Commit Graph

274 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dave Olszewski
8fcaca3ff2 don't use default revision if a rev was specified
If a revision is specified, it happens not to have any commits, don't
use the default revision.  By doing so, surprising and undesired
behavior can happen, such as showing the reflog for HEAD when a branch
was specified.

[jc: squashed a test from René]

Signed-off-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-03-13 21:23:43 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
1f54d693fd Merge branch 'jc/grep-author-all-match-implicit' into maint
* jc/grep-author-all-match-implicit:
  "log --author=me --grep=it" should find intersection, not union
2010-03-08 00:35:59 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
712d352577 Merge branch 'tr/maint-cherry-pick-list' into maint
* tr/maint-cherry-pick-list:
  cherry_pick_list: quit early if one side is empty
2010-03-04 22:26:44 -08:00
Thomas Rast
36c079756f cherry_pick_list: quit early if one side is empty
The --cherry-pick logic starts by counting the commits on each side,
so that it can filter away commits on the bigger one.  However, so
far it missed an opportunity for optimization: it doesn't need to do
any work if either side is empty.

This in particular helps the common use-case 'git rebase -i HEAD~$n':
it internally uses --cherry-pick, but since HEAD~$n is a direct
ancestor the left side is always empty.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-20 10:33:11 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
105e473397 Fix log -g this@{upstream}
It showed the correct objects but walked a wrong reflog.
Again, tests are from Jeff King.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-26 13:49:50 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
80235ba79e "log --author=me --grep=it" should find intersection, not union
Historically, any grep filter in "git log" family of commands were taken
as restricting to commits with any of the words in the commit log message.
However, the user almost always want to find commits "done by this person
on that topic".  With "--all-match" option, a series of grep patterns can
be turned into a requirement that all of them must produce a match, but
that makes it impossible to ask for "done by me, on either this or that"
with:

	log --author=me --committer=him --grep=this --grep=that

because it will require both "this" and "that" to appear.

Change the "header" parser of grep library to treat the headers specially,
and parse it as:

	(all-match-OR (HEADER-AUTHOR me)
		      (HEADER-COMMITTER him)
		      (OR
		      	(PATTERN this)
			(PATTERN that) ) )

Even though the "log" command line parser doesn't give direct access to
the extended grep syntax to group terms with parentheses, this change will
cover the majority of the case the users would want.

This incidentally revealed that one test in t7002 was bogus.  It ran:

	log --author=Thor --grep=Thu --format='%s'

and expected (wrongly) "Thu" to match "Thursday" in the author/committer
date, but that would never match, as the timestamp in raw commit buffer
does not have the name of the day-of-the-week.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-25 19:28:13 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
78bc024ab0 Merge branch 'il/rev-glob'
* il/rev-glob:
  Documentation: improve description of --glob=pattern and friends
  rev-parse --branches/--tags/--remotes=pattern
  rev-parse --glob
2010-01-22 16:08:16 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
c6ec7efdd4 Merge branch 'jl/submodule-diff'
* jl/submodule-diff:
  Performance optimization for detection of modified submodules
  git status: Show uncommitted submodule changes too when enabled
  Teach diff that modified submodule directory is dirty
  Show submodules as modified when they contain a dirty work tree
2010-01-22 16:08:10 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
67bc740721 Merge branch 'jc/maint-limit-note-output'
* jc/maint-limit-note-output:
  Fix "log --oneline" not to show notes
  Fix "log" family not to be too agressive about showing notes
2010-01-22 16:08:01 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
7dccadf363 Fix "log --oneline" not to show notes
This option should be treated pretty much the same as --format="%h %s".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-21 14:57:41 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
66b2ed09c2 Fix "log" family not to be too agressive about showing notes
Giving "Notes" information in the default output format of "log" and
"show" is a sensible progress (the user has asked for it by having the
notes), but for some commands (e.g. "format-patch") spewing notes into the
formatted commit log message without being asked is too aggressive.

Enable notes output only for "log", "show", "whatchanged" by default and
only when the user didn't ask any specific --pretty/--format from the
command line; users can explicitly override this default with --show-notes
and --no-notes option.

Parts of tests are taken from Jeff King's fix.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-20 19:57:02 -08:00
Ilari Liusvaara
b09fe971de rev-parse --branches/--tags/--remotes=pattern
Since local branch, tags and remote tracking branch namespaces are
most often used, add shortcut notations for globbing those in
manner similar to --glob option.

