Introduce tests for a variety of `git update-index` use cases, including
performance scenarios. Tests are intended to exercise `update-index` with
options that change the commands interaction with the index (e.g.,
`--again`) and with files/directories inside and outside a sparse checkout
cone.
Of note is that these tests clearly establish the behavior of `git
update-index --add` with untracked, outside-of-cone files. Unlike `git add`,
which fails with an error when provided with such files, `update-index`
succeeds in adding them to the index. Additionally, the `skip-worktree` flag
is *not* automatically added to the new entry. Although this is pre-existing
behavior, there are a couple of reasons to avoid changing it in favor of
consistency with e.g. `git add`:
* `update-index` is low-level command for modifying the index; while it can
perform operations similar to those of `add`, it traditionally has fewer
"guardrails" preventing a user from doing something they may not want to
do (in this case, adding an outside-of-cone, non-`skip-worktree` file to
the index)
* `update-index` typically only exits with an error code if it is incapable
of performing an operation (e.g., if an internal function call fails);
adding a new file outside the sparse checkout definition is still a valid
operation, albeit an inadvisable one
* `update-index` does not implicitly set flags (e.g., `skip-worktree`) when
creating new index entries with `--add`; if flags need to be updated,
options like `--[no-]skip-worktree` allow a user to intentionally set them
All this to say that, while there are valid reasons to consider changing the
treatment of outside-of-cone files in `update-index`, there are also
sufficient reasons for leaving it as-is.
Co-authored-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add repository settings to allow usage of the sparse index.
When using the `--all` option, sparse directories are ignored by default due
to the `skip-worktree` flag, so there is no need to expand the index. If
`--ignore-skip-worktree-bits` is specified, the index is expanded in order
to check out all files.
When checking out individual files, existing behavior in a full index is to
exit with an error if a directory is specified (as the directory name will
not match an index entry). However, it is possible in a sparse index to
match a directory name to a sparse directory index entry, but checking out
that sparse directory still results in an error on checkout. To reduce some
potential confusion for users, `checkout_file(...)` explicitly exits with an
informative error if provided with a sparse directory name. The test
corresponding to this scenario verifies the error message, which now differs
between sparse index and non-sparse index checkouts.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update `checkout-index` to no longer refresh files that have the
`skip-worktree` bit set, exiting with an error if `skip-worktree` filenames
are directly provided to `checkout-index`. The newly-added
`--ignore-skip-worktree-bits` option provides a mechanism to replicate the
old behavior, checking out *all* files specified (even those with
`skip-worktree` enabled).
The ability to toggle whether files should be checked-out based on
`skip-worktree` already exists in `git checkout` and `git restore` (both of
which have an `--ignore-skip-worktree-bits` option). The change to, by
default, ignore `skip-worktree` files is especially helpful for
sparse-checkout; it prevents inadvertent creation of files outside the
sparse definition on disk and eliminates the need to expand a sparse index
when using the `--all` option.
Internal usage of `checkout-index` in `git stash` and `git filter-branch` do
not make explicit use of files with `skip-worktree` enabled, so
`--ignore-skip-worktree-bits` is not added to them.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add tests to cover `checkout-index`, with a focus on cases interesting in a
sparse checkout (e.g., files specified outside sparse checkout definition).
New tests are intended to serve as a baseline for existing and/or expected
behavior and performance when integrating `checkout-index` with the sparse
index. Note that the test 'checkout-index --all' is marked as
'test_expect_failure', indicating that `update-index --all` will be modified
in a subsequent patch to behave as the test expects.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove full index requirement for `git clean` and test to ensure the index
is not expanded in `git clean`. Add to existing test for `git clean` to
verify cleanup of untracked files in sparse directories is consistent
between sparse index and non-sparse index checkouts.
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rearrange conditions in method determining whether index expansion is
necessary when a pathspec is specified for `git reset`, placing less
expensive condition first. Additionally, add details & examples to related
code comments to help with readability.
Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update t1092 test 'reset with pathspecs outside sparse definition' to verify
index contents. The use of `rev-parse` verifies the contents of HEAD, not
the index, providing no real validation of the reset results. Conversely,
`ls-files` reports the contents of the index (OIDs, flags, filenames), which
are then compared across checkouts to ensure compatible index states.
Fixes 741a2c9ffa (reset: expand test coverage for sparse checkouts,
2021-09-27).
Signed-off-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change code added in 1ae2b8cda8 (reftable: add merged table view,
2021-10-07) to consistently use the "uint64_t" type. These "min" and
"max" variables get passed in the body of this function to a function
whose prototype is:
[...] reftable_writer_set_limits([...], uint64_t min, uint64_t max
This avoids the following warning on SunCC 12.5 on
gcc211.fsffrance.org:
"reftable/merged_test.c", line 27: warning: initializer does not fit or is out of range: 0xffffffff
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apparently, the IBM xlc compiler doesn't like this.
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A test case wants to append stuff to a loose object file to ensure
that this kind of corruption is detected. To make a read-only loose
object file writable with chmod, it is not necessary to also make
it executable. Replace the bitmask 755 with the instruction +w to
request only the write bit and to also heed the umask. And get rid
of a POSIXPERM prerequisite, which is unnecessary for the test.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a logic error in refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() introduced in a recent
series of mine to abstract the refs API away from errno. See
96f6623ada (Merge branch 'ab/refs-errno-cleanup', 2021-11-29)for that
series.
In that series introduction of "failure_errno" to
refs_resolve_ref_unsafe came in ef18119dec (refs API: add a version
of refs_resolve_ref_unsafe() with "errno", 2021-10-16). There we'd set
"errno = 0" immediately before refs_read_raw_ref(), and then set
"failure_errno" to "errno" if errno was non-zero afterwards.
Then in the next commit 8b72fea7e9 (refs API: make
refs_read_raw_ref() not set errno, 2021-10-16) we started expecting
"refs_read_raw_ref()" to set "failure_errno". It would do that if
refs_read_raw_ref() failed, but it wouldn't be the same errno.
So we might set the "errno" here to any arbitrary bad value, and end
up e.g. returning NULL when we meant to return the refname from
refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(), or the other way around. Instrumenting this
code will reveal cases where refs_read_raw_ref() will fail, and
"errno" and "failure_errno" will be set to different values.
In practice I haven't found a case where this scary bug changed
anything in practice. The reason for that is that we'll not care about
the actual value of "errno" here per-se, but only whether:
1. We have an errno
2. If it's one of ENOENT, EISDIR or ENOTDIR. See the adjacent code
added in a1c1d8170d (refs_resolve_ref_unsafe: handle d/f
conflicts for writes, 2017-10-06)
I.e. if we clobber "failure_errno" with "errno", but it happened to be
one of those three, and we'll clobber it with another one of the three
we were OK.
Perhaps there are cases where the difference ended up mattering, but I
haven't found them. Instrumenting the test suite to fail if "errno"
and "failure_errno" are different shows a lot of failures, checking if
they're different *and* one is but not the other is outside that list
of three "errno" values yields no failures.
But let's fix the obvious bug. We should just stop paying attention to
"errno" in refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(). In addition let's change the
partial resetting of "errno" in files_read_raw_ref() to happen just
before the "return", to ensure that any such bug will be more easily
spotted in the future.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Translate new messages
- Translate the word 'cone' instead of leaving it verbatim
(in the context of sparse checkout)
- Make translations of 'failed to' consistent
Signed-off-by: Fangyi Zhou <me@fangyi.io>
Reviewed-by: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: 依云 <lilydjwg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Some lockfile code called free() in signal-death code path, which
has been corrected.
* ps/lockfile-cleanup-fix:
fetch: fix deadlock when cleaning up lockfiles in async signals
"git merge $signed_tag" started to drop the tag message from the
default merge message it uses by accident, which has been corrected.
