Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Sixt
8b02c64a3c t5503: GIT_DEBUG_SEND_PACK is not supported on MinGW
The test opens fd 3 and instructs git-upload-pack (via GIT_DEBUG_SEND_PACK)
to log information to that channel.

The way in which new processes are spawned by git on MinGW does not inherit
all file descriptors to the child processes, but only 0, 1, and 2.
The tests in t5503 require that file descriptor 3 is inherited from
git-fetch to git-upload-pack.

A complete implementation is non-trivial and not warranted just to satisfy
this test.  Note that the incompleteness applies only to the executables
that use compat/mingw.c; bash and perl (the other important executables
used by git) are complete, of course.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
2009-03-22 17:52:43 +01:00
Junio C Hamano
3af828634f tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index"
As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the
results of what git command that is being tested has done.  We would not
know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the
cute hack of "git diff --no-index".

Rather use test_cmp for that purpose.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 00:01:56 -07:00
Shawn O. Pearce
41fa7d2eae Teach git-fetch to exploit server side automatic tag following
If the remote peer upload-pack process supports the include-tag
protocol extension then we can avoid running a second fetch cycle
on the client side by letting the server send us the annotated tags
along with the objects it is packing for us.  In the following graph
we can now fetch both "tag1" and "tag2" on the same connection that
we fetched "master" from the remote when we only have L available
on the local side:

         T - tag1          S - tag2
        /                 /
   L - o ------ o ------ B
    \                     \
     \                     \
      origin/master         master

The objects for "tag1" are implicitly downloaded without our direct
knowledge.  The existing "quickfetch" optimization within git-fetch
discovers that tag1 is complete after the first connection and does
not open a second connection.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-04 23:28:15 -08:00
Shawn O. Pearce
cf7f929a10 Teach git-fetch to grab a tag at the same time as a commit
If the situation is the following on the remote and L is the common
base between both sides:

          T - tag1    S - tag2
         /           /
    L - A - O - O - B
     \               \
      origin/master   master

and we have decided to fetch "master" to acquire the range L..B we
can also nab tag S at the same time during the first connection,
as we can clearly see from the refs advertised by upload-pack that
S^{} = B and master = B.

Unfortunately we still cannot nab T at the same time as we are not
able to see that T^{} will also be in the range implied by L..B.
Such computations must be performed on the remote side (not yet
supported) or on the client side as post-processing (the current
behavior).

This optimization is an extension of the previous one in that it
helps on projects which tend to publish both a new commit and a
new tag, then lay idle for a while before publishing anything else.
Most followers are able to download both the new commit and the new
tag in one connection, rather than two.  git.git tends to follow
such patterns with its roughly once-daily updates from Junio.

A protocol extension and additional server side logic would be
necessary to also ensure T is grabbed on the first connection.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-03-03 00:05:45 -08:00