"git grep -e '$pattern'", unlike the case where the patterns are read from
a file, did not treat individual lines in the given pattern argument as
separate regular expressions as it should.
By René Scharfe
* rs/maint-grep-F:
grep: stop leaking line strings with -f
grep: support newline separated pattern list
grep: factor out do_append_grep_pat()
grep: factor out create_grep_pat()
"git checkout" gave progress display even when the standard error
stream was not connected to the tty, which made little sense.
By Avery Pennarun
* ap/checkout-no-progress-for-non-tty:
checkout: no progress messages if !isatty(2).
When adding the information from a tag, put an empty line between the
message of the tag and the commented-out signature verification
information.
At least for the kernel workflow, I often end up re-formatting the message
that people send me in the tag data. In that situation, putting the tag
message and the tag signature verification back-to-back then means that
normal editor "reflow parapgraph" command will get confused and think that
the signature is a continuation of the last message paragraph.
So I always end up having to first add an empty line, and then go back and
reflow the last paragraph. Let's just do it in git directly.
The extra vertical space also makes the verification visually stand out
more from the user-supplied message, so it looks a bit more readable to me
too, but that may be just an odd personal preference.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git status --porcelain" ignored "--branch" option by mistake. The output
for "git status --branch -z" was also incorrect and did not terminate the
record for the current branch name with NUL as asked.
By Jeff King
* jk/maint-status-porcelain-z-b:
status: respect "-b" for porcelain format
status: fix null termination with "-b"
status: refactor null_termination option
commit: refactor option parsing
If stderr isn't a tty, we shouldn't be printing incremental progress
messages. In particular, this affects 'git checkout -f . >&logfile'
unless you provided -q. And git-new-workdir has no way to provide -q.
It would probably be better to have progress.c check isatty(2) all the time,
but that wouldn't allow things like 'git push --progress' to force progress
reporting to on, so I won't try to solve the general case right now.
Actual fix suggested by Jeff King.
Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When reading patterns from a file, we pass the lines as allocated string
buffers to append_grep_pat() and never free them. That's not a problem
because they are needed until the program ends anyway.
However, now that the function duplicates the pattern string, we can
reuse the strbuf after calling that function. This simplifies the code
a bit and plugs a minor memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Gives a better DWIM behaviour for --pretty=format:%gd, "stash list", and
"log -g", depending on how the starting point ("master" vs "master@{0}" vs
"master@{now}") and date formatting options (e.g. "--date=iso") are given
on the command line.
By Jeff King (4) and Junio C Hamano (1)
* jk/maint-reflog-walk-count-vs-time:
reflog-walk: tell explicit --date=default from not having --date at all
reflog-walk: always make HEAD@{0} show indexed selectors
reflog-walk: clean up "flag" field of commit_reflog struct
log: respect date_mode_explicit with --format:%gd
t1411: add more selector index/date tests
Running "git checkout" on an unborn branch used to corrupt HEAD
(regression in 1.7.10); this makes it error out.
By Erik Faye-Lund
* ef/checkout-empty:
checkout: do not corrupt HEAD on empty repo
When checking out another commit from an already detached state, we used
to report all commits that are not reachable from any of the refs as
lossage, but some of them might be reachable from the new HEAD, and there
is no need to warn about them.
By Johannes Sixt
* js/checkout-detach-count:
checkout (detached): truncate list of orphaned commits at the new HEAD
t2020-checkout-detach: check for the number of orphaned commits
Some time ago, "git clone" lost the progress output for its "checkout"
phase; when run without any "--quiet" option, it should give progress to
the lengthy operation.
By Erik Faye-Lund
* ef/maint-clone-progress-fix:
clone: fix progress-regression
The cases "git push" fails due to non-ff can be broken into three
categories; each case is given a separate advise message.
By Christopher Tiwald (2) and Jeff King (1)
* ct/advise-push-default:
Fix httpd tests that broke when non-ff push advice changed
clean up struct ref's nonfastforward field
push: Provide situational hints for non-fast-forward errors
"git repack" used to write out unreachable objects as loose objects
when repacking, even if such loose objects will immediately pruned
due to its age.
By Jeff King
* jk/repack-no-explode-objects-from-old-pack:
gc: use argv-array for sub-commands
argv-array: add a new "pushl" method
argv-array: refactor empty_argv initialization
gc: do not explode objects which will be immediately pruned
Unlike "git rev-parse --show-cdup", "--show-prefix" did not give an
empty line when run at the top of the working tree.
By Ross Lagerwall
* rl/show-empty-prefix:
rev-parse --show-prefix: add in trailing newline
"git push" over smart-http lost progress output a few releases ago.
