"git commit --allow-empty-message -C $commit" did not work when the
commit did not have any log message.
* jk/commit-C-pick-empty:
commit: do not complain of empty messages from -C
* jk/commit-date-approxidate:
commit: accept more date formats for "--date"
commit: print "Date" line when the user has set date
pretty: make show_ident_date public
commit: use split_ident_line to compare author/committer
"git blame" miscounted number of columns needed to show localized
timestamps, resulting in jaggy left-side-edge of the source code
lines in its output.
* jx/blame-align-relative-time:
blame: dynamic blame_date_width for different locales
blame: fix broken time_buf paddings in relative timestamp
"git merge" without argument, even when there is an upstream
defined for the current branch, refused to run until
merge.defaultToUpstream is set to true. Flip the default of that
configuration variable to true.
* fc/merge-default-to-upstream:
merge: enable defaulttoupstream by default
* rs/ref-update-check-errors-early:
commit.c: check for lock error and return early
sequencer.c: check for lock failure and bail early in fast_forward_to
Enable threaded index-pack on platforms without thread-unsafe
pread() emulation.
* nd/index-pack-one-fd-per-thread:
index-pack: work around thread-unsafe pread()
Read-only operations such as "git status" that internally refreshes
the index write out the refreshed index to the disk to optimize
future accesses to the working tree, but this could race with a
"read-write" operation that modify the index while it is running.
Detect such a race and avoid overwriting the index.
Duy raised a good point that we may need to do the same for the
normal writeout codepath, not just the "opportunistic" update
codepath. While that is true, nobody sane would be running two
simultaneous operations that are clearly write-oriented competing
with each other against the same index file. So in that sense that
can be done as a less urgent follow-up for this topic.
* ym/fix-opportunistic-index-update-race:
read-cache.c: verify index file before we opportunistically update it
wrapper.c: add xpread() similar to xread()
Update "update-ref --stdin [-z]" and then introduce a transactional
support for (multi-)reference updates.
* mh/ref-transaction: (27 commits)
ref_transaction_commit(): work with transaction->updates in place
struct ref_update: add a type field
struct ref_update: add a lock field
ref_transaction_commit(): simplify code using temporary variables
struct ref_update: store refname as a FLEX_ARRAY
struct ref_update: rename field "ref_name" to "refname"
refs: remove API function update_refs()
update-ref --stdin: reimplement using reference transactions
refs: add a concept of a reference transaction
update-ref --stdin: harmonize error messages
update-ref --stdin: improve the error message for unexpected EOF
t1400: test one mistake at a time
update-ref --stdin -z: deprecate interpreting the empty string as zeros
update-ref.c: extract a new function, parse_next_sha1()
t1400: test that stdin -z update treats empty <newvalue> as zeros
update-ref --stdin: simplify error messages for missing oldvalues
update-ref --stdin: make error messages more consistent
update-ref --stdin: improve error messages for invalid values
update-ref.c: extract a new function, parse_refname()
parse_cmd_verify(): copy old_sha1 instead of evaluating <oldvalue> twice
...
"--ignore-space-change" option of "git apply" ignored the
spaces at the beginning of line too aggressively, which is
inconsistent with the option of the same name "diff" and "git diff"
have.
* jc/apply-ignore-whitespace:
apply --ignore-space-change: lines with and without leading whitespaces do not match
Right now we pass off the string found by "--date" straight
to the fmt_ident function, which will use our strict
parse_date to normalize it. However, this means obvious
things like "--date=now" or "--date=2.days.ago" will not
work.
Instead, let's fallback to the approxidate function to
handle this for us. Note that we must try parse_date
ourselves first, even though approxidate will try strict
parsing itself. The reason is that approxidate throws away
any timezone information it sees from the strict parsing,
and we want to preserve it. So asking for:
git commit --date="@1234567890 -0700"
continues to set the date in -0700, regardless of what the
local timezone is.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we make a commit and the author is not the same as the
committer (e.g., because you used "-c $commit" or
"--author=$somebody"), we print the author's name and email
in both the commit-message template and as part of the
commit summary. This is a safety check to give the user a
chance to confirm that we are doing what they expect.
