When calculating whether there is a d/f conflict, the calculation of
whether both sides are directories generates an incorrect references
mask because it does not use the loop index to set the correct bit.
Fix this typo.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sort filenames read from the maildir/ in a way that is more likely
to sort messages in the order the writing MUA meant to, by sorting
numeric segment in numeric order and non-numeric segment in
alphabetical order.
* jk/mailsplit-maildir-muttsort:
mailsplit: sort maildir filenames more cleverly
"git branch" had more cases where it did not bother to check
nonsense command line parameters.
* nd/branch-error-cases:
branch: segfault fixes and validation
In "git reflog expire", REACHABLE bit was not cleared from the
correct objects.
* jc/maint-reflog-expire-clean-mark-typofix:
reflog: fix typo in "reflog expire" clean-up codepath
In cases where the setting and access of a variable are
protected by the same conditional flag, older versions of
gcc would generate a "might be used unitialized" warning. We
silence the warning by initializing the variable to itself,
a hack that gcc recognizes.
Modern versions of gcc are smart enough to get this right,
going back to at least version 4.3.5. gcc 4.1 does get it
wrong in both cases, but is sufficiently old that we
probably don't need to care about it anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The translation of "completed with %d local objects" is put in a
48-byte buffer, which may be enough for English but not true for any
translations. Convert it to use strbuf (i.e. no hard limit on
translation length).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We originally thought the transition would need a period where "git add
[-u|-A]" without pathspec would be forbidden, but the warning is big
enough to scare people and teach them not to use it (or, if so, to
understand the consequences).
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In "reflog expire" we were not clearing the REACHABLE bit from
objects reachable from the tip of refs we marked earlier.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A maildir does not technically record the order in which
items were placed into it. That means that when applying a
patch series from a maildir, we may get the patches in the
wrong order. We try to work around this by sorting the
filenames. Unfortunately, this may or may not work depending
on the naming scheme used by the writer of the maildir.
For instance, mutt will write:
${epoch_seconds}.${pid}_${seq}.${host}
where we have:
- epoch_seconds: timestamp at which entry was written
- pid: PID of writing process
- seq: a sequence number to ensure uniqueness of filenames
- host: hostname
None of the numbers are zero-padded. Therefore, when we sort
the names as byte strings, entries that cross a digit
boundary (e.g., 10) will sort out of order. In the case of
timestamps, it almost never matters (because we do not cross
a digit boundary in the epoch time very often these days).
But for the sequence number, a 10-patch series would be
ordered as 1, 10, 2, 3, etc.
To fix this, we can use a custom sort comparison function
which traverses each string, comparing chunks of digits
numerically, and otherwise doing a byte-for-byte comparison.
That would sort:
123.456_1.bar
123.456_2.bar
...
123.456_10.bar
according to the sequence number. Since maildir does not
define a filename format, this is really just a heuristic.
But it happens to work for mutt, and there is a reasonable
chance that it will work for other writers, too (at least as
well as a straight sort).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git check-ignore ." segfaulted, as a function it calls deep in its
callchain took a string in the <ptr, length> form but did not stop
when given an empty string.
* as/check-ignore:
name-hash: allow hashing an empty string
t0008: document test_expect_success_multi
A couple of references still survive to .git/refs as a tree
of all refs. Fix one in docs, one in a -h message, one in
a -h message quoted in docs.
Signed-off-by: Greg Price <price@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even though "git update-index" was updated to use parse-options
infrastracture some time ago to make it possible to show list of
options with usage_with_options(), "git update-index -h" only shows
the usage. Detect this case and call usage_with_options() to show
the list of options as well.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
branch_get() can return NULL (so far on detached HEAD only) but some
code paths in builtin/branch.c cannot deal with that and cause
segfaults.
While at there, make sure to bail out when the user gives 2 or more
branches with --set-upstream-to or --unset-upstream, where only the
first branch is processed and the rest silently dropped.
Reported-by: Per Cederqvist <cederp@opera.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Usually we do not pass an empty string to the function hash_name()
because we almost always ask for hash values for a path that is a
candidate to be added to the index. However, check-ignore (and most
likely check-attr, but I didn't check) apparently has a callchain
to ask the hash value for an empty path when it was given a "." from
the top-level directory to ask "Is the path . excluded by default?"
Make sure that hash_name() does not overrun the end of the given
pathname even when it is empty.
Remove a sweep-the-issue-under-the-rug conditional in check-ignore
that avoided to pass an empty string to the callchain while at it.
