The new rename subcommand does the followings:
1) Renames the remote.foo configuration section to remote.bar
2) Updates the remote.bar.fetch refspecs
3) Updates the branch.*.remote settings
4) Renames the tracking branches: renames the normal refs and rewrites
the symrefs to point to the new refs.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mv/maint-branch-m-symref:
update-ref --no-deref -d: handle the case when the pointed ref is packed
git branch -m: forbid renaming of a symref
Fix git update-ref --no-deref -d.
rename_ref(): handle the case when the reflog of a ref does not exist
Fix git branch -m for symrefs.
* sh/rebase-i-p:
git-rebase--interactive.sh: comparision with == is bashism
rebase-i-p: minimum fix to obvious issues
rebase-i-p: if todo was reordered use HEAD as the rewritten parent
rebase-i-p: do not include non-first-parent commits touching UPSTREAM
rebase-i-p: only list commits that require rewriting in todo
rebase-i-p: fix 'no squashing merges' tripping up non-merges
rebase-i-p: delay saving current-commit to REWRITTEN if squashing
rebase-i-p: use HEAD for updating the ref instead of mapping OLDHEAD
rebase-i-p: test to exclude commits from todo based on its parents
Occasionally, it may be useful to prevent branches from getting deleted from
a centralized repository, particularly when no administrative access to the
server is available to undo it via reflog. It also makes
receive.denyNonFastForwards more useful if it is used for access control
since it prevents force-updating by deleting and re-creating a ref.
Signed-off-by: Jan Krüger <jk@jk.gs>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In this case we did nothing in the past, but we should delete the
reference in fact.
The problem was that when the symref is not packed but the referenced
ref is packed, then we assumed that the symref is packed as well, but
symrefs are never packed.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-svn: change dashed git-commit-tree to git commit-tree
Documentation: clarify information about 'ident' attribute
bash completion: add doubledash to "git show"
Use test-chmtime -v instead of perl in t5000 to get mtime of a file
Add --verbose|-v to test-chmtime
asciidoc: add minor workaround to add an empty line after code blocks
Plug a memleak in builtin-revert
Add file delete/create info when we overflow rename_limit
Install git-cvsserver in $(bindir)
Install git-shell in bindir, too
The test was broken on admittedly broken combination of Windows, Cygwin,
and ActiveState Perl.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <ariesen@harmanbecker.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There may be cases where one would really want to rename the symbolic
ref without changing its value, but "git branch -m" is not such a
use-case.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This moves the call to git_config to a place where it doesn't break the
logic for using git archive in a bare repository but retains the fix to
make git archive respect core.autocrlf.
Tests are by René Scharfe.
Signed-off-by: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
Tested-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Till now --no-deref was just ignored when deleting refs, fix this.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This had two problems with symrefs. First, it copied the actual sha1
instead of the "pointer", second it failed to remove the old ref after a
successful rename.
Given that till now delete_ref() always dereferenced symrefs, a new
parameters has been introduced to delete_ref() to allow deleting refs
without a dereference.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 9441b61dc5 introduced serious bugs in index-pack which are
described and fixed by commit ce3f6dc655. However, despite the
boldness of those bugs, the test suite still passed.
This improves t5302-pack-index.sh so to ensure a much better code
path coverage. With commit ce3f6dc655 reverted, 17 of the 26 tests
do fail now.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, branches were listed on a single line in each section. But
if there are many branches, then horizontal, line-wrapped lists are very
inconvenient to scan for a human. This makes the lists vertical, i.e one
branch per line is printed.
Since "git remote" is porcelain, we can easily make this
backwards-incompatible change.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a file is different between the working tree copy, the index, and the
HEAD, then we do not allow it to be deleted without --force.
However, this is overly tight in the face of "git add --intent-to-add":
$ git add --intent-to-add file
$ : oops, I don't actually want to stage that yet
$ git rm --cached file
error: 'empty' has staged content different from both the
file and the HEAD (use -f to force removal)
$ git rm -f --cached file
Unfortunately, there is currently no way to distinguish between an empty
file that has been added and an "intent to add" file. The ideal behavior
would be to disallow the former while allowing the latter.
This patch loosens the safety valve to allow the deletion only if we are
deleting the cached entry and the cached content is empty. This covers
the intent-to-add situation, and assumes there is little harm in not
protecting users who have legitimately added an empty file. In many
cases, the file will still be empty, in which case the safety valve does
not trigger anyway (since the content remains untouched in the working
tree). Otherwise, we do remove the fact that no content was staged, but
given that the content is by definition empty, it is not terribly
difficult for a user to recreate it.
However, we still document the desired behavior in the form of two
tests. One checks the correct removal of an intent-to-add file. The other
checks that we still disallow removal of empty files, but is marked as
expect_failure to indicate this compromise. If the intent-to-add feature
is ever extended to differentiate between normal empty files and
intent-to-add files, then the safety valve can be re-tightened.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/diff-convfilter:
diff: add filter for converting binary to text
diff: introduce diff.<driver>.binary
diff: unify external diff and funcname parsing code
t4012: use test_cmp instead of cmp
* js/maint-fetch-update-head:
pull: allow "git pull origin $something:$current_branch" into an unborn branch
Fix fetch/pull when run without --update-head-ok
Conflicts:
t/t5510-fetch.sh
* jc/maint-co-track:
Enhance hold_lock_file_for_{update,append}() API
demonstrate breakage of detached checkout with symbolic link HEAD
Fix "checkout --track -b newbranch" on detached HEAD
Conflicts:
builtin-commit.c
Currently git-blame outputs text from the commit messages
(e.g. the author name and the summary string) as-is, without
even providing any information about the encoding used for
the data. It makes interpreting the data in multilingual
environment very difficult.