With this, one can express the "what I have but origin doesn't?"
as:

'git log --branches --not --remotes=origin'

Original-idea-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-20 12:30:25 -08:00
Ilari Liusvaara
d08bae7e22 rev-parse --glob
Add --glob=<glob-pattern> option to rev-parse and everything that
accepts its options. This option matches all refs that match given
shell glob pattern (complete with some DWIM logic).

Example:

'git log --branches --not --glob=remotes/origin'

To show what you have that origin doesn't.

Signed-off-by: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-20 12:29:05 -08:00
Jens Lehmann
e3d42c4773 Performance optimization for detection of modified submodules
In the worst case is_submodule_modified() got called three times for
each submodule. The information we got from scanning the whole
submodule tree the first time can be reused instead.

New parameters have been added to diff_change() and diff_addremove(),
the information is stored in a new member of struct diff_filespec. Its
value is then reused instead of calling is_submodule_modified() again.

When no explicit "-dirty" is needed in the output the call to
is_submodule_modified() is not necessary when the submodules HEAD
already disagrees with the ref of the superproject, as this alone
marks it as modified. To achieve that, get_stat_data() got an extra
argument.

Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-18 17:28:21 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
3cc3fb7df6 Merge branch 'jc/1.7.0-diff-whitespace-only-status'
* jc/1.7.0-diff-whitespace-only-status:
  diff.c: fix typoes in comments
  Make test case number unique
  diff: Rename QUIET internal option to QUICK
  diff: change semantics of "ignore whitespace" options

Conflicts:
	diff.h
2009-12-26 14:03:18 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
e61f25f3a6 Merge branch 'jc/log-stdin'
* jc/log-stdin:
  Add trivial tests for --stdin option to log family
  Make --stdin option to "log" family read also pathspecs
  setup_revisions(): do not call get_pathspec() too early
  Teach --stdin option to "log" family
  read_revision_from_stdin(): use strbuf

Conflicts:
	revision.c
2009-11-23 22:30:08 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
60da8b15c1 Make --stdin option to "log" family read also pathspecs
Similar to the command line arguments, after giving zero or more revs, you can
feed a line "--" and then feed pathspecs one at a time.

With this

	(
		echo ^maint
		echo --
		echo Documentation
	) | git log --stat --oneline --stdin master -- t

lists commits that touch Documentation/ or t/ between maint and master.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20 15:10:47 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
5486ef0e6d setup_revisions(): do not call get_pathspec() too early
This is necessary because we will later allow pathspecs to be fed from the
standard input, and pathspecs taken from the command line (and converted
via get_pathspec() already) in revs->prune_data too early gets in the way
when we want to append from the standard input.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20 15:10:47 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
8b3dce5650 Teach --stdin option to "log" family
Move the logic to read revs from standard input that rev-list knows about
from it to revision machinery, so that all the users of setup_revisions()
can feed the list of revs from the standard input when "--stdin" is used
on the command line.

Allow some users of the revision machinery that want different semantics
from the "--stdin" option to disable it by setting an option in the
rev_info structure.

This also cleans up the kludge made to bundle.c via cut and paste.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20 15:10:29 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
63d564b300 read_revision_from_stdin(): use strbuf
It is so 2005 (and Linus ;-) to have a fixed 1000-byte buffer that
reads from the user.  Let's use strbuf to unlimit the input length.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-20 14:50:43 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
ad3f9a71a8 Add '--bisect' revision machinery argument
I personally use "git bisect visualize" all the time when I bisect, but it
turns out that that is not a very flexible model. Sometimes I want to do
bisection based on all commits (no pathname limiting), but then visualize
the current bisection tree with just a few pathnames because I _suspect_
those pathnames are involved in the problem but am not totally sure about
them.

And at other times, I want to use other revision parsing logic, none of
which is available with "git bisect visualize".

So this adds "--bisect" as a revision parsing argument, and as a result it
just works with all the normal logging tools. So now I can just do

	gitk --bisect --simplify-by-decoration filename-here

etc.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-10-28 16:07:43 -07:00
Jeff King
f4ea32f0b4 improve reflog date/number heuristic
When we show a reflog, we have two ways of naming the entry:
by sequence number (e.g., HEAD@{0}) or by date (e.g.,
HEAD@{10 minutes ago}). There is no explicit option to set
one or the other, but we guess based on whether or not the
user has provided us with a date format, showing them the
date version if they have done so, and the sequence number
otherwise.

This usually made sense if the use did something like "git
log -g --date=relative". However, it didn't make much sense
if the user set the date format using the log.date config
variable; in that case, all of their reflogs would end up as
dates.

