When a reference that existed in the packed-refs file is deleted, the
packed-refs file must be rewritten. Previously, the file was
rewritten without any peeled refs, even if the file contained peeled
refs when it was read. This was not a bug, because the packed-refs
file header didn't claim that the file contained peeled values. But
it had a performance cost, because the repository would lose the
benefit of having precomputed peeled references until pack-refs was
run again.
Teach repack_without_ref() to write peeled refs to the packed-refs
file (regardless of whether they were present in the old version of
the file).
This means that if the old version of the packed-refs file was not
fully peeled, then repack_without_ref() will have to peel references.
To avoid the expense of reading lots of loose references, we take two
shortcuts relative to pack-refs:
* If the peeled value of a reference is already known (i.e., because
it was read from the old version of the packed-refs file), then
output that peeled value again without any checks. This is the
usual code path and should avoid any noticeable overhead. (This is
different than pack-refs, which always re-peels references.)
* We don't verify that the packed ref is still current. It could be
that a packed references is overridden by a loose reference, in
which case the packed ref is no longer needed and might even refer
to an object that has been garbage collected. But we don't check;
instead, we just try to peel all references. If peeling is
successful, the peeled value is written out (even though it might
not be needed any more); if not, then the reference is silently
omitted from the output.
The extra overhead of peeling references in repack_without_ref()
should only be incurred the first time the packed-refs file is written
by a version of Git that knows about the "fully-peeled" attribute.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a test that demonstrates that the peeled values recorded in
packed-refs are lost if a packed ref is deleted. (The code in
repack_without_ref() doesn't even attempt to write peeled refs.) This
will be fixed in a moment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Stop emitting an error message when deleting a packed reference if we
find another dangling packed reference that is overridden by a loose
reference. See the previous commit for a longer explanation of the
issue.
We have to be careful to make sure that the invalid packed reference
really *is* overridden by a loose reference; otherwise what we have
found is repository corruption, which we *should* report.
Please note that this approach is vulnerable to a race condition
similar to the race conditions already known to affect packed
references [1]:
* Process 1 tries to peel packed reference X as part of deleting
another packed reference. It discovers that X does not refer to a
valid object (because the object that it referred to has been
garbage collected).
* Process 2 tries to delete reference X. It starts by deleting the
loose reference X.
* Process 1 checks whether there is a loose reference X. There is not
(it has just been deleted by process 2), so process 1 reports a
spurious error "X does not point to a valid object!"
The worst case seems relatively harmless, and the fix is identical to
the fix that will be needed for the other race conditions (namely
holding a lock on the packed-refs file during *all* reference
deletions), so we leave the cleaning up of all of them as a future
project.
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/211956
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A packed reference can be overridden by a loose reference, in which
case the packed reference is obsolete and is never used. The object
pointed to by such a reference can be garbage collected. Since
d66da478f2, this could lead to the emission of a spurious error
message:
error: refs/heads/master does not point to a valid object!
The error is generated by repack_without_ref() if there is an obsolete
dangling packed reference in packed-refs when the packed-refs file has
to be rewritten due to the deletion of another packed reference. Add
a failing test demonstrating this problem and some passing tests of
related scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A pattern "dir" (without trailing slash) in the attributes file
stopped matching a directory "dir" by mistake with an earlier change
that wanted to allow pattern "dir/" to also match.
* jc/directory-attrs-regression-fix:
t: check that a pattern without trailing slash matches a directory
dir.c::match_pathname(): pay attention to the length of string parameters
dir.c::match_pathname(): adjust patternlen when shifting pattern
dir.c::match_basename(): pay attention to the length of string parameters
attr.c::path_matches(): special case paths that end with a slash
attr.c::path_matches(): the basename is part of the pathname
* ap/maint-diff-rename-avoid-overlap:
tests: make sure rename pretty print works
diff: prevent pprint_rename from underrunning input
diff: Fix rename pretty-print when suffix and prefix overlap
Prior to v1.8.1.1, with:
git init
echo content >foo &&
mkdir subdir &&
echo content >subdir/bar &&
echo "subdir export-ignore" >.gitattributes
git add . &&
git commit -m one &&
git archive HEAD | tar tf -
the resulting archive would contain only "foo" and ".gitattributes",
not subdir. This was broken with a recent change that intended to
allow "subdir/ export-ignore" to also exclude the directory, but
instead ended up _requiring_ the trailing slash by mistake.
