If you were on 'frotz' branch before you checked out your current
branch, "git merge @{-1}~22" means the same as "git merge frotz~22".
The strbuf_branchname() function, when interpret_branch_name() gives
up resolving "@{-1}~22" fully, returns "frotz" and tells the caller
that it only resolved "@{-1}" part of the input, mistakes this as a
total failure, and appends the whole thing to the result, yielding
"frotz@{-1}~22", which does not make any sense.
Inspect the return value from interpret_branch_name() a bit more
carefully. When it errored out without consuming anything, we will
get -1 and we should return the whole thing. Otherwise, we should
append the remainder (i.e. "~22" in the earlier example) to the
partially resolved name (i.e. "frotz").
The test suite adds enough number of checkout to make @{-12} in the
last test in t0100 that tried to check "we haven't flipped branches
that many times" error case succeed; raise the number to a hundred.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Describe how 'add' sets the submodule's logical name, which is used in
the configuration entry names.
Clarify that 'init' only sets up the configuration entries for
submodules that have already been added elsewhere. Describe that
<path> arguments limit the submodules that are configured.
Signed-off-by: Dale Worley <worley@ariadne.com>
Acked-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, the default history treated bottom commits the same as any
other UNINTERESTING commit, which could force it down side branches.
Consider the following history:
*A--*B---D--*F * marks !TREESAME parent paths
\ /*
`-C-'
When requesting "B..F", B is UNINTERESTING but TREESAME to D. C is
!UNINTERESTING.
So default following would go from D into the irrelevant side branch C
to A, rather than to B. Note also that if there had been an extra
!UNINTERESTING commit B1 between B and D, it wouldn't have gone down C.
Change the default following to test relevant_commit() instead of
!UNINTERESTING, so it can proceed straight from D to B, thus finishing
the traversal of that path.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using --parents or --children, get_commit_action() previously showed
all merges, even if TREESAME to both parents.
This was intended to tie together the topology of the rewritten parents,
but it was excessive - in fact we only need to show merges that have two
or more relevant parents. Merges at the boundary do not necessarily need
to be shown.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the BOTTOM flag to define relevance for pruning. Relevant commits
are those that are !UNINTERESTING or BOTTOM, and this allows us to
identify irrelevant side branches (UNINTERESTING && !BOTTOM).
If a merge has relevant parents, and it is TREESAME to them, then do not
let irrelevant parents cause the merge to be treated as !TREESAME.
When considering simplification, don't always include all merges -
merges with exactly one relevant parent can be simplified, if TREESAME
according to the above rule.
These two changes greatly increase simplification in limited, pruned
revision lists.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When performing edge-based operations on the revision graph, it can be
useful to be able to identify the INTERESTING graph's connection(s) to
the bottom commit(s) specified by the user.
Conceptually when the user specifies "A..B" (== B ^A), they are asking
for the history from A to B. The first connection from A onto the
INTERESTING graph is part of that history, and should be considered. If
we consider only INTERESTING nodes and their connections, then we're
really only considering the history from A's immediate descendants to B.
This patch does not change behaviour, but adds a new BOTTOM flag to
indicate the bottom commits specified by the user, ready to be used by
following patches.
We immediately use the BOTTOM flag to return collect_bottom_commits() to
its original approach of examining the pending commit list rather than
the command line. This will ensure alignment of the definition of
"bottom" with future patches.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reimplement commit 4b7f53da on top of the new simplify-merges
infrastructure, tightening the condition to only consider root parents;
the original version incorrectly dropped parents that were TREESAME to
anything.
Original log message follows.
The merge simplification rule stated in 6546b59 (revision traversal:
show full history with merge simplification, 2008-07-31) still
treated merge commits too specially. Namely, in a history with this
shape:
---o---o---M
/
x---x---x
where three 'x' were on a history completely unrelated to the main
history 'o' and do not touch any of the paths we are following, we
still said that after simplifying all of the parents of M, 'x'
(which is the leftmost 'x' that rightmost 'x simplifies down to) and
'o' (which would be the last commit on the main history that touches
the paths we are following) are independent from each other, and
both need to be kept.