This patch records the source of the date format and only
triggers the date-based view if --date= was given on the
command line.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2009-09-29 10:06:49 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
24343c6099 Merge branch 'as/maint-graph-interesting-fix'
* as/maint-graph-interesting-fix:
  Add tests for rev-list --graph with options that simplify history
  graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting()
2009-08-27 16:59:56 -07:00
Adam Simpkins
beb5af43a6 graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting()
Previously, graph_is_interesting() did not behave quite the same way as
the code in get_revision().  As a result, it would sometimes think
commits were uninteresting, even though get_revision() would return
them.  This resulted in incorrect lines in the graph output.

This change creates a get_commit_action() function, which
graph_is_interesting() and simplify_commit() both now use to determine
if a commit will be shown.  It is identical to the old simplify_commit()
behavior, except that it never calls rewrite_parents().

This problem was reported by Santi Béjar.  The following command
would exhibit the problem before, but now works correctly:

  git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline v1.6.3.3

Previously git graph did not display the output for this command
correctly between f29ac4f and 66996ec, among other places.

Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <simpkins@facebook.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-21 12:41:25 -07:00
Lars Hjemli
33e7018c45 git-log: allow --decorate[=short|full]
Commit de435ac0 changed the behavior of --decorate from printing the
full ref (e.g., "refs/heads/master") to a shorter, more human-readable
version (e.g., just "master"). While this is nice for human readers,
external tools using the output from "git log" may prefer the full
version.

This patch introduces an extension to --decorate to allow the caller to
specify either the short or the full versions.

Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-08-18 13:14:17 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
90b1994170 diff: Rename QUIET internal option to QUICK
The option "QUIET" primarily meant "find if we have _any_ difference as
quick as possible and report", which means we often do not even have to
look at blobs if we know the trees are different by looking at the higher
level (e.g. "diff-tree A B").  As a side effect, because there is no point
showing one change that we happened to have found first, it also enables
NO_OUTPUT and EXIT_WITH_STATUS options, making the end result look quiet.

Rename the internal option to QUICK to reflect this better; it also makes
grepping the source tree much easier, as there are other kinds of QUIET
option everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-29 10:22:39 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
f222abdeec Make 'git show' more useful
For some reason, I ended up doing

	git show HEAD~5..

as an odd way of asking for a log. I realize I should just have used "git
log", but at the same time it does make perfect conceptual sense. After
all, you _could_ have done

	git show HEAD HEAD~1 HEAD~2 HEAD~3 HEAD~4

and saying "git show HEAD~5.." is pretty natural. It's not like "git show"
only ever showed a single commit (or other object) before either! So
conceptually, giving a commit range is a very sensible operation, even
though you'd traditionally have used "git log" for that.

However, doing that currently results in an error

	fatal: object ranges do not make sense when not walking revisions

which admittedly _also_ makes perfect sense - from an internal git
implementation standpoint in 'revision.c'.

However, I think that asking to show a range makes sense to a user, while
saying "object ranges no not make sense when not walking revisions" only
makes sense to a git developer.

So on the whole, of the two different "makes perfect sense" behaviors, I
think I originally picked the wrong one. And quite frankly, I don't really
see anybody actually _depending_ on that error case. So why not change it?

So rather than error out, just turn that non-walking error case into a
"silently turn on walking" instead.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-07-14 13:50:29 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
b8e8db281c git log: add '--merges' flag to match '--no-merges'
I do various statistics on git, and one of the things I look at is merges,
because they are often interesting events to count ("how many merges vs
how much 'real development'" kind of statistics). And you can do it with
some fairly straightforward scripting, ie

	git rev-list --parents HEAD |
		grep ' .* ' |
		git diff-tree --always -s --pretty=oneline --stdin |
		less -S

will do it.

But I finally got irritated with the fact that we can skip merges with
'--no-merges', but we can't do the trivial reverse operation.

So this just adds a '--merges' flag that _only_ shows merges. Now you can
do the above with just a

	git log --merges --pretty=oneline

which is a lot simpler. It also means that we automatically get a lot of
statistics for free, eg

	git shortlog -ns --merges

does exactly what you'd want it to do.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-29 12:32:51 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
ceff8e7ade Clean up and simplify rev_compare_tree()
This simplifies the logic of rev_compare_tree() by removing a special
case.

It does so by turning the special case of finding a diff to be "all new
files" into a more generic case of "all new" vs "all removed" vs "mixed
changes", so now the code is actually more powerful and more generic, and
the added symmetry actually makes it simpler too.

