We already have a test demonstrating that removing the last entry from a
config section fails to remove the section header of the now-empty
section.
The same can happen, of course, if we remove the last entries in one fell
swoop. This is *also* a bug, and should be fixed at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During the review of the first iteration of the patch series to remove
sections that become empty upon --unset or --unset-all, Jeff King
identified a couple of problematic cases with the backtracking approach
that was still used then to "look backwards for the section header":
https://public-inbox.org/git/20180329213229.GG2939@sigill.intra.peff.net/
This patch adds a couple of concocted examples designed to fool a
backtracking parser.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In https://public-inbox.org/git/7vvc8alzat.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org/
a reasonable patch was made quite a bit less so by changing a test case
demonstrating a bug to a test case that demonstrates that we ask for too
much: the test case 'unsetting the last key in a section removes header'
now expects a future bug fix to be able to determine whether a free-form
comment above a section header refers to said section or not.
Rather than shooting for the stars (and not even getting off the
ground), let's start shooting for something obtainable and be reasonably
confident that we *can* get it.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test case 'unset with cont. lines' relied on a bug that is about to
be fixed: it tests *explicitly* that removing the last entry from a
config section leaves an *empty* section behind.
Let's fix this test case not to rely on that behavior, simply by
preventing the section from becoming empty.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When replacing multiple config entries at once, we did not re-set the
flag that indicates whether we need to insert a new-line before the new
entry. As a consequence, an extra new-line was inserted under certain
circumstances.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
