Commit Graph

161 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jonathan Nieder
7610fa57e6 merge-recursive --renormalize
Teach "git merge-recursive" a --renormalize option to enable the
merge.renormalize configuration.  The --no-renormalize option can
be used to override it in the negative.

So in the future, you might be able to, e.g.:

	git checkout -m -Xrenormalize otherbranch

or

	git revert -Xrenormalize otherpatch

or

	git pull --rebase -Xrenormalize

The bad part: merge.renormalize is still not honored for most
commands.  And it reveals lots of places that -X has not been plumbed
in (so we get "git merge -Xrenormalize" but not much else).

NEEDSWORK: tests

Cc: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-06 09:20:02 -07:00
Eyvind Bernhardsen
f217f0e86d Avoid conflicts when merging branches with mixed normalization
Currently, merging across changes in line ending normalization is
painful since files containing CRLF will conflict with normalized files,
even if the only difference between the two versions is the line
endings.  Additionally, any "real" merge conflicts that exist are
obscured because every line in the file has a conflict.

Assume you start out with a repo that has a lot of text files with CRLF
checked in (A):

      o---C
     /     \
    A---B---D

B: Add "* text=auto" to .gitattributes and normalize all files to
   LF-only

C: Modify some of the text files

D: Try to merge C

You will get a ridiculous number of LF/CRLF conflicts when trying to
merge C into D, since the repository contents for C are "wrong" wrt the
new .gitattributes file.

Fix ll-merge so that the "base", "theirs" and "ours" stages are passed
through convert_to_worktree() and convert_to_git() before a three-way
merge.  This ensures that all three stages are normalized in the same
way, removing from consideration differences that are only due to
normalization.

This feature is optional for now since it changes a low-level mechanism
and is not necessary for the majority of users.  The "merge.renormalize"
config variable enables it.

Signed-off-by: Eyvind Bernhardsen <eyvind.bernhardsen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-07-02 15:43:15 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
8642abc764 Merge branch 'tc/merge-m-log'
* tc/merge-m-log:
  merge: --log appends shortlog to message if specified
  fmt-merge-msg: add function to append shortlog only
  fmt-merge-msg: refactor merge title formatting
  fmt-merge-msg: minor refactor of fmt_merge_msg()
  merge: rename variable
  merge: update comment
  t7604-merge-custom-message: show that --log doesn't append to -m
  t7604-merge-custom-message: shift expected output creation

Conflicts:
	builtin.h
2010-06-18 11:16:54 -07:00
Tay Ray Chuan
f0ecac2b70 merge: --log appends shortlog to message if specified
When the user specifies a message, use fmt_merge_msg_shortlog() to
append the shortlog.

Previously, when a message was specified, we ignored the merge title
("Merge <foo> into <bar>") and shortlog from fmt_merge_msg().

Update the documentation for -m to reflect this too.

Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-10 12:02:20 -07:00
Tay Ray Chuan
97d45bcb2f merge: rename variable
It is more accurate to call it 'merge_names' instead of 'msg', as it
does not contain the final message.

Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-10 11:57:33 -07:00
Tay Ray Chuan
7558922028 merge: update comment
ce9d823 (merge: do not add standard message when message is given with
-m option) changed the behaviour of the code that the comment addressed,
but the comment was not similarly updated.

Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-05-10 11:57:32 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
f78eeeaf55 Merge branch 'cc/revert-strategy'
* cc/revert-strategy:
  revert: add "--strategy" option to choose merge strategy
  merge: make function try_merge_command non static
  merge: refactor code that calls "git merge-STRATEGY"
  revert: refactor merge recursive code into its own function
  revert: use strbuf to refactor the code that writes the merge message

Conflicts:
	builtin/revert.c
2010-05-08 22:34:47 -07:00
Christian Couder
c674d05273 merge: make function try_merge_command non static
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-01 11:14:10 -07:00
Christian Couder
3f9083cde3 merge: refactor code that calls "git merge-STRATEGY"
In the try_merge_strategy() function, when the strategy is "recursive"
or "subtree", the merge_recursive() function is called.
Otherwise we launch a "git merge-STRATEGY" process.

To make it possible to reuse code that launches a "git merge-STRATEGY"
process, this patch refactors this code into a new try_merge_command()
function.

Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-04-01 11:14:10 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
99f5b0845a Merge branch 'cc/cherry-pick-ff'
* cc/cherry-pick-ff:
  revert: fix tiny memory leak in cherry-pick --ff
  rebase -i: use new --ff cherry-pick option
  Documentation: describe new cherry-pick --ff option
  cherry-pick: add tests for new --ff option
  revert: add --ff option to allow fast forward when cherry-picking
  builtin/merge: make checkout_fast_forward() non static
  parse-options: add parse_options_concat() to concat options
2010-03-28 21:52:28 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
81b50f3ce4 Move 'builtin-*' into a 'builtin/' subdirectory
This shrinks the top-level directory a bit, and makes it much more
pleasant to use auto-completion on the thing. Instead of

	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab>
	Display all 180 possibilities? (y or n)
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-sh
	builtin-shortlog.c     builtin-show-branch.c  builtin-show-ref.c
	builtin-shortlog.o     builtin-show-branch.o  builtin-show-ref.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shor<tab>
	builtin-shortlog.c  builtin-shortlog.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shortlog.c

you get

	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab>		[type]
	builtin/   builtin.h
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin		[auto-completes to]
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sh<tab>	[type]
	shortlog.c     shortlog.o     show-branch.c  show-branch.o  show-ref.c     show-ref.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sho		[auto-completes to]
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shor<tab>	[type]
	shortlog.c  shortlog.o
	[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shortlog.c

which doesn't seem all that different, but not having that annoying
break in "Display all 180 possibilities?" is quite a relief.

NOTE! If you do this in a clean tree (no object files etc), or using an
editor that has auto-completion rules that ignores '*.o' files, you
won't see that annoying 'Display all 180 possibilities?' message - it
will just show the choices instead.  I think bash has some cut-off
around 100 choices or something.

So the reason I see this is that I'm using an odd editory, and thus
don't have the rules to cut down on auto-completion.  But you can
simulate that by using 'ls' instead, or something similar.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-02-22 14:29:41 -08:00