This makes no changes to any existing behavior, but apart from the
simplification it does make it possible to some day care about whether all
changes were just deletions if we want to. Which we may well want to for
merge handling.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-03 00:49:50 -07:00
Mike Ralphson
3ea3c215c0 Fix typos / spelling in comments
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-22 19:02:12 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
9824a388e5 Merge branch 'lt/pack-object-memuse'
* lt/pack-object-memuse:
  show_object(): push path_name() call further down
  process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering

Conflicts:
	builtin-pack-objects.c
	builtin-rev-list.c
	list-objects.c
	list-objects.h
	upload-pack.c
2009-04-18 14:46:17 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
cf2ab916af show_object(): push path_name() call further down
In particular, pushing the "path_name()" call _into_ the show() function
would seem to allow

 - more clarity into who "owns" the name (ie now when we free the name in
   the show_object callback, it's because we generated it ourselves by
   calling path_name())

 - not calling path_name() at all, either because we don't care about the
   name in the first place, or because we are actually happy walking the
   linked list of "struct name_path *" and the last component.

Now, I didn't do that latter optimization, because it would require some
more coding, but especially looking at "builtin-pack-objects.c", we really
don't even want the whole pathname, we really would be better off with the
list of path components.

Why? We use that name for two things:
 - add_preferred_base_object(), which actually _wants_ to traverse the
   path, and now does it by looking for '/' characters!
 - for 'name_hash()', which only cares about the last 16 characters of a
   name, so again, generating the full name seems to be just unnecessary
   work.

Anyway, so I didn't look any closer at those things, but it did convince
me that the "show_object()" calling convention was crazy, and we're
actually better off doing _less_ in list-objects.c, and giving people
access to the internal data structures so that they can decide whether
they want to generate a path-name or not.

This patch does that, and then for people who did use the name (even if
they might do something more clever in the future), it just does the
straightforward "name = path_name(path, component); .. free(name);" thing.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-12 17:28:31 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
8d2dfc49b1 process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering
Here's a less trivial thing, and slightly more dubious one.

I was looking at that "struct object_array objects", and wondering why we
do that. I have honestly totally forgotten. Why not just call the "show()"
function as we encounter the objects? Rather than add the objects to the
object_array, and then at the very end going through the array and doing a
'show' on all, just do things more incrementally.

Now, there are possible downsides to this:

 - the "buffer using object_array" _can_ in theory result in at least
   better I-cache usage (two tight loops rather than one more spread out
   one). I don't think this is a real issue, but in theory..

 - this _does_ change the order of the objects printed. Instead of doing a
   "process_tree(revs, commit->tree, &objects, NULL, "");" in the loop
   over the commits (which puts all the root trees _first_ in the object
   list, this patch just adds them to the list of pending objects, and
   then we'll traverse them in that order (and thus show each root tree
   object together with the objects we discover under it)

   I _think_ the new ordering actually makes more sense, but the object
   ordering is actually a subtle thing when it comes to packing
   efficiency, so any change in order is going to have implications for
   packing. Good or bad, I dunno.

 - There may be some reason why we did it that odd way with the object
   array, that I have simply forgotten.

Anyway, now that we don't buffer up the objects before showing them
that may actually result in lower memory usage during that whole
traverse_commit_list() phase.

This is seriously not very deeply tested. It makes sense to me, it seems
to pass all the tests, it looks ok, but...

Does anybody remember why we did that "object_array" thing? It used to be
an "object_list" a long long time ago, but got changed into the array due
to better memory usage patterns (those linked lists of obejcts are
horrible from a memory allocation standpoint). But I wonder why we didn't
do this back then. Maybe there's a reason for it.

Or maybe there _used_ to be a reason, and no longer is.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-04-12 17:28:31 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
3c91bf6805 Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack'
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
  pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
  t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
  Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
  pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
  git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
  t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws

Conflicts:
	t/t7700-repack.sh
2009-04-01 22:34:19 -07:00
Brandon Casey
4d6acb7041 Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
This option to pack-objects/rev-list was created to improve the -A and -a
options of repack.  It was found to be lacking in that it did not provide
the ability to differentiate between local and non-local kept packs, and
found to be unnecessary since objects residing in local kept packs can be
filtered out by the --honor-pack-keep option.

Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-20 13:32:33 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
aec813062b Merge branch 'jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack'
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
  is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
  Simplify is_kept_pack()
  Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
  has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
  has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
  git-repack: resist stray environment variable
2009-03-11 13:49:56 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
69e020ae00 is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Now is_kept_pack() is just a member lookup into a structure, we can write
it as such.

Also rewrite the sole caller of has_sha1_kept_pack() to switch on the
criteria the callee uses (namely, revs->kept_pack_only) between calling
has_sha1_kept_pack() and has_sha1_pack(), so that these two callees do not
have to take a pointer to struct rev_info as an argument.

