Originally, moving a <source> directory which is not on-disk due
to its existence outside of sparse-checkout cone, "giv mv" command
errors out with "bad source".
Add a helper check_dir_in_index() function to see if a directory
name exists in the index. Also add a SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR bit to mark
such directories.
Change the checking logic, so that such <source> directory makes
"giv mv" command warns with "advise_on_updating_sparse_paths()"
instead of "bad source"; also user now can supply a "--sparse" flag so
this operation can be carried out successfully.
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, moving a sparse file into cone can result in unwarned
overwrite of existing entry. The expected behavior is that if the
<destination> exists in the entry, user should be prompted to supply
a [-f|--force] to carry out the operation, or the operation should
fail.
Add a check mechanism to do that.
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Originally, moving a <source> file which is not on-disk but exists in
index as a SKIP_WORKTREE enabled cache entry, "giv mv" command errors
out with "bad source".
Change the checking logic, so that such <source>
file makes "giv mv" command warns with "advise_on_updating_sparse_paths()"
instead of "bad source"; also user now can supply a "--sparse" flag so
this operation can be carried out successfully.
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add corresponding tests to test following situations:
We do not have sufficient coverage of moving files outside
of a sparse-checkout cone. Create new tests covering this
behavior, keeping in mind that the user can include --sparse
(or not), move a file or directory, and the destination can
already exist in the index (in this case user can use --force
to overwrite existing entry).
Helped-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add an explicit --no-cone to several sparse-checkout invocations in
preparation for changing the default to cone mode.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These three commands recently learned to avoid updating paths outside
the sparse checkout even if they are missing the SKIP_WORKTREE bit. This
is done using path_in_sparse_checkout(), which checks whether a given
path matches the current list of sparsity rules, similar to what
clear_ce_flags() does when we run "git sparse checkout init" or "git
sparse-checkout reapply". However, clear_ce_flags() uses a recursive
approach, applying the match results from parent directories on paths
that get the UNDECIDED result, whereas path_in_sparse_checkout() only
attempts to match the full path and immediately considers UNDECIDED as
NOT_MATCHED. This makes the function miss matches with leading
directories. For example, if the user has the sparsity patterns "!/a"
and "b/", add, rm, and mv will fail to update the path "a/b/c" and end
up displaying a warning about it being outside the sparse checkout even
though it isn't. This problem only occurs in full pattern mode as the
pattern matching functions never return UNDECIDED for cone mode.
To fix this, replicate the recursive behavior of clear_ce_flags() in
path_in_sparse_checkout(), falling back to the parent directory match
when a path gets the UNDECIDED result. (If this turns out to be too
expensive in some cases, we may want to later add some form of caching
to accelerate multiple queries within the same directory. This is not
implemented in this patch, though.) Also add two tests for each affected
command (add, rm, and mv) to check that they behave correctly with the
recursive pattern matching. The first test would previously fail without
this patch while the second already succeeded. It is added mostly to
make sure that we are not breaking the existing pattern matching for
directories that are really sparse, and also as a protection against any
future regressions.
Two other existing tests had to be changed as well: one test in t3602
checks that "git rm -r <dir>" won't remove sparse entries, but it didn't
allow the non-sparse entries inside <dir> to be removed. The other one,
in t7002, tested that "git mv" would correctly display a warning message
for sparse paths, but it accidentally expected the message to include
two non-sparse paths as well.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Tavares <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Acked-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous changes modified the behavior of 'git add', 'git rm', and
'git mv' to not adjust paths outside the sparse-checkout cone, even if
they exist in the working tree and their cache entries lack the
SKIP_WORKTREE bit. The intention is to warn users that they are doing
something potentially dangerous. The '--sparse' option was added to each
command to allow careful users the same ability they had before.
To improve the discoverability of this new functionality, add a message
to advice.updateSparsePath that mentions the existence of the option.
The previous set of changes also modified the purpose of this message to
include possibly a list of paths instead of only a list of pathspecs.
Make the warning message more clear about this new behavior.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since cmd_mv() does not operate on cache entries and instead directly
checks the filesystem, we can only use path_in_sparse_checkout() as a
mechanism for seeing if a path is sparse or not. Be sure to skip
returning a failure if '-k' is specified.
To ensure that the advice around sparse paths is the only reason a move
failed, be sure to check this as the very last thing before inserting
into the src_for_dst list.
The tests cover a variety of cases such as whether the target is tracked
or untracked, and whether the source or destination are in or outside of
the sparse-checkout definition.
Helped-by: Matheus Tavares Bernardino <matheus.bernardino@usp.br>
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
