Adjust the overly broad .gitignore and "make clean" rule added in
ce39c2e04c (Provide a Windows version resource for the git
executables., 2012-05-24).
For now this is merely a correctness fix, but needed because a
subsequent commit will want to check in *.res files elsewhere in the
tree, which we shouldn't have to "git add -f".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "--patch ." part of SPATCH_FLAGS added in f57d11728d (coccinelle:
put sane filenames into output patches, 2018-07-23) should have been
added unconditionally to the "spatch" invocation instead, using it
isn't optional.
Let's also move the other mandatory flag to come after
$(SPATCH_FLAGS), to ensure that our "--sp-file" overrides any provided
in the environment, both --sp-file <arg> and --patch <arg> are
last-option-wins as far as spatch(1) option parsing is concerned.
The environment variable override was initially added in
a9a884aea5 (coccicheck: use --all-includes by default,
2016-09-30). In practice there's probably nobody that's using
SPATCH_FLAGS to try to intentionally break our invocations, but since
we're changing this let's make it clear what (if anything) we expect
to be overridden by user-supplied flags.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update test style in t/t30[*].sh for uniformity, that's to
keep test title the same line with helper function itself,
and fix some indentions.
Add a new section "recommended style" in t/README to
encourage people to use more modern style in test.
Signed-off-by: Li Linchao <lilinchao@oschina.cn>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is code in both merge-recursive and merge-ort for avoiding doubly
transitive renames (i.e. one side renames directory A/ -> B/, and the
other side renames directory B/ -> C/), because this combination would
otherwise make a mess for new files added to A/ on the first side and
wondering which directory they end up in -- especially if there were
even more renames such as the first side renaming C/ -> D/. In such
cases, it just turns "off" directory rename detection for the higher
order transitive cases.
The testcases added in t6423 a couple commits ago are slightly different
but similar in principle. They involve a similar case of paired
renaming but instead of A/ -> B/ and B/ -> C/, the second side renames
a leading directory of B/ to C/. And both sides add a new file
somewhere under the directory that the other side will rename. While
the new files added start within different directories and thus could
logically end up within different directories, it is weird for a file
on one side to end up where the other one started and not move along
with it. So, let's just turn off directory rename detection in this
case as well.
Another way to look at this is that if the source name involved in a
directory rename on one side is the target name of a directory rename
operation for a file from the other side, then we avoid the doubly
transitive rename. (More concretely, if a directory rename on side D
wants to rename a file on side E from OLD_NAME -> NEW_NAME, and side D
already had a file named NEW_NAME, and a directory rename on side E
wants to rename side D's NEW_NAME -> NEWER_NAME, then we turn off the
directory rename detection for NEW_NAME to prevent the
NEW_NAME -> NEWER_NAME rename, and instead end up with an add/add
conflict on NEW_NAME.)
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Run compute_collisions() for renames on both sides of history before
any calls to collect_renames(), and do not free the computed collisions
until after both calls to collect_renames(). This is just a code
reorganization at this point that doesn't make sense on its own, but
will permit us to use the computed collision info from both sides
within each call to collect_renames() in a subsequent commit.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit makes no functional changes, it's just some code movement in
preparation for later changes.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
No functional changes, just some preparatory cleanups.
Suggested-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is an attempt at minimalizing a testcase reported by Glen Choo
with tensorflow where merge-ort would report an assertion failure:
Assertion failed: (ci->filemask == 2 || ci->filemask == 4), function apply_directory_rename_modifications, file merge-ort.c, line 2410
reversing the direction of the merge provides a different error:
error: cache entry has null sha1: ...
fatal: unable to write .git/index
so we add testcases for both. With these new testcases, the
recursive strategy differs in that it returns the latter error for
both merge directions.
These testcases are somehow a little different than Glen's original
tensorflow testcase in that these ones trigger a bug with the recursive
algorithm whereas his testcase didn't. I figure that means these
testcases somehow manage to be more comprehensive.
