Pressing TAB right after 'git command --long-option=' results in
'git command --long-option=--long-option=' when the long option requires
an argument, but we don't provide completion for its arguments (e.g.
commit --author=, apply --exclude=). This patch detects these long
options and provides empty completion array for them.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Add the following long options to be completed with command "git":
--paginate
--work-tree=
--help
Signed-off-by: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
When doing completion of rebase options in a subdirectory of the work
tree during an ongoing rebase, wrong options were offered because of the
hardcoded .git/.dotest-merge path.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This patch adds the __git_find_subcommand function, which takes one
argument: a string containing all subcommands separated by spaces. The
function searches through the command line whether a subcommand is
already present. The first found subcommand will be printed to standard
output.
This enables us to remove code duplications from completion functions
for commands having subcommands.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
But still all branches are listed, if -r is present
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The new option --rebasing is used internally for rebase to tell am that
it is being used for its purpose. This would leave .dotest/rebasing to
help "completion" scripts tell if the ongoing operation is am or rebase.
Also the option at the same time stands for --binary, -3 and -k which
are always given when rebase drives am as its backend.
Using the information "am" leaves, git-completion.bash tells ongoing
rebase and am apart.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the time when I am on a detached HEAD and I am not doing
a rebase or bisect operation the working directory is sitting on a
tagged release of the repository. Showing the tag name instead of
the commit SHA-1 is much more descriptive and a much better reminder
of the state of this working directory.
Now that git-describe --exact-match is available as a cheap means
of obtaining the exact annotated tag or nothing at all, we can
favor the annotated tag name over the abbreviated commit SHA-1.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch makes the git prompt (when enabled) show if a merge or a
rebase is unfinished. It also detects if a bisect is being done as
well as detached checkouts.
An uncompleted git-am cannot be distinguised from a rebase (the
non-interactive version). Instead of having an even longer prompt
we simply ignore that and hope the power users that use git-am knows
the difference.
Signed-off-by: Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg@dewire.com>
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
There is a convention that commands containing a double-dash
are implementation details and not to be used by mortals. We
should automatically remove them from the completion
suggestions as such.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I use "git diff" (the porcelain) really often, and am almost as often
annoyed that the completions do not know how to complete something simple
as --cached. Now they do.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This has been proposed for a few times without much reaction
from the list. Actually remove it to see who screams.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
convert-objects was needed to convert from an old-style repository,
which hashed the compressed contents and used a different date format.
Such repositories are presumably no longer common and, if such
conversions are necessary, should be done by writing a frontend for
git-fast-import.
Linus, the original author, is OK with moving it to contrib.
Signed-off-by: Matt Kraai <kraai@ftbfs.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Lately I have been doing a lot of calls to `git tag -d` and also to
`git tag -v`. In both such cases being able to complete the names
of existing tags saves the fingers some typing effort. We now look
for the -d or -v option to git-tag in the bash completion support
and offer up existing tag names as possible choices for these.
When creating a new tag we now also offer bash completion support
for the second argument to git-tag (the object to be tagged) as this
can often be a specific existing branch name and is not necessarily
the current HEAD.
If the -f option is being used to recreate an existing tag we now
also offer completion support on the existing tag names for the
first argument of git-tag, helping to the user to reselect the
prior tag name that they are trying to replace.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Both --left-right and --cherry-pick are particularly long to type, so
help the user there.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-submodule command is new in 1.5.3 and contains a number
of useful subcommands for working on submodules. We usually try
to offer the subcommands of a git command in the bash completion,
so here they are for git-submodule.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I'm often finding that I need to run git-describe on very long
remote tracking branch names, to find out what tagged revision
the remote tracking branch is now at (or not at). Typing out
the ref names is painful, so bash completion on them is a very
useful feature.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
A number of commands have learned new tricks as part of git 1.5.3.
If these are long options (--foo) we tend to support them in the
bash completion, as it makes the user's task of using the option
slightly easier.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This is a new addition to 1.5.3; let's teach it to the
completion before the final release.
