* jk/argv-array:
run_hook: use argv_array API
checkout: use argv_array API
bisect: use argv_array API
quote: provide sq_dequote_to_argv_array
refactor argv_array into generic code
quote.h: fix bogus comment
add sha1_array API docs
* maint-1.7.6:
notes_merge_commit(): do not pass temporary buffer to other function
gitweb: Fix links to lines in blobs when javascript-actions are enabled
mergetool: no longer need to save standard input
mergetool: Use args as pathspec to unmerged files
t9159-*.sh: skip for mergeinfo test for svn <= 1.4
date.c: Support iso8601 timezone formats
remote: only update remote-tracking branch if updating refspec
remote rename: warn when refspec was not updated
remote: "rename o foo" should not rename ref "origin/bar"
remote: write correct fetch spec when renaming remote 'remote'
* mz/remote-rename:
remote: only update remote-tracking branch if updating refspec
remote rename: warn when refspec was not updated
remote: "rename o foo" should not rename ref "origin/bar"
remote: write correct fetch spec when renaming remote 'remote'
* nd/maint-autofix-tag-in-head:
Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
merge: remove global variable head[]
merge: use return value of resolve_ref() to determine if HEAD is invalid
merge: keep stash[] a local variable
Conflicts:
builtin/merge.c
I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
to have patched.
Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
The above is on glibc-based systems. On other systems, rather than
getting "null", you may provoke a segfault as git tries to
dereference the NULL file name.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous logic in show_config was to print the delimiter when the
value was set, but Boolean variables have an implicit value "true" when
they appear with no value in the config file. As a result, we got:
git_Config --get-regexp '.*\.Boolean' #1. Ok: example.boolean
git_Config --bool --get-regexp '.*\.Boolean' #2. NO: example.booleantrue
Fix this by defering the display of the separator until after the value
to display has been computed.
Reported-by: Brian Foster <brian.foster@maxim-ic.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make ERR as first packet of remote snapshot reply work like it does in
fetch/push. Lets servers decline remote snapshot with message the same
way as declining fetch/push with a message.
Signed-off-by: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Checking paths out of a tree is (currently) defined to do:
- Grab the paths from the named tree that match the given pathspec,
and add them to the index;
- Check out the contents from the index for paths that match the
pathspec to the working tree; and while at it
- If the given pathspec did not match anything, suspect a typo from the
command line and error out without updating the index nor the working
tree.
Suppose that the branch you are working on has dir/myfile, and the "other"
branch has dir/other but not dir/myfile. Further imagine that you have
either modified or removed dir/myfile in your working tree, but you have
not run "git add dir/myfile" or "git rm dir/myfile" to tell Git about your
local change. Running
$ git checkout other dir
would add dir/other to the index with the contents taken out of the
"other" branch, and check out the paths from the index that match the
pathspec "dir", namely, "dir/other" and "dir/myfile", overwriting your
local changes to "dir/myfile", even though "other" branch does not even
know about that file.
Fix it by updating the working tree only with the index entries that
was read from the "other" tree.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running git describe --dirty the index should be refreshed. Previously
the cached index would cause describe to think that the index was dirty when,
in reality, it was just stale.
The issue was exposed by python setuptools which hardlinks files into another
directory when building a distribution.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
get_one_patchid() uses a rather dumb heuristic to determine if the
passed buffer is part of the next commit. Whenever the first 40 bytes
are a valid hexadecimal sha1 representation, get_one_patchid() returns
next_sha1.
Once the current line is longer than the fixed buffer, this will break
(provided the additional bytes make a valid hexadecimal sha1). As a result
patch-id returns incorrect results. Instead, use strbuf and read one line
at a time.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Schubert <mschub@elegosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the usual "git" transport, a large-ish transfer with "git fetch" and
"git pull" give progress eye-candy to avoid boring users. However, not
when they are reading from a bundle. I.e.
$ git pull ../git-bundle.bndl master
This teaches bundle.c:unbundle() to give "-v" option to index-pack and
tell it to give progress bar when transport decides it is necessary.
The operation in the other direction, "git bundle create", could also
learn to honor --quiet but that is a separate issue.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
HEAD and MERGE_HEAD (among other branch tips) should never hold a
tag. That can only be caused by broken tools and is cumbersome to fix
by an end user with:
$ git update-ref HEAD $(git rev-parse HEAD^{commit})
which may look like a magic to a new person.
