Abandoning an already applied change in "git rebase -i" with
"--continue" left CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and confused later steps.
* js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip:
rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behind
t3404: demonstrate CHERRY_PICK_HEAD bug
When skipping commits whose changes were already applied via `git rebase
--continue`, we need to clean up said file explicitly.
The same is not true for `git rebase --skip` because that will execute
`git reset --hard` as part of the "skip" handling in git-rebase.sh, even
before git-rebase--interactive.sh is called.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase -i" fired post-rewrite hook when it shouldn't (namely,
when it was told to stop sequencing with 'exec' insn).
* mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec:
t5407: use <<- to align the expected output
rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec command
rebase -i: demonstrate incorrect behavior of post-rewrite
Usually, when 'git rebase' stops before completing the rebase, it is to
give the user an opportunity to edit a commit (e.g. with the 'edit'
command). In such cases, 'git rebase' leaves the sha1 of the commit being
rewritten in "$state_dir"/stopped-sha, and subsequent 'git rebase
--continue' will call the post-rewrite hook with this sha1 as <old-sha1>
argument to the post-rewrite hook.
The case of 'git rebase' stopping because of a failed 'exec' command is
different: it gives the opportunity to the user to examine or fix the
failure, but does not stop saying "here's a commit to edit, use
--continue when you're done". So, there's no reason to call the
post-rewrite hook for 'exec' commands. If the user did rewrite the
commit, it would be with 'git commit --amend' which already called the
post-rewrite hook.
Fix the behavior to leave no stopped-sha file in case of failed exec
command, and teach 'git rebase --continue' to skip record_in_rewritten if
no stopped-sha file is found.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When rebase--interactive processes a task, it removes the item from
the todo list and appends it to another list of executed tasks. If a
pick (this includes squash and fixup) fails before the index has
recorded the changes, take the corresponding item and put it on the todo
list again. Otherwise, the changes introduced by the scheduled commit
would be lost.
That kind of decision is possible since the cherry-pick command
signals why it failed to apply the changes of the given commit. Either
the changes are recorded in the index using a conflict (return value 1)
and rebase does not continue until they are resolved or the changes
are not recorded in the index (return value neither 0 nor 1) and
rebase has to try again with the same task.
Add a test cases for regression testing to the "rebase-interactive"
test suite.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ruch <bafain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase -i" recently started to include the number of
commits in the insn sheet to be processed, but on a platform
that prepends leading whitespaces to "wc -l" output, the numbers
are shown with extra whitespaces that aren't necessary.
* es/rebase-i-count-todo:
rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment
rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item count
97f05f43 (Show number of TODO items for interactive rebase, 2014-12-10)
taught rebase-interactive to display an item count in the instruction
list comments:
# Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 (4 TODO item(s))
#
# Commands:
# p, pick = use commit
# ...
However, with the exception of the --edit-todo option, "TODO" is a
one-off term, never presented to the user by rebase-interactive in
any other context. The item count is in fact the number of commands
("pick", "edit", etc.) remaining on the instruction sheet, and the
comment immediately following it talks about "Commands". Consequently,
replace "(# TODO item(s))" with the more accurate and meaningful
"(# command(s))".
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
97f05f43 (Show number of TODO items for interactive rebase, 2014-12-10)
taught rebase-interactive to compute an item count with 'wc -l' and
display it in the instruction list comments:
# Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 (4 TODO item(s))
On Mac OS X, however, it renders as:
# Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 ( 4 TODO item(s))
since 'wc -l' indents its output with leading spaces. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The insn sheet "git rebase -i" creates did not fully honor
core.abbrev settings.
* ks/rebase-i-abbrev:
rebase -i: use full object name internally throughout the script
In earlier days, the abbreviated commit object name shown to the end
users were generated with hardcoded --abbrev=7; 56895038 (rebase
-i: respect core.abbrev, 2013-09-28) tried to make it honor the user
specified core.abbrev, but it missed the very initial invocation of
the editor.
These days, we try to use the full 40-hex object names internally to
avoid ambiguity that can arise after rebase starts running. Newly
created objects during the rebase may share the same prefix with
existing commits listed in the insn sheet. These object names are
shortened just before invoking the sequence editor to present the
insn sheet to the end user, and then expanded back to full object
names when the editor returns.
But the code still used the shortened names when preparing the insn
sheet for the very first time, resulting "7 hexdigits or more"
output to the user. Change the code to use full 40-hex commit
object names from the very beginning to make things more uniform.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
During 'rebase -i', one wrong edit in a long rebase session
might inadvertently drop commits/items. This change shows
the total number of TODO items in the comments after the
list. After performing the rebase edit, total item counts
can be compared to make sure that no changes have been lost
in the edit.