This patch brings the same safety for the "date" field,
which may be set by "-c" or by using "--date". Note that we
explicitly do not set it for $GIT_AUTHOR_DATE, as it is
probably not of interest when "git commit" is being fed its
parameters by a script.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of string-wise comparing the author/committer lines
with their timestamps truncated, we can use split_ident_line
and ident_cmp. These functions are more robust than our
ad-hoc parsing, though in practice it should not matter, as
we just generated these ident lines ourselves.
However, this will also allow us easy access to the
timestamp and tz fields in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If we use a different conflict style `git rerere forget` is not able
to find the matching conflict SHA-1 because the diff generated is
actually different from what `git merge` generated, due to the
XDL_MERGE_* option differences among the codepaths.
The fix is to call git_xmerge_config() so that git_xmerge_style is set
properly and the diffs match.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we pick another commit's message, we die() immediately
if we find that it's empty and we are not going to run an
editor (i.e., when running "-C" instead of "-c"). However,
this check is redundant and harmful.
It's redundant because we will already notice the empty
message later, after we would have run the editor, and die
there (just as we would for a regular, not "-C" case, where
the user provided an empty message in the editor).
It's harmful for a few reasons:
1. It does not respect --allow-empty-message. As a result,
a "git rebase -i" cannot "pick" such a commit. So you
cannot even go back in time to fix it with a "reword"
or "edit" instruction.
2. It does not take into account other ways besides the
editor to modify the message. For example, "git commit
-C empty-commit -m foo" could take the author
information from empty-commit, but add a message to it.
There's more to do to make that work correctly (and
right now we explicitly forbid "-C with -m"), but this
removes one roadblock.
3. The existing check is not enough to prevent segfaults.
We try to find the "\n\n" header/body boundary in the
commit. If it is at the end of the string (i.e., no
body), _or_ if we cannot find it at all (i.e., a
truncated commit object), we consider the message
empty. With "-C", that's OK; we die in either case. But
with "-c", we continue on, and in the case of a
truncated commit may end up dereferencing NULL+2.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In large repos, the recursion implementation of contains(commit,
commit_list) may result in a stack overflow. Replace the recursion with
a loop to fix it.
This problem is more apparent on Windows than on Linux, where the stack
is more limited by default.
See also this thread on the msysGit list:
https://groups.google.com/d/topic/msysgit/FqT6boJrb2g/discussion
[jes: re-written to imitate the original recursion more closely]
Thomas Braun pointed out several documentation shortcomings.
Tests are run only if ulimit -s is available. This means they cannot
be run on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Jean-Jacques Lafay <jeanjacques.lafay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Stepan Kasal <kasal@ucw.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When show date in relative date format for git-blame, the max display
width of datetime is set as the length of the string "Thu Oct 19
16:00:04 2006 -0700" (30 characters long). But actually the max width
for C locale is only 22 (the length of string "x years, xx months ago").
And for other locale, it maybe smaller. E.g. For Chinese locale, only
needs a half (16-character width).
Set blame_date_width as the display width of _("4 years, 11 months
ago"), so that translators can make the choice.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Command `git blame --date relative` aligns the date field with a
fixed-width (defined by blame_date_width), and if time_str is shorter
than that, it adds spaces for padding. But there are two bugs in the
following codes:
time_len = strlen(time_str);
...
memset(time_buf + time_len, ' ', blame_date_width - time_len);
1. The type of blame_date_width is size_t, which is unsigned. If
time_len is greater than blame_date_width, the result of
"blame_date_width - time_len" will never be a negative number, but a
really big positive number, and will cause memory overwrite.
This bug can be triggered if either l10n message for function
show_date_relative() in date.c is longer than 30 characters, then
`git blame --date relative` may exit abnormally.
2. When show blame information with relative time, the UTF-8 characters
in time_str will break the alignment of columns after the date field.
This is because the time_buf padding with spaces should have a
constant display width, not a fixed strlen size. So we should call
utf8_strwidth() instead of strlen() for width calibration.
Helped-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There's no point in this:
% git merge
fatal: No commit specified and merge.defaultToUpstream not set.