Reported-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rewrite of "git add -i" in C that appeared in Git 2.25 didn't
correctly record a removed file to the index, which is an old
regression but has become widely known because the C version
has become the default in the latest release.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rewrite of "git add -i" in C that appeared in Git 2.25 didn't
correctly record a removed file to the index, which was fixed.
* js/add-i-delete:
add --interactive: allow `update` to stage deleted files
Originally, moving a <source> directory which is not on-disk due
to its existence outside of sparse-checkout cone, "giv mv" command
errors out with "bad source".
Add a helper check_dir_in_index() function to see if a directory
name exists in the index. Also add a SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR bit to mark
such directories.
Change the checking logic, so that such <source> directory makes
"giv mv" command warns with "advise_on_updating_sparse_paths()"
instead of "bad source"; also user now can supply a "--sparse" flag so
this operation can be carried out successfully.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As suggested by Derrick [1], move the in-line definition of
"enum update_mode" to the top of the file and make it use "flags"
mode (each state is a different bit in the word).
Change the flag assignments from '=' (single assignment) to '|='
(additive). Also change flag evaluation from '==' to '&', etc.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/22aadea2-9330-aa9e-7b6a-834585189144@github.com/
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, moving a sparse file into cone can result in unwarned
overwrite of existing entry. The expected behavior is that if the
<destination> exists in the entry, user should be prompted to supply
a [-f|--force] to carry out the operation, or the operation should
fail.
Add a check mechanism to do that.
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, moving a <source> file which is not on-disk but exists in
index as a SKIP_WORKTREE enabled cache entry, "giv mv" command errors
out with "bad source".
Change the checking logic, so that such <source>
file makes "giv mv" command warns with "advise_on_updating_sparse_paths()"
instead of "bad source"; also user now can supply a "--sparse" flag so
this operation can be carried out successfully.
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previous if/else-if chain are highly nested and hard to develop/extend.
Refactor to decouple this if/else-if chain by using goto to jump ahead.
Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, "git mv" a sparse file from out-of-cone to
in-cone does not update the moved file's sparsity (remove its
SKIP_WORKTREE bit). And the corresponding cache entry is, unexpectedly,
not checked out in the working tree.
Update the behavior so that:
1. Moving from out-of-cone to in-cone removes the SKIP_WORKTREE bit from
corresponding cache entry.
2. The moved cache entry is checked out in the working tree to reflect
the updated sparsity.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add test for "mv: add check_dir_in_index() and solve general dir check
issue" in this series.
This change tests the following:
1. mv <source> as a directory on the sparse index boundary (where it
would be a sparse directory in a sparse index).
2. mv <source> as a directory which is deeper than the boundary (so
the sparse index would expand in the cache_name_pos() method).
These tests can be written now for correctness, but later the first case
can be updated to use the 'ensure_not_expanded' helper in t1092.
Suggested-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add corresponding tests to test following situations:
We do not have sufficient coverage of moving files outside
of a sparse-checkout cone. Create new tests covering this
behavior, keeping in mind that the user can include --sparse
(or not), move a file or directory, and the destination can
already exist in the index (in this case user can use --force
to overwrite existing entry).