It is a valid question to ask for check-ignore if the top-level is
set to be ignored by default, even though the answer is most likely
no, if only because there is currently no way to specify such an
entry in the .gitignore file. But it is an unusual thing to ask and
it is not worth optimizing for it by special casing at the top level
of the call chain.
Signed-off-by: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow the server side to redact the refs/ namespace it shows to the
client.
Will merge to 'master'.
* jc/hidden-refs:
upload/receive-pack: allow hiding ref hierarchies
upload-pack: simplify request validation
upload-pack: share more code
Instead of requiring the full 40-hex object names on the index
line, we can read submodule commit object names from the textual
diff when synthesizing a fake ancestore tree for "git am -3".
* jc/extended-fake-ancestor-for-gitlink:
apply: verify submodule commit object name better
pathspec is the most widely used term, and is the one defined in
gitglossary.txt. <filepattern> was used only in the synopsys for git-add
and git-commit, and in git-add.txt. Get rid of it.
This patch is obtained with by running:
perl -pi -e 's/filepattern/pathspec/' `git grep -l filepattern`
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make sure the similarity value shown in the "apply --summary"
output is sensible, even when the input had a bogus value.
* jk/apply-similaritly-parsing:
builtin/apply: tighten (dis)similarity index parsing
Rebasing the history of superproject with change in the submodule
has been broken since v1.7.12.
* jc/fake-ancestor-with-non-blobs:
apply: diagnose incomplete submodule object name better
apply: simplify build_fake_ancestor()
git-am: record full index line in the patch used while rebasing
Fix various error messages and conditions in "git branch", e.g. we
advertised "branch -d/-D" to remove one or more branches but actually
implemented removal of zero or more branches---request to remove no
branches was not rejected.
* nd/branch-error-cases:
branch: let branch filters imply --list
docs: clarify git-branch --list behavior
branch: mark more strings for translation
branch: give a more helpful message on redundant arguments
branch: reject -D/-d without branch name
A repository may have refs that are only used for its internal
bookkeeping purposes that should not be exposed to the others that
come over the network.
Teach upload-pack to omit some refs from its initial advertisement
by paying attention to the uploadpack.hiderefs multi-valued
configuration variable. Do the same to receive-pack via the
receive.hiderefs variable. As a convenient short-hand, allow using
transfer.hiderefs to set the value to both of these variables.
Any ref that is under the hierarchies listed on the value of these
variable is excluded from responses to requests made by "ls-remote",
"fetch", etc. (for upload-pack) and "push" (for receive-pack).
Because these hidden refs do not count as OUR_REF, an attempt to
fetch objects at the tip of them will be rejected, and because these
refs do not get advertised, "git push :" will not see local branches
that have the same name as them as "matching" ones to be sent.
An attempt to update/delete these hidden refs with an explicit
refspec, e.g. "git push origin :refs/hidden/22", is rejected. This
is not a new restriction. To the pusher, it would appear that there
is no such ref, so its push request will conclude with "Now that I
sent you all the data, it is time for you to update the refs. I saw
that the ref did not exist when I started pushing, and I want the
result to point at this commit". The receiving end will apply the
compare-and-swap rule to this request and rejects the push with
"Well, your update request conflicts with somebody else; I see there
is such a ref.", which is the right thing to do. Otherwise a push to
a hidden ref will always be "the last one wins", which is not a good
default.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rebasing the history of superproject with change in the submodule
was broken since v1.7.12.
* jc/fake-ancestor-with-non-blobs:
apply: diagnose incomplete submodule object name better
apply: simplify build_fake_ancestor()
git-am: record full index line in the patch used while rebasing
A textual patch also records the submodule commit object name in
full. Make the parsing more robust by reading from there and
verifying the (possibly abbreviated) name on the index line matches.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Clarify the ownership rule for commit->buffer field, which some
callers incorrectly accessed without making sure it is populated.
* jk/read-commit-buffer-data-after-free:
logmsg_reencode: lazily load missing commit buffers
logmsg_reencode: never return NULL
commit: drop useless xstrdup of commit message
Forbid "git add -u" and "git add -A" without pathspec run from a
subdirectory, to train people to type "." (or ":/") to make the
choice of default does not matter.
* mm/add-u-A-sans-pathspec:
add: warn when -u or -A is used without pathspec
Improve error and advice messages given locally when "git push"
refuses when it cannot compute fast-forwardness by separating these
cases from the normal "not a fast-forward; merge first and push
again" case.