A pattern "subdir" should match any path "subdir", whether it is a
directory or a non-directory. A pattern "subdir/" insists that a
path "subdir" must be a directory for it to match.
This patch adds test not just for this simple case, but also for
deeper cross-directory cases, as well as cases with wildcards.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Logic in still_interesting function allows to stop the commits
traversing if the oldest processed commit is not older then the
youngest commit on the list to process and the list contains only
commits marked as not interesting ones. It can be premature when dealing
with a set of coequal commits. For example git rev-list A^! --not B
provides wrong answer if all commits in the range A..B had the same
commit time and there are more then 7 of them.
To fix this problem the relevant part of the logic in still_interesting
is changed to: the walk can be stopped if the oldest processed commit is
younger then the youngest commit on the list to processed.
Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
MSYS bash considers the part "/g" in the sed expression "s/./=/g" as an
absolute path after an assignment, and mangles it to a C:/something
string. Do not attract bash's attention by avoiding the equals sign.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Older versions of pack-refs did not write peel lines for
refs outside of refs/tags. This meant that on reading the
pack-refs file, we might set the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for
such a ref, even though we do not know anything about its
peeled value.
The previous commit updated the writer to always peel, no
matter what the ref is. That means that packed-refs files
written by newer versions of git are fine to be read by both
old and new versions of git. However, we still have the
problem of reading packed-refs files written by older
versions of git, or by other implementations which have not
yet learned the same trick.
The simplest fix would be to always unset the
REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for refs outside of refs/tags that do
not have a peel line (if it has a peel line, we know it is
valid, but we cannot assume a missing peel line means
anything). But that loses an important optimization, as
upload-pack should not need to load the object pointed to by
refs/heads/foo to determine that it is not a tag.
Instead, we add a "fully-peeled" trait to the packed-refs
file. If it is set, we know that we can trust a missing peel
line to mean that a ref cannot be peeled. Otherwise, we fall
back to assuming nothing.
[commit message and tests by Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Syntax branchname@{upstream} should interpret its argument as a name of
a branch. Add the test to check that it doesn't try to interpret it as a
refname if the branch in question does not exist.
Signed-off-by: Kacper Kornet <draenog@pld-linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we pack an annotated tag ref, we write not only the
sha1 of the tag object along with the ref, but also the sha1
obtained by peeling the tag. This lets readers of the
pack-refs file know the peeled value without having to
actually load the object, speeding up upload-pack's ref
advertisement.
The writer marks a packed-refs file with peeled refs using
the "peeled" trait at the top of the file. When the reader
sees this trait, it knows that each ref is either followed
by its peeled value, or it is not an annotated tag.
However, there is a mismatch between the assumptions of the
reader and writer. The writer will only peel refs under
refs/tags, but the reader does not know this; it will assume
a ref without a peeled value must not be a tag object. Thus
an annotated tag object placed outside of the refs/tags
hierarchy will not have its peeled value printed by
upload-pack.
The simplest way to fix this is to start writing peel values
for all refs. This matches what the reader expects for both
new and old versions of git.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When looking up the stream filter, write_entry() should be passing the
path of the file in the repository, not the path to which the content is
going to be written. This allows the file to be correctly looked up
against the .gitattributes files in the working tree.
This change makes the streaming case match the non-streaming case which
passes ce->name to convert_to_working_tree later in the same function.
The two tests added here test the different paths through write_entry
since the CRLF filter is a streaming filter but the user-defined smudge
filter is not streamed.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Description goes on the test_expect_* line
- Open SQ of test goes on the test_expect_* line
- Closing SQ of test goes on its own line
- Use TAB for indent
Also remove three comments that appear to relate to the development of
the patch before it was committed.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently the documentation of GIT_PERF_REPEAT_COUNT says the default is
five while "perf-lib.sh" uses a value of three as a default.
Update the documentation so that it is consistent with the code.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add basic use cases and corner cases tests for
"git diff -M --summary/stat".
Signed-off-by: Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before 82dce99 (attr: more matching optimizations from .gitignore,
2012-10-15), .gitattributes did not have any special treatment of a
leading '!'. The docs, however, always said
The rules how the pattern matches paths are the same as in
`.gitignore` files; see linkgit:gitignore[5].
By those rules, leading '!' means pattern negation. So 82dce99
correctly determined that this kind of line makes no sense and should
be disallowed.