Signed-off-by: Onno Kortmann <onno@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed
the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from
which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does
not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream
we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with
changes in $upstream..$orig_head.
Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using
this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so
that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode):
git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \
$upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point
This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the
following topology:
C --- D --- E <- dev
/
B <- master@{1}
/
o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master
where:
- B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B;
- C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict
textually if applied in the wrong order;
- E depends textually on D.
The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as
the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that
need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C*
and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is:
o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev
If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch
containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits
are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D
(or equivalently D*) results in a conflict.
This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we
either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the
patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the
patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten.
Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com>
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The autostash mode of "git rebase -i" did not restore the dirty
working tree state if the user aborted the interactive rebase by
emptying the insn sheet.
* rr/rebase-autostash-fix:
rebase -i: test "Nothing to do" case with autostash
rebase -i: handle "Nothing to do" case with autostash
The construct is error-prone; "test" being built-in in most modern
shells, the reason to avoid "test <cond> && test <cond>" spawning
one extra process by using a single "test <cond> -a <cond>" no
longer exists.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a user invokes
$ git rebase -i @~3
with dirty files and rebase.autostash turned on, and exits the $EDITOR
with an empty buffer, the autostash fails to apply. Although the primary
focus of rr/rebase-autostash was to get the git-rebase--backend.sh
scripts to return control to git-rebase.sh, it missed this case in
git-rebase--interactive.sh. Since this case is unlike the other cases
which return control for housekeeping, assign it a special return status
and handle that return value explicitly in git-rebase.sh.
Reported-by: Karen Etheridge <ether@cpan.org>
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Work around /bin/sh that does not like "return" at the top-level
of a file that is dot-sourced from inside a function definition.
* km/avoid-non-function-return-in-rebase:
Revert "rebase: fix run_specific_rebase's use of "return" on FreeBSD"
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD
Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4)
the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution
of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that
dot-sourced it. The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves
poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed.
In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function,
then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not
itself inside a function), control will return from the function
that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might
follow the dot command inside that function. Commit 99855ddf (first
appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command
the last line in the function.
Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements
in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the
troublesome "return". The fix in 99855ddf does not address this
problem.
For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents:
run_script2() {
. "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh"
_e=$?
echo only this line should show
[ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e
return 3
}
run_script2
e=$?
[ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; }
And script2.sh with these contents:
if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then
return 5
fi
case bad in *)
echo always shows
esac
echo should not get here
! :
When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh'
after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell
is simply the single line:
only this line should show
However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output
appears instead:
should not get here
expected status 3 got 1
Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2
function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh
following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the
"echo always shows" line did not run).
These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in
script2.sh. If script2.sh is changed to this:
main() {
if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then
return 5
fi
case bad in *)
echo always shows
esac
echo should not get here
! :
}
main
Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using
other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations.
We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving
the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own
function and then calling that as the last line in the script.
Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In some places we "echo" a string that comes from a commit log
message, which may have a backslash sequence that is interpreted by
the command (POSIX.1 allows this), most notably "dash"'s built-in
'echo'.
A commit message which contains the string '\n' (or ends with the
string '\c') may result in a garbage line in the todo list of an
interactive rebase which causes the rebase to fail.
To reproduce the behavior (with dash as /bin/sh):
mkdir test && cd test && git init
echo 1 >foo && git add foo
git commit -m"this commit message ends with '\n'"
echo 2 >foo && git commit -a --fixup HEAD
git rebase -i --autosquash --root
Now the editor opens with garbage in line 3 which has to be
removed or the rebase fails.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Storbeck <uwe@ibr.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a shell snippet meant to be sourced by other shell scripts, an
opening #! line does more harm than good.
The harm:
- When the shell library is sourced, the interpreter and options from
the #! line are not used. Specifying a particular shell can
confuse the reader into thinking it is safe for the shell library
to rely on idiosyncrasies of that shell.
- Using #! instead of a plain comment drops a helpful visual clue
that this is a shell library and not a self-contained script.
- Tools such as lintian can use a #! line to tell when an
installation script has failed by forgetting to set a script
executable. This check does not work if shell libraries also start
with a #! line.
The good:
- Text editors notice the #! line and use it for syntax highlighting
if you try to edit the installed scripts (without ".sh" suffix) in
place.
The use of the #! for file type detection is not needed because Git's
shell libraries are meant to be edited in source form (with ".sh"
suffix). Replace the opening #! lines with comments.
This involves tweaking the test harness's valgrind support to find
shell libraries by looking for "# " in the first line instead of "#!"