By Jeff King
* jk/maint-push-progress:
t5541: test more combinations of --progress
teach send-pack about --[no-]progress
send-pack: show progress when isatty(2)
In abe1998 ("git checkout -b: allow switching out of an unborn
branch"), a code-path overly-optimisticly assumed that a
branch-name was specified. This is not always the case, and as
a result a NULL-pointer was attempted printed to .git/HEAD.
This could lead to at least two different failure modes:
1) vsnprintf formated the NULL-string as something useful (e.g
"(null)")
2) vsnprintf crashed
Neither were very convenient for formatting a new HEAD-reference.
To fix this, reintroduce some strictness so we only take this
new codepath if a banch-name was specified.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no reason not to, as the user has to explicitly ask
for it, so we are not breaking compatibility by doing so. We
can do this simply by moving the "show_branch" flag into
the wt_status struct. As a bonus, this saves us from passing
it explicitly, simplifying the code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
This option is passed separately to the wt_status printing
functions, whereas every other formatting option is
contained in the wt_status struct itself. Let's do the same
here, so we can avoid passing it around through the call
stack.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
The options are declared as a static global, but really they
need only be accessible from cmd_commit. Additionally,
declare the "struct wt_status" in cmd_commit and cmd_status
as static at the top of each function; this will let the
options lists reference them directly, which will facilitate
further cleanups.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
In 5bd631b3 ("clone: support multiple levels of verbosity"), the
default behavior to show progress of the implicit checkout in
the clone-command regressed so that progress was only shown if
the verbose-option was specified.
Fix this by making option_verbosity == 0 output progress as well.
Signed-off-by: Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git checkout switches from a detached HEAD to any other commit, then
all orphaned commits were listed in a warning:
Warning: you are leaving 2 commits behind...:
a5e5396 another fixup
6aa1af6 fixup foo
But if the new commit is actually one from this list (6aa1af6 in this
example), then the list in the warning can be truncated at the new HEAD,
because history beginning at HEAD is not "left behind". This makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we show a reflog selector (e.g., via "git log -g"), we
perform some DWIM magic: while we normally show the entry's
index (e.g., HEAD@{1}), if the user has given us a date
with "--date", then we show a date-based select (e.g.,
HEAD@{yesterday}).
However, we don't want to trigger this magic if the
alternate date format we got was from the "log.date"
configuration; that is not sufficiently strong context for
us to invoke this particular magic. To fix this, commit
f4ea32f (improve reflog date/number heuristic, 2009-09-24)
introduced a "date_mode_explicit" flag in rev_info. This
flag is set only when we see a "--date" option on the
command line, and we a vanilla date to the reflog code if
the date was not explicit.
Later, commit 8f8f547 (Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD]
for reflog information, 2009-10-19) added another way to
show selectors, and it did not respect the date_mode_explicit
flag from f4ea32f.
This patch propagates the date_mode_explicit flag to the
pretty-print code, which can then use it to pass the
appropriate date field to the reflog code. This brings the
behavior of "%gd" in line with the other formats, and means
that its output is independent of any user configuration.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Octopus merge strategy did not reduce heads that are recorded in the final
commit correctly.
By Junio C Hamano (4) and Michał Kiedrowicz (1)
* jc/merge-reduce-parents-early:
fmt-merge-msg: discard needless merge parents
builtin/merge.c: reduce parents early
builtin/merge.c: collect other parents early
builtin/merge.c: remove "remoteheads" global variable
merge tests: octopus with redundant parents
The command line parser choked "git cherry-pick $name" when $name can be
both revision name and a pathname, even though $name can never be a path
in the context of the command.
By Clemens Buchacher
* cb/cherry-pick-rev-path-confusion:
cherry-pick: do not expect file arguments
The report from "git fetch" said "new branch" even for a non branch ref.
By Marc Branchaud
* mb/fetch-call-a-non-branch-a-ref:
fetch: describe new refs based on where it came from
fetch: Give remote_ref to update_local_ref() as well
When "git fetch" encounters repositories with too many references, the
command line of "fetch-pack" that is run by a helper e.g. remote-curl, may
fail to hold all of them. Now such an internal invocation can feed the
references through the standard input of "fetch-pack".
By Ivan Todoroski
* it/fetch-pack-many-refs:
remote-curl: main test case for the OS command line overflow
fetch-pack: test cases for the new --stdin option
remote-curl: send the refs to fetch-pack on stdin
fetch-pack: new --stdin option to read refs from stdin
Conflicts:
t/t5500-fetch-pack.sh
"git fetch" that recurses into submodules on demand did not check if it
needs to go into submodules when non branches (most notably, tags) are
fetched.
