Broken &&-chains in the test scripts have been corrected.
* es/test-chain-lint:
t6000-t9999: detect and signal failure within loop
t5000-t5999: detect and signal failure within loop
t4000-t4999: detect and signal failure within loop
t0000-t3999: detect and signal failure within loop
tests: simplify by dropping unnecessary `for` loops
tests: apply modern idiom for exiting loop upon failure
tests: apply modern idiom for signaling test failure
tests: fix broken &&-chains in `{...}` groups
tests: fix broken &&-chains in `$(...)` command substitutions
tests: fix broken &&-chains in compound statements
tests: use test_write_lines() to generate line-oriented output
tests: simplify construction of large blocks of text
t9107: use shell parameter expansion to avoid breaking &&-chain
t6300: make `%(raw:size) --shell` test more robust
t5516: drop unnecessary subshell and command invocation
t4202: clarify intent by creating expected content less cleverly
t1020: avoid aborting entire test script when one test fails
t1010: fix unnoticed failure on Windows
t/lib-pager: use sane_unset() to avoid breaking &&-chain
Failures within `for` and `while` loops can go unnoticed if not detected
and signaled manually since the loop itself does not abort when a
contained command fails, nor will a failure necessarily be detected when
the loop finishes since the loop returns the exit code of the last
command it ran on the final iteration, which may not be the command
which failed. Therefore, detect and signal failures manually within
loops using the idiom `|| return 1` (or `|| exit 1` within subshells).
Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before, --reflog option would look for '\t' in the reflog message. As refs.c
already parses the reflog line, the '\t' was never found, and show-branch
--reflog would always say "(none)" as reflog message
Add test.
Signed-off-by: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add missing tests for --remotes, --list and --merge-base. These are
not exhaustive, but better than the nothing we have now.
There were some tests for this command added in f76412ed6d ([PATCH]
Add 'git show-branch'., 2005-08-21) has never been properly tested,
namely for the --all option in t6432-merge-recursive-space-options.sh,
and some of --merge-base and --independent in t6010-merge-base.sh.
This fixes a few more blind spots, but there's still a lot of behavior
that's not tested for.
These new tests show the odd (and possibly unintentional) behavior of
--merge-base with one argument, and how its output is the same as "git
merge-base" with N bases in this particular case. See the test added
in f621a8454d (git-merge-base/git-show-branch --merge-base:
Documentation and test, 2009-08-05) for a case where the two aren't
the same.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the colored output introduced in ab07ba2a24 (show-branch: color
the commit status signs, 2009-04-22) to not color and reset each
individual space character we use for padding. The intent is to color
just the "!", "+" etc. characters.
This makes the output easier to test, so let's do that now. The test
would be much more verbose without a color/reset for each space
character. Since the coloring cycles through colors we previously had
a "rainbow of space characters".
In theory this breaks things for anyone who's relying on the exact
colored output of show-branch, in practice I'd think anyone parsing it
isn't actively turning on the colored output.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Modernize test code added in ce567d1867 (Add test to show that
show-branch misses out the 8th column, 2008-07-23) and
11ee57bc4c (sort_in_topological_order(): avoid setting a commit flag,
2008-07-23) to use test helpers.
I'm renaming "out" to "actual" for consistency with other tests, and
introducing a "branches.sorted" file in the setup, to make it clear
that it's important that the list be sorted in this particular way.
The "show-branch" output is indented with spaces, which would cause
complaints under "git show --check" with an indented here-doc
block. Let's prefix the lines with "> " to work around that, and to
make it clear that the leading whitespace is important.
We can also get rid of the hardcoding of "main" added here in
334afbc76f (tests: mark tests relying on the current default for
`init.defaultBranch`, 2020-11-18). For this test we're setting up an
"initial" commit anyway, and now that we've moved over to test_commit
we can reference that instead.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rename the only *show-branch* test file to indicate that more tests
belong it in than just the one-off octopus test it now contains.
The test was initially added in ce567d1867 (Add test to show that
show-branch misses out the 8th column, 2008-07-23) and
11ee57bc4c (sort_in_topological_order(): avoid setting a commit flag,
2008-07-23). Those two add almost the same content, one with a
test_expect_success and the other a test_expect_failure (a bug being
tested for was fixed on one of the branches).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