Be easy, warn users (so broken tools can be fixed if they bother to
report) and move on.
Be robust, if the given SHA-1 cannot be resolved to a commit object,
die (therefore return value is always valid).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also kill head_invalid in favor of "head_commit == NULL".
Local variable "head" in cmd_merge() is renamed to "head_sha1" to make
sure I don't miss any access because this variable should not be used
after head_commit is set (use head_commit->object.sha1 instead).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
resolve_ref() only updates "head" when it returns non NULL value (it
may update "head" even when returning NULL, but not in all cases).
Because "head" is not initialized before the call, is_null_sha1() is
not enough. Check also resolve_ref() return value.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git branch" command, while not in listing mode, calls create_branch()
even when the target branch already exists, and it does so even when it is
not interested in updating the value of the branch (i.e. the name of the
commit object that sits at the tip of the existing branch). This happens
when the command is run with "--set-upstream" option.
The earlier safety-measure to prevent "git branch -f $branch $commit" from
updating the currently checked out branch did not take it into account,
and we no longer can update the tracking information of the current branch.
Minimally fix this regression by telling the validation code if it is
called to really update the value of a potentially existing branch, or if
the caller merely is interested in updating auxiliary aspects of a branch.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Jay Soffian
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We were using a similar ad-hoc rev_list_args structure, but
this saves some code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Running a hook has to make complex set-up to establish web of
communication between child process and multiplexer, which is common
regardless of what kind of data is fed to the hook. Refactor the parts
that is specific to the data fed to the particular set of hooks from the
part that runs the hook, so that the code can be reused to drive hooks
that take different kind of data.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
commit c9bfb953 (want_color: automatically fallback to color.ui,
2011-08-17) introduced a regression where format-patch produces colorized
patches when color.ui is set to "always".
In f3aafa4 (Disable color detection during format-patch, 2006-07-09),
git_format_config was taught to intercept diff.color to avoid passing it
down to git_log_config and later, git_diff_ui_config.
Teach git_format_config to intercept color.ui in the same way.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git remote rename' will only update the remote's fetch refspec if it
looks like a default one. If the remote has no default fetch refspec,
as in
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/upstream/*
we would not update the fetch refspec and even if there is a ref
called "refs/remotes/origin/master", we should not rename it, since it
was not created by fetching from the remote.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When renaming a remote, we also try to update the fetch refspec
accordingly, but only if it has the default format. For others, such
as refs/heads/master:refs/heads/origin, we are conservative and leave
it untouched. Let's give the user a warning about refspecs that are
not updated, so he can manually update the config if necessary.
Suggested-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When renaming a remote called 'o' using 'git remote rename o foo', git
should also rename any remote-tracking branches for the remote. This
does happen, but any remote-tracking branches starting with
'refs/remotes/o', such as 'refs/remotes/origin/bar', will also be
renamed (to 'refs/remotes/foorigin/bar' in this case).
Fix it by simply matching one more character, up to the slash
following the remote name.
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When renaming a remote whose name is contained in a configured fetch
refspec for that remote, we currently replace the first occurrence of
the remote name in the refspec. This is correct in most cases, but
breaks if the remote name occurs in the fetch refspec before the
expected place. For example, we currently change
[remote "remote"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/remote/*
into
[remote "origin"]
url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git
fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/origins/remote/*
Reduce the risk of changing incorrect sections of the refspec by
matching the entire ":refs/remotes/<name>/" instead of just "<name>".
Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Asking fwrite() to write one item of size bytes results in fwrite()
reporting "I wrote zero item", when size is zero. Instead, we could
ask it to write "size" items of 1 byte and expect it to report that
"I wrote size items" when it succeeds, with any value of size,
including zero.
Noticed and reported by BJ Hargrave.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It makes no sense to do the - possibly very expensive - call to "rev-list
<new-ref-sha1> --not --all" in check_for_new_submodule_commits() when
there aren't any submodules configured.
Leave check_for_new_submodule_commits() early when no name <-> path
mappings for submodules are found in the configuration. To make that work
reading the configuration had to be moved further up in cmd_fetch(), as
doing that after the actual fetch of the superproject was too late.
Reported-by: Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit ffa69e61d3, reversing
changes made to 4a13c4d148.
Adding a new command line option to receive-pack and feed it from
send-pack is not an acceptable way to add features, as there is no
guarantee that your updated send-pack will be talking to updated
receive-pack. New features need to be added via the capability mechanism
negotiated over the protocol.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