This removes the header file dependency issue temporarily introduced by
the earlier commit, so we revert changes associated to that as well.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28 01:06:06 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
03a9683d22 Simplify is_kept_pack()
This removes --unpacked=<packfile> parameter from the revision parser, and
rewrites its use in git-repack to pass a single --kept-pack-only option
instead.

The new --kept-pack-only option means just that.  When this option is
given, is_kept_pack() that used to say "not on the --unpacked=<packfile>
list" now says "the packfile has corresponding .keep file".

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28 01:06:06 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
b8431b033f has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
Its "ignore_packed" parameter always comes from struct rev_info.  This
patch makes the function take a pointer to the surrounding structure, so
that the refactoring in the next patch becomes easier to review.

There is an unfortunate header file dependency and the easiest workaround
is to temporarily move the function declaration from cache.h to
revision.h; this will be moved back to cache.h once the function loses
this "ignore_packed" parameter altogether in the later part of the
series.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28 01:06:06 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
cd673c1f17 has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
Most of the callers of this function except only one pass NULL to its last
parameter, ignore_packed.

Introduce has_sha1_kept_pack() function that has the function signature
and the semantics of this function, and convert the sole caller that does
not pass NULL to call this new function.

All other callers and has_sha1_pack() lose the ignore_packed parameter.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-28 01:06:06 -08:00
Nanako Shiraishi
de84accc59 Add --oneline that is a synonym to "--pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit"
These two are often used together but are too long to type.

Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-24 23:53:40 -08:00
Nanako Shiraishi
3a4c1a5e21 Add --format that is a synonym to --pretty
Some people prefer to call the pretty-print styles "format", and get
annoyed to see "git log --format=short" fail.  Introduce it as a synonym
to --pretty so that both can be used.

Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-24 23:53:36 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
aff4e8dc21 Merge branch 'maint'
* maint:
  revision traversal and pack: notice and die on missing commit
2009-02-11 02:00:22 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
268c015495 Merge branch 'maint-1.5.6' into maint
* maint-1.5.6:
  revision traversal and pack: notice and die on missing commit
2009-02-11 02:00:07 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
afce435000 Merge branch 'maint-1.5.5' into maint-1.5.6
* maint-1.5.5:
  revision traversal and pack: notice and die on missing commit

Conflicts:
	revision.c
2009-02-11 01:41:22 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
92798702cf Merge branch 'maint-1.5.4' into maint-1.5.5
* maint-1.5.4:
  revision traversal and pack: notice and die on missing commit
2009-02-11 01:40:12 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
ed62089c1c revision traversal and pack: notice and die on missing commit
cc0e6c5 (Handle return code of parse_commit in revision machinery,
2007-05-04) attempted to tighten error checking in the revision machinery,
but it wasn't enough.  When get_revision_1() was asked for the next commit
to return, it tries to read and simplify the parents of the commit to be
returned, but an error while doing so was silently ignored and reported as
a truncated history to the caller instead.

This resulted in an early end of "git log" output or a pack that lacks
older commits from "git pack-objects", without any error indication in the
exit status from these commands, even though the underlying parse_commit()
issues an error message to the end user.

Note that the codepath in add_parents_list() that paints parents of an
UNINTERESTING commit UNINTERESTING silently ignores the error when
parse_commit() fails; this is deliberate and in line with aeeae1b
(revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing,
2009-01-27).

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-02-11 01:29:52 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
8abc61880d Merge branch 'js/maint-all-implies-HEAD' into maint
* js/maint-all-implies-HEAD:
  bundle: allow the same ref to be given more than once
  revision walker: include a detached HEAD in --all
2009-02-05 17:54:12 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
2d40cadc25 Merge branch 'jc/maint-allow-uninteresting-missing'
* jc/maint-allow-uninteresting-missing:
  revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing
2009-01-31 18:08:22 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
aeeae1b771 revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing
Most of the existing codepaths were meant to treat missing uninteresting
objects to be a silently ignored non-error, but there were a few places
in handle_commit() and add_parents_to_list(), which are two key functions
in the revision traversal machinery, that cared:

 - When a tag refers to an object that we do not have, we barfed.  We
   ignore such a tag if it is painted as UNINTERESTING with this change.

 - When digging deeper into the ancestry chain of a commit that is already
   painted as UNINTERESTING, in order to paint its parents UNINTERESTING,
   we barfed if parse_parent() for a parent commit object failed.  We can
   ignore such a parent commit object.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-01-28 11:00:28 -08:00