* fs/ssh-signing-key-lifetime:
fmt-merge-msg: prevent use-after-free with signed tags
Notably, it lacks uncompress2(); use the fallback we ship in our
tree instead.
Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
shift count being exactly at 7-bit smaller than the long is OK; on
32-bit architecture, shift count starts at 4 and goes through 11, 18
and 25, at which point the guard triggers one iteration too early.
Reported-by: Marc Strapetz <marc.strapetz@syntevo.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To test for a key that is completely unknown to the keyring we need one
to sign the commit with. This was done by generating a new key and not
add it into the keyring. To avoid the key generation overhead and
problems where GPG did hang in CI during it, switch GNUPGHOME to the
empty $GNUPGHOME_NOT_USED instead, therefore making all used keys unknown
for this single `verify-commit` call.
Reported-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Stelzer <fs@gigacodes.de>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is useful to know when a branch first diverged in history
from some integration branch in order to be able to enumerate
the user's local changes. However, these local changes can
include arbitrary merges, so it is necessary to ignore this
merge structure when finding the divergence point.
In order to do this, teach the "rev-list" family to accept
"--exclude-first-parent-only", which restricts the traversal
of excluded commits to only follow first parent links.
-A-----E-F-G--main
\ / /
B-C-D--topic
In this example, the goal is to return the set {B, C, D} which
represents a topic branch that has been merged into main branch.
`git rev-list topic ^main` will end up returning no commits
since excluding main will end up traversing the commits on topic
as well. `git rev-list --exclude-first-parent-only topic ^main`
however will return {B, C, D} as desired.
Add docs for the new flag, and clarify the doc for --first-parent
to indicate that it applies to traversing the set of included
commits only.
Signed-off-by: Jerry Zhang <jerry@skydio.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The message introduced by commit 593a2a5d06 (branch: protect branches
checked out in all worktrees, 2021-12-01) is missing a space in the
first line, add it.
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The C reimplementation of "add -p" fails to split the last hunk in a
file if hunk ends with an addition or deletion without any post context
line unless it is the last file to be processed.
To determine whether a hunk can be split a counter is incremented each
time a context line follows an insertion or deletion. If at the end of
the hunk the value of this counter is greater than one then the hunk
can be split into that number of smaller hunks. If the last hunk in a
file ends with an insertion or deletion then there is no following
context line and the counter will not be incremented. This case is
already handled at the end of the loop where counter is incremented if
the last hunk ended with an insertion or deletion. Unfortunately there
is no similar check between files (likely because the perl version
only ever parses one diff at a time). Fix this by checking if the last
hunk ended with an insertion or deletion when we see the diff header
of a new file and extend the existing regression test.
Reproted-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Clean up some test constructs in preparation for extending the tests
in the next commit. There are three small changes, I've grouped them
together as they're so small it didn't seem worth creating three
separate commits.
1 - "cat file | sed expression" is better written as
"sed expression file".
2 - Follow our usual practice of redirecting the output of git
commands to a file rather than piping it into another command.
3 - Use test_write_lines rather than 'printf "%s\n"'.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation for the eol attribute states that it is "effectively
setting the text attribute". However, this implies that it forces the
text attribute to always be set, which has not been the case since
6523728499 ("convert: unify the "auto" handling of CRLF", 2016-06-28).
Let's avoid confusing users (and the present author when trying to
describe Git's behavior to others) by clearly documenting in which
cases the "eol" attribute has effect.
