"git p4" used to try expanding malformed "$keyword$" that spans
across multiple lines.
* pw/maint-p4-rcs-expansion-newline:
git p4: RCS expansion should not span newlines
This bug was introduced in cb585a9 (git-p4: keyword
flattening fixes, 2011-10-16). The newline character
is indeed special, and $File$ expansions should not try
to match across multiple lines.
Based-on-patch-by: Chris Goard <cgoard@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Add '--conflict' option to git-p4 subcommand to specify what action
to take when conflicts are found during 'p4 submit'.
* pw/p4-submit-conflicts:
git-p4: add submit --conflict option and config varaiable
git p4: add submit --prepare-p4-only option
git p4: add submit --dry-run option
git p4: accept -v for --verbose
git p4: revert deleted files after submit cancel
git p4: rearrange submit template construction
git p4: test clean-up after failed submit, fix added files
git p4: standardize submit cancel due to unchanged template
git p4: move conflict prompt into run, add [q]uit input
git p4: remove submit failure options [a]pply and [w]rite
git p4: gracefully fail if some commits could not be applied
git p4 test: remove bash-ism of combined export/assignment
This allows specifying what to do when a conflict
happens when applying a commit to p4, automating the
interactive prompt.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This option can be used to prepare the client workspace for
submission, only. It does not invoke the final "p4 submit".
A message describes how to proceed, either submitting the
changes or reverting.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A new option, "git p4 submit --dry-run" can be used to verify
what commits and labels would be moved into p4.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The short form "-v" is common in many git commands as an
alias for "--verbose".
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The user can decide not to continue with a submission,
by not saving the p4 submit template, then answering "no" to
the "Submit anyway?" prompt. In this case, be sure to
return the p4 client to its initial state.
Deleted files were not reverted; fix this and test all cases.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Put all items in order as they appear, and add comments.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test a variety of cases where a patch failed to apply to
p4 and had to be cleaned up.
If the patch failed to apply cleanly, do not try to remove
to-be-added files, as they have not really been added yet.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When editing the submit template, if no change was made to it,
git p4 offers a prompt "Submit anyway?". Answering "no" cancels
the submit.
Previously, a "no" answer behaves like a "[s]kip" answer to the
failed-patch prompt, in that it proceeded to try to apply the
rest of the commits. Instead, put users back into the new
"[s]kip / [c]ontinue" loop so that they can decide. This makes
both cases of patch failure behave identically.
The return code of git p4 after a "no" answer is now the same
as that for a "skip" due to failed patch; update a test to
understand this.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When applying a commit to the p4 workspace fails, a prompt
asks what to do next. This belongs up in run() instead
of in applyCommit(), where run() can notice, for instance,
that the prompt is unnecessary because this is the last commit.
Offer two options about how to continue at conflict: [s]kip or
[q]uit. Having an explicit "quit" option gives git p4 a chance
to clean up, show the applied-commit summary, and do tag export.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a patch failed to apply, these interactive options offered
to:
1) apply the patch anyway, leaving reject (.rej) files around, or,
2) write the patch to a file (patch.txt)
In both cases it suggested to invoke "git p4 submit --continue",
an unimplemented option.
While manually fixing the rejects and submitting the result might
work, there are many steps that must be done to the job properly:
* apply patch
* invoke p4 add and delete
* change executable bits
* p4 sync -f renamed/copied files
* extract commit message into p4 change description and
move Jobs lines out of description section
* set changelist owner for --preserve-user
Plus the following manual sync/rebase will cause conflicts too,
which must be resolved once again.
Drop these workflows. Instead users should do a sync/rebase in
git, fix the conflicts there, and do a clean "git p4 submit".
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a commit fails to apply cleanly to the p4 tree, an interactive
prompt asks what to do next. In all cases (skip, apply, write),
the behavior after the prompt had a few problems.
Change it so that it does not claim erroneously that all commits
were applied. Instead list the set of the patches under
consideration, and mark with an asterisk those that were
applied successfully. Like this example:
Applying 592f1f9 line5 in file1 will conflict
...
Unfortunately applying the change failed!
What do you want to do?
[s]kip this patch / [a]pply the patch forcibly and with .rej files / [w]rite the patch to a file (patch.txt) s
Skipping! Good luck with the next patches...
//depot/file1#4 - was edit, reverted
Applying b8db1c6 okay_commit_after_skip
...
Change 6 submitted.
Applied only the commits marked with '*':
592f1f9 line5 in file1 will conflict
* b8db1c6 okay_commit_after_skip
Do not try to sync and rebase unless all patches were applied.
If there was a conflict during the submit, there is sure to be one
at the rebase. Let the user to do the sync and rebase manually.
