Refactor the fetch_refs function into a function that does the fetching
of refs and another function that stores them. This is in preparation
for allowing additional processing of the fetched refs before updating
the local ref store.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Populate peer ref OIDs in get_ref_map instead of do_fetch. Besides
tightening scopes of variables in the code, this also prepares for
get_ref_map being able to be called multiple times within do_fetch.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add tests to check the behavior of fetching from a repository which
changes between rounds of negotiation (for example, when different
servers in a load-balancing agreement participate in the same stateless
RPC negotiation). This forms a baseline of comparison to the ref-in-want
functionality (which will be introduced to the client in subsequent
commits), and ensures that subsequent commits do not change existing
behavior.
As part of this effort, a mechanism to substitute strings in a single
HTTP response is added.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, while performing packfile negotiation, clients are only
allowed to specify their desired objects using object ids. This causes
a vulnerability to failure when an object turns non-existent during
negotiation, which may happen if, for example, the desired repository is
provided by multiple Git servers in a load-balancing arrangement and
there exists replication delay.
In order to eliminate this vulnerability, implement the ref-in-want
feature for the 'fetch' command in protocol version 2. This feature
enables the 'fetch' command to support requests in the form of ref names
through a new "want-ref <ref>" parameter. At the conclusion of
negotiation, the server will send a list of all of the wanted references
(as provided by "want-ref" lines) in addition to the generated packfile.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-rebase.sh wrote strategy options to .git/rebase/merge/strategy_opts
in the following format:
'--ours' '--renormalize'
Note the double spaces.
git-rebase--interactive uses sequencer.c to parse that file, and
sequencer.c used split_cmdline() to get the individual strategy options.
After splitting, sequencer.c prefixed each "option" with a double dash,
so, concatenating all its options would result in:
-- --ours -- --renormalize
So, when it ended up calling try_merge_strategy(), that in turn would run
git merge-$strategy -- --ours -- --renormalize $merge_base -- $head $remote
instead of the expected/desired
git merge-$strategy --ours --renormalize $merge_base -- $head $remote
Remove the extra spaces so that when it goes through split_cmdline() we end
up with the desired command line.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We are not passing the same args to merge strategies when we are doing an
--interactive rebase as we do with a --merge rebase. The merge strategy
should not need to be aware of which type of rebase is in effect. Add a
testcase which checks for the appropriate args.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make it easier to find references to core.excludesfile and the default
$XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/ignore path.
Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The default core.excludesfile path is $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/ignore.
$HOME/.config/git/ignore is used if XDG_CONFIG_HOME is empty or unset,
as described later in the document.
Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase backends currently behave differently with empty commit messages,
largely as a side-effect of the different underlying commands on which
they are based. am-based rebases apply commits with an empty commit
message without stopping or requiring the user to specify an extra flag.
(It is interesting to note that am-based rebases are the default rebase
type, and no one has ever requested a --no-allow-empty-message flag to
change this behavior.) merge-based and interactive-based rebases (which
are ultimately based on git-commit), will currently halt on any such
commits and require the user to manually specify what to do with the
commit and continue.
One possible rationale for the difference in behavior is that the purpose
of an "am" based rebase is solely to transplant an existing history, while
an "interactive" rebase is one whose purpose is to polish a series before
making it publishable. Thus, stopping and asking for confirmation for a
possible problem is more appropriate in the latter case. However, there
are two problems with this rationale:
1) merge-based rebases are also non-interactive and there are multiple
types of rebases that use the interactive machinery but are not
explicitly interactive (e.g. when either --rebase-merges or
--keep-empty are specified without --interactive). These rebases are
also used solely to transplant an existing history, and thus also
should default to --allow-empty-message.
2) this rationale only says that the user is more accepting of stopping
in the case of an explicitly interactive rebase, not that stopping
for this particular reason actually makes sense. Exploring whether
it makes sense, requires backing up and analyzing the underlying
commands...
If git-commit did not error out on empty commits by default, accidental
creation of commits with empty messages would be a very common occurrence
(this check has caught me many times). Further, nearly all such empty
commit messages would be considered an accidental error (as evidenced by a
huge amount of documentation across version control systems and in various
blog posts explaining how important commit messages are). A simple check
for what would otherwise be a common error thus made a lot of sense, and
git-commit gained an --allow-empty-message flag for special case
overrides. This has made commits with empty messages very rare.
There are two sources for commits with empty messages for rebase (and
cherry-pick): (a) commits created in git where the user previously
specified --allow-empty-message to git-commit, and (b) commits imported
into git from other version control systems. In case (a), the user has
already explicitly specified that there is something special about this
commit that makes them not want to specify a commit message; forcing them
to re-specify with every cherry-pick or rebase seems more likely to be
infuriating than helpful. In case (b), the commit is highly unlikely to
have been authored by the person who has imported the history and is doing
the rebase or cherry-pick, and thus the user is unlikely to be the
appropriate person to write a commit message for it. Stopping and
expecting the user to modify the commit before proceeding thus seems
counter-productive.