Specifically, the attribute always has an effect unless the file is
explicitly set as -text, or the file is set as text=auto and the file is
detected as binary.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Right now, it isn't clear what the behavior is when the eol attribute is
set in .gitattributes but the text attribute is not. Let's add some
tests to document this behavior in our code, which happens to be that
the behavior is as if we set the text attribute implicitly. This will
make sure we don't accidentally change the behavior, which somebody is
probably relying on, and serve as documentation to developers.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a typo in my recent 03dc51fe849 (cat-file: fix remaining usage
bugs, 2021-10-09).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix up whitespace issues around "(... | ...)" in the SYNOPSIS and
usage. These were introduced in ab/cat-file series. See
e145efa6059 (Merge branch 'ab/cat-file' into next, 2022-01-05). In
particular 57d6a1cf96, 5a40417876 and 97fe725075 in that series.
We'll now correctly emit this usage output:
$ git cat-file -h
usage: git cat-file <type> <object>
or: git cat-file (-e | -p) <object>
or: git cat-file (-t | -s) [--allow-unknown-type] <object>
[...]
Before this the last line of that would be inconsistent with the
preceding "(-e | -p)":
or: git cat-file ( -t | -s ) [--allow-unknown-type] <object>
Reported-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Includes extra translation for branch.c:313 which has an
upstream whitespace error that is expected to be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
Switching out manual arg parsing for the parse-options API for the
expire and delete subcommands.
Move explicit_expiry flag into cmd_reflog_expire_cb struct so callbacks
can set both the value of the timestamp as well as the explicit_expiry
flag.
Signed-off-by: "John Cai" <johncai86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When merging a signed tag, fmt_merge_msg_sigs() is responsible for
populating the body of the merge message with the names of the signed
tags, their signatures, and the validity of those signatures.
In 02769437e1 (ssh signing: use sigc struct to pass payload,
2021-12-09), check_signature() was taught to pass the object payload via
the sigc struct instead of passing the payload buffer separately.
In effect, 02769437e1 causes buf, and sigc.payload to point at the same
region in memory. This causes a problem for fmt_tag_signature(), which
wants to read from this location, since it is freed beforehand by
signature_check_clear() (which frees it via sigc's `payload` member).
That makes the subsequent use in fmt_tag_signature() a use-after-free.
As a result, merge messages did not contain the body of any signed tags.
Luckily, they tend not to contain garbage, either, since the result of
strstr()-ing the object buffer in fmt_tag_signature() is guarded:
const char *tag_body = strstr(buf, "\n\n");
if (tag_body) {
tag_body += 2;
strbuf_add(tagbuf, tag_body, buf + len - tag_body);
}
Unfortunately, the tests in t6200 did not catch this at the time because
they do not search for the body of signed tags in fmt-merge-msg's
output.
Resolve this by waiting to call signature_check_clear() until after its
contents can be safely discarded. Harden ourselves against any future
regressions in this area by making sure we can find signed tag messages
in the output of fmt-merge-msg, too.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git stash apply" forgot to attempt restoring untracked files when
it failed to restore changes to tracked ones.
* en/stash-df-fix:
stash: do not return before restoring untracked files
Similar message templates have been consolidated so that
translators need to work on fewer number of messages.
* ja/i18n-similar-messages:
i18n: turn even more messages into "cannot be used together" ones
i18n: ref-filter: factorize "%(foo) atom used without %(bar) atom"
i18n: factorize "--foo outside a repository"
i18n: refactor "unrecognized %(foo) argument" strings
i18n: factorize "no directory given for --foo"
i18n: factorize "--foo requires --bar" and the like
i18n: tag.c factorize i18n strings
i18n: standardize "cannot open" and "cannot read"
i18n: turn "options are incompatible" into "cannot be used together"
i18n: refactor "%s, %s and %s are mutually exclusive"
i18n: refactor "foo and bar are mutually exclusive"
A corner case bug in the ort merge strategy has been corrected.
* en/merge-ort-renorm-with-rename-delete-conflict-fix:
merge-ort: fix bug with renormalization and rename/delete conflicts
Extend the guidance to choose the base commit to build your work
on, and hint/nudge contributors to read others' changes.
* jc/doc-submitting-patches-choice-of-base:
SubmittingPatchs: clarify choice of base and testing
