* bg/format-patch-doc-update:
format-patch: Add "--no-stat" as a synonym for "-p"
format-patch documentation: Fix formatting
format-patch documentation: Remove diff options that are not useful
format-patch: Always generate a patch
* jp/fetch-cull-many-refs:
remote: fix use-after-free error detected by glibc in ref_remove_duplicates
fetch: Speed up fetch of large numbers of refs
remote: Make ref_remove_duplicates faster for large numbers of refs
4d23660 (describe: when failing, tell the user about options that
work, 2009-10-28) forgot to update the shortcut path where the code
detected and used a possible exact match. This means that an
unannotated tag on HEAD would be used by 'git describe'.
Guard this code path against the new circumstances, where unannotated
tags can be present in ->util even if we're not actually planning to
use them.
While there, also add some tests for --all.
Reported by 'yashi' on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sb/tutorial-test:
t1200: prepare for merging with Fast-forward bikeshedding
t1200: further modernize test script style
t1200: Make documentation and test agree
t1200: cleanup and modernize test style
* git://git.bogomips.org/git-svn:
Document git-svn's first-parent rule
git svn: attempt to create empty dirs on clone+rebase
git svn: add authorsfile test case for ~/.gitconfig
git svn: read global+system config for clone+init
git svn: handle SVN merges from revisions past the tip of the branch
Add tests for --full-name, --full-tree, --abbrev, and --name-only.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We parse unhandled.log files for empty_dir statements and make a
best effort attempt to recreate empty directories on fresh
clones and rebase. This should cover the majority of cases
where users work off a single branch or for projects where
branches do not differ in empty directories.
Since this cannot affect "normal" git commands like "checkout"
or "reset", so users switching between branches in a single
working directory should use the new "git svn mkdirs" command
after switching branches.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
* js/maint-diff-color-words:
diff --color-words: bit of clean-up
diff --color-words -U0: fix the location of hunk headers
t4034-diff-words: add a test for word diff without context
Conflicts:
diff.c
In ref_remove_duplicates, when we encounter a duplicate and remove it
from the list we need to make sure that the prev pointer stays
pointing at the last entry and also skip over adding the just freed
entry to the string_list.
Previously fetch could crash with:
*** glibc detected *** git: corrupted double-linked list: ...
Also add a test to try and catch problems with duplicate removal in
the future.
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commit for:
git svn: read global+system config for clone+init
Initially lacked a test case because the author was unable to
reproduce it under his test environment, this adds it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
When recording the revisions that it has merged, SVN sets the top
revision to be the latest revision in the repository, which is not
necessarily a revision on the branch that is being merged from. When
it is not on the branch, git-svn fails to add the extra parent to
represent the merge because it relies on finding the commit on the
branch that corresponds to the top of the SVN merge range.
In order to correctly handle this case, we look for the maximum
revision less than or equal to the top of the SVN merge range that is
actually on the branch being merged from.
[ew: This includes the following (squashed) commit to prevent
errors during bisect:]
Author: Toby Allsopp <toby.allsopp@navman.co.nz>
Date: Fri Nov 13 09:48:39 2009 +1300
git-svn: add (failing) test for SVN 1.5+ merge with intervening commit
This test exposes a bug in git-svn's handling of SVN 1.5+ mergeinfo
properties. The problematic case is when there is some commit on an
unrelated branch after the last commit on the merged-from branch.
When SVN records the mergeinfo property, it records the latest
revision in the whole repository, which, in the problematic case, is
not on the branch it is merging from.
To trigger the git-svn bug, we modify t9151 to include two SVN merges,
the second of which has an intervening commit. The SVN dump was
generated using SVN 1.6.6 (on Debian squeeze amd64).
Signed-off-by: Toby Allsopp <toby.allsopp@navman.co.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Since a0e4639 (filter-branch: fix ref rewriting with
--subdirectory-filter, 2008-08-12) git-filter-branch has done
nearest-ancestor rewriting when using a --subdirectory-filter.
However, that rewriting strategy is also a useful building block in
other tasks. For example, if you want to split out a subset of files
from your history, you would typically call
git filter-branch -- <refs> -- <files>
But this fails for all refs that do not point directly to a commit
that affects <files>, because their referenced commit will not be
rewritten and the ref remains untouched.
The code was already there for the --subdirectory-filter case, so just
introduce an option that enables it independently.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jeff King recently reinstated -p to suppress the default diffstat
(as -p used to work before 68daa64, about 14 months ago).