Further, note that while empty commit messages was a common error case for
git-commit to deal with, it is a rare case for rebase (or cherry-pick).
The fact that it is rare raises the question of why it would be worth
checking and stopping on this particular condition and not others. For
example, why doesn't an interactive rebase automatically stop if the
commit message's first line is 2000 columns long, or is missing a blank
line after the first line, or has every line indented with five spaces, or
any number of other myriad problems?
Finally, note that if a user doing an interactive rebase does have the
necessary knowledge to add a message for any such commit and wants to do
so, it is rather simple for them to change the appropriate line from
'pick' to 'reword'. The fact that the subject is empty in the todo list
that the user edits should even serve as a way to notify them.
As far as I can tell, the fact that merge-based and interactive-based
rebases stop on commits with empty commit messages is solely a by-product
of having been based on git-commit. It went without notice for a long
time precisely because such cases are rare. The rareness of this
situation made it difficult to reason about, so when folks did eventually
notice this behavior, they assumed it was there for a good reason and just
added an --allow-empty-message flag. In my opinion, stopping on such
messages not desirable in any of these cases, even the (explicitly)
interactive case.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a simple directory rename testcase, in conjunction with each of the
types of rebases:
git-rebase--interactive
git-rebase--am
git-rebase--merge
and also use the same testcase for
git am --3way
This demonstrates a difference in behavior between the different rebase
backends in regards to directory rename detection.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are a variety of aspects that are common to all rebases regardless
of which backend is in use; however, the behavior for these different
aspects varies in ways that could surprise users. (In fact, it's not
clear -- to me at least -- that these differences were even desirable or
intentional.) Document these differences.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
rebase was taught the --force-rebase option in commit b2f82e05de ("Teach
rebase to rebase even if upstream is up to date", 2009-02-13). This flag
worked for the am and merge backends, but wasn't a valid option for the
interactive backend.
rebase was taught the --no-ff option for interactive rebases in commit
b499549401 ("Teach rebase the --no-ff option.", 2010-03-24), to do the
exact same thing as --force-rebase does for non-interactive rebases. This
commit explicitly documented the fact that --force-rebase was incompatible
with --interactive, though it made --no-ff a synonym for --force-rebase
for non-interactive rebases. The choice of a new option was based on the
fact that "force rebase" didn't sound like an appropriate term for the
interactive machinery.
In commit 6bb4e485cf ("rebase: align variable names", 2011-02-06), the
separate parsing of command line options in the different rebase scripts
was removed, and whether on accident or because the author noticed that
these options did the same thing, the options became synonyms and both
were accepted by all three rebase types.
In commit 2d26d533a0 ("Documentation/git-rebase.txt: -f forces a rebase
that would otherwise be a no-op", 2014-08-12), which reworded the
description of the --force-rebase option, the (no-longer correct) sentence
stating that --force-rebase was incompatible with --interactive was
finally removed.
Finally, as explained at
https://public-inbox.org/git/98279912-0f52-969d-44a6-22242039387f@xiplink.com
In the original discussion around this option [1], at one point I
proposed teaching rebase--interactive to respect --force-rebase
instead of adding a new option [2]. Ultimately --no-ff was chosen as
the better user interface design [3], because an interactive rebase
can't be "forced" to run.
We have accepted both --no-ff and --force-rebase as full synonyms for all
three rebase types for over seven years. Documenting them differently
and in ways that suggest they might not be quite synonyms simply leads to
confusion. Adjust the documentation to match reality.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git rebase has three different types: am, merge, and interactive, all of
which are implemented in terms of separate scripts. am builds on git-am,
merge builds on git-merge-recursive, and interactive builds on
git-cherry-pick. We make use of features in those lower-level commands in
the different rebase types, but those features don't exist in all of the
lower level commands so we have a range of incompatibilities. Previously,
we just accepted nearly any argument and silently ignored whichever ones
weren't implemented for the type of rebase specified. Change this so the
incompatibilities are documented, included in the testsuite, and tested
for at runtime with an appropriate error message shown.
Some exceptions I left out:
* --merge and --interactive are technically incompatible since they are
supposed to run different underlying scripts, but with a few small
changes, --interactive can do everything that --merge can. In fact,
I'll shortly be sending another patch to remove git-rebase--merge and
reimplement it on top of git-rebase--interactive.