[sp: Added missing git-stash completion configuration]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Using `git push origin +foo` to forcefully overwrite the remote
branch named foo is a common idiom, especially since + is shorter
than the long option --force and can be specified on a per-branch
basis.
We now complete `git push origin +foo` just like we do the standard
`git push origin foo`. The leading + on a branch refspec does not
alter the completion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Raimund Bauer just discovered that the default bash completion for
a local branch name in a git-push line is not the best choice when
the branch does not exist on the remote system.
In the past we have always completed the local name 'test' as
"test:test", indicating that the destination name is the same as
the local name. But this fails when "test" does not yet exist on
the remote system, as there is no "test" branch for it to match
the name against.
Fortunately git-push does the right thing when given just the
local branch, as it assumes you want to use the same name in the
destination repository. So we now offer "test" as the completion
in a git-push line, and let git-push assume that is also the remote
branch name.
We also still support the remote branch completion after the :,
but only if the user manually adds the colon before trying to get
a completion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
A few new configuration options grew out of the woodwork during the
1.5.2 series. Most of these are pretty easy to support a completion
of, so we do so.
I wanted to also add completion support for the <driver> part of
merge.<driver>.name but to do that we have to look at all of the
.gitattributes files and guess what the unique set of <driver>
strings would be. Since this appears to be non-trivial I'm punting
on it at this time.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
(Somewhat) recently git-log learned about --reverse (to show commits
in the opposite order) and a looong time ago I think it learned
about --raw (to show the raw diff, rather than a unified diff).
These are both useful options, so we should make them easy for the
user to complete.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Recently the git-remote command grew an update subcommand, which
can be used to execute git-fetch across multiple repositories
in a single step. These can be configured with the 'remotes.*'
configuration options, so we can offer completion for any name that
matches and appears to be useful to git-remote update.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
1) Added a note about supporting the long options for most commands,
as we have been doing so for quite some time.
2) Include a notice that these routines are covered by the GPL,
as that may not be obvious, even though they are distributed
as part of the core Git distribution.
3) Added a short section on how to send patches to the routines,
and to whom they should get sent to. Currently that is me,
as I am the active maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
This was just me being silly; I put the --not option into the
completion list twice. There's no duplicates shown in the shell
as the shell removes them before showing them to the user. But we
really don't need the duplicates in the source script either.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
We've had completion for git-log for quite some time, but just
today I noticed we don't have it for the new builtin shortlog
that runs git-log internally. This is indeed a handy thing to
have completion for, especially when your branch names are of
the Very-Very-Long-and-Hard/To-Type/Variety/That-Some-Use.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
The diff-* programs are meant to be plumbing for the diff frontend;
most end users aren't invoking these commands directly. Consequently
we should avoid showing them as possible completions.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
[sp: Modified Jonas' original patch to keep checkout-index
as a a valid completion.]
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Add a new configuration option clean.requireForce. If set, git-clean will
refuse to run, unless forced with the new -f option, or not acting due to -n.
Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The new git-fast-import command is not intended to be invoked
directly by an end user. So offering it as a possible completion
for a subcommand is not very useful.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Completing the 3 core subcommands to git-remote, along with the
names of remotes for 'show' and 'prune' (which take only existing
remotes) is handy.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Apparently `git-rebase -m` uses a metadata directory within .git
(.git/.dotest-merge) rather than .dotest used by git-am (and
git-rebase without the -m option). This caused the completion code
to not offer --continue, --skip or --abort when working within a
`git-rebase -m` session.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We now offer completion support for git-bisect's subcommands,
as well as ref name completion on the good/bad/reset subcommands.
This should make interacting with git-bisect slightly easier on
the fingers.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We've recently added --add as an argument to git-config, but I
missed putting it into the earlier round of git-config updates
within the bash completion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Don't offer resolve as a possible subcommand completion. If you
read the top of the script, there is a big warning about how it
will go away soon in the near future. People should not be using it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I'm lazy. I don't want to type out --prune if bash can do it for
me with --<tab>.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Apparently nobody really makes use of git-diff-stages, as nobody
has complained that it is not supported by the git-diff frontend.
Since its likely this will go away in the future, we should not
offer it as a possible subcommand completion.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