By Jens Lehmann
* jl/maint-submodule-recurse-fetch:
submodules: recursive fetch also checks new tags for submodule commits
"git blame" started missing quite a few changes from the origin since we
stopped using the diff minimalization by default in v1.7.2 era.
Teach "--minimal" option to "git blame" to work around this regression.
* jc/maint-blame-minimal:
blame: accept --need-minimal
The send_pack function gets a "progress" flag saying "yes,
definitely show progress" or "no, definitely do not show
progress". This gets set properly by transport_push when
send_pack is called directly.
However, when the send-pack command is executed separately
(as it is for the remote-curl helper), there is no way to
tell it "definitely do this". As a result, we do not
properly respect "git push --no-progress" for smart-http
remotes; you will still get progress if stderr is a tty.
This patch teaches send-pack --progress and --no-progress,
and teaches remote-curl to pass the appropriate option to
override send-pack's isatty check. This fixes the
--no-progress case above, and as a bonus, also makes "git
push --progress" work when stderr is not a tty.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The send_pack_args struct has two verbosity flags: "quiet"
and "progress". Originally, if "quiet" was set, we would
tell pack-objects explicitly to be quiet, and if "progress"
was set, we would tell it to show progress. Otherwise, we
told it neither, and it relied on isatty(2) to make the
decision itself.
However, commit 01fdc21 changed the meaning of these
variables. Now both "quiet" and "!progress" instruct us to
tell pack-objects to be quiet (and a non-zero "progress"
means the same as before). This works well for transports
which call send_pack directly, as the transport code copies
transport->progress into send_pack_args->progress, and they
both have the same meaning.
However, the code path of calling "git send-pack" was left
behind. It always sets "progress" to 0, and thus always
tells pack-objects to be quiet. We can work around this by
checking isatty(2) ourselves in the cmd_send_pack code path,
restoring the original behavior of the send-pack command.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'push to upstream' implementation was broken in some corner
cases. "git push $there" without refspec, when the current branch is
set to push to a remote different from $there, used to push to $there
using the upstream information to a remote unreleated to $there.
* jc/push-upstream-sanity:
push: error out when the "upstream" semantics does not make sense
Rename detection logic used to match two empty files as renames during
merge-recursive, leading unnatural mismerges.
By Jeff King
* jk/diff-no-rename-empty:
merge-recursive: don't detect renames of empty files
teach diffcore-rename to optionally ignore empty content
make is_empty_blob_sha1 available everywhere
drop casts from users EMPTY_TREE_SHA1_BIN
When "git commit --template F" errors out because the user did not
touch the message, it claimed that it aborts due to "empty message",
which was utterly wrong.
By Junio C Hamano (4) and Adam Monsen (1)
* jc/commit-unedited-template:
Documentation/git-commit: rephrase the "initial-ness" of templates
git-commit.txt: clarify -t requires editing message
commit: rephrase the error when user did not touch templated log message
commit: do not trigger bogus "has templated message edited" check
t7501: test the right kind of breakage
"git commit --author=$name" did not tell the name that was being
recorded in the resulting commit to hooks, even though it does do so
when the end user overrode the authorship via the "GIT_AUTHOR_NAME"
environment variable.
* jc/commit-hook-authorship:
commit: pass author/committer info to hooks
t7503: does pre-commit-hook learn authorship?
ident.c: add split_ident_line() to parse formatted ident line
This is used by "git pull" to construct a merge message from list of
remote refs. When pulling redundant set of refs, however, it did not
filter them even though the merge itself discards them as unnecessary.
Teach the command to do the same for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-gc executes many sub-commands. The argument list for
some of these is constant, but for others we add more
arguments at runtime. The latter is implemented by allocating
a constant extra number of NULLs, and either using a custom
append function, or just referencing unused slots by number.
As of commit 7e52f56, which added two new arguments, it is
possible to exceed the constant number of slots for "repack"
by running "git gc --aggressive", causing "git gc" to die.
This patch converts all of the static argv lists to use
argv-array. In addition to fixing the overflow caused by
7e52f56, it has a few advantages:
1. We can drop the custom append function (which,
incidentally, had an off-by-one error exacerbating the
static limit).
2. We can drop the ugly magic numbers used when adding
arguments to "prune".
3. Adding further arguments will be easier; you can just
add new "push" calls without worrying about increasing
any static limits.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of waiting until we record the parents of resulting merge, reduce
redundant parents (including our HEAD) immediately after reading them.
