEP_UNTRACKED_CONTENTS only takes effect
if DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO is set.
* As coded, I believe DIR_SHOW_IGNORED would just happen to take
precedence over DIR_SHOW_IGNORED_TOO in the code as currently
constructed.
Which is a long way of saying "we just got lucky".
Fix clean.c to avoid setting these mutually exclusive values at the same
time, and add a check to dir.c that will throw a BUG() to prevent anyone
else from making this mistake.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ignoring the sparse-checkout feature momentarily, if one has a submodule and
creates local branches within it with unpushed changes and maybe adds some
untracked files to it, then we would want to avoid accidentally removing such
a submodule. So, for example with git.git, if you run
git checkout v2.13.0
then the sha1collisiondetection/ submodule is NOT removed even though it
did not exist as a submodule until v2.14.0. Similarly, if you only had
v2.13.0 checked out previously and ran
git checkout v2.14.0
the sha1collisiondetection/ submodule would NOT be automatically
initialized despite being part of v2.14.0. In both cases, git requires
submodules to be initialized or deinitialized separately. Further, we
also have special handling for submodules in other commands such as
clean, which requires two --force flags to delete untracked submodules,
and some commands have a --recurse-submodules flag.
sparse-checkout is very similar to checkout, as evidenced by the similar
name -- it adds and removes files from the working copy. However, for
the same avoid-data-loss reasons we do not want to remove a submodule
from the working copy with checkout, we do not want to do it with
sparse-checkout either. So submodules need to be separately initialized
or deinitialized; changing sparse-checkout rules should not
automatically trigger the removal or vivification of submodules.
I believe the previous wording in git-sparse-checkout.txt about
submodules was only about this particular issue. Unfortunately, the
previous wording could be interpreted to imply that submodules should be
considered active regardless of sparsity patterns. Update the wording
to avoid making such an implication. It may be helpful to consider two
example situations where the differences in wording become important:
In the future, we want users to be able to run commands like
git clone --sparse=moduleA --recurse-submodules $REPO_URL
and have sparsity paths automatically set up and have submodules *within
the sparsity paths* be automatically initialized. We do not want all
submodules in any path to be automatically initialized with that
command.
Similarly, we want to be able to do things like
git -c sparse.restrictCmds grep --recurse-submodules $REV $PATTERN
and search through $REV for $PATTERN within the recorded sparsity
patterns. We want it to recurse into submodules within those sparsity
patterns, but do not want to recurse into directories that do not match
the sparsity patterns in search of a possible submodule.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Preliminary clean-ups around refs API, plus file format
specification documentation for the reftable backend.
* hn/refs-cleanup:
reftable: define version 2 of the spec to accomodate SHA256
reftable: clarify how empty tables should be written
reftable: file format documentation
refs: improve documentation for ref iterator
t: use update-ref and show-ref to reading/writing refs
refs.h: clarify reflog iteration order
Since all invocations of test_submodule_forced_switch() are git
commands, automatically prepend "git" before invoking
test_submodule_switch_common().
Similarly, many invocations of test_submodule_switch() are also git
commands so automatically prepend "git" before invoking
test_submodule_switch_common() as well.
Finally, for invocations of test_submodule_switch() that invoke a custom
function, rename the old function to test_submodule_switch_func().
This is necessary because in a future commit, we will be adding some
logic that needs to distinguish between an invocation of a plain git
comamnd and an invocation of a test helper function.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Document the usage for producing combined commits with "git diff".
This includes updating the synopsis section.
While here, add the three-dot notation to the synopsis.
Make "git diff -h" print the same usage summary as the manual
page synopsis, minus the "A..B" form, which is now discouraged.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git diff is given a symmetric difference A...B, it chooses
some merge base from the two specified commits (as documented).
This fails, however, if there is *no* merge base: instead, you
see the differences between A and B, which is certainly not what
is expected.
Moreover, if additional revisions are specified on the command
line ("git diff A...B C"), the results get a bit weird:
* If there is a symmetric difference merge base, this is used
as the left side of the diff. The last final ref is used as
the right side.
* If there is no merge base, the symmetric status is completely
lost. We will produce a combined diff instead.
Similar weirdness occurs if you use, e.g., "git diff C A...B D".
Likewise, using multiple two-dot ranges, or tossing extra
revision specifiers into the command line with two-dot ranges,
or mixing two and three dot ranges, all produce nonsense.
To avoid all this, add a routine to catch the range cases and
verify that that the arguments make sense. As a side effect,
produce a warning showing *which* merge base is being used when
there are multiple choices; die if there is no merge base.
Signed-off-by: Chris Torek <chris.torek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As 'upload-pack.c' is now using 'struct upload_pack_data'
thoroughly, let's refactor some common code into a new
do_got_oid() function.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we cleanup 'upload-pack.c' by using 'struct upload_pack_data'
more thoroughly, let's move the 'oldest_have' static variable
into this struct.
It is used by both protocol v0 and protocol v2 code.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we cleanup 'upload-pack.c' by using 'struct upload_pack_data'
more thoroughly, let's pass that struct to got_oid(), so that
this function can use all the fields of the struct.
This will be used in followup commits to move a static variable
into 'upload_pack_data'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we cleanup 'upload-pack.c' by using 'struct upload_pack_data'
more thoroughly, let's pass that struct to ok_to_give_up(), so
that this function can use all the fields of the struct.
This will be used in followup commits to move a static variable
into 'upload_pack_data'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we cleanup 'upload-pack.c' by using 'struct upload_pack_data'
more thoroughly, let's pass that struct to send_acks(), so
that this function can use all the fields of the struct.
This will be used in followup commits to move a static variable
into 'upload_pack_data'.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
