A patch attached as application/octet-stream (e.g. not text/*) were
mishandled, not correctly honoring Content-Transfer-Encoding
(e.g. base64).
* lt/mailinfo-handle-attachment-more-sanely:
mailinfo: don't require "text" mime type for attachments
A patch attached as application/octet-stream (e.g. not text/*) were
mishandled, not correctly honoring Content-Transfer-Encoding
(e.g. base64).
* lt/mailinfo-handle-attachment-more-sanely:
mailinfo: don't require "text" mime type for attachments
Currently "git am" does insane things if the mbox it is given contains
attachments with a MIME type that aren't "text/*".
In particular, it will still decode them, and pass them "one line at a
time" to the mail body filter, but because it has determined that they
aren't text (without actually looking at the contents, just at the mime
type) the "line" will be the encoding line (eg 'base64') rather than a
line of *content*.
Which then will cause the text filtering to fail, because we won't
correctly notice when the attachment text switches from the commit message
to the actual patch. Resulting in a patch failure, even if patch may be a
perfectly well-formed attachment, it's just that the message type may be
(for example) "application/octet-stream" instead of "text/plain".
Just remove all the bogus games with the message_type. The only difference
that code creates is how the data is passed to the filter function
(chunked per-pred-code line or per post-decode line), and that difference
is *wrong*, since chunking things per pre-decode line can never be a
sensible operation, and cannot possibly matter for binary data anyway.
This code goes all the way back to March of 2007, in commit 87ab799234
("builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes"), and apparently Don used to
pass random mbox contents to git. However, the pre-decode vs post-decode
logic really shouldn't matter even for that case, and more importantly, "I
fed git am crap" is not a valid reason to break *real* patch attachments.
If somebody really cares, and determines that some attachment is binary
data (by looking at the data, not the MIME-type), the whole attachment
should be dismissed, rather than fed in random-sized chunks to
"handle_filter()".
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When "git am" is fed an input that has multiple "Content-type: ..."
header, it did not grok charset= attribute correctly.
* jc/maint-mailinfo-mime-attr:
mailinfo: do not concatenate charset= attribute values from mime headers
"Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8" header should not appear
twice in the input, but it is always better to gracefully deal with
such a case. The current code concatenates the value to the values
we have seen previously, producing nonsense such as "utf8UTF-8".
Instead of concatenating, forget the previous value and use the last
value we see.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We strip the prefix from "Re: subject" and also from a less common
"re: subject", but left even less common "RE: subject" intact.
* jc/mailinfo-RE:
mailinfo: strip "RE: " prefix
We already strip the more common Re: and re:, and we do not often
see RE: from saner MUA, but this prefix does exist and gets used
from time to time.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a line in the message is not a valid utf-8, "git mailinfo"
attempts to convert it to utf-8 assuming the input is latin1 (and
punt if it does not convert cleanly). Using the same heuristics in
"git commit" and "git commit-tree" lets the editor output be in
latin1 to make the overall system more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The logic for the -b mode, where [PATCH] is dropped but [foo] is not,
silently ate all spaces after the ].
Fix this by keeping the next isspace() character, if there is any.
Being more thorough is pointless, as the later cleanup_space() call
will normalize any sequence of whitespace to a single ' '.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without the "-k" option, mailinfo will convert a folded
subject header like:
Subject: this is a
subject that doesn't
fit on one line
into a single line. With "-k", however, we assumed that
these newlines were significant and represented something
that the sending side would want us to preserve.
For messages created by format-patch, this assumption was
broken by a1f6baa (format-patch: wrap long header lines,
2011-02-23). For messages sent by arbitrary MUAs, this was
probably never a good assumption to make, as they may have
been folding subjects in accordance with rfc822's line
length recommendations all along.
This patch now joins folded lines with a single whitespace
character. This treats header folding purely as a syntactic
feature of the transport mechanism, not as something that
format-patch is trying to tell us about the original
subject.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* builtin/commit.c: Replace block of code with a one-liner call to
logmsg_reencode().
* commit.c: new function for looking up a comit by name
* pretty.c: helper methods for getting output encodings
Add helpers get_log_output_encoding() and
get_commit_output_encoding() that eliminate some messy and duplicate
if-blocks.
Signed-off-by: Pat Notz <patnotz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this patch at least IBM VisualAge C 5.0 (I have 5.0.2) on AIX
5.1 fails to compile git.
enum style is inconsistent already, with some enums declared on one
line, some over 3 lines with the enum values all on the middle line,
sometimes with 1 enum value per line... and independently of that the
trailing comma is sometimes present and other times absent, often
mixing with/without trailing comma styles in a single file, and
sometimes in consecutive enum declarations.
Clearly, omitting the comma is the more portable style, and this patch
changes all enum declarations to use the portable omitted dangling
comma style consistently.
Signed-off-by: Gary V. Vaughan <gary@thewrittenword.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Handle perforations found “in the wild” more robustly by recognizing
“%<” as an alternative scissors mark.
This feature is only meant to support old habits. Discourage new use
of the percent-based version by only documenting the 8< symbol so new
users’ perforations can still be recognized by old versions of Git.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This shrinks the top-level directory a bit, and makes it much more
pleasant to use auto-completion on the thing. Instead of
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab>
Display all 180 possibilities? (y or n)
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-sh
builtin-shortlog.c builtin-show-branch.c builtin-show-ref.c
builtin-shortlog.o builtin-show-branch.o builtin-show-ref.o
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shor<tab>
builtin-shortlog.c builtin-shortlog.o
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin-shortlog.c
you get
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em buil<tab> [type]
builtin/ builtin.h
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin [auto-completes to]
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sh<tab> [type]
shortlog.c shortlog.o show-branch.c show-branch.o show-ref.c show-ref.o
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/sho [auto-completes to]
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shor<tab> [type]
shortlog.c shortlog.o
[torvalds@nehalem git]$ em builtin/shortlog.c
which doesn't seem all that different, but not having that annoying
break in "Display all 180 possibilities?" is quite a relief.
NOTE! If you do this in a clean tree (no object files etc), or using an
editor that has auto-completion rules that ignores '*.o' files, you
won't see that annoying 'Display all 180 possibilities?' message - it
will just show the choices instead. I think bash has some cut-off
around 100 choices or something.
So the reason I see this is that I'm using an odd editory, and thus
don't have the rules to cut down on auto-completion. But you can
simulate that by using 'ls' instead, or something similar.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