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak introduced in a310d43494 ([PATCH] Deltification
library work by Nicolas Pitre., 2005-05-19), as a result we can mark
another test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak introduced in fa099d2322 (worktree.c: kill
parse_ref() in favor of refs_resolve_ref_unsafe(), 2017-04-24), as a
result we can mark another test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix memory leaks introduced with these tests in f1294eaf7f (bloom.c:
introduce core Bloom filter constructs, 2020-03-30), as a result we
can mark almost the entirety of t0095-bloom.sh as passing with
SANITIZE=leak using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true", there's still an
unrelated memory leak in "git commit" in one of the tests, let's skip
that one under SANITIZE_LEAK for now.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix memory leaks introduced with these tests in
75459410ed (json_writer: new routines to create JSON data,
2018-07-13), as a result we can mark a test as passing with
SANITIZE=leak using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix memory leaks in "test-tool regex" which have been there since
c91841594c (test-regex: Add a test to check for a bug in the regex
routines, 2012-09-01), as a result we can mark a test as passing with
SANITIZE=leak using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
We could regfree() on the die() paths here, which would make some
invocations of valgrind(1) happy, but let's just target SANITIZE=leak
for now. Variables that are still reachable when we die() are not
reported as leaks.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in "test-tool urlmatch-normalization", as a result
we can mark the corresponding test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix memory leaks in two test-tools used by t0090-cache-tree.sh. As a
result we can mark the test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in "test-tool path-utils", as a result we can mark
the corresponding test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in "test-tool test-hash" which has been there since
b57cbbf8a8 (test-sha1: test hashing large buffer, 2006-06-24), as a
result we can mark more tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak introduced in 44c175c7a4 (pull: error on no merge
candidates, 2015-06-18). As a result we can mark several tests as
passing with SANITIZE=leak using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Removing the "int ret = 0" assignment added here in a6d7eb2c7a (pull:
optionally rebase submodules (remote submodule changes only),
2017-06-23) is not a logic error, it could always have been left
uninitialized (as "int ret"), now that we'll use the "ret" from the
upper scope we can drop the assignment in the "opt_rebase" branch.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak where "cat-file" will leak the "path" member. See
e5fba602e5 (textconv: support for cat_file, 2010-06-15) for the code
that introduced the offending get_oid_with_context() call (called
get_sha1_with_context() at the time).
As a result we can mark several tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
using "TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
As noted in dc944b65f1 (get_sha1_with_context: dynamically allocate
oc->path, 2017-05-19) callers must free the "path" member. That same
commit added the relevant free() to this function, but we weren't
catching cases where we'd return early.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in code added in 41abfe15d9 (maintenance: add
pack-refs task, 2021-02-09), we need to call strvec_clear() on the
"struct strvec" that we initialized.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 1c41d2805e (unpack_trees_options: free messages when done,
2018-05-21) we started calling clear_unpack_trees_porcelain() on this
codepath, but missed this error path.
We could call clear_unpack_trees_porcelain() just before we error()
and return when unmerged_cache() fails, but the more correct fix is to
not have the unmerged_cache() check happen in the middle of our
"topts" setup.
Before 23cbf11b5c (merge-recursive: porcelain messages for checkout,
2010-08-11) we would not malloc() to setup our "topts", which is when
this started to leak on the error path.
Before that this code wasn't conflating the setup of "topts" and the
unmerged_cache() call in any meaningful way. The initial version in
782c2d65c2 (Build in checkout, 2008-02-07) just does a "memset" of
it, and initializes a single struct member.
Then in 8ccba008ee (unpack-trees: allow Porcelain to give different
error messages, 2008-05-17) we added the initialization of the error
message, which as noted above finally started leaking in 23cbf11b5c.
Let's fix the memory leak, and avoid future issues by initializing the
"topts" with a helper function. There are no functional changes here.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in "merge-file", we need to loop over the "mmfs"
array and free() what we've got so far when we error out. As a result
we can mark a test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Refactor the code in builtin/merge-file.c to:
* Use the initializer to zero out "mmfs", and use modern C syntax for
the rest.
* Refactor the the inner loop to use a variable and "if/else if"
pattern followed by "return". This will make a change to change it to
a "goto cleanup" pattern smaller.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak introduced in 440c705ea6 (cat-file: add
--batch-command mode, 2022-02-18). The free_cmds() function was only
called on "queued_nr" if we had a "flush" command. As the "without
flush for blob info" test added in the same commit shows we can't rely
on that, so let's call free_cmds() again at the end.