This commit changes the blame implementation to recode the
messages using the rules used by other commands like git-log.
Namely, the target encoding can be specified through the
i18n.commitEncoding or i18n.logOutputEncoding options, or
directly on the command line using the --encoding parameter.
Converting the encoding before output seems to be more
friendly to the porcelain tools than simply providing the
value of the encoding header, and does not require changing
the output format.
If anybody needs the old behavior, it is possible to
achieve it by specifying --encoding=none.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gavrilov <angavrilov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before commit d0b92a3f6e it was possible to run 'git index-pack'
directly in the .git/objects/pack/ directory. Restore that ability.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
06cbe855 (Make core.sharedRepository more generic, 2008-04-16) made
several testcases in t1301-shared-repo.sh which fail if on a system
which creates files with extended attributes (e.g. SELinux), since ls
appends a '+' sign to the permission set in such cases. In fact,
POSIX.1 allows ls to add a single printable character after the usual
3x3 permission bits to show that an optional alternate/additional access
method is associated with the path.
This fixes the testcase to strip any such sign prior to verifying the
permission set.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested-by: Deskin Miller <deskinm@umich.edu>
* dp/checkattr:
git-check-attr(1): use 'verse' for multi-line synopsis sections
check-attr: Add --stdin option
check-attr: add an internal check_attr() function
This changes the "die_on_error" boolean parameter to a mere "flags", and
changes the existing callers of hold_lock_file_for_update/append()
functions to pass LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When core.prefersymlinkrefs is in use, detaching the HEAD by
checkout incorrectly clobbers the tip of the current branch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When aborting a failed merge that has brought in a new path using "git
reset --hard" or "git read-tree --reset -u", we used to first forget about
the new path (via read_cache_unmerged) and then matched the working tree
to what is recorded in the index, thus ending up leaving the new path in
the work tree.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes erroneous output slightly easier to see. We also
flip the argument order to match our usual style.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
format-patch is most commonly used for multiple patches at once when
sending a patchset, in which case we want to number the patches; on
the other hand, single patches are not usually expected to be
numbered.
In other words, the typical behavior expected from format-patch is the
one obtained by enabling autonumber, so we set it to be the default.
Users that want to disable numbering for a particular patchset can do
so with the existing -N command-line switch. Users that want to
change the default behavior can use the format.numbering config key.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Test-updates-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test to make sure that checkout fails when --track was asked for and
we cannot set up tracking information in t7201 was wrong, and it turns out
that the implementation for that feature itself was buggy. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the "git status" display code was originally converted
to C, we copied the code from ls-files to discover whether a
pathname returned by read_directory was an "other", or
untracked, file.
Much later, 5698454e updated the code in ls-files to handle
some new cases caused by gitlinks. This left the code in
wt-status.c broken: it would display submodule directories
as untracked directories. Nobody noticed until now, however,
because unless status.showUntrackedFiles was set to "all",
submodule directories were not actually reported by
read_directory. So the bug was only triggered in the
presence of a submodule _and_ this config option.
This patch pulls the ls-files code into a new function,
cache_name_is_other, and uses it in both places. This should
leave the ls-files functionality the same and fix the bug
in status.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the caller supplies --tags they want the lightweight, unannotated
tags to be searched for a match. If a lightweight tag is closer
in the history, it should be matched, even if an annotated tag is
reachable further back in the commit chain.
The same applies with --all when matching any other type of ref.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Acked-By: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 969c8775 introduced a test which uses the non-portable construct:
command1 && ! command2 | command3
which must be
command1 && ! (command2 | command3)
to work on bsd shells (this is another example of bbf08124, which fixed
several similar cases).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some misguided documents floating on the Net suggest this sequence:
mkdir newdir && cd newdir
git init
git remote add origin $url
git pull origin master:master
"git pull" has known about misguided "pull" that lets the underlying fetch
update the current branch for a long time. It also has known about
"git pull origin master" into a branch yet to be born.
These two workarounds however were not aware of the existence of each
other and did not work well together. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
t1301-shared-repo.sh: don't let a default ACL interfere with the test
git-check-attr(1): add output and example sections
xdiff-interface.c: strip newline (and cr) from line before pattern matching
t4018-diff-funcname: demonstrate end of line funcname matching flaw
t4018-diff-funcname: rework negated last expression test
Typo "does not exists" when git remote update remote.
remote.c: correct the check for a leading '/' in a remote name
Add testcase to ensure merging an early part of a branch is done properly
Conflicts:
t/t7600-merge.sh
This test creates files with several different umasks and expects their
permissions to be initialized according to the umask, so a default ACL on the
trash directory (which overrides the umask for files created in that directory)
causes the test to fail. To avoid that, remove the default ACL if possible with
setfacl(1).
Signed-off-by: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This seems like the best guess we can make until git sequencer marks are
available. That being said, within the context of re-ordering a commit before
its parent in todo, I think applying it on top of the current commit seems like
a reasonable assumption of what the user intended.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