This changes how a couple tets in t9810-git-p4-rcs.sh behave:
- git p4 now does not leave files open and edited in the
client
- If a git commit contains a change to a file that was
deleted in p4, the test used to check that the sync/rebase
loop happened after the failure to apply the change. Since
now sync/rebase does not happen after failure, do not test
this. Normal rebase machinery, outside of git p4, will let
rebase --skip work.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The bug report in http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11893688
observes that files are mapped into the wrong locations in
git when both --use-client-spec and --branch-detection are enabled.
Fix this by changing the relative path prefix to match discovered
branches when using a client spec.
The problem was likely introduced with ecb7cf9 (git-p4: rewrite view
handling, 2012-01-02).
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Tested-by: Matthew Korich <matthew@korich.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of having to remember to do it after each call to
stripRepoPath, make it part of that function.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This instance variable is needed during commit() to map
files from p4 to their relative locations in git. Set
it when initializing P4Sync to avoid passing it to every
commit() call.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For -M option (detectRenames) in P4Submit, use 'p4 move' rather
than 'p4 integrate'. Check Perforce server for exisitence of
'p4 move' and use it if present, otherwise revert to 'p4 integrate'.
[pw: wildcard-encode src/dest, add/update tests, tweak code]
Signed-off-by: Gary Gibbons <ggibbons@perforce.com>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
P4Submit.applyCommit()
To avoid recalculating the same diffOpts for each commit, move it
out of applyCommit() and into the top-level run(). Also fix a bug
in that code which interpreted the value of detectRenames as a
string rather than as a boolean.
[pw: fix documentation, rearrange code a bit]
Signed-off-by: Gary Gibbons <ggibbons@perforce.com>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
P4 has a feature called "jobs" that allows linking changes
to a bug tracking system or other tasks. When submitting
code, a job name can be specified to mark that this change
is associated with a particular job.
Teach git-p4 to find an optional "Jobs:" line in git commit
messages and use them to make a Jobs section in the p4
change specifitation.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By Luke Diamand
* ld/git-p4-tags-and-labels:
git p4: fix bug when enabling tag import/export via config variables
git p4: fix bug when verbose enabled with tag export
git p4: add test for tag import/export enabled via config
Use Python's True, not true. Causes failure when enabling tag
import or export in "git p4" using a config option rather than
the command line.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Wrong variable name used when verbose enabled, causes failure.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Acked-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are four wildcard characters in p4. Files with these
characters can be added to p4 repos using the "-f" option. They
are stored in %xx notation, and when checked out, p4 converts
them back to normal.
When adding files with wildcards in git, the submit path must
be careful to use the encoded names in some places, and it
must use "-f" to add them. All other p4 commands that operate
on the client directory expect encoded filenames as arguments.
Support for wildcards in the clone/sync path was added in
084f630 (git-p4: decode p4 wildcard characters, 2011-02-19),
but that change did not handle the submit path.
There was a problem with wildcards in the sync path too. Commit
084f630 (git-p4: decode p4 wildcard characters, 2011-02-19)
handled files with p4 wildcards that were added or modified in
p4. Do this for deleted files, and also in branch detection
checks, too.
Reported-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The way rename works is with a "p4 integrate", optionally
followed by a "p4 edit" if the change is not a 100% rename.
Contents are generated by applying a patch, not doing a file
system rename. Copy is similar.
In this case, p4 does not fix the permissions back to read-only.
Make sure this happens by calling "p4 sync -f".
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code to auto-create the client directory, added in 0591cfa
(git-p4: ensure submit clientPath exists before chdir,
2011-12-09), works when the client directory never existed.
But if the directory is summarily removed without telling p4,
the sync operation will not bring back all the files. Always
do "sync -f" if the client directory is newly created.
Reported-by: Gary Gibbons <ggibbons@perforce.com>
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The verbose flag is common to all classes, or at least should be.
Make it a member of the base Command class, rather than
reimplementing for each class. Make option parsing mirror this.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
p4 itself treats an empty value for P4EDITOR as the same as
having P4EDITOR unset. Do the same for "git p4".
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous one is already in 'next' but was somewhat lacking.
The configuration "git-p4.validLabelRegexp" is now called
"labelExportRegexp", and its default covers lowercase alphabets as
well.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The existing label import code looks at each commit being
imported, and then checks for labels at that commit. This
doesn't work in the real world though because it will drop
labels applied on changelists that have already been imported,
a common pattern.
This change adds a new --import-labels option. With this option,
at the end of the sync, git p4 gets sets of labels in p4 and git,
and then creates a git tag for each missing p4 label.
This means that tags created on older changelists are
still imported.
Tags that could not be imported are added to an ignore
list.
The same sets of git and p4 tags and labels can also be used to
derive a list of git tags to export to p4. This is enabled with
--export-labels in 'git p4 submit'.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In messages to the user and comments, change "git-p4" to "git p4".
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Move git-p4 out of contrib/fast-import into the main code base,
aside other foreign SCM tools.
Signed-off-by: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
