Carefully excluding t5526, which sees independent development elsewhere
at the time of writing, we use `main` as the default branch name in
t55[23]*. This trick was performed via
$ (cd t &&
sed -i -e 's/master/main/g' -e 's/MASTER/MAIN/g' \
-e 's/Master/Main/g' -e 's/naster/nain/g' -- \
t55[23]*.sh &&
git checkout HEAD -- t5526\*)
Note that t5533 contains a variation of the name `master` (`naster`)
that we rename here, too.
This commit allows us to define
`GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main` for that range of tests.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During stateless packfile negotiation where a depth is given, stateless
RPC clients (e.g. git-remote-curl) will send multiple upload-pack
requests with the first containing only the
wants/shallows/deepens/filters and the subsequent containing haves/done.
When upload-pack handles such requests, entering get_common_commits
without checking whether the client has hung up can result in unexpected
EOF during the negotiation loop and a die() with message "fatal: the
remote end hung up unexpectedly".
Real world effects include:
- A client speaking to git-http-backend via a server that doesn't check
the exit codes of CGIs (e.g. mod_cgi) doesn't know and doesn't care
about the fatal. It continues to process the response body as normal.
- A client speaking to a server that does check the exit code and
returns an errant HTTP status as a result will fail with the message
"error: RPC failed; HTTP 500 curl 22 The requested URL returned error:
500."
- Admins running servers that surface the failure must workaround it by
patching code that handles execution of git-http-backend to ignore exit
codes or take other heuristic approaches.
- Admins may have to deal with "hung up unexpectedly" log spam related
to the failures even in cases where the exit code isn't surfaced as an
HTTP server-side error status.
To avoid these EOF related fatals, have upload-pack gently peek for an
EOF between the sending of shallow/unshallow lines (followed by flush)
and the reading of client haves. If the client has hung up at this
point, exit normally.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Duvall <dan@mutual.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we call test_oid_init in the setup for all test scripts,
there's no point in calling it individually. Remove all of the places
where we've done so to help keep tests tidy.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Compute the various pkt-line values based on the length of the object
IDs in use.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit bdb31eada7 (upload-pack: report "not our ref" to client,
2017-02-23) catches the case where a client asks for an object we don't
have, and issues a message that the client can show to the user (in
addition to dying and writing to stderr).
There's a similar case (with the same message) when the client asks for
an object which we _do_ have, but which isn't a ref tip (or isn't
reachable, when uploadpack.allowReachableSHA1InWant is true). Let's give
that one the same treatment, for the same reason (namely that it's more
informative to the client than just hanging up, since they won't see our
stderr over some protocols).
There are two tests here. We cover it most directly in t5530 by invoking
upload-pack, which matches the existing "not our ref" test.
But a more end-to-end check is that "git fetch" actually shows the
message to the client. We're already checking in t5516 that this case
fails, so we can just check stderr there, too. Note that even after we
started ignoring SIGPIPE in 8bf4becf0c, this could in theory still be
racy as described in that commit (because we die() on write failures
before pumping the connection for any ERR packets).
In practice this should be OK for this case. The server will not
actually check reachability until it has received our whole group of
"want" lines. And since we have no objects in the repository, we won't
send any "have" lines, meaning we're always waiting to read the server
response.
Note also that this case cannot happen in the v2 protocol, since it
allows any available object to be requested. However, we don't have to
take any steps to protect against the upcoming GIT_TEST_PROTOCOL_VERSION
in our tests:
- the tests in t5516 would already need to be skipped under v2, and
that is covered by ab0c5f5096 (tests: always test fetch of
unreachable with v0, 2019-02-25)
- the tests in t5530 invoke upload-pack directly, which will continue
to default to v0. Eventually we may have a test setting which uses
v2 even for bare upload-pack calls, but we can't override it here
until we know what the setting looks like.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Back in 9f9aa76130 (upload-pack: Improve error message when bad ref
requested, 2010-07-31), we added a test to make sure that we die with a
sensible message when the client asks for an object we don't have.
Much later, in bdb31eada7 (upload-pack: report "not our ref" to client,
2017-02-23), we started reporting that information via an "ERR" line in
the protocol. Let's check that part, as well.
While we're touching this test, let's drop the "-q" on the grep calls.
Our usual test style just relies on --verbose to control output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command
substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command
substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the
simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded
command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require
careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}"
done
and then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
upload-pack has a special revision walking code for shallow
recipients. It works almost like the similar code in pack-objects
except:
1. in upload-pack, graft points could be added for deepening;
2. also when the repository is deepened, the shallow point will be
moved further away from the tip, but the old shallow point will be
marked as edge to produce more efficient packs. See 6523078 (make
shallow repository deepening more network efficient - 2009-09-03).
