The $strategy_opts variable contains a space-separated list
of strategy options, each individually shell-quoted. To loop
over each, we "unwrap" them by doing an eval like:
eval '
for opt in '"$strategy_opts"'
do
...
done
'
Note the quoting that means we expand $strategy_opts inline
in the code to be evaluated (which is the right thing
because we want the IFS-split and de-quoting). If the
variable is empty, however, we ask the shell to eval the
following code:
for opt in
do
...
done
without anything between "in" and "do". Most modern shells
are happy to treat that like a noop, but reportedly ksh88 on
AIX considers it a syntax error. So let's catch the case
that the variable is empty and skip the eval altogether
(since we know the loop would be a noop anyway).
Reported-by: Armin Kunaschik <megabreit@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some multi-byte encoding can have a backslash byte as a later part
of one letter, which would confuse "highlight" filter used in
gitweb.
* sk/gitweb-highlight-encoding:
gitweb: apply fallback encoding before highlight
Recent update to Git LFS broke "git p4" by changing the output from
its "lfs pointer" subcommand.
* ls/p4-lfs:
git-p4: fix Git LFS pointer parsing
travis-ci: express Linux/OS X dependency versions more clearly
travis-ci: update Git-LFS and P4 to the latest version
Commit e6e7530 (test helpers: move test-* to t/helper/ subdirectory -
2016-04-13) moves test-* to t/helper. However because bin-wrappers/*
only depend on wrap-for-bin.sh, when switching between a branch that has
this commit and one that does not, bin-wrappers/* may not be regenerated
and point to the old/outdated test programs.
This commit makes a non-functional change in wrap-for-bin.sh, just
enough for 'make' to detect and re-execute wrap-for-bin.sh. When
switching between a branch containing both this commit and e6e7530 and
one containing neither, bin-wrappers/*, we should get fresh bin-wrappers/*.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As a small example of using "test-parse-options --expect",
rewrite the "check" helper using it, instead of comparing
the whole variable dump.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
9a001381 (Fix tests under GETTEXT_POISON on parseopt, 2012-08-27)
introduced check_i18n, but the helper was never used from the
beginning.
The same commit also introduced check_unknown_i18n to replace the
helper check_unknown and changed all users of the latter to use the
former, but failed to remove check_unknown itself.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Existing tests in t0040 follow a rather verbose pattern:
cat >expect <<\EOF
boolean: 0
integer: 0
magnitude: 0
timestamp: 0
string: (not set)
abbrev: 7
verbose: 0
quiet: 3
dry run: no
file: (not set)
EOF
test_expect_success 'multiple quiet levels' '
test-parse-options -q -q -q >output 2>output.err &&
test_must_be_empty output.err &&
test_cmp expect output
'
But the only thing this test cares about is if "quiet: 3" is in the
output. We should be able to write the above 18 lines with just
four lines, like this:
test_expect_success 'multiple quiet levels' '
test-parse-options --expect="quiet: 3" -q -q -q
'
Teach the new --expect=<string> option to test-parse-options helper.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When test-parse-options detects an error on the command line, it
gives the usage string just like any parse-options API users do,
without showing any "variable dump". An exception is the callback
test, where a "variable dump" for the option is done before the
command line options are fully parsed.
Do not expose this implementation detail by separating the handling
of callback test into two phases, one to capture the fact that an
option was given during the option parsing phase, and the other to
show that fact as a part of normal "variable dump".
The effect of this fix is seen in the patch to t/t0040 where it
tried "test-parse-options --no-length" where "--length" is a callback
that does not take a negative form.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To support this developer's use case of allowing build agents token-based
access to private repositories, we introduced the http.extraheader
feature, allowing extra HTTP headers to be sent along with every HTTP
request.
This patch verifies that we can configure these extra HTTP headers via the
command-line for use with `git submodule update`, too. Example: git -c
http.extraheader="Secret: Sauce" submodule update --init
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Build documentation as separate Travis CI job to check for
documentation errors.
Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is easy to add incorrect "linkgit:<page>[<section>]" references
to our documentation suite. Catch these common classes of errors:
* Referring to Documentation/<page>.txt that does not exist.
* Referring to a <page> outside the Git suite. In general, <page>
must begin with "git".
* Listing the manual <section> incorrectly. The first line of the
Documentation/<page>.txt must end with "(<section>)".
with a new script "ci/lint-gitlink", and drive it from "make check-docs".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To test that extra HTTP headers are passed correctly, t5551 verifies that
a fetch succeeds when two required headers are passed, and that the fetch
does not succeed when those headers are not passed.