However, -p is also needed in combination with certain options
(e.g. --stat or --numstat) in order to produce any patch at all.
The documentation does not mention this.
Since the purpose of format-patch is to produce a patch that
can be emailed, it does not make sense that certain combination
of options will suppress the generation of the patch itself.
Therefore:
* Update 'git format-patch' to always generate a patch.
* Since the --name-only, --name-status, and --check suppresses
the generation of the patch, disallow those options,
and remove the description of them in the documentation.
* Remove the reference to -p in the description of -U.
* Remove the descriptions of the options that are synonyms for -p
plus another option (--patch-with-raw and --patch-with-stat).
* While at it, slightly tweak the description of -p itself
to say that it generates "plain patches", so that you can
think of -p as "plain patch" as an mnemonic aid.
Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Once upon a time, format-patch would use its default stat
plus patch format only when no diff format was given on the
command line. This meant that "format-patch -p" would
suppress the stat and show just the patch.
Commit 68daa64 changed this to keep the stat format when we
had an "implicit" patch format, like "-U5". As a side
effect, this meant that an explicit patch format was now
ignored (because cmd_format_patch didn't know the reason
that the format was set way down in diff_opt_parse).
This patch unbreaks what 68daa64 did (while still preserving
what 68daa64 was trying to do), reinstating "-p" to suppress
the default behavior. We do this by parsing "-p" ourselves
in format-patch, and noting whether it was used explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"commit -s" used to add an empty line before adding S-o-b line only when
the last line of the existing log message is not another S-o-b line, but
c1e01b0 (commit: More generous accepting of RFC-2822 footer lines.,
2009-10-28) introduced logic to omit this empty line when the message ends
with a run of "footer" lines, to cover S-o-b's friends, e.g. Acked-by.
However, the logic was overzealous and missed one corner case. A message
that consists of a single line that begins with Token + colon, it can be
mistaken as a S-o-b's friend. We do want an empty line in such a case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A tree-wide bikeshedding to replace "fast forward" into "fast-forward" is
in 'master'. Since we want to keep this "test modernization" series
mergeable also to the maintenance track, we would need to tweak the test
to accept both old spellings and new spellings.
Sigh... This kind of headache is the primary reason we try not to allow
such a tree-wide bike-shedding, but the damage has already been done.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of using bare "cmp", use "test_cmp". Output when the test is run
with a -v option becomes easier to diagnose when something goes wrong
because on saner platforms test_cmp uses "diff -u".
There is no need to put an extra backslash to a line that ends with a '|'
(i.e. the upstream of a pipe).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There were some differences between t1200 and the gitcore-tutorial. Add
missing tests for manually merging two branches, and use the same
commands in both files.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Many parts of the tests in t1200 are run outside the test harness,
circumventing the usefulness of -v and spewing messages to stdout when
-v isn't used. Fix these problems by modernizing the test a bit.
An extra test_done has existed since commit 6a74642 (git-commit --amend:
two fixes., 2006-04-20) leading to the last 6 tests never being run.
Remove it and teach the resolve merge test about fast-forward merges.
Also fix the last test's incorrect find command and prune before
checking for unpacked objects so we remove the unreachable conflict-marked
blob.
Finally, we remove the TODO notes, because fetch, push, and clone have
their own tests since t1200 was introduced and we're not going to add
them here 4 years later.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For convenience in scripts and aliases, add the option
--ff-only to only allow fast-forwards (and up-to-date,
despite the name).
Disallow combining --ff-only and --no-ff, since they
flatly contradict each other.
Allow all other options to be combined with --ff-only
(i.e. do not add any code to handle them specially),
including the following options:
* --strategy (one or more): As long as the chosen merge
strategy results in up-to-date or fast-forward, the
command will succeed.
* --squash: I cannot imagine why anyone would want to
squash commits only if fast-forward is possible, but I
also see no reason why it should not be allowed.
* --message: The message will always be ignored, but I see
no need to explicitly disallow providing a redundant message.
Acknowledgements: I did look at Yuval Kogman's earlier
patch (107768 in gmane), mainly as shortcut to find my
way in the code, but I did not copy anything directly.