Pass the file to pack-objects via --shallow-file. This will override
$GIT_DIR/shallow and give pack-objects the exact repository shape
that upload-pack has.
mark edge commits by revision command arguments. Even if old shallow
points are passed as "--not" revisions as in this patch, they will not
be picked up by mark_edges_uninteresting() because this function looks
up to parents for edges, while in this case the edge is the children,
in the opposite direction. This will be fixed in an later patch when
all given uninteresting commits are marked as edges.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the i18n-specific test functions in test scripts for pack-object.
This issue was was introduced in v1.7.10.2-556-g46140:
46140 index-pack: use streaming interface for collision test on large blobs
cf2ba pack-objects: use streaming interface for reading large loose blobs
and been broken under GETTEXT_POISON=YesPlease since.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When printing an error message saying a ref was requested that we do not
have, only print that ref, rather than the ref and everything sent to us
on the same packet line (e.g. protocol support specifications).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* js/run-command-updates:
api-run-command.txt: describe error behavior of run_command functions
run-command.c: squelch a "use before assignment" warning
receive-pack: remove unnecessary run_status report
run_command: report failure to execute the program, but optionally don't
run_command: encode deadly signal number in the return value
run_command: report system call errors instead of returning error codes
run_command: return exit code as positive value
MinGW: simplify waitpid() emulation macros
The motivation for this change is that system call failures are serious
errors that should be reported to the user, but only few callers took the
burden to decode the error codes that the functions returned into error
messages.
If at all, then only an unspecific error message was given. A prominent
example is this:
$ git upload-pack . | :
fatal: unable to run 'git-upload-pack'
In this example, git-upload-pack, the external command invoked through the
git wrapper, dies due to SIGPIPE, but the git wrapper does not bother to
report the real cause. In fact, this very error message is copied to the
syslog if git-daemon's client aborts the connection early.
With this change, system call failures are reported immediately after the
failure and only a generic failure code is returned to the caller. In the
above example the error is now to the point:
$ git upload-pack . | :
error: git-upload-pack died of signal
Note that there is no error report if the invoked program terminated with
a non-zero exit code, because it is reasonable to expect that the invoked
program has already reported an error. (But many run_command call sites
nevertheless write a generic error message.)
There was one special return code that was used to identify the case where
run_command failed because the requested program could not be exec'd. This
special case is now treated like a system call failure with errno set to
ENOENT. No error is reported in this case, because the call site in git.c
expects this as a normal result. Therefore, the callers that carefully
decoded the return value still check for this condition.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Offload object enumeration in upload-pack to pack-objects, but fall
back on internal revision walker for shallow interaction. Aside from
architecturally making more sense, this also leaves the door open for
pack-objects to employ a revision cache mechanism. Test t5530 updated
in order to explicitly check both enumeration methods.
Signed-off-by: Nick Edelen <sirnot@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".
This is useful to
- make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
e.g. SIGSEGV, and
- advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.
Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite
of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests
run a series of commands that leads to the single command that
needs to be tested, like this:
test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
what is to be tested
'
And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the
point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to
succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are
trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to
check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which
is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands.
This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to
use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is
tested, like this:
test_expect_success 'test title' '
setup1 &&
setup2 &&
setup3 &&
! this command should fail
'
test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that
that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it
currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a
file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can
write a test like this:
test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' '
rm -f bar &&
git foo &&
test -f bar
'
This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead
of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the
outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
upload-pack spawns two processes, rev-list and pack-objects, and carefully
monitors their status so that it can report failure to the remote end.
This change removes the complicated procedures on the grounds of the
following observations:
- If everything is OK, rev-list closes its output pipe end, upon which
pack-objects (which reads from the pipe) sees EOF and terminates itself,
closing its output (and error) pipes. upload-pack reads from both until
it sees EOF in both. It collects the exit codes of the child processes
(which indicate success) and terminates successfully.
- If rev-list sees an error, it closes its output and terminates with
failure. pack-objects sees EOF in its input and terminates successfully.
Again upload-pack reads its inputs until EOF. When it now collects
the exit codes of its child processes, it notices the failure of rev-list
and signals failure to the remote end.
- If pack-objects sees an error, it terminates with failure. Since this
breaks the pipe to rev-list, rev-list is killed with SIGPIPE.
upload-pack reads its input until EOF, then collects the exit codes of
the child processes, notices their failures, and signals failure to the
remote end.
- If upload-pack itself dies unexpectedly, pack-objects is killed with
SIGPIPE, and subsequently also rev-list.
The upshot of this is that precise monitoring of child processes is not
required because both terminate if either one of them dies unexpectedly.
This allows us to use finish_command() and finish_async() instead of
an explicit waitpid(2) call.
The change is smaller than it looks because most of it only reduces the
indentation of a large part of the inner loop.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