(see v1.7.6-rc3~7, 2011-06-17).
Suggested by Russ Allbery through lintian. Thanks to Jeff King and
Clemens Buchacher for further analysis.
Tested by searching for non-executable scripts with #! line:
find . -name .git -prune -o -type f -not -executable |
while read file
do
read line <"$file"
case $line in
'#!'*)
echo "$file"
;;
esac
done
The only remaining scripts found are templates for shell scripts
(unimplemented.sh, wrap-for-bin.sh) and sample input used in tests
(t/t4034/perl/{pre,post}).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
collapse_todo_ids() uses `git rev-parse --short=7' to abbreviate
commit ids before showing them to the user in a text editor. Let's
drop argument from --short to the configured value instead (still
defaulting to 7).
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
The commit object names in the insn sheet that was prepared at the
beginning of "rebase -i" session can become ambiguous as the
rebasing progresses and the repository gains more commits. Make
sure the internal record is kept with full 40-hex object names.
* es/rebase-i-no-abbrev:
rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collision
t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision
t3404: make tests more self-contained
"git rebase -p" internally used the merge machinery, but when
rebasing, there should not be a need for merge summary.
* rt/rebase-p-no-merge-summary:
rebase --preserve-merges: ignore "merge.log" config
"rebase -i" forgot that the comment character can be configurable
while reading its insn sheet.
* es/rebase-i-respect-core-commentchar:
rebase -i: fix cases ignoring core.commentchar
The 'todo' sheet for interactive rebase shows abbreviated SHA-1's and
then performs its operations upon those shortened values. This can lead
to an abort if the SHA-1 of a reworded or edited commit is no longer
unique within the abbreviated SHA-1 space and a subsequent SHA-1 in the
todo list has the same abbreviated value.
For example:
edit f00dfad first
pick badbeef second
If, after editing, the new SHA-1 of "first" also has prefix badbeef,
then the subsequent 'pick badbeef second' will fail since badbeef is no
longer a unique SHA-1 abbreviation:
error: short SHA1 badbeef is ambiguous.
fatal: Needed a single revision
Invalid commit name: badbeef
Fix this problem by expanding the SHA-1's in the todo list before
performing the operations.
[es: also collapse & expand SHA-1's for --edit-todo; respect
core.commentchar in transform_todo_ids(); compose commit message]
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "merge.log" config is set, "rebase --preserve-merges" will add
the log lines to the message of the rebased merge commit. A rebase
should not modify a commit message automatically.
Teach "git-rebase" to ignore that configuration by passing
"--no-log" to the git-merge call.
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
180bad3d (rebase -i: respect core.commentchar, 2013-02-11) updated
"rebase -i" to honor core.commentchar but missed one instance of
hard-coded '#' comment character in skip_unnecessary_picks().
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase [-i]" used to leave just "rebase" as its reflog message
for some operations. This rewords them to be more informative.
* rr/rebase-reflog-message-reword:
rebase -i: use a better reflog message
rebase: use a better reflog message
Merge strategy and its options can be specified in `git rebase`,
but with `--interactive`, they were completely ignored.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In rebase -i --autosquash, ignore all "fixup! " or "squash! " after the
first. This supports the case when a git commit --fixup/--squash referred
to an earlier fixup/squash instead of the original commit (whether
intentionally, as when the user expressly meant to note that the commit
fixes an earlier fixup; or inadvertently, as when the user meant to refer to
the original commit with :/msg; or out of laziness, as when the user could
remember how to refer to the fixup but not the original).
In the todo list, the full commit message is preserved, in case it provides
useful cues to the user. A test helper set_cat_todo_editor is introduced to
check this.
Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that the "checkout" invoked internally from "rebase -i" knows to
honor GIT_REFLOG_ACTION, we can start to use it to write a better
reflog message when "rebase anotherbranch", "rebase --onto branch",
etc. internally checks out the new fork point. We will write:
rebase -i: checkout master
instead of the old
rebase -i
As all the calls git-rebase--interactive make to underlying git
commands that leave reflog messages are preceded by the internal
comment_for_reflog helper function, which uses the original value of
the GIT_REFLOG_ACTION variable it saw when it first started, the new
assignments to GIT_REFLOG_ACTION actively contaminate the value of
the variable, knowing that it will be reset to a sane value before
it is used again. This does not generally hold true but it should
suffice for now.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Return control to the caller git-rebase.sh to get these two tasks
rm -fr "$dotest"
git gc --auto
done by it.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for a later patch that will create $state_dir/autostash
in git-rebase.sh before anything else can happen, change a `mkdir
$state_dir` call to `mkdir -p $state_dir`. The change is safe,
because this is not a test to detect an in-progress rebase (that is
already done much earlier in git-rebase.sh).
