git-add reads this variable, and honours the contents of that file if that
exists. Match this behaviour in git-status, too.
Noticed by Evan Carroll on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Noticed that there were only tests for --int, but not
for --bool. Add some.
Signed-off-by: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
For tracking branches and tags, git-svn prefers to connect
to the root of the repository or at least the level that
houses branches and tags as well as trunk. However, users
that are accustomed to tracking a single directory have
no use for this feature.
As pointed out by Junio, users may not have permissions to
connect to connect to a higher-level path in the repository.
While the current minimize_url() function detects lack of
permissions to certain paths _after_ successful logins, it
cannot effectively determine if it is trying to access a
login-only portion of a repo when the user expects to
connect to a part where anonymous access is allowed.
For people used to the git-svnimport switches of
--trunk, --tags, --branches, they'll already pass the
repository root (or root+subdirectory), so minimize URL
isn't of too much use to them, either.
For people *not* used to git-svnimport, git-svn also
supports:
git svn init --minimize-url \
--trunk http://repository-root/foo/trunk \
--branches http://repository-root/foo/branches \
--tags http://repository-root/foo/tags
And this is where the new --minimize-url command-line switch
comes in to allow for this behavior to continue working.
You cannot currently checkout the tip of an existing branch
without moving to the branch.
This allows you to detach your HEAD and place it at such a
commit, with:
$ git checkout master^0
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Fix t4200 so that it also works on OS X by not relying on gnu
extensions to sed.
Signed-off-by: Bryan Larsen <bryan@larsen.st>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The function common_prefix() is used to find the common subdirectory of
a couple of pathnames. When checking if the next pathname matches up with
the prefix, it incorrectly checked the whole path, not just the prefix
(including the slash). Thus, the expensive part of the loop was executed
always.
The other bug is more serious: if the first and the last pathname in the
list have a longer common prefix than the common prefix for _all_ pathnames
in the list, the longer one would be chosen. This bug was probably hidden
by the fact that bash's wildcard expansion sorts the results, and the code
just so happens to work with sorted input.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Noticed by applying two diffs of different contexts to the same file.
The check for existence of a file was wrong: the test assumed it was
a directory and reset the errno (twice: directly and by calling
lstat). So if an entry existed and was _not_ a directory no attempt
was made to rename into it, because the errno (expected by renaming
code) was already reset to 0. This resulted in error:
fatal: unable to write file file mode 100644
For Linux, removing "errno = 0" is enough, as lstat wont modify errno
if it was successful. The behavior should not be depended upon,
though, so modify the "if" as well.
The test simulates this situation.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In the test 'compare delta flavors', /usr/bin/stat is used to get file size.
This isn't portable. There already is a dependency on Perl, use its '-s'
operator to get the file size.
Signed-off-by: Arjen Laarhoven <arjen@yaph.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The renaming without config test changed a branch from q to Q, which
fails on non-case sensitive file systems. Change the test to use q
and q2.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If the user is trying to apply a Git generated diff file and they
have specified a -p<n> option, where <n> is not 1, the user probably
has a good reason for doing this. Such as they are me, trying to
apply a patch generated in git.git for the git-gui subdirectory to
the git-gui.git repository, where there is no git-gui subdirectory
present.
Users shouldn't supply -p2 unless they mean it. But if they are
supplying it, they probably have thought about how to make this
patch apply to their working directory, and want to risk whatever
results may come from that.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Make git_config_rename_section return success if no config file
exists. Otherwise, renaming a branch would abort, leaving the
repository in an inconsistent state.
[jc: test]
Signed-off-by: Geert Bosch <bosch@gnat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Commit 64edf4b2 cleaned up the initialization of git-archive,
at the cost of 'git-archive --list' now requiring a git repo.
This patch reverts the cleanup and documents the requirement
for this particular dirtyness in a test.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The earlier code does not swap hunks when the beginning of the
first side is identical to the whole of the second side. In
such a case, the first one should sort later.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
On OS X, wc outputs 6 spaces before the number of lines, so the test
expecting the string "10" failed. Do not quote $cmd to strip away
the problematic whitespace as other tests do.
Also fix the grammar of the test name while making changes to it.
There's only one preimage, so it's "has", not "have".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When a file has more then one conflicting hunks, it repeated the
contents of previous hunks in output for later ones.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Don't translate the patch to UTF-8, instead preserve the data as
is. This also reverts a test case that was included in the
original patch series.