* jc/push-reject-reasons:
push: finishing touches to explain REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS better
push: introduce REJECT_FETCH_FIRST and REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE
push: further simplify the logic to assign rejection reason
push: further clean up fields of "struct ref"
Configuration parsing for tar.* configuration variables were
broken. Introduce a new config-keyname parser API to make the
callers much less error prone.
* jk/config-parsing-cleanup:
reflog: use parse_config_key in config callback
help: use parse_config_key for man config
submodule: simplify memory handling in config parsing
submodule: use parse_config_key when parsing config
userdiff: drop parse_driver function
convert some config callbacks to parse_config_key
archive-tar: use parse_config_key when parsing config
config: add helper function for parsing key names
Allow a configuration variable core.commentchar to customize the
character used to comment out the hint lines in the edited text from
the default '#'.
* jc/custom-comment-char:
Allow custom "comment char"
Attempt to "branch --edit-description" an existing branch, while
being on a detached HEAD, errored out.
* nd/edit-branch-desc-while-detached:
branch: no detached HEAD check when editing another branch's description
* jc/merge-blobs:
Makefile: Replace merge-file.h with merge-blobs.h in LIB_H
merge-tree: fix d/f conflicts
merge-tree: add comments to clarify what these functions are doing
merge-tree: lose unused "resolve_directories"
merge-tree: lose unused "flags" from merge_list
Which merge_file() function do you mean?
This was prompted by an incorrect warning issued by clang [1], and a
suggestion by Linus to restrict the range to check for values greater
than INT_MAX since these will give bogus output after casting to int.
In fact the (dis)similarity index is a percentage, so reject values
greater than 100.
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/213857
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Attempt to "branch --edit-description" an existing branch, while
being on a detached HEAD, errored out.
* nd/edit-branch-desc-while-detached:
branch: no detached HEAD check when editing another branch's description
Help "fetch only" repositories that do not trigger "gc --auto"
often enough.
* jk/gc-auto-after-fetch:
fetch-pack: avoid repeatedly re-scanning pack directory
fetch: run gc --auto after fetching
We stopped paying attention to $GIT_CONFIG environment that points
at a single configuration file from any command other than "git config"
quite a while ago, but "git clone" internally set, exported, and
then unexported the variable during its operation unnecessarily.
* jc/no-git-config-in-clone:
clone: do not export and unexport GIT_CONFIG
"git fetch --depth" was broken in at least three ways. The
resulting history was deeper than specified by one commit, it was
unclear how to wipe the shallowness of the repository with the
command, and documentation was misleading.
* nd/fetch-depth-is-broken:
fetch: elaborate --depth action
upload-pack: fix off-by-one depth calculation in shallow clone
fetch: add --unshallow for turning shallow repo into complete one
"git am -3" uses this function to build a tree that records how the
preimage the patch was created from would have looked like. An
abbreviated object name on the index line is ordinarily sufficient
for us to figure out the object name the preimage tree would have
contained, but a change to a submodule by definition shows an object
name of a submodule commit which our repository should not have, and
get_sha1_blob() is not an appropriate way to read it (or get_sha1()
for that matter).
Use get_sha1_hex() and complain if we do not find a full object name
there.
We could read from the payload part of the patch to learn the full
object name of the commit, but the primary user "git rebase" has
been fixed to give us a full object name, so this should suffice
for now.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The local variable sha1_ptr in the build_fake_ancestor() function
used to either point at the null_sha1[] (if the ancestor did not
have the path) or at sha1[] (if we read the object name into the
local array), but 7a98869 (apply: get rid of --index-info in favor
of --build-fake-ancestor, 2007-09-17) made the "missing in the
ancestor" case unnecessary, hence sha1_ptr, when used, always points
at the local array.
Get rid of the unneeded variable, and restructure the if/else
cascade a bit to make it easier to read. There should be no
behaviour change.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, a branch filter like `--contains`, `--merged`, or
`--no-merged` is ignored when we are not in listing mode.
For example:
git branch --contains=foo bar
will create the branch "bar" from the current HEAD, ignoring
the `--contains` argument entirely. This is not very
helpful. There are two reasonable behaviors for git here:
1. Flag an error; the arguments do not make sense.
2. Implicitly go into `--list` mode
This patch chooses the latter, as it is more convenient, and
there should not be any ambiguity with attempting to create
a branch; using `--contains` and not wanting to list is
nonsensical.
That leaves the case where an explicit modification option
like `-d` is given. We already catch the case where
`--list` is given alongside `-d` and flag an error. With
this patch, we will also catch the use of `--contains` and
other filter options alongside `-d`.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