However, this test would also succeed if the configuration required only
one header. As Apache's configuration is notoriously tricky (this
developer frequently requires StackOverflow's help to understand Apache's
documentation), especially when still supporting the 2.2 line, let's just
really make sure that the test verifies what we want it to verify.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Lars Schneider noticed that the configuration introduced to test the
extra HTTP headers cannot be used with Apache 2.2 (which is still
actively maintained, as pointed out by Junio Hamano).
To let the tests pass with Apache 2.2 again, let's substitute the
offending <RequireAll> and `expr` by using old school RewriteCond
statements.
As RewriteCond does not allow testing for *non*-matches, we simply match
the desired case first and let it pass by marking the RewriteRule as
'[L]' ("last rule, do not process any other matching RewriteRules after
this"), and then have another RewriteRule that matches all other cases
and lets them fail via '[F]' ("fail").
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Tested-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add commit.verbose configuration variable as a convenience for those
who always prefer --verbose.
Add tests to check the behavior introduced by this commit and also to
verify that behavior of status doesn't break because of this commit.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Even though a Git commit object is designed to be capable of storing
any binary data as its payload, in practice people use it to describe
the changes in textual form, and tools like "git log" are designed to
treat the payload as text.
Detect and warn when we see any commit object with a NUL byte in
it.
Note that a NUL byte in the header part is already detected as a
grave error. This change is purely about the message part.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are a handful of incorrect "linkgit:<page>[<section>]"
instances in our documentation set.
* Some have an extra colon after "linkgit:"; fix them by removing
the extra colon;
* Some refer to a page outside the Git suite, namely curl(1); fix
them by using the `curl(1)` that already appears on the same page
for the same purpose of referring the readers to its manual page.
* Some spell the name of the page incorrectly, e.g. "rev-list" when
they mean "git-rev-list"; fix them.
* Some list the manual section incorrectly; fix them to make sure
they match what is at the top of the target of the link.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One test in t6036 prepares a file whose contents contain these
lines:
<<<<<<< Temporary merge branch 1
C
=======
B
>>>>>>> Temporary merge branch 2
and uses recursive merge strategy to run criss-cross merge with it.
Manual merge resolution by users fundamentally depends on being able
to distinguish the tracked contents from the separator lines added
by "git merge" in order to allow users to tell which block of lines
came from where. You can deliberately craft a file with lines that
resemble conflict marker lines to make it impossible for the user
(the outer merge of merge-recursive counts as a user of the result
of "virtual parent" merge) to tell which part is which, and write a
test to demonstrate that with such a file that "git merge" cannot
fundamentally work well and has to fail.
It however is pointless and waste of time and resource to run such a
test that asserts the obvious.
In real life, people who do need to track files with such lines that
have <<<< ==== >>>> as their prefixes set the conflict-marker-size
attribute to make sure they will be able to tell between the tracked
lines that happen to begin with these (confusing) prefixes and the
marker lines that are added by "git merge".
Remove the test as pointless waste of resource.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The primary use of conflict markers is to help the user who resolves
the final (outer) merge by hand to show which part came from which
branch by separating the blocks of lines apart. When the conflicted
parts from a "virtual ancestor" merge created by merge-recursive
remains in the common ancestor part in the final result, however,
the conflict markers that are the same size as the final merge
become harder to see.
Increase the conflict marker size slightly for these inner merges so
that the markers from the final merge and cruft from internal merge
can be distinguished more easily.
This would help reduce the common issue that prevents "rerere" from
being used on a really complex conflict.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rewrite the 'seq' imitation using only commands and features that
are typically found built into modern POSIX shells, instead of
relying on Perl to run a single-liner script.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
88d50724 (am --skip: revert changes introduced by failed 3way merge,
2015-06-06), unlike all the other patches in the series, forgot to
quote the output from "$(git ls-files -u)" when using it as the
argument to "test -z", leading to a syntax error on platforms whose
test does not interpret "test -z" (no other arguments) as testing if
a string "-z" is the null string (which GNU test and test that is
built into bash and dash seem to do).
Note that $(git ls-files -u | wc -l) is deliberately left unquoted,
as some implementations of "wc -l" includes extra blank characters
in its output and cannot be compared as string, i.e. "test 0 = $(...)".
Signed-off-by: Armin Kunaschik <megabreit@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We never used the "letters" form since we came up with "test_seq" to
replace use of non-portable "seq" in our test script, which we
introduced it at d17cf5f3 (tests: Introduce test_seq, 2012-08-04).
We use this helper to either iterate for N times (i.e. the values on
the lines do not even matter), or just to get N distinct strings
(i.e. the values on the lines themselves do not really matter, but
we care that they are different from each other and reproducible).
Stop promising that we may allow using "letters"; this would open an
easier reimplementation that does not rely on $PERL, if somebody
later wants to.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While at there, improve the error message a bit (what operation failed?)
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