That is incorrect; when the side branch 'x' never touches the paths,
it should be removed to allow M to simplify down to the last commit
on the main history that touches the paths.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When simplifying an odd merge, such as one that used "-s ours", we may
find ourselves TREESAME to apparently redundant parents. Prevent
simplify_merges() from removing every TREESAME parent; if this would
happen reinstate the first TREESAME parent - the one that the default
log would have followed.
This avoids producing a totally disjoint history from the default log
when the default log is a better explanation of the end result, and aids
visualisation of odd merges.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
History simplification previously always treated merges as TREESAME
if they were TREESAME to any parent.
While this was consistent with the default behaviour, this could be
extremely unhelpful when searching detailed history, and could not be
overridden. For example, if a merge had ignored a change, as if by "-s
ours", then:
git log -m -p --full-history -Schange file
would successfully locate "change"'s addition but would not locate the
merge that resolved against it.
Futher, simplify_merges could drop the actual parent that a commit
was TREESAME to, leaving it as a normal commit marked TREESAME that
isn't actually TREESAME to its remaining parent.
Now redefine a commit's TREESAME flag to be true only if a commit is
TREESAME to _all_ of its parents. This doesn't affect either the default
simplify_history behaviour (because partially TREESAME merges are turned
into normal commits), or full-history with parent rewriting (because all
merges are output). But it does affect other modes. The clearest
difference is that --full-history will show more merges - sufficient to
ensure that -m -p --full-history log searches can really explain every
change to the file, including those changes' ultimate fate in merges.
Also modify simplify_merges to recalculate TREESAME after removing
a parent. This is achieved by storing per-parent TREESAME flags on the
initial scan, so the combined flag can be easily recomputed.
This fixes some t6111 failures, but creates a couple of new ones -
we are now showing some merges that don't need to be shown.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation of --boundary uses the term "uninteresting", which is
not used or defined anywhere else in the documentation. This is
unhelpful and confusing to anyone who hasn't seen the UNINTERESTING
flag in the source code.
Change to use "excluded", as per revisions.txt.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the example given, P is not TREESAME to E. This doesn't affect the
current result, but it will matter when we change behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some side branching and odd merging to illustrate various flaws in
revision list scans, particularly when limiting the list.
Many expected failures, which will be gone by the end of the "history
traversal refinements" series.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for upcoming TREESAME work, check the result for G.t,
which is dropped in "-s ours" merge L. The default rev-list is empty, as
expected - it follows the first parent path where it never existed.
Unfortunately, --ancestry-path is also empty. Merges H J and L are all
TREESAME to 1 parent, so are treated as TREESAME and not shown. This is
clearly undesirable in the case of merge L, which dropped our G.t by
taking the non-ancestry-path version. Document this as a known failure,
and expect "H J L", the 3 merges along the path that had to chose G.t
versions.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When growing the table, take the opportunity to "compact" it by removing
entries with NULL decoration.
Users may have "removed" decorations by passing NULL to
insert_decoration. An object's table entry can't actually be removed
during normal operation, as it would break the linear hash collision
search. But we can remove NULL decoration entries when rebuilding the
table.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation assures users that "A...B" is defined as "A B --not
$(git merge-base --all A B)". This wasn't in fact quite true, because
the calculated merge bases were not sent to add_rev_cmdline().
The main effect of this was that although
git rev-list --ancestry-path A B --not $(git merge-base --all A B)
worked, the simpler form
git rev-list --ancestry-path A...B
failed with a "no bottom commits" error.
Other potential users of bottom commits could also be affected by this
problem, if they examine revs->cmdline_info; I came across the issue in
my proposed history traversal refinements series.
So ensure that the calculated merge bases are sent to add_rev_cmdline(),
flagged with new 'whence' enum value REV_CMD_MERGE_BASE.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Bracey <kevin@bracey.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 95b0c60 (remote-bzr: add support for bzr repos) introduced a
regression by assuming all bzr remote repos are listable, but they are
not.