Also allow overwriting the authorship and title information we
gather from RFC2822 mail headers with additional in-body
headers, which was pointed out by Linus.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Elias Pipping:
> I'm on a mac, hence /usr/bin/sed is not gnu sed, which makes
> t4118 fail.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Ack'd-by: Elias Pipping <pipping@macports.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There are two breakages in the %P/%p interpolation. It appended
an excess SP at the end of the list, and it gave uninitialized
contents of a buffer on the stack for root commits.
This fixes it, while updating the t6006 test which expected the
wrong output.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
These could stand to be a little more complex, but it should
at least catch obvious problems (like the recently fixed %ct
bug).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This idea was suggested by Bill Lear
(Message-ID: <17920.38942.364466.642979@lisa.zopyra.com>)
and I think it is a very good one.
This patch adds a new test file for "git bisect run", but there
is currently only one basic test.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Elias Pipping:
> I'm on a mac, hence /usr/bin/sed is not gnu sed, which makes
> t4118 fail.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Ack'd-by: Elias Pipping <pipping@macports.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Waaaaaaay back Git was considered to be secure as it never overwrote
an object it already had. This was ensured by always unpacking the
packfile received over the network (both in fetch and receive-pack)
and our already existing logic to not create a loose object for an
object we already have.
Lately however we keep "large-ish" packfiles on both fetch and push
by running them through index-pack instead of unpack-objects. This
would let an attacker perform a birthday attack.
How? Assume the attacker knows a SHA-1 that has two different
data streams. He knows the client is likely to have the "good"
one. So he sends the "evil" variant to the other end as part of
a "large-ish" packfile. The recipient keeps that packfile, and
indexes it. Now since this is a birthday attack there is a SHA-1
collision; two objects exist in the repository with the same SHA-1.
They have *very* different data streams. One of them is "evil".
Currently the poor recipient cannot tell the two objects apart,
short of by examining the timestamp of the packfiles. But lets
say the recipient repacks before he realizes he's been attacked.
We may wind up packing the "evil" version of the object, and deleting
the "good" one. This is made *even more likely* by Junio's recent
rearrange_packed_git patch (b867092f).
It is extremely unlikely for a SHA1 collisions to occur, but if it
ever happens with a remote (hence untrusted) object we simply must
not let the fetch succeed.
Normally received packs should not contain objects we already have.
But when they do we must ensure duplicated objects with the same SHA1
actually contain the same data.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* ar/diff:
Add tests for --quiet option of diff programs
try-to-simplify-commit: use diff-tree --quiet machinery.
revision.c: explain what tree_difference does
Teach --quiet to diff backends.
diff --quiet
Remove unused diffcore_std_no_resolve
Allow git-diff exit with codes similar to diff(1)
Make sure pack-objects with --delta-base-offset works fine, and that
it actually produces smaller packs as expected.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The 'use packed deltified objects' test was flawed as it failed to
remove the pack and index from the previous test, effectively preventing
the desired pack from being exercised as objects could be found in that
other pack instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch adds support for a dummy remote '.' to avoid having
to declare a fake remote like
[remote "local"]
url = .
fetch = refs/heads/*:refs/heads/*
Such a builtin remote simplifies the operation of "git-fetch",
which will populate FETCH_HEAD but will not pretend that two
repositories are in use, will not create a thin pack, and will
not perform any useless remapping of names. The speed
improvement is around 20%, and it should improve more if
"git-fetch" is converted to a builtin.
To this end, git-parse-remote is grown with a new kind of
remote, 'builtin'. In git-fetch.sh, we treat the builtin remote
specially in that it needs no pack/store operations. In fact,
doing git-fetch on a builtin remote will simply populate
FETCH_HEAD appropriately.
The patch also improves of the --track/--no-track support,
extending it so that branch.<name>.remote items referring '.'
can be created. Finally, it fixes a typo in git-checkout.sh.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This introduces a new command-line option: --exit-code. The diff
programs will return 1 for differences, return 0 for equality, and
something else for errors.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I am working on a project that required parsing through regular
mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I
started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working
from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to
handle a big chunk of my email.
After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more
limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk
of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features
that I needed in order for me do what I wanted.
Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think
any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the
boundary stuff).
List of major changes/fixes:
- can't create empty patch files fix
- empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am
- multipart boundaries are now handled
- only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those
headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers
- decode and filter base64 patches correctly
- various other accidental fixes
I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or
compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really
only the empty patch file).
I tested this through various mailing list archives and
everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails).
[jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to
fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.]
