Commit Graph

111 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Torvalds
521a4f4cf4 git-pack-objects: do the delta search in reverse size order
Starting from big objects and going backwards means that we end up
picking a delta that goes from a bigger object to a smaller one.  That's
advantageous for two reasons: the bigger object is likely the newer one
(since things tend to grow, rather than shrink), and doing a delete
tends to be smaller than doing an add.

So the deltas don't tend to be top-of-tree, and the packed end result is
just slightly smaller.
2005-06-26 13:43:41 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
c4fb06c0d0 Fix object packing/unpacking.
This actually successfully packed and unpacked a git archive down to
1.3MB (17MB unpacked).

Right now unpacking is way too noisy, lots of debug messages left.
2005-06-26 08:40:08 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
8ee378a0f0 [PATCH] Finish initial cut of git-pack-object/git-unpack-object pair.
This finishes the initial round of git-pack-object /
git-unpack-object pair.  They are now good enough to be used as
a transport medium:

 - Fix delta direction in pack-objects; the original was
   computing delta to create the base object from the object to
   be squashed, which was quite unfriendly for unpacker ;-).

 - Add a script to test the very basics.

 - Implement unpacker for both regular and deltified objects.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-26 07:33:23 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
d116a45a9a Add "--depth=N" parameter to git-pack-objects to limit maximum delta depth
It too defaults to 10. A nice round random number.
2005-06-25 20:17:59 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
f846bbff15 git-pack-objects: make "--window=x" semantics more logical.
A zero disables delta generation (like before), but we make the window
be one bigger than specified, since we use one entry for the one to be
tested (it used to be that "--window=1" was meaningless, since we'd have
used up the single-entry window with the entry to be tested, and had no
chance of actually ever finding a delta).

The default window remains at 10, but now it really means "test the 10
closest objects", not "test the 9 closest objects".
2005-06-25 19:35:47 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
75c42d8cc3 Add a "max_size" parameter to diff_delta()
Anything that generates a delta to see if two objects are close usually
isn't interested in the delta ends up being bigger than some specified
size, and this allows us to stop delta generation early when that
happens.
2005-06-25 19:30:20 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
78817c15de Fix delta "sliding window" code
When Junio fixed the lack of a successful error code from try_delta(),
that uncovered an off-by-one error in the caller.

Also, some testing made it clear that we now find a lot more deltas,
because we used to (incorrectly) break early on bogus "failure"
cases.
2005-06-25 18:29:23 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
eb41ab11e8 [PATCH] (patchlet) pack-objects.c: try_delta()
Return value of try_delta is checked for negativeness, but the
success path does not return anything, letting compiler warn and
presumably return garbage.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-06-25 18:12:07 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
d38c3721a1 git-pack-objects: mark the delta packing with a 'D'.
When writing a delta, we take the real type from the object we're
doing the delta against, and just write a 'D' as the type of the
current object.
2005-06-25 15:58:42 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
49397104f2 git-pack-objects: fix typo
("<" should be "=")
2005-06-25 15:24:30 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
c323ac7d9c git-pack-objects: create a packed object representation.
This is kind of like a tar-ball for a set of objects, ready to be
shipped off to another end.  Alternatively, you could use is as a packed
representation of the object database directly, if you changed
"read_sha1_file()" to read these kinds of packs.

The latter is partiularly useful to generate a "packed history", ie you
could pack up your old history efficiently, but still have it available
(at a performance hit, of course).

I haven't actually written an unpacker yet, so the end result has not
been verified in any way yet.  I obviously always write bug-free code,
so it just has to work, no?
2005-06-25 14:42:43 -07:00