If merging results in an unchanged tree, git-commit-script should not
complain that there's nothing to commit.
Also, add "[--all]" to usage().
[jc: usually there is no reason to record an unchanging merge,
but this code path is triggered only when there is a nontrivial
merge that needed to be resolved by hand, and we should be able
to record the fact that these two tree heads are dealt with as a
regular two-parent commit in order to help later merges.]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When more than two references need to be checked with
ref_newer() function, the second and later calls did not work
correctly. This was because the later calls found commits
retained by the "struct object" layer that still had smudges
made by earlier calls.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I'm totally stupid and got it backwards, sorry about that.
git-merge-cache -q would mean it's noisy and quiet without any
parameters.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After failing to apply a patch, when operating under -q (query)
flag, give the user an opportunity to fix up the patch in a
separate window and retry.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Every time after servicing the connection, select() first fails
with EINTR and ends up waiting for one second before serving the
next client. The sleep() was placed by the original author per
suggestion from the list to avoid spinning on failing select,
but at least this EINTR situation should not result in "at most
one client per second" service limit.
I am not sure if this is the right fix, but WTH. The king
penguin says that serious people would run the daemon under
inetd anyway, and I agree with that.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The King Penguin says:
Now, for extra bonus points, maybe you should make "git-rev-list" also
understand the "rev..rev" format (which you can't do with just the
get_sha1() interface, since it expands into more).
The faithful servant makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Everybody envies rev-parse, who is the only one that can grok
the extended sha1 format. Move the get_extended_sha1() out of
rev-parse, rename it to get_sha1() and make it available to
everybody else.
The one I posted earlier to the list had one bug where it did
not handle a name that ends with a digit correctly (it
incorrectly tried the "Nth parent" path). This commit fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Again I left the v2.6.11-tree tag behind. My bad.
This commit makes sure that we do not barf when pushing a ref
that is a non-commitish tag. You can update a remote ref under
the following conditions:
* You can always use --force.
* Creating a brand new ref is OK.
* If the remote ref is exactly the same as what you are
pushing, it is OK (nothing is pushed).
* You can replace a commitish with another commitish which is a
descendant of it, if you can verify the ancestry between them;
this and the above means you have to have what you are replacing.
* Otherwise you cannot update; you need to use --force.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
OK, I admit I am an idiot. I ended up creating bunch of garbage
directories like .git/HEADbranch/ .git/HEADrefs/...
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If the graph gets to use more than a certain percentage (default 50%)
of the width of the top-left pane, we now reduce the amount of space
allowed for each graph line. This means it doesn't look quite as
nice but you can still see the headline for the commit. (Currently
the only way to customize the percentage is to edit your ~/.gitk
file manually.)
When I munged the original from Linus, which did not terminate
when the last bisect to check happened to be a bad one, to
terminate, I seem to have botched the end result to pick.
Thanks for Sanjoy Mahajan for a good reproduction recipe to
diagnose this.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
fix one 'should it be static?' warning and
two 'mixing declarations and code' warnings.
Signed-off-by: Alecs King <alecsk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The king penguin said:
It has no point any more, all the tools check the file
status on their own, and yes, the thing should probably be
removed.
and the faithful servant makes it so.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Fixed location of HTML documents in debian doc-base file.
Without this fix debian package won't install properly (complains
about missing /usr/share/doc/git-core/html directory).
jc: thanks, Kalle. I think debian/rules is still broken around
etcdir area, though.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Describe the renaming push. The wording is horrible and I would
appreciate a rewrite, but it is better than nothing ;-).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This allows git-send-pack to push local refs to a destination
repository under different names.
Here is the name mapping rules for refs.
* If there is no ref mapping on the command line:
- if '--all' is specified, it is equivalent to specifying
<local> ":" <local> for all the existing local refs on the
command line
- otherwise, it is equivalent to specifying <ref> ":" <ref> for
all the refs that exist on both sides.
* <name> is just a shorthand for <name> ":" <name>
* <src> ":" <dst>
push ref that matches <src> to ref that matches <dst>.
- It is an error if <src> does not match exactly one of local
refs.
- It is an error if <dst> matches more than one remote refs.
- If <dst> does not match any remote refs, either
- it has to start with "refs/"; <dst> is used as the
destination literally in this case.