We know the most likely scenario is that the user wants to merge the
upstream, and if not, he can set merge.defaultToUpstream to false.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move the check for the lock failure to happen immediately after
lock_any_ref_for_update(). Previously the lock and the
check-if-lock-failed was separated by a handful of string
manipulation statements.
Moving the check to occur immediately after the failed lock makes
the code slightly easier to read and makes it follow the pattern of
try-to-take-a-lock();
if (check-if-lock-failed) {
error();
}
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <sahlberg@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When extract l10n messages, we use "--add-comments" option to keep
comments right above the l10n messages for references. But sometimes
irrelevant comments are also extracted. For example in the following
code block, the comment in line 2 will be extracted as comment for the
l10n message in line 3, but obviously it's wrong.
{ OPTION_CALLBACK, 0, "ignore-removal", &addremove_explicit,
NULL /* takes no arguments */,
N_("ignore paths removed in the working tree (same as
--no-all)"),
PARSE_OPT_NOARG, ignore_removal_cb },
Since almost all comments for l10n translators are marked with the same
prefix (tag): "TRANSLATORS:", it's safe to only extract comments with
this special tag. I.E. it's better to call xgettext as:
xgettext --add-comments=TRANSLATORS: ...
Also tweaks the multi-line comment in "init-db.c", to make it start with
the proper tag, not "* TRANSLATORS:" (which has a star before the tag).
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Multi-threaing of index-pack was disabled with c0f8654
(index-pack: Disable threading on cygwin - 2012-06-26), because
pread() implementations for Cygwin and MSYS were not thread
safe. Recent Cygwin does offer usable pread() and we enabled
multi-threading with 103d530f (Cygwin 1.7 has thread-safe pread,
2013-07-19).
Work around this problem on platforms with a thread-unsafe
pread() emulation by opening one file handle per thread; it
would prevent parallel pread() on different file handles from
stepping on each other.
Also remove NO_THREAD_SAFE_PREAD that was introduced in c0f8654
because it's no longer used anywhere.
This workaround is unconditional, even for platforms with
thread-safe pread() because the overhead is small (a couple file
handles more) and not worth fragmenting the code.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is a common mistake to call read(2)/pread(2) and forget to
anticipate that they may return error with EAGAIN/EINTR when the
system call is interrupted.
We have xread() helper to relieve callers of read(2) from having to
worry about it; add xpread() helper to do the same for pread(2).
Update the caller in the builtin/index-pack.c and the mmap emulation
in compat/.
Signed-off-by: Yiannis Marangos <yiannis.marangos@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Eradicate mistaken use of "nor" (that is, essentially "nor" used
not in "neither A nor B" ;-)) from in-code comments, command output
strings, and documentations.
* jl/nor-or-nand-and:
code and test: fix misuses of "nor"
comments: fix misuses of "nor"
contrib: fix misuses of "nor"
Documentation: fix misuses of "nor"
Make sure that the help text given to describe the "<param>" part
of the "git cmd --option=<param>" does not contain SP or _,
e.g. "--gpg-sign=<key-id>" option for "git commit" is not spelled
as "--gpg-sign=<key id>".
* jc/rev-parse-argh-dashed-multi-words:
parse-options: make sure argh string does not have SP or _
update-index: teach --cacheinfo a new syntax "mode,sha1,path"
parse-options: multi-word argh should use dash to separate words
This change is mostly clerical: the parse_cmd_*() functions need to
use local variables rather than a struct ref_update to collect the
arguments needed for each update, and then call ref_transaction_*() to
queue the change rather than building up the list of changes at the
caller side.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make (most of) the error messages for invalid input have the same
format [1]:
$COMMAND [SP $REFNAME]: $MESSAGE
Update the tests accordingly.
[1] A few error messages are left with their old form, because
$COMMAND and $REFNAME aren't passed all the way down the call
stack. Maybe those sites should be changed some day, too.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Distinguish this error from the error that an argument is missing for
another reason. Update the tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the original version of this command, for the single case of the
"update" command's <newvalue>, the empty string was interpreted as
being equivalent to 40 "0"s. This shorthand is unnecessary (binary
input will usually be generated programmatically anyway), and it
complicates the parser and the documentation.
