Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Johannes Schindelin
cd94c6f91e fsck: git receive-pack: support excluding objects from fsck'ing
The optional new config option `receive.fsck.skipList` specifies the path
to a file listing the names, i.e. SHA-1s, one per line, of objects that
are to be ignored by `git receive-pack` when `receive.fsckObjects = true`.

This is extremely handy in case of legacy repositories where it would
cause more pain to change incorrect objects than to live with them
(e.g. a duplicate 'author' line in an early commit object).

The intended use case is for server administrators to inspect objects
that are reported by `git push` as being too problematic to enter the
repository, and to add the objects' SHA-1 to a (preferably sorted) file
when the objects are legitimate, i.e. when it is determined that those
problematic objects should be allowed to enter the server.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-23 14:27:37 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
efaba7cc77 fsck: optionally ignore specific fsck issues completely
An fsck issue in a legacy repository might be so common that one would
like not to bother the user with mentioning it at all. With this change,
that is possible by setting the respective message type to "ignore".

This change "abuses" the missingEmail=warn test to verify that "ignore"
is also accepted and works correctly. And while at it, it makes sure
that multiple options work, too (they are passed to unpack-objects or
index-pack as a comma-separated list via the --strict=... command-line
option).

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-23 14:27:36 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
f50c440730 fsck: disallow demoting grave fsck errors to warnings
Some kinds of errors are intrinsically unrecoverable (e.g. errors while
uncompressing objects). It does not make sense to allow demoting them to
mere warnings.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-23 14:27:36 -07:00
Johannes Schindelin
70a4ae73d8 fsck: add a simple test for receive.fsck.<msg-id>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-06-23 14:27:36 -07:00
Jeff King
74eb32d3a4 receive-pack: drop "n/a" on unpacker errors
The output from git push currently looks like this:

  $ git push dest HEAD
  fatal: [some message from index-pack]
  error: unpack failed: index-pack abnormal exit
  To dest
   ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> master (n/a (unpacker error))

That n/a is meant to be "the per-ref status is not
available" but the nested parentheses just make it look
ugly. Let's turn the final line into just:

   ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> master (unpacker error)

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-09-21 09:50:13 -07:00
Clemens Buchacher
ef7e93d908 do not override receive-pack errors
Receive runs rev-list --verify-objects in order to detect missing
objects. However, such errors are ignored and overridden later.
Instead, consequently ignore all update commands for which an error has
already been detected.

Some tests in t5504 are obsoleted by this change, because invalid
objects are detected even if fsck is not enabled. Instead, they now test
for different error messages depending on whether or not fsck is turned
on. A better fix would be to force a corruption that will be detected by
fsck but not by rev-list.

Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-02-13 13:29:08 -08:00
Junio C Hamano
2e2e7e9dd0 Merge branch 'jc/fetch-verify'
* jc/fetch-verify:
  fetch: verify we have everything we need before updating our ref
  rev-list --verify-object
  list-objects: pass callback data to show_objects()
2011-10-05 12:36:20 -07:00
Junio C Hamano
b10a53583f test: fetch/receive with fsckobjects
Add tests for the new fetch.fsckobjects, and also tests for
receive.fsckobjects we have had for quite some time.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-09-04 18:19:36 -07:00