Since "nr" follows the usual pattern of being set to 0 if we've
free()'d the memory already it's OK to call it twice, even in cases
where we are doing a "flush".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Call the release_revisions() function added in
1878b5edc0 (revision.[ch]: provide and start using a
release_revisions(), 2022-04-13) in cmd_revert(), as well as freeing
the xmalloc()'d "revs" member itself.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in code added in bf0231c661 (rev-parse: add
--show-superproject-working-tree, 2017-03-08), we should never have
made the result of xgetcwd() a "const char *", as we return a
strbuf_detach()'d value. Let's fix that and free() it when we're done
with it.
We can't mark any tests passing passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" as a result of this change, but
e.g. "t/t1500-rev-parse.sh" now gets closer to passing.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak added in 0ec4b1650c (clone: fix ref selection in
--single-branch --branch=xxx, 2012-06-22).
Whether we get our "remote_head" from copy_ref() directly, or with a
call to guess_remote_head() it'll be the result of a copy_ref() in
either case, as guess_remote_head() is a wrapper for copy_ref() (or it
returns NULL).
We can't mark any tests passing passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true" as a result of this change, but
e.g. "t/t1500-rev-parse.sh" now gets closer to passing.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a memory leak in "git check-ref-format" that's been present in the
code in one form or another since 38eedc634b (git check-ref-format
--print, 2009-10-12), the code got substantially refactored in
cfbe22f03f (check-ref-format: handle subcommands in separate
functions, 2010-08-05).
As a result we can mark a test as passing with SANITIZE=leak using
"TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test had a line reading
! test_file_is_empty actual
which was meant to be
! test_must_be_empty actual
The test worked despite the error, because even though
test_file_is_empty is a non-existent function, the '!' negated the
return value and made it pass. It'd be better to avoid the negation,
so something like
test_file_not_empty actual
would be better, but perhaps it makes even more sense to specify the
number of lines of expected output to make the test a bit tighter.
Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@palantir.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph is used to opportunistically optimize accesses to
certain pieces of information on commit objects, and
lookup_commit_in_graph() tries to say "no" when the requested commit
does not locally exist by returning NULL, in which case the caller
can ask for (which may result in on-demand fetching from a promisor
remote) and parse the commit object itself.
However, it uses a wrong helper, repo_has_object_file(), to do so.
This helper not only checks if an object is mmediately available in
the local object store, but also tries to fetch from a promisor remote.
But the fetch machinery calls lookup_commit_in_graph(), thus causing an
infinite loop.
We should make lookup_commit_in_graph() expect that a commit given to it
can be legitimately missing from the local object store, by using the
has_object_file() helper instead.
Signed-off-by: Han Xin <hanxin.hx@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
All invocations of do_get_submodule_displaypath() pass
get_super_prefix() as the super_prefix arg, which is exactly the same
as get_submodule_displaypath().
Replace all calls to do_get_submodule_displaypath() with
get_submodule_displaypath(), and since it has no more callers, remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Unlike the other subcommands, "git submodule--helper update" uses the
"--recursive-prefix" flag instead of "--super-prefix". The two flags are
otherwise identical (they only serve to compute the 'display path' of a
submodule), except that there is a dedicated helper function to get the
value of "--super-prefix".
This inconsistency exists because "git submodule update" used to pass
"--recursive-prefix" between shell and C (introduced in [1]) before
"--super-prefix" was introduced (in [2]), and for simplicity, we kept
this name when "git submodule--helper update" was created.
Remove "--recursive-prefix" and its associated code from "git
submodule--helper update", replacing it with "--super-prefix".
To use "--super-prefix", module_update is marked with
SUPPORT_SUPER_PREFIX. Note that module_clone must also be marked with
SUPPORT_SUPER_PREFIX, otherwise the "git submodule--helper clone"
subprocess will fail check because "--super-prefix" is propagated via
the environment.
[1] 48308681b0 (git submodule update: have a dedicated helper for
cloning, 2016-02-29)
[2] 74866d7579 (git: make super-prefix option, 2016-10-07)
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove the SUPPORT_SUPER_PREFIX flag from "add", "init" and
"summary". For the "add" command it hasn't been used since [1],
likewise for "init" and "summary" since [2] and [3], respectively.