If they are not listable they are basically useless, so let's assume
there is no bzr repo.
Reported-by: Thorsten Kranzkowski <dl8bcu@dl8bcu.de>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise, the user would never ever see new bookmarks, only the
ones that (s)he initially cloned.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We skip it locally, but not for the remote, so let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In certain situations we might end up pushing garbage revisions
(e.g. in a rebase), and the patches to deal with that haven't been
merged yet. So let's disable forced pushes by default.
We are essentially reverting back to the old v1.8.2 behavior, to
minimize the possibility of regressions, but in a way the user can
configure.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a user creates a new branch with git:
% git checkout -b branches/devel
and then pushes this branch
% git push origin branches/devel
which is the way to push new mercurial branches, we do want to
create a branch, but the command would fail without newbranch=True.
This only matters when force_push=False, but setting newbranch=True
unconditionally does not hurt.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Remove try/except check because we are no longer calling
check_output(), which may throw an exception.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Drop unused "global", and remove redundant comparison of two files.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a deletion is followed by exactly 3 (or whatever the number of
context lines) unchanged lines, followed by another change, the combined
diff output would hide the first deletion, resulting in a malformed
diff.
This happened because the 3 lines before each change are painted
interesting, but also marked as no_pre_delete to prevent showing deletes
that were previously marked as uninteresting. This behaviour was
introduced in c86fbe53 (diff -c/--cc: do not include uninteresting
deletion before leading context). However, as a side effect, this could
also mark deletes that were already interesting as no_pre_delete. This
would happen only if the delete was exactly 3 lines away from the next
change, since lines farther away would not be touched by the "paint
three lines before the change" code and lines closer would be painted
by the "merge two adjacent hunks" code instead, which does not set the
no_pre_delete flag.
This commit fixes this problem by only setting the no_pre_delete flag
for changes that were previously uninteresting.
Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a clone exists with the old organization (v1.8.2) it will prevent
the new shared bzr repository organization from working, so let's
remove this repository, which is not used any more.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the 'coverage' target to build coverage-untested-functions by
default, so as to make it more discoverable.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If the user sets DEFAULT_TEST_TARGET=prove in his config.mak, that
carries over into the coverage tests. Which is really bad if he also
sets GIT_PROVE_OPTS=-j<..> as that completely breaks the coverage
runs.
Instead of attempting to mess with the GIT_PROVE_OPTS, just force the
test target to 'test' so that we run under make, like we intended all
along.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The coverage-compile target depends on coverage-clean, which is
supposed to remove the earlier build products that would get in the
way of the next coverage test run.
However, removing *.gcno is actively wrong. These are the files that
contain the compile-time coverage related data. They are only rebuilt
if the source is compiled. So if one ran 'make coverage' two times in
a row, the second run would remove *.gcno, but then fail to recreate
them because neither source files nor build flags have changed. (This
remained hidden for so long most likely because any other intervening
use of 'make' will change the build flags, causing a full rebuild.)
So we make an exception for *.gcno. The *.gcda are the coverage
results, written when the gcov-instrumented program is run. We still
remove those, so as to get a one-test-run view of the data; you could
probably argue the other way too.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Confusingly, the coverage-build target in fact builds with gcov
support _and runs tests_.
Split it into two targets that actually are named after what they do.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* git://ozlabs.org/~paulus/gitk:
gitk: On OSX, bring the gitk window to front
gitk: Add support for -G'regex' pickaxe variant
gitk: Add menu item for reverting commits
gitk: Simplify file filtering
gitk: Display the date of a tag in a human-friendly way
gitk: Improve behaviour of drop-down lists
gitk: Move hard-coded colors to .gitk
On OSX, Tcl/Tk application windows are created behind all
the applications down the stack of windows. This is very
annoying, because once a gitk window appears, it's the
downmost window and switching to it is pain.
The patch is: if we are on OSX, use osascript to
bring the current Wish process window to front.
Signed-off-by: Tair Sabirgaliev <tair.sabirgaliev@gmail.com>
Thanks-to: Stefan Haller <lists@haller-berlin.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
git log -G'regex' is a very useful alternative to the classic
pickaxe. Minimal patch to make it usable from gitk.