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/fastimport:
Remove unnecessary casts from fast-import
New fast-import test case for valid tree sorting
fast-import: grow tree storage more aggressively
POSIX says sed may add a trailing LF if there isn't already
one there. We shouldn't rely on it not adding that LF, as
some systems (Mac OS X for example) will add it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The Git tree sorting convention is more complex than just the name,
it needs to include the mode too to make sure trees sort as though
their name ends with "/".
This is a simple test case that verifies fast-import keeps the tree
ordering correct after editing the same tree twice in a single
input stream. A recent proposed patch series (that has not yet
been applied) will cause this test to fail, due to a bug in the
way the series handles sorting within the trees.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
* jc/boundary:
git-bundle: prevent overwriting existing bundles
git-bundle: die if a given ref is not included in bundle
git-bundle: handle thin packs in subcommand "unbundle"
git-bundle: Make thin packs
git-bundle: avoid packing objects which are in the prerequisites
bundle: fix wrong check of read_header()'s return value & add tests
revision --boundary: fix uncounted case.
revision --boundary: fix stupid typo
git-bundle: make verify a bit more chatty.
revision traversal: SHOWN means shown
git-bundle: various fixups
revision traversal: retire BOUNDARY_SHOW
revision walker: Fix --boundary when limited
Sergey Vlasov, Andy Parkins and Alex Riesen all pointed out that it
is possible for a single invocation of receive-pack to be given more
refs than the OS might allow us to pass as command line parameters
to a single hook invocation.
We don't want to break these up into multiple invocations (like
xargs might do) as that makes it impossible for the pre-receive
hook to verify multiple related ref updates occur at the same time,
and it makes it harder for post-receive to send out a single batch
notification.
Instead we pass the reference data on a pipe connected to the
hook's stdin, supplying one ref per line to the hook. This way a
single hook invocation can obtain an infinite amount of ref data,
without bumping into any operating system limits.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In order to track and build on top of a branch 'topic' you track from
your upstream repository, you often would end up doing this sequence:
git checkout -b mytopic origin/topic
git config --add branch.mytopic.remote origin
git config --add branch.mytopic.merge refs/heads/topic
This would first fork your own 'mytopic' branch from the 'topic'
branch you track from the 'origin' repository; then it would set up two
configuration variables so that 'git pull' without parameters does the
right thing while you are on your own 'mytopic' branch.
This commit adds a --track option to git-branch, so that "git
branch --track mytopic origin/topic" performs the latter two actions
when creating your 'mytopic' branch.
If the configuration variable branch.autosetupmerge is set to true, you
do not have to pass the --track option explicitly; further patches in
this series allow setting the variable with a "git remote add" option.
The configuration variable is off by default, and there is a --no-track
option to countermand it even if the variable is set.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
* js/diff-ni:
Get rid of the dependency to GNU diff in the tests
diff --no-index: support /dev/null as filename
diff-ni: fix the diff with standard input
diff: support reading a file from stdin via "-"
* 'master' of git://repo.or.cz/git/fastimport:
Allow fast-import frontends to reload the marks table
Use atomic updates to the fast-import mark file
Preallocate memory earlier in fast-import
When saying something like "--since=1.day.ago" or "--max-count=5",
git-bundle finds the boundary commits which are recorded as
prerequisites. However, it failed to tell pack-objects _not_ to
pack the objects which are in these.
Fix that. And add a test for that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I'm giving fast-import a lesson on how to reload the marks table
using the same format it outputs with --export-marks. This way
a frontend can reload the marks table from a prior import, making
incremental imports less painful.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Bill Lear pointed out that it is easy to send out notifications of
changes with the update hook, but successful execution of the update
hook does not necessarily mean that the ref was actually updated.
Lock contention on the ref or being unable to append to the reflog
may prevent the ref from being changed. Sending out notifications
prior to the ref actually changing is very misleading.
To help this situation I am introducing two new hooks to the
receive-pack flow: pre-receive and post-receive. These new hooks
are invoked only once per receive-pack execution and are passed
three arguments per ref (refname, old-sha1, new-sha1).
The new post-receive hook is ideal for sending out notifications,
as it has the complete list of all refnames that were successfully
updated as well as the old and new SHA-1 values. This allows more
interesting notifications to be sent. Multiple ref updates could
be easily summarized into one email, for example.
The new pre-receive hook is ideal for logging update attempts, as it
is run only once for the entire receive-pack operation. It can also
be used to verify multiple updates happen at once, e.g. an update
to the `maint` head must also be accompained by a new annotated tag.
Lots of documentation improvements for receive-pack are included
in this change, as we want to make sure the new hooks are clearly
explained.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