As implemented in 74866d7579 (git: make super-prefix option,
2016-10-07) the SUPPORT_SUPER_PREFIX flag in git.c applies for the
entire command, but as implemented in 89c8626557 (submodule helper:
support super prefix, 2016-12-08) we assert here in
cmd_submodule__helper() that we're not getting the flag unexpectedly.
1. 8c8195e9c3 (submodule--helper: introduce add-clone subcommand,
2021-07-10)
2. 6e7c14e65c (submodule update --init: display correct path from
submodule, 2017-01-06)
3. 1cf823d8f0 (submodule: remove unnecessary `prefix` based option
logic, 2021-06-22)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace a chunk of code in update_submodule() with an equivalent
do_get_submodule_displaypath() invocation. This is already tested by
t/t7406-submodule-update.sh:'submodule update --init --recursive from
subdirectory', so no tests are added.
The two are equivalent because:
- Exactly one of recursive_prefix|prefix is non-NULL at a time; prefix
is set at the superproject level, and recursive_prefix is set when
recursing into submodules. There is also a BUG() statement in
get_submodule_displaypath() that asserts that both cannot be non-NULL.
- In get_submodule_displaypath(), get_super_prefix() always returns NULL
because "--super-prefix" is never passed. Thus calling it is
equivalent to calling do_get_submodule_displaypath() with super_prefix
= NULL.
Therefore:
- When recursive_prefix is non-NULL, prefix is NULL, and thus
get_submodule_displaypath() just returns prefixed_path. This is
identical to calling do_get_submodule_displaypath() with super_prefix
= recursive_prefix because the return value is still the concatenation
of recursive_prefix + update_data->sm_path.
- When prefix is non-NULL, prefixed_path = update_data->sm_path. Thus
calling get_submodule_displaypath() with prefixed_path is equivalent
to calling do_get_submodule_displaypath() with update_data->sm_path
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
update_submodule() uses duplicated code to compute
update_data->displaypath and next.recursive_prefix. The latter is just
the former with "/" appended to it, and since update_data->displaypath
not changed outside of this statement, we can just reuse the already
computed result.
We can go one step further and remove the reference to
next.recursive_prefix altogether. Since it is only used in
update_data_to_args() (to compute the "--recursive-prefix" flag for the
recursive update child process) we can just use the already computed
.displaypath value of there.
Delete the duplicated code, and remove the unnecessary reference to
next.recursive_prefix. As a bonus, this fixes a memory leak where
prefixed_path was never freed (this leak was first reported in [1]).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/877a45867ae368bf9e053caedcb6cf421e02344d.1655336146.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are two locations in prepare_to_clone_next_submodule() that
manually calculate the submodule display path, but should just use
do_get_submodule_displaypath() for consistency.
Do this replacement and reorder the code slightly to avoid computing
the display path twice.
Until the preceding commit this code had never been tested, with our
newly added tests we can see that both these sites have been computing
the display path incorrectly ever since they were introduced in
48308681b0 (git submodule update: have a dedicated helper for cloning,
2016-02-29) [1]:
- The first hunk puts a "/" between recursive_prefix and ce->name, but
recursive_prefix already ends with "/".
- The second hunk calls relative_path() on recursive_prefix and
ce->name, but relative_path() only makes sense when both paths share
the same base directory. This is never the case here:
- recursive_prefix is the path from the topmost superproject to the
current submodule
- ce->name is the path from the root of the current submodule to its
submodule.
so, e.g. recursive_prefix="super" and ce->name="submodule" produces
displayname="../super" instead of "super/submodule".
[1] I verified this by applying the tests to 48308681b0.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are two locations in prepare_to_clone_next_submodule() that
manually calculate the submodule display path. As discussed in the
next commit the "Skipping" output isn't exactly what we want, but
let's test how we behave now, before changing the existing behavior.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
