Pressing the escape key while in the merge dialog cancels the merge
and correctly unlocks the index. Unfortunately this is not true of
the Cancel button, using it closes the dialog but does not release
the index lock, rendering git-gui frozen until you restart it. We
now properly release the index lock when the Cancel button is used.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Because Tk does not assure us the order that it will process
children in before it destroys the main toplevel we cannot safely
save our geometry data during a "bind . <Destroy>" event binding.
The geometry may have already changed as a result of a one or
more children being removed from the layout. This was pointed
out in gitk by Mark Levedahl, and patched over there by commit
b6047c5a81.
So we now also use "wm protocol . WM_DELETE_WINDOW" to detect when
the window is closed by the user, and forward that close event to
our main do_quit routine.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Now that we have a slightly easier method of working with per-widget
data we should make use of that technique in our browser and console
meta-widgets, as both have a decent amount of information that they
store on a per-widget basis and our current approach of handling
it is difficult to follow.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I found it useful to be able to use j/k (vi-like keys) to move
up and down the list of branches to merge and shift-j/k to do
the selection, much as shift-up/down (arrow keys) would alter
the selection.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Since we support vi-like keys for scrolling in other UI contexts
we can easily do so here too. Tk's handy little `event generate'
makes this a lot easier than I thought it would be. We may want
to go back and fix some of the other vi-like bindings to redirect
to the arrow and pageup/pagedown keys, rather than running the
view changes directly.
I've bound 'v' to visualize, as this is a somewhat common thing
to want to do in the merge dialog. Control (or Command) Return
is also bound to start the merge, much as it is bound in the
main window to activate the commit.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When merging branches using our local merge feature it can be
handy to know the first few digits of the commit the ref points
at as well as the short description of the branch name.
Unfortunately I'm unable to use three listboxes in a row, as Tcl
freaks out and refuses to let me have a selection in more than
one of them at any given point in time. So instead we use a
fixed width font in the existing listbox and organize the data
into three columns. Not nearly as nice looking, but users can
continue to use the listbox's features.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Johannes Sixt pointed out that git-gui was randomly selecting
which branch (or tag!) it will show in the merge dialog when
more than one ref points at the same commit. This can be a
problem for the user if they want to merge a branch, but the
ref that git-gui selected to display was actually a tag that
points at the commit at the tip of that branch. Since the
user is looking for the branch, and not the tag, its confusing
to not find it, and worse, merging the tag causes git-merge to
generate a different message than if the branch was selected.
While I am in here and am messing around I have changed the
for-each-ref usage to take advantage of its --tcl formatting,
and to fetch the subject line of the commit (or tag) we are
looking at. This way we could present the subject line in the
UI to the user, given them an even better chance to select
the correct branch.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Like the console procs I have moved the code related to merge
support into their own namespace, so that they are isolated
from the rest of the world.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To help modularize git-gui better I'm isolating the code and
variables required to handle our little console windows into
their own namespace. This way we can say console::new rather
than new_console, and the hidden internal procs to create the
window and read data from our filehandle are off in their own
private little land, where most users don't see them.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm finding it difficult to work with a 6,000+ line Tcl script
and not go insane while looking for a particular block of code.
Since most of the program is organized into different units of
functionality and not all users will need all units immediately
on startup we can improve things by splitting procs out into
multiple files and let auto_load handle things for us.
This should help not only to better organize the source, but
it may also improve startup times for some users as the Tcl
parser does not need to read as much script before it can show
the UI. In many cases the user can avoid reading at least half
of git-gui now.
Unfortunately we now need a library directory in our runtime
location. This is currently assumed to be $(sharedir)/git-gui/lib
and its expected that the Makefile invoker will setup some sort of
reasonable sharedir value for us, or let us assume its going to be
$(gitexecdir)/../share.
We now also require a tclsh (in TCL_PATH) to just run the Makefile,
as we use tclsh to generate the tclIndex for our lib directory. I'm
hoping this is not an unncessary burden on end-users who are building
from source.
I haven't really made any functionality changes here, this is just a
huge migration of code from one file to many smaller files. All of
the new changes are to setup the library path and install the library
files.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