So gently deprecate this usage: remove its description from the
documentation and emit a warning if it is found. But for reasons of
backwards compatibility, continue to accept it.
Helped-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Replace three functions, update_store_new_sha1(),
update_store_old_sha1(), and parse_next_arg(), with a single function,
parse_next_sha1(). The new function takes care of a whole argument,
including checking whether it is there, converting it to an SHA-1, and
emitting errors on EOF or for invalid values. The return value
indicates whether the argument was present or absent, which requires
a bit of intelligence because absent values are represented
differently depending on whether "-z" was used.
The new interface means that the calling functions, parse_cmd_*(),
don't have to interpret the result differently based on the
line_termination mode that is in effect. It also means that
parse_cmd_create() can distinguish unambiguously between an empty new
value and a zeros new value, which fixes a failure in t1400.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of, for example,
fatal: update refs/heads/master missing [<oldvalue>] NUL
emit
fatal: update refs/heads/master missing <oldvalue>
Update the tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The old error messages emitted for invalid input sometimes said
"<oldvalue>"/"<newvalue>" and sometimes said "old value"/"new value".
Convert them all to the former. Update the tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If an invalid value is passed to "update-ref --stdin" as <oldvalue> or
<newvalue>, include the command and the name of the reference at the
beginning of the error message. Update the tests accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no reason to obscure the fact that parse_first_arg() always
parses refnames. Form the new function by combining parse_first_arg()
and update_store_ref_name().
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Aside from avoiding a tiny bit of work, this makes it transparently
obvious that old_sha1 and new_sha1 are identical. It is arguably a
bit silly to have to set new_sha1 in order to verify old_sha1, but
that is a problem for another day.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Read the whole input into a strbuf at once, and then parse it from
there. This might also be a tad faster, but that is not the point.
The point is to decouple the parsing code from the input source (the
old parsing code had to read new data even in the middle of commands).
Add docstrings for the parsing functions.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The old signature of update_refs() required a
(const struct ref_update **) for its updates_orig argument. The
"const" is presumably there to promise that the function will not
modify the contents of the structures.
But this declaration does not permit the function to be called with a
(struct ref_update **), which is perfectly legitimate. C's type
system is not powerful enough to express what we'd like. So remove
the first "const" from the declaration.
On the other hand, the function *can* promise not to modify the
pointers within the array that is passed to it without inconveniencing
its callers. So add a "const" that has that effect, making the final
declaration
(struct ref_update * const *).
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Given that these constants are only being used when updating
references, it is inappropriate to give them such generic names as
"DIE_ON_ERR". So prefix their names with "UPDATE_REFS_".
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The old parse_arg(), when fed an argument
"refs/heads/a"master
parsed 'refs/heads/a' off of the front of the argument and considered
itself successful. It was only when parse_next_arg() tried to parse
the *next* argument that a problem was noticed. But in fact, the
definition of the input format requires arguments to be terminated by
SP or NUL, so *this* argument is already erroneous and parse_arg()
should diagnose the problem.
So teach parse_arg() to verify that C-quoted arguments are terminated
correctly. If not, emit a more specific error message.
There is no corresponding error case of a non-C-quoted argument that
is not terminated correctly, because the end of a non-quoted argument
is *by definition* a space or NUL, so there is no way to insert other
junk between the "end" of the argument and the argument terminator.
Adjust the tests to expect the new error message. Add a docstring to
the function, incorporating the comments that were formerly within the
function plus some added information.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we are sending a packfile to a remote, we currently try
to reuse a whole chunk of packfile without bothering to look
at the individual objects. This can make things like initial
clones much lighter on the server, as we can just dump the
packfile bytes.
However, it's possible that the other side cannot read our
packfile verbatim. For example, we may have objects stored
as OFS_DELTA, but the client is an antique version of git
that only understands REF_DELTA. We negotiate this
capability over the fetch protocol. A normal pack-objects
run will convert OFS_DELTA into REF_DELTA on the fly, but
the "reuse pack" code path never even looks at the objects.