[zj: reword message]
[paulus@samba.org: reword droplist item]
Signed-off-by: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Return control to the caller git-rebase.sh to get these two tasks
rm -fr "$dotest"
git gc --auto
done by it.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Return control to the caller git-rebase.sh to get these two tasks
rm -fr "$dotest"
git gc --auto
done by it.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We only need to do these two tasks
git gc --auto
rm -fr "$dotest"
ourselves if the script was invoked as a standalone program; when
invoked with --rebasing (from git-rebase--am.sh), cascade control back
to the ultimate caller git-rebase.sh to do this for us.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
On successful completion of a rebase in git-rebase--$backend.sh, the
$backend script cleans up on its own and exits. The cleanup routine
is however, independent of the $backend, and each $backend script
unnecessarily duplicates this work:
rm -rf "$state_dir"
git gc --auto
Prepare git-rebase.sh for later patches that return control from each
$backend script back to us, for performing this generic cleanup
routine. The code that this patch adds is currently unreachable, and
will only start to be used when git-rebase--$backend.sh scripts are
taught to return control in later patches.
Another advantage is that git-rebase.sh can implement a generic
finish_rebase() to possibly do additional tasks in addition to the
cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for a later patch that will create $state_dir/autostash
in git-rebase.sh before anything else can happen, change a `mkdir
$state_dir` call to `mkdir -p $state_dir`. The change is safe,
because this is not a test to detect an in-progress rebase (that is
already done much earlier in git-rebase.sh).
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for a later patch that creates $dotest/autostash in
git-rebase.sh before anything else happens, don't assume that the
presence of a $dotest directory implies the existence of the
$dotest/next and $dotest/last files. Look for them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The set-up step to prepare a repository with 50000 tags used a
non-porable '\+' to match one-or-more.
The error was not caught because the next test that uses that
repository did not even bother to check if these expected tags were
actually cloned to the resulting repository.
Fix the sed construct to use BRE and update the "clone" test that
wanted to test cloning from such a repository with many refs to
check the resulting repository.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we run a regular "git fetch" without arguments, we
update the tracking refs according to the configured
refspec. However, when we run "git fetch origin master" (or
"git pull origin master"), we do not look at the configured
refspecs at all, and just update FETCH_HEAD.
We miss an opportunity to update "refs/remotes/origin/master"
(or whatever the user has configured). Some users find this
confusing, because they would want to do further comparisons
against the old state of the remote master, like:
$ git pull origin master
$ git log HEAD...origin/master
In the currnet code, they are comparing against whatever
commit happened to be in origin/master from the last time
they did a complete "git fetch". This patch will update a
ref from the RHS of a configured refspec whenever we happen
to be fetching its LHS. That makes the case above work.
The downside is that any users who really care about whether
and when their tracking branches are updated may be
surprised.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Each "struct ref" has a boolean flag that is set by the
fetch code to determine whether the ref should be marked as
"not-for-merge" or not when we write it out to FETCH_HEAD.
It would be useful to turn this boolean into a tri-state,
with the third state meaning "do not bother writing it out
to FETCH_HEAD at all". That would let us add extra refs to
the set of refs to be stored (e.g., to store copies of
things we fetched) without impacting FETCH_HEAD.
This patch turns it into an enum that covers the tri-state
case, and hopefully makes the code more explicit and easier
to read.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The documentation erroneously used the same wording for both fetch and
pull, stating that something will be merged even in git-fetch(1).
In addition, saying that "<ref> is equivalent to <ref>:" doesn't
really help anyone who still needs to read manpages. Clarify what is
actually going on.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We have three sequential tests for for whether tracking refs
are updated by various fetches and pulls; the first two
should not update the ref, and the third should. Each test
depends on the state left by the test before.
This is fragile (a failing early test will confuse later
tests), and means we cannot add more "should update" tests
after the third one.
Let's instead save the initial state before these tests, and
then reset to a known state before running each test.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