Signed-off-by: Björn Gustavsson <bgustavsson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because --root can put our trash directories elsewhere,
using ".." may not always work.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
so that they can be run individually as
(cd t && ./t9150-svk-mergetickets.sh)
etc. just like all other test scripts.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit b5227d8 changed the behavior of "ls-files" with
respect to includes, but accidentally broke the "-i" option
The original behavior was:
1. if no "-i" is given, cull all results according to --exclude*
2. if "-i" is given, show the inverse of (1)
The broken behavior was:
1. if no "-i" is given:
a. for "-o", cull results according to --exclude*
b. for index files, always show all
2. if "-i" is given:
a. for "-o", shows the inverse of (1a)
b. for index files, always show all
The fixed behavior keeps the new (1b) behavior introduced
by b5227d8, but fixes the (2b) behavior to show only ignored
files, not all files.
This patch also tweaks the documentation. The original text
was somewhat obscure in the first place, but it is also now
inaccurate (the relationship between (1b) and (2b) is not
quite a "reverse").
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Colored word diff without context lines firstly printed all the hunk
headers among each other and then printed the diff.
This was due to the code relying on getting at least one context line at
the end of each hunk, where the colored words would be flushed (it is
done that way to be able to ignore rewrapped lines).
Noticed by Markus Heidelberg.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
'git commit -s' will insert a blank line before the Signed-off-by
line at the end of the message, unless this last line is a
Signed-off-by line itself. Common use has other trailing lines
at the ends of commit text, in the style of RFC2822 headers.
Be more generous in considering lines to be part of this footer.
If the last paragraph of the commit message reasonably resembles
RFC-2822 formatted lines, don't insert that blank line.
The new Signed-off-by line is still only suppressed when the
author's existing Signed-off-by is the last line of the message.
Signed-off-by: David Brown <davidb@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Usually we show deletion as a big hunk deleting all of the
file's text. However, for files with no content, the diff
shows just the 'deleted file mode ...' line. This patch
cause "add -p" (and related commands) to recognize that line
and explicitly ask about deleting the file.
We only add the "stage this deletion" hunk for empty files,
since other files will already ask about the big content
deletion hunk. We could also change those files to simply
display "stage this deletion", but showing the actual
deleted content is probably what an interactive user wants.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the --dirty option, git describe works on HEAD but append s"-dirty"
iff the contents of the work tree differs from HEAD. E.g.
$ git describe --dirty
v1.6.5-15-gc274db7
$ echo >> Makefile
$ git describe --dirty
v1.6.5-15-gc274db7-dirty
The --dirty option can also be used to specify what is appended, instead
of the default string "-dirty".
$ git describe --dirty=.mod
v1.6.5-15-gc274db7.mod
Many build scripts use `git describe` to produce a version number based on
the description of HEAD (on which the work tree is based) + saying that if
the build contains uncommitted changes. This patch helps the writing of
such scripts since `git describe --dirty` does directly the intended thing.
Three possiblities were considered while discussing this new feature:
1. Describe the work tree by default and describe HEAD only if "HEAD" is
explicitly specified
Pro: does the right thing by default (both for users and for scripts)
Pro: other git commands that works on the work tree by default
Con: breaks existing scripts used by the Linux kernel and other projects
2. Use --worktree instead of --dirty
Pro: does what it says: "git describe --worktree" describes the work tree
Con: other commands do not require a --worktree option when working
on the work tree (it often is the default mode for them)
Con: unusable with an optional value: "git describe --worktree=.mod"
is quite unintuitive.
3. Use --dirty as in this patch
Pro: makes sense to specify an optional value (what the dirty mark is)
Pro: does not have any of the big cons of previous alternatives
* does not break scripts
* is not inconsistent with other git commands
This patch takes the third approach.
Signed-off-by: Jean Privat <jean@pryen.org>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This feature is long overdue; convert SVN's merge representation to git's
as revisions are imported. This works by converting the list of revisions
in each line of the svn:mergeinfo into git revision ranges, and then
checking the latest of each of these revision ranges for A) being new and
B) now being completely merged.
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Dump generated with SVN 1.5.1 (on lenny amd64). This test
should hopefully cover all but a few intermediate versions of
the svnmerge.py script.
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
SVK is a simple case to start with, as its idea of merge parents
matches git's one. When a svk:merge ticket is encountered, check each
of the listed merged revisions to see if they are in the history of
this commit; if not, then we have encountered a merge - record it.
[ew: minor formatting cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Possibly the 'perl' in the PATH is not the one to be used for the tests;
let PERL set in the environment select it.
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Dump generated with SVK 2.0.2 and SVN 1.5.1 (on lenny amd64).
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam.vilain@catalyst.net.nz>
Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