The change to t7602 illustrates the essence of the effect of this change.
The octopus merge strategy used to be fed with redundant commits only to
discard them as "up-to-date", but we no longer feed such redundant commits
to it and the affected test degenerates to a regular two-head merge.
And obviously the known-to-be-broken test in t6028 is now fixed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the code around to populate remoteheads list early in the process
before any decision regarding twohead vs octopus and fast-forwardness is
made.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
update_local_ref() used to say "[new branch]" when we stored a new ref
outside refs/tags/ hierarchy, but the message is more about what we
fetched, so use the refname at the origin to make that decision.
Also, only call a new ref a "branch" if it's under refs/heads/.
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This way, the function can look at the remote side to adjust the
informational message it gives.
Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a commit-ish passed to cherry-pick or revert happens to have a file
of the same name, git complains that the argument is ambiguous and
advises to use '--'. To make things worse, the '--' argument is removed
by parse_options, und so passing '--' has no effect.
Instead, always interpret cherry-pick/revert arguments as revisions.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 88a21979c (fetch/pull: recurse into submodules when necessary) all
fetched commits are examined if they contain submodule changes (unless
configuration or command line options inhibit that). If a newly recorded
submodule commit is not present in the submodule, a fetch is run inside
it to download that commit.
Checking new refs was done in an else branch where it wasn't executed for
tags. This normally isn't a problem because tags are only fetched with
the branches they live on, then checking the new commits in the fetched
branches for submodule commits will also process all tags. But when a
specific tag is fetched (or the refspec contains refs/tags/) commits only
reachable by tags won't be searched for submodule commits, which is a bug.
Fix that by moving the code outside the if/else construct to handle new
tags just like any other ref. The performance impact of adding tags that
most of the time lie on a branch which is checked anyway for new submodule
commit should be minimal, as since 6859de4 (fetch: avoid quadratic loop
checking for updated submodules) all ref-tips are collected first and then
fed to a single rev-list.
Spotted-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Between v1.7.1 and v1.7.2, 582aa00bdf switched the default "diff"
invocation not to use XDF_NEED_MINIMAL, but this breaks "git blame"
rather badly.
Allow the command line option to ask for an extra careful matching.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we pack everything into one big pack with "git repack
-Ad", any unreferenced objects in to-be-deleted packs are
exploded into loose objects, with the intent that they will
be examined and possibly cleaned up by the next run of "git
prune".
Since the exploded objects will receive the mtime of the
pack from which they come, if the source pack is old, those
loose objects will end up pruned immediately. In that case,
it is much more efficient to skip the exploding step
entirely for these objects.
This patch teaches pack-objects to receive the expiration
information and avoid writing these objects out. It also
teaches "git gc" to pass the value of gc.pruneexpire to
repack (which in turn learns to pass it along to
pack-objects) so that this optimization happens
automatically during "git gc" and "git gc --auto".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Print out a trailing newline when --show-prefix is run with cwd
at the top level of the tree which results in an empty prefix.
Behavior is now like --show-cdup.
Fixes an expected failure in t1501.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerwall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/cache-tree:
t0090: be prepared that 'wc -l' writes leading blanks
reset: update cache-tree data when appropriate
commit: write cache-tree data when writing index anyway
Refactor cache_tree_update idiom from commit
Test the current state of the cache-tree optimization
Add test-scrap-cache-tree
The user can say "git push" without specifying any refspec. When using
the "upstream" semantics via the push.default configuration, the user
wants to update the "upstream" branch of the current branch, which is the
branch at a remote repository the current branch is set to integrate with,
with this command.
However, there are cases that such a "git push" that uses the "upstream"
semantics does not make sense:
- The current branch does not have branch.$name.remote configured. By
definition, "git push" that does not name where to push to will not
know where to push to. The user may explicitly say "git push $there",
but again, by definition, no branch at repository $there is set to
integrate with the current branch in this case and we wouldn't know
which remote branch to update.
- The current branch does have branch.$name.remote configured, but it
does not specify branch.$name.merge that names what branch at the
remote this branch integrates with. "git push" knows where to push in
this case (or the user may explicitly say "git push $remote" to tell us
where to push), but we do not know which remote branch to update.
- The current branch does have its remote and upstream branch configured,
but the user said "git push $there", where $there is not the remote
named by "branch.$name.remote". By definition, no branch at repository
$there is set to integrate with the current branch in this case, and
this push is not meant to update any branch at the remote repository
$there.
The first two cases were already checked correctly, but the third case was
not checked and we ended up updating the branch named branch.$name.merge
at repository $there, which was totally bogus.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