- <src> == <dst> and the ref that matched the <src> must not
exist in the set of remote refs; the ref matched <src>
locally is used as the name of the destination.
For example,
- "git-send-pack --all <remote>" works exactly as before;
- "git-send-pack <remote> master:upstream" pushes local master
to remote ref that matches "upstream". If there is no such
ref, it is an error.
- "git-send-pack <remote> master:refs/heads/upstream" pushes
local master to remote refs/heads/upstream, even when
refs/heads/upstream does not exist.
- "git-send-pack <remote> master" into an empty remote
repository pushes the local ref/heads/master to the remote
ref/heads/master.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A template mechanism to populate newly initialized repository
with default set of files is introduced. Use it to ship example
hooks that can be used for update and post update checks, as
Josef Weidendorfer suggests.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Call inflateEnd to release zlib state after use.
- After resolving delta, free base object data.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@altlinux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When pushing into multi-user repository, or when pushing to a
repository from a local repository that has rebased branches
that has been pruned, the destination repository can have head
commits that are missing from the local repository.
This should not matter as long as the local head of the branch
being pushed is a proper superset of the destination branch, but
we ended up trying to run rev-list telling it to exclude objects
reachable from those heads missing from the local repository,
causing it to barf. Prune those heads from the rev-list
parameter list, and make sure we do not try to push a branch
whose remote head is something we lack.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now it is ready to hit the "master" branch, clean up the script
for trailing whitespace and mixture of tabs and spaces.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Email addresses aren't generally case sensitive in the real world, but
technically, they *can* be. So, let's do the right thing.
Additionally, fix the generated message-id to have the right template used.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Note, using --no-chain-reply-to means you probably want to put a special
message into the first email you send, i.e, a 0/N patch cover sheet.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is based off of GregKH's script, send-lots-of-email.pl, and strives to do
all the nice things a good subsystem maintainer does when forwarding a patch or
50 upstream:
All the prior handlers of the patch, as determined by the
Signed-off-by: lines, and/or the author of the commit, are cc:ed on the
email.
All emails are sent as a reply to the previous email, making it easy to
skip a collection of emails that are uninteresting.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This causes ssh-pull to request objects in prefetch() and read then in
fetch(), such that it reduces the unpipelined round-trip time.
This also makes sha1_write_from_fd() support having a buffer of data
which it accidentally read from the fd after the object; this was
formerly not a problem, because it would always get a short read at
the end of an object, because the next object had not been
requested. This is no longer true.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This processes objects in two simultaneous passes. Each object will
first be given to prefetch(), as soon as it is possible to tell that
it will be needed, and then will be given to fetch(), when it is the
next object that needs to be parsed. Unless an implementation does
something with prefetch(), this should have no effect.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Add function to look up an object which is entirely unknown, so that
it can be put in a list. Various other functions related to lists of
objects.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It does not matter if the only refs you push are directly
underneath heads and tags, but we forgot to make sure we have
leading directories so pushing tags/v0.99/1 would not have
worked.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The earlier one conflated update and post-update hooks for no
good reason. Correct that ugly hack. Now post-update hooks
will take the list of successfully updated refs.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
send-pack had a confusing misfeature that "send-pack --all
master" updated all refs, while "send-pack --all" did not do
anything. Make --all and explicit refs mutually exclusive, and
make sure "send-pack --all" updates all refs.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The current shortlog list is backward making it look odd.
This reverses it so things appear more logically.
[jc: Nico says that this restores the short-log behaviour from
the BK days.]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Things have slowly but surely started to settle down, and the
http transport finally can natively grok packed repositories.
To give Pasky a good anchor point, hoping that he can start
split off the core part from Cogito, here is the 0.99.3, which
will be accompanied with its own tag.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-merge-cache reporting failed merge program is undesirable for
Cogito, since it emits its own more appropriate error message in that
case. However, I want to show other possible git-merge-cache error
messages. So -q will just silence this particular error.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A few sparse warnings have crept in again since I checked last time:
undeclared variables with global scope.
Fix them by marking the private variables properly "static".
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Some implementations of wc pad the line number with white space, which
expr does not grok as a number.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Fix a few typos.
Adapt to git-http-pull not borking on packed repositories.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
- Yes, push does not lock, but that does not mean it is not
meant for multi-user repository. It just ought to perform
correctly without using locks.
- Let's not pretend we know _the_ right way.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