However, users who actually had a rule for files starting with a '!'
are in a bad position: before 82dce99 '!' matched that literal
character, so it is conceivable that users have .gitattributes with
such lines in them. After 82dce99 the unescaped version was
disallowed in such a way that git outright refuses to run(!) most
commands in the presence of such a .gitattributes. It therefore
becomes very hard to fix, let alone work with, such repositories.
Let's at least allow the users to fix their repos: change the fatal
error into a warning.
Reported-by: mathstuf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With core.ignorecase=true, name-hash.c builds a case insensitive index of
all tracked directories. Currently, the existing cache entry structures are
added multiple times to the same hashtable (with different name lengths and
hash codes). However, there's only one dir_next pointer, which gets
completely messed up in case of hash collisions. In the worst case, this
causes an endless loop if ce == ce->dir_next (see t7062).
Use a separate hashtable and separate structures for the directory index
so that each directory entry has its own next pointer. Use reference
counting to track which directory entry contains files.
There are only slight changes to the name-hash.c API:
- new free_name_hash() used by read_cache.c::discard_index()
- remove_name_hash() takes an additional index_state parameter
- index_name_exists() for a directory (trailing '/') may return a cache
entry that has been removed (CE_UNHASHED). This is not a problem as the
return value is only used to check if the directory exists (dir.c) or to
normalize casing of directory names (read-cache.c).
Getting rid of cache_entry.dir_next reduces memory consumption, especially
with core.ignorecase=false (which doesn't use that member at all).
With core.ignorecase=true, building the directory index is slightly faster
as we add / check the parent directory first (instead of going through all
directory levels for each file in the index). E.g. with WebKit (~200k
files, ~7k dirs), time spent in lazy_init_name_hash is reduced from 176ms
to 130ms.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"Advice" is a mass noun, not a count noun; it's not ordinarily
pluralized.
Signed-off-by: Greg Price <price@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 1b77d83cab 'setup_git_directory_gently_1(): resolve symlinks
in ceiling paths' changed the setup code to resolve symlinks in the
entries in GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES. Because those entries are
compared textually to the symlink-resolved current directory, an
entry in GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES that contained a symlink would have
no effect. It was known that this could cause performance problems
if the symlink resolution *itself* touched slow filesystems, but it
was thought that such use cases would be unlikely. The intention of
the earlier change was to deal with a case when the user has this:
GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES=/home/gitster
but in reality, /home/gitster is a symbolic link to somewhere else,
e.g. /net/machine/home4/gitster. A textual comparison between the
specified value /home/gitster and the location getcwd(3) returns
would not help us, but readlink("/home/gitster") would still be
fast.
After this change was released, Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
reported:
> [...] my computer has been acting so slow when I’m not connected to
> the network. I put various network filesystem paths in
> $GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES, such as
> /afs/athena.mit.edu/user/a/n/andersk (to avoid hitting its parents
> /afs/athena.mit.edu, /afs/athena.mit.edu/user/a, and
> /afs/athena.mit.edu/user/a/n which all live in different AFS
> volumes). Now when I’m not connected to the network, every
> invocation of Git, including the __git_ps1 in my shell prompt, waits
> for AFS to timeout.
To allow users to work around this problem, give them a mechanism to
turn off symlink resolution in GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES entries. All
the entries that follow an empty entry will not be checked for symbolic
links and used literally in comparison. E.g. with these:
GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES=:/foo/bar:/xyzzy or
GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES=/foo/bar::/xyzzy
we will not readlink("/xyzzy") because it comes after an empty entry.
With the former (but not with the latter), "/foo/bar" comes after an
empty entry, and we will not readlink it, either.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git cherry-pick" did not replay a root commit to an unborn branch.
* mz/pick-unborn:
learn to pick/revert into unborn branch
tests: move test_cmp_rev to test-lib-functions
Scripts to test bash completion was inherently flaky as it was
affected by whatever random things the user may have on $PATH.
* jc/do-not-let-random-file-interfere-with-completion-tests:
t9902: protect test from stray build artifacts
Rebasing the history of superproject with change in the submodule
has been broken since v1.7.12.
* jc/fake-ancestor-with-non-blobs:
apply: diagnose incomplete submodule object name better
apply: simplify build_fake_ancestor()
git-am: record full index line in the patch used while rebasing
Before parsing a suspected smart-HTTP response verify the returned
Content-Type matches the standard. This protects a client from
attempting to process a payload that smells like a smart-HTTP
server response.