* One could argue that --interactive and --quiet are incompatible since
--interactive doesn't implement a --quiet mode (perhaps since
cherry-pick itself does not implement one). However, the interactive
mode is more quiet than the other modes in general with progress
messages, so one could argue that it's already quiet.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git rebase is split into three types: am, merge, and interactive. Various
options imply different types, and which mode we are using determine which
sub-script (git-rebase--$type) is executed to finish the work. Not all
options work with all types, so add tests for combinations where we expect
to receive an error rather than having options be silently ignored.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph feature is now integrated with 'fsck' and 'gc',
so remove those items from the "Future Work" section of the
commit-graph design document.
Also remove the section on lazy-loading trees, as that was completed
in an earlier patch series.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph file is a very helpful feature for speeding up git
operations. In order to make it more useful, make it possible to
write the commit-graph file during standard garbage collection
operations.
Add a 'gc.commitGraph' config setting that triggers writing a
commit-graph file after any non-trivial 'git gc' command. Defaults to
false while the commit-graph feature matures. We specifically do not
want to have this on by default until the commit-graph feature is fully
integrated with history-modifying features like shallow clones.
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing commit-graph files, it can be convenient to ask for all
reachable commits (starting at the ref set) in the resulting file. This
is particularly helpful when writing to stdin is complicated, such as a
future integration with 'git gc'.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If core.commitGraph is true, verify the contents of the commit-graph
during 'git fsck' using the 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand. Run
this check on all alternates, as well.
We use a new process for two reasons:
1. The subcommand decouples the details of loading and verifying a
commit-graph file from the other fsck details.
2. The commit-graph verification requires the commits to be loaded
in a specific order to guarantee we parse from the commit-graph
file for some objects and from the object database for others.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph file ends with a SHA1 hash of the previous contents. If
a commit-graph file has errors but the checksum hash is correct, then we
know that the problem is a bug in Git and not simply file corruption
after-the-fact.
Compute the checksum right away so it is the first error that appears,
and make the message translatable since this error can be "corrected" by
a user by simply deleting the file and recomputing. The rest of the
errors are useful only to developers.
Be sure to continue checking the rest of the file data if the checksum
is wrong. This is important for our tests, as we break the checksum as
we modify bytes of the commit-graph file.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph file has an extra chunk to store the parent int-ids for
parents beyond the first parent for octopus merges. Our test repo has a
single octopus merge that we can manipulate to demonstrate the 'verify'
subcommand detects incorrect values in that chunk.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While iterating through the commit parents, perform the generation
number calculation and compare against the value stored in the
commit-graph.
The tests demonstrate that having a different set of parents affects
the generation number calculation, and this value propagates to
descendants. Hence, we drop the single-line condition on the output.
Since Git will ship with the commit-graph feature without generation
numbers, we need to accept commit-graphs with all generation numbers
equal to zero. In this case, ignore the generation number calculation.
However, verify that we should never have a mix of zero and non-zero
generation numbers. Create a test that sets one commit to generation
zero and all following commits report a failure as they have non-zero
generation in a file that contains generation number zero.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph file stores parents in a two-column portion of the
commit data chunk. If there is only one parent, then the second column
stores 0xFFFFFFFF to indicate no second parent.
The 'verify' subcommand checks the parent list for the commit loaded
from the commit-graph and the one parsed from the object database. Test
these checks for corrupt parents, too many parents, and wrong parents.
Add a boundary check to insert_parent_or_die() for when the parent
position value is out of range.
The octopus merge will be tested in a later commit.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'verify' subcommand must compare the commit content parsed from the
commit-graph against the content in the object database. Use
lookup_commit() and parse_commit_in_graph_one() to parse the commits
from the graph and compare against a commit that is loaded separately
and parsed directly from the object database.
Add checks for the root tree OID.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the 'verify' subcommand, load commits directly from the object
database to ensure they exist. Parse by skipping the commit-graph.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the commit-graph file, the OID fanout chunk provides an index into
the OID lookup. The 'verify' subcommand should find incorrect values
in the fanout.
Similarly, the 'verify' subcommand should find out-of-order values in
the OID lookup.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph file requires the following three chunks:
* OID Fanout
* OID Lookup
* Commit Data
If any of these are missing, then the 'verify' subcommand should
report a failure. This includes the chunk IDs malformed or the
chunk count is truncated.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is the first of several commits that add a test to check that
'git commit-graph verify' catches corruption in the commit-graph
file. The first test checks that the command catches an error in
the file signature. This is a check that exists in the existing
commit-graph reading code.
Add a helper method 'corrupt_graph_and_verify' to the test script
t5318-commit-graph.sh. This helper corrupts the commit-graph file
at a certain location, runs 'git commit-graph verify', and reports
the output to the 'err' file. This data is filtered to remove the
lines added by 'test_must_fail' when the test is run verbosely.