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a rebase stops (e.g. interrupted by a merge conflict), it could
be useful to know how far a rebase has progressed and how many
commits in total this rebase will apply. Teach the __git_ps1()
command to display the number of commits so far applied and the
total number of commits to be applied, like this:
((3ec0a6a...)|REBASE 2/5)
In the example above the rebase has stopped at the second commit due to
a merge conflict and there are a total number of five commits to be
applied by this rebase.
This information can be already obtained from the following files which are
being generated during the rebase:
GIT_DIR/.git/rebase-merge/msgnum (git-rebase--merge.sh)
GIT_DIR/.git/rebase-merge/end (git-rebase--merge.sh)
GIT_DIR/.git/rebase-apply/next (git-am.sh)
GIT_DIR/.git/rebase-apply/last (git-am.sh)
but "rebase -i" does not leave necessary clues.
Implement this feature by doing these three things:
1) Modify git-rebase--interactive.sh to also create
GIT_DIR/.git/rebase-merge/msgnum
GIT_DIR/.git/rebase-merge/end
files for the number of commits so far applied and the total
number of commits to be applied.
2) Modify git-prompt.sh to read and display info from the above
files.
3) Update test t9903-bash-prompt.sh to reflect changes introduced
by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Klinger <zoltan.klinger@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit eff80a9 (Allow custom "comment char") introduced a custom comment
character for commit messages but did not teach git-rebase--interactive
to use it.
Change git-rebase--interactive to read core.commentchar and use its
value when generating commit messages and for the command list.
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier change to add --keep-empty option broke "git rebase
--preserve-merges" and lost merge commits that end up being the
same as its parent.
* ph/rebase-preserve-all-merges:
rebase --preserve-merges: keep all merge commits including empty ones
Since 90e1818f9a (git-rebase: add keep_empty flag, 2012-04-20)
'git rebase --preserve-merges' fails to preserve empty merge commits
unless --keep-empty is also specified. Merge commits should be
preserved in order to preserve the structure of the rebased graph,
even if the merge commit does not introduce changes to the parent.
Teach rebase not to drop merge commits only because they are empty.
A special case which is not handled by this change is for a merge commit
whose parents are now the same commit because all the previous different
parents have been dropped as a result of this rebase or some previous
operation.
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <hordp@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach an option to edit the insn sheet to "git rebase -i".
* aw/rebase-i-edit-todo:
rebase -i: suggest using --edit-todo to fix an unknown instruction
rebase -i: Add tests for "--edit-todo"
rebase -i: Teach "--edit-todo" action
rebase -i: Refactor help messages for todo file
rebase usage: subcommands can not be combined with -i
We have now an explicit UI to edit the todo sheet and need not disclose
the name of the file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the todo sheet of interactive rebase instructs to run a non-existing
command, the operation stops with the following error:
Execution failed: no-such
You can fix the problem, and then run
git rebase --continue
fatal: 'rebase' appears to be a git command, but we were not
able to execute it. Maybe git-rebase is broken?
The reason is that the shell that attempted to run the command exits with
code 127. rebase--interactive just forwards this code to the caller (the
git wrapper). But our smart run-command infrastructure detects this
special exit code and turns it into ENOENT, which in turn is interpreted
by the git wrapper as if the external command that it just executed did
not exist. This is finally translated to the misleading last two lines in
error message cited above.
Fix it by translating the error code before it is forwarded.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This allows users to edit the todo file while they're stopped in the
middle of an interactive rebase. When this action is executed, all
comments from the original todo file are stripped, and new help messages
are appended to the end.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-1.7.11:
Almost 1.7.11.6
gitweb: URL-decode $my_url/$my_uri when stripping PATH_INFO
rebase -i: use full onto sha1 in reflog
sh-setup: protect from exported IFS
receive-pack: do not leak output from auto-gc to standard output
t/t5400: demonstrate breakage caused by informational message from prune
setup: clarify error messages for file/revisions ambiguity
send-email: improve RFC2047 quote parsing
fsck: detect null sha1 in tree entries
do not write null sha1s to on-disk index
diff: do not use null sha1 as a sentinel value
The reflog entries left by "git rebase" and "git rebase -i" were
inconsistent (the interactive one gave an abbreviated object name).
* mg/rebase-i-onto-reflog-in-full:
rebase -i: use full onto sha1 in reflog
The reflog entries left by "git rebase" and "git rebase -i" were
inconsistent.
* mg/rebase-i-onto-reflog-in-full:
rebase -i: use full onto sha1 in reflog