This patch disables packfile reuse if the other side is
missing any capabilities that we might have used in the
on-disk pack. Right now the only one is OFS_DELTA, but we
may need to expand in the future (e.g., if packv4 introduces
new object types).
We could be more thorough and only disable reuse in this
case when we actually have an OFS_DELTA to send, but:
1. We almost always will have one, since we prefer
OFS_DELTA to REF_DELTA when possible. So this case
would almost never come up.
2. Looking through the objects defeats the purpose of the
optimization, which is to do as little work as possible
to get the bytes to the remote.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Allow tweaking the maximum length of the delta-chain produced by
"gc --aggressive".
* nd/gc-aggressive:
environment.c: fix constness for odb_pack_keep()
gc --aggressive: make --depth configurable
Attempts to show where a single-strand-of-pearls break in "git log"
output.
* nd/log-show-linear-break:
log: add --show-linear-break to help see non-linear history
object.h: centralize object flag allocation
Signed-off-by: Aman Gupta <aman@tmm1.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Acked-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teaches the "rev-parse --parseopt" mechanism used by scripted
Porcelains to parse command line options and give help text how to
supply argv-help (the placeholder string for an option parameter,
e.g. "key-id" in "--gpg-sign=<key-id>").
* ib/rev-parse-parseopt-argh:
t1502: protect runs of SPs used in the indentation
rev-parse --parseopt: option argument name hints
When 1c192f3 (gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive - 2007-12-06)
made --depth=250 the default value, it didn't really explain the
reason behind, especially the pros and cons of --depth=250.
An old mail from Linus below explains it at length. Long story short,
--depth=250 is a disk saver and a performance killer. Not everybody
agrees on that aggressiveness. Let the user configure it.
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc --aggressive: make it really aggressive
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 08:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0712060803430.13796@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Gmane-URL: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.devel/94637
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Harvey Harrison wrote:
>
> 7:41:25elapsed 86%CPU
Heh. And this is why you want to do it exactly *once*, and then just
export the end result for others ;)
> -r--r--r-- 1 hharrison hharrison 324094684 2007-12-06 07:26 pack-1d46...pack
But yeah, especially if you allow longer delta chains, the end result can
be much smaller (and what makes the one-time repack more expensive is the
window size, not the delta chain - you could make the delta chains longer
with no cost overhead at packing time)
HOWEVER.
The longer delta chains do make it potentially much more expensive to then
use old history. So there's a trade-off. And quite frankly, a delta depth
of 250 is likely going to cause overflows in the delta cache (which is
only 256 entries in size *and* it's a hash, so it's going to start having
hash conflicts long before hitting the 250 depth limit).
So when I said "--depth=250 --window=250", I chose those numbers more as
an example of extremely aggressive packing, and I'm not at all sure that
the end result is necessarily wonderfully usable. It's going to save disk
space (and network bandwidth - the delta's will be re-used for the network
protocol too!), but there are definitely downsides too, and using long
delta chains may simply not be worth it in practice.
(And some of it might just want to have git tuning, ie if people think
that long deltas are worth it, we could easily just expand on the delta
hash, at the cost of some more memory used!)
That said, the good news is that working with *new* history will not be
affected negatively, and if you want to be _really_ sneaky, there are ways
to say "create a pack that contains the history up to a version one year
ago, and be very aggressive about those old versions that we still want to
have around, but do a separate pack for newer stuff using less aggressive
parameters"
So this is something that can be tweaked, although we don't really have
any really nice interfaces for stuff like that (ie the git delta cache
size is hardcoded in the sources and cannot be set in the config file, and
the "pack old history more aggressively" involves some manual scripting
and knowing how "git pack-objects" works rather than any nice simple
command line switch).
So the thing to take away from this is:
- git is certainly flexible as hell
- .. but to get the full power you may need to tweak things
- .. happily you really only need to have one person to do the tweaking,
and the tweaked end results will be available to others that do not
need to know/care.
And whether the difference between 320MB and 500MB is worth any really
involved tweaking (considering the potential downsides), I really don't
know. Only testing will tell.
Linus
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