Then, the output is checked to contain a specific error message.
Most messages from 'git commit-graph verify' will not be marked
for translation. There will be one exception: the message that
reports an invalid checksum will be marked for translation, as that
is the only message that is intended for a typical user.
Helped-by: Szeder Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the commit-graph file becomes corrupt, we need a way to verify
that its contents match the object database. In the manner of
'git fsck' we will implement a 'git commit-graph verify' subcommand
to report all issues with the file.
Add the 'verify' subcommand to the 'commit-graph' builtin and its
documentation. The subcommand is currently a no-op except for
loading the commit-graph into memory, which may trigger run-time
errors that would be caught by normal use. Add a simple test that
ensures the command returns a zero error code.
If no commit-graph file exists, this is an acceptable state. Do
not report any errors.
Helped-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When lazy-loading a tree for a commit, it will be important to select
the tree from a specific struct commit_graph. Create a new method that
specifies the commit-graph file and use that in
get_commit_tree_in_graph().
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In anticipation of verifying commit-graph file contents against the
object database, create parse_commit_internal() to allow side-stepping
the commit-graph file and parse directly from the object database.
Due to the use of generation numbers, this method should not be called
unless the intention is explicit in avoiding commits from the
commit-graph file.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before verifying a commit-graph file against the object database, we
need to parse all commits from the given commit-graph file. Create
parse_commit_in_graph_one() to target a given struct commit_graph.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The GRAPH_MIN_SIZE macro should be the smallest size of a parsable
commit-graph file. However, the minimum number of chunks was wrong.
It is possible to write a commit-graph file with zero commits, and
that violates this macro's value.
Rewrite the macro, and use extra macros to better explain the magic
constants.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit-graph tests should be checking that normal Git operations
succeed and have matching output with and without the commit-graph
feature enabled. However, the test was toggling 'core.graph' instead
of the correct 'core.commitGraph' variable.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Last sections are squashed into non-formatted block after adding
"REBASING MERGES".
To reproduce the error see bottom of page:
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-rebase
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Parfinenko <vparfinenko@excelsior-usa.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commits in state:filter.map have already been processed, so don't
filter them again. This makes incremental git filter-branch much faster.
Also add tests for --state-branch option.
Signed-off-by: Michael Barabanov <michael.barabanov@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reuse config_from_gitmodules in repo_read_gitmodules to remove some
duplication and also have a single point where the .gitmodules file is
read.
The change does not introduce any new behavior, the same gitmodules_cb
config callback is still used, which only deals with configuration
specific to submodules.
The check about the repo's worktree is removed from repo_read_gitmodules
because it's already performed in config_from_gitmodules.
The config_from_gitmodules function is moved up in the file —unchanged—
before its users to avoid a forward declaration.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Generalize config_from_gitmodules() to accept a repository as an argument.
This is in preparation to reuse the function in repo_read_gitmodules in
order to have a single point where the '.gitmodules' file is accessed.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that 'config_from_gitmodules' is not used in the open, it can be
marked as private.
Hopefully this will prevent its usage for retrieving arbitrary
configuration form the '.gitmodules' file.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a helper function to make it clearer that retrieving 'update-clone'
configuration from the .gitmodules file is a special case supported
solely for backward compatibility purposes.
This change removes one direct use of 'config_from_gitmodules' for
options not strictly related to submodules: "submodule.fetchjobs" does
not describe a property of a submodule, but a behavior of other commands
when dealing with submodules, so it does not really belong to the
.gitmodules file.
This is in the effort to communicate better that .gitmodules is not to
be used as a mechanism to store arbitrary configuration in the
repository that any command can retrieve.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a helper function to make it clearer that retrieving 'fetch'
configuration from the .gitmodules file is a special case supported
solely for backward compatibility purposes.
This change removes one direct use of 'config_from_gitmodules' in code
not strictly related to submodules, in the effort to communicate better
that .gitmodules is not to be used as a mechanism to store arbitrary
configuration in the repository that any command can retrieve.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The .gitmodules file is not meant as a place to store arbitrary
configuration to distribute with the repository.
Move config_from_gitmodules() out of config.c and into
submodule-config.c to make it even clearer that it is not a mechanism to
retrieve arbitrary configuration from the .gitmodules file.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Ospite <ao2@ao2.it>
Acked-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With GNU sed, the r command doesn't care if a space separates it and
the filename it reads from.
With SunOS sed, the space is required.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro R. Sedeño <asedeno@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
signoff is not specific to the am-backend. Also, re-order a few options
to make like things (e.g. strategy and strategy-option) be near each
other.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git rebase has many options that only work with one of its three backends.
It also has a few other pairs of incompatible options. Document these.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