JGit has been doing this check on all responses since the dawn of
time. I mistakenly failed to include it in git-core when smart HTTP
was introduced. At the time I didn't know how to get the Content-Type
from libcurl. I punted, meant to circle back and fix this, and just
plain forgot about it.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/merge-blobs:
Makefile: Replace merge-file.h with merge-blobs.h in LIB_H
merge-tree: fix d/f conflicts
merge-tree: add comments to clarify what these functions are doing
merge-tree: lose unused "resolve_directories"
merge-tree: lose unused "flags" from merge_list
Which merge_file() function do you mean?
Earlier, a230949 (am --rebasing: get patch body from commit, not
from mailbox, 2012-06-26) learned to regenerate patch body from the
commit object while rebasing, instead of reading from the rebase-am
front-end. While doing so, it used "git diff-tree" but without
giving it the "--full-index" option.
This does not matter for in-repository objects; during rebasing, any
abbreviated object name should uniquely identify them.
But we may be rebasing a commit that contains a change to a gitlink,
in which case we usually should not have the object (it names a
commit in the submodule). A full object name is necessary to later
reconstruct a fake ancestor index for them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update tests that were expecting to fail due to a bug that was
fixed earlier.
* tb/t0050-maint:
t0050: Use TAB for indentation
t0050: honor CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS in add (with different case)
t0050: known breakage vanished in merge (case change)
Output from "git status --ignored" did not work well when used with
"--untracked".
* ap/status-ignored-in-ignored-directory:
status: always report ignored tracked directories
git-status: Test --ignored behavior
dir.c: Make git-status --ignored more consistent
An element on GIT_CEILING_DIRECTORIES list that does not name the
real path to a directory (i.e. a symbolic link) could have caused
the GIT_DIR discovery logic to escape the ceiling.
* mh/ceiling:
string_list_longest_prefix(): remove function
setup_git_directory_gently_1(): resolve symlinks in ceiling paths
longest_ancestor_length(): require prefix list entries to be normalized
longest_ancestor_length(): take a string_list argument for prefixes
longest_ancestor_length(): use string_list_split()
Introduce new function real_path_if_valid()
real_path_internal(): add comment explaining use of cwd
Introduce new static function real_path_internal()
Python 2.4 lacks the following features:
subprocess.check_call
struct.pack_into
Take a cue from 460d1026 and provide an implementation of the
CalledProcessError exception. Then replace the calls to
subproccess.check_call with calls to subprocess.call that check the return
status and raise a CalledProcessError exception if necessary.
The struct.pack_into in t/9802 can be converted into a single struct.pack
call which is available in Python 2.4.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <bcasey@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When you have random build artifacts in your build directory, left
behind by running "make" while on another branch, the "git help -a"
command run by __git_list_all_commands in the completion script that
is being tested does not have a way to know that they are not part
of the subcommands this build will ship. Such extra subcommands may
come from the user's $PATH. They will interfere with the tests that
expect a certain prefix to uniquely expand to a known completion.
Instrument the completion script and give it a way for us to tell
what (subset of) subcommands we are going to ship.
Also add a test to "git --help <prefix><TAB>" expansion. It needs
to show not just commands but some selected documentation pages.
Based on an idea by Jeff King.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use one TAB for indentation and remove empty lines
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test case "add (with different case)" indicates a
known breakage when run on a case insensitive file system.
The test is invalid for case sensitive file system, it will always fail.
Check the precondition CASE_INSENSITIVE_FS before running it.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test case has passed since this commit:
commit 0047dd2fd1
Author: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Date: Thu May 15 07:19:54 2008 +0200
t0050: Fix merge test on case sensitive file systems
Remove the known breakage by using test_expect_success
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rs/zip-tests:
t5003: check if unzip supports symlinks
t5000, t5003: move ZIP tests into their own script
t0024, t5000: use test_lazy_prereq for UNZIP
t0024, t5000: clear variable UNZIP, use GIT_UNZIP instead
These variables are user parameters to control how to run the perf
tests. Allow users to do so.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git clone --separate-git-dir=$over_there" is interrupted, it
failed to remove the real location of the $GIT_DIR it created. This
was most visible when interrupting a submodule update.
* jl/interrupt-clone-remove-separate-git-dir:
clone: support atomic operation with --separate-git-dir
