* nd/find-pack-entry-recent-cache-invalidation:
find_pack_entry(): do not keep packed_git pointer locally
sha1_file.c: move the core logic of find_pack_entry() into fill_pack_entry()
* fc/zsh-completion:
completion: simplify __gitcomp and __gitcomp_nl implementations
completion: use ls -1 instead of rolling a loop to do that ourselves
completion: work around zsh option propagation bug
* jk/maint-tag-show-fixes:
tag: do not show non-tag contents with "-n"
tag: die when listing missing or corrupt objects
tag: fix output of "tag -n" when errors occur
Conflicts:
t/t7004-tag.sh
Commit 19d2d23 (gitweb: add project_filter to limit project list
to a subdirectory, 2012-01-30) added also support for displaying
$project_filter, if present, in page title.
Unfortunately it forgot to treat $project_filter as path, and escape
it using esc_path(), like it is done for $filename.
Also, it was not obvious that "$site_name - $project_filter" is about
project filtering: use "$site_name - projects in '$project_filter'".
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The extra_refs provided a kludgy way to create fake references at a
global level in the hope that they would only affect some particular
code path. The last user of this API been rewritten, so strip this
stuff out before somebody else gets the bad idea of using it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Alternate references are directly (and now, correctly) handled by
fetch-pack, so there is no need to inform fetch-pack about them via
the extra_refs back channel.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Objects in an alternate object database are already available to the
local repository and therefore don't need to be fetched. So mark them
as complete in everything_local().
This fixes a test in t5700.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic of the (single) caller is clearer without encapsulating this
one line in a function.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The parameters denote reference names, which are no longer 1:1 with
filesystem paths.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The bahavior of a bunch of code before the "if (refs)" statement also
depends on whether refs is set, so make the logic clearer by shifting
this code into the if statement.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If an alternate supplies some, but not all, of the objects needed for
a fetch, fetch-pack nevertheless generates "want" lines for the
alternate objects that are present. Demonstrate this problem via a
failing test.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ok, so now "git merge" defaults to editing when interactive - lovely. But
when testing that, I noticed that while you can say
git merge --[no-]edit ..branch..
that does not work with "git pull". You get a message like
error: unknown option `no-edit'
usage: git fetch [<options>] [<repository> [<refspec>...]]
or: git fetch [<options>] <group>
or: git fetch --multiple [<options>] [(<repository> | <group>)...]
or: git fetch --all [<options>]
-v, --verbose be more verbose
-q, --quiet be more quiet
--all fetch from all remotes
...
which is because that stupid shell script doesn't know about the new
flags, and just passes it to "git fetch" instead.
Now, I really wanted to just make "git pull" a built-in instead of that
nasty shell script, but I'm lazy. So here's the trivial updates to
git-pull.sh to at least teach it about -e/--edit/--no-edit.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In v1.7.7-rc0~3^2 (2011-08-19), git mergetool's "meld" support learned
to use the --output option when calling versions of meld that are
detected to support it (1.5.0 and newer, hopefully).
Alas, it misdetects old versions (before 1.1.5, 2006-06-11) of meld as
supporting the option, so on systems with such meld, instead of
getting a nice merge helper, the operator gets a dialog box with the
text "Wrong number of arguments (Got 5)". (Version 1.1.5 is when meld
switched to using optparse. One consequence of that change was that
errors in usage are detected and signalled through the exit status
even when --help was passed.)
Luckily there is a simpler check that is more reliable: the usage
string printed by "meld --help" reliably reflects whether --output is
supported in a given version. Use it.
Reported-by: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Document bunch of bugfix topics to be merged down to 'maint' soonish
for 1.7.9.1 maintenance release.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"perf" uses a the forked copy of this file, and wants to use these two
macros.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The implementation of sane ctype macros only depends on symbols in
git-compat-util.h not cache.h
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
$X is appended to binary names for Windows builds (ie. git.exe).
Pollution from the environment can inadvertently trigger this behaviour,
resulting in 'git' turning into 'gitwhatever' without warning.
Signed-off-by: Michael Palimaka <kensington@astralcloak.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the user explicitly asked us not to, don't launch an editor.
But do everything else the same way as the "edit" case, i.e. leave the
comment with verification result in the log template and record the
mergesig in the resulting merge commit for later inspection.
Based on initiail analysis by Jonathan Nieder.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is necessary to write the else branch as a nested conditional. Also,
write the conditions with parentheses because we use them throughout the
Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git tag -n" did not check the type of the object it is reading the top n
lines from. At least, avoid showing the beginning of trees and blobs when
dealing with lightweight tags that point at them.
As the payload of a tag and a commit look similar in that they both start
with a header block, which is skipped for the purpose of "-n" output,
followed by human readable text, allow the message of commit objects to be
shown just like the contents of tag objects. This avoids regression for
people who have been using "tag -n" to show the log messages of commits
that are pointed at by lightweight tags.
Test script is from Jeff King.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bl/gitweb-project-filter:
gitweb: Make project search respect project_filter
gitweb: improve usability of projects search form
gitweb: place links to parent directories in page header
gitweb: show active project_filter in project_list page header
gitweb: limit links to alternate forms of project_list to active project_filter
gitweb: add project_filter to limit project list to a subdirectory
gitweb: prepare git_get_projects_list for use outside 'forks'.
gitweb: move hard coded .git suffix out of git_get_projects_list
* jn/svn-fe: (36 commits)
vcs-svn: suppress a -Wtype-limits warning
vcs-svn: allow import of > 4GiB files
vcs-svn: rename check_overflow arguments for clarity
vcs-svn/svndiff.c: squelch false "unused" warning from gcc
vcs-svn: reset first_commit_done in fast_export_init
vcs-svn: do not initialize report_buffer twice
vcs-svn: avoid hangs from corrupt deltas
vcs-svn: guard against overflow when computing preimage length
vcs-svn: cap number of bytes read from sliding view
test-svn-fe: split off "test-svn-fe -d" into a separate function
vcs-svn: implement text-delta handling
vcs-svn: let deltas use data from preimage
vcs-svn: let deltas use data from postimage
vcs-svn: verify that deltas consume all inline data
vcs-svn: implement copyfrom_data delta instruction
vcs-svn: read instructions from deltas
vcs-svn: read inline data from deltas
vcs-svn: read the preimage when applying deltas
vcs-svn: parse svndiff0 window header
vcs-svn: skeleton of an svn delta parser
...
Originally, "git add -N" was introduced to help users from forgetting to
add new files to the index before they ran "git commit -a". As an attempt
to help them further so that they do not forget to say "-a", "git commit"
to commit the index as-is was taught to error out, reminding the user that
they may have forgotten to add the final contents of the paths before
running the command.
This turned out to be a false "safety" that is useless. If the user made
changes to already tracked paths and paths added with "git add -N", and
then ran "git add" to register the final contents of the paths added with
"git add -N", "git commit" will happily create a commit out of the index,
without including the local changes made to the already tracked paths. It
was not a useful "safety" measure to prevent "forgetful" mistakes from
happening.
It turns out that this behaviour is not just a useless false "safety", but
actively hurts use cases of "git add -N" that were discovered later and
have become popular, namely, to tell Git to be aware of these paths added
by "git add -N", so that commands like "git status" and "git diff" would
include them in their output, even though the user is not interested in
including them in the next commit they are going to make.
Fix this ancient UI mistake, and instead make a commit from the index
ignoring the paths added by "git add -N" without adding real contents.
Based on the work by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy, and helped by injection of
sanity from Jonathan Nieder and others on the Git mailing list.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the userdiff_config function was introduced in be58e70
(diff: unify external diff and funcname parsing code,
2008-10-05), it used a return value convention unlike any
other config callback. Like other callbacks, it used "-1" to
signal error. But it returned "1" to indicate that it found
something, and "0" otherwise; other callbacks simply
returned "0" to indicate that no error occurred.
This distinction was necessary at the time, because the
userdiff namespace overlapped slightly with the color
configuration namespace. So "diff.color.foo" could mean "the
'foo' slot of diff coloring" or "the 'foo' component of the
"color" userdiff driver". Because the color-parsing code
would die on an unknown color slot, we needed the userdiff
code to indicate that it had matched the variable, letting
us bypass the color-parsing code entirely.
Later, in 8b8e862 (ignore unknown color configuration,
2009-12-12), the color-parsing code learned to silently
ignore unknown slots. This means we no longer need to
protect userdiff-matched variables from reaching the
color-parsing code.
We can therefore change the userdiff_config calling
convention to a more normal one. This drops some code from
each caller, which is nice. But more importantly, it reduces
the cognitive load for readers who may wonder why
userdiff_config is unlike every other config callback.
There's no need to add a new test confirming that this
works; t4020 already contains a test that sets
diff.color.external.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the HEAD of the submodule matches what is recorded in the index of
the superproject, and it has local changes or untracked files, the patch
offered by "git add -e" for editing shows a diff like this:
diff --git a/submodule b/submodule
<header>
-deadbeef...
+deadbeef...-dirty
Because applying such a patch has no effect to the index, this is a
useless noise. Generate the patch with IGNORE_DIRTY_SUBMODULES flag to
prevent such a change from getting reported.
This patch also loses the "-dirty" suffix from the output when the HEAD of
the submodule is different from what is in the index of the superproject.
As such dirtiness expressed by the suffix does not affect the result of
the patch application at all, there is no information lost if we remove
it. The user could still run "git status" before "git add -e" if s/he
cares about the dirtiness.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
