* jc/log-stdin:
Add trivial tests for --stdin option to log family
Make --stdin option to "log" family read also pathspecs
setup_revisions(): do not call get_pathspec() too early
Teach --stdin option to "log" family
read_revision_from_stdin(): use strbuf
Conflicts:
revision.c
Move the logic to read revs from standard input that rev-list knows about
from it to revision machinery, so that all the users of setup_revisions()
can feed the list of revs from the standard input when "--stdin" is used
on the command line.
Allow some users of the revision machinery that want different semantics
from the "--stdin" option to disable it by setting an option in the
rev_info structure.
This also cleans up the kludge made to bundle.c via cut and paste.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I personally use "git bisect visualize" all the time when I bisect, but it
turns out that that is not a very flexible model. Sometimes I want to do
bisection based on all commits (no pathname limiting), but then visualize
the current bisection tree with just a few pathnames because I _suspect_
those pathnames are involved in the problem but am not totally sure about
them.
And at other times, I want to use other revision parsing logic, none of
which is available with "git bisect visualize".
So this adds "--bisect" as a revision parsing argument, and as a result it
just works with all the normal logging tools. So now I can just do
gitk --bisect --simplify-by-decoration filename-here
etc.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we show a reflog, we have two ways of naming the entry:
by sequence number (e.g., HEAD@{0}) or by date (e.g.,
HEAD@{10 minutes ago}). There is no explicit option to set
one or the other, but we guess based on whether or not the
user has provided us with a date format, showing them the
date version if they have done so, and the sequence number
otherwise.
This usually made sense if the use did something like "git
log -g --date=relative". However, it didn't make much sense
if the user set the date format using the log.date config
variable; in that case, all of their reflogs would end up as
dates.
This patch records the source of the date format and only
triggers the date-based view if --date= was given on the
command line.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Previously, graph_is_interesting() did not behave quite the same way as
the code in get_revision(). As a result, it would sometimes think
commits were uninteresting, even though get_revision() would return
them. This resulted in incorrect lines in the graph output.
This change creates a get_commit_action() function, which
graph_is_interesting() and simplify_commit() both now use to determine
if a commit will be shown. It is identical to the old simplify_commit()
behavior, except that it never calls rewrite_parents().
This problem was reported by Santi Béjar. The following command
would exhibit the problem before, but now works correctly:
git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline v1.6.3.3
Previously git graph did not display the output for this command
correctly between f29ac4f and 66996ec, among other places.
Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <simpkins@facebook.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit de435ac0 changed the behavior of --decorate from printing the
full ref (e.g., "refs/heads/master") to a shorter, more human-readable
version (e.g., just "master"). While this is nice for human readers,
external tools using the output from "git log" may prefer the full
version.
This patch introduces an extension to --decorate to allow the caller to
specify either the short or the full versions.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I do various statistics on git, and one of the things I look at is merges,
because they are often interesting events to count ("how many merges vs
how much 'real development'" kind of statistics). And you can do it with
some fairly straightforward scripting, ie
git rev-list --parents HEAD |
grep ' .* ' |
git diff-tree --always -s --pretty=oneline --stdin |
less -S
will do it.
But I finally got irritated with the fact that we can skip merges with
'--no-merges', but we can't do the trivial reverse operation.
So this just adds a '--merges' flag that _only_ shows merges. Now you can
do the above with just a
git log --merges --pretty=oneline
which is a lot simpler. It also means that we automatically get a lot of
statistics for free, eg
git shortlog -ns --merges
does exactly what you'd want it to do.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This simplifies the logic of rev_compare_tree() by removing a special
case.
It does so by turning the special case of finding a diff to be "all new
files" into a more generic case of "all new" vs "all removed" vs "mixed
changes", so now the code is actually more powerful and more generic, and
the added symmetry actually makes it simpler too.
This makes no changes to any existing behavior, but apart from the
simplification it does make it possible to some day care about whether all
changes were just deletions if we want to. Which we may well want to for
merge handling.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* lt/pack-object-memuse:
show_object(): push path_name() call further down
process_{tree,blob}: show objects without buffering
Conflicts:
builtin-pack-objects.c
builtin-rev-list.c
list-objects.c
list-objects.h
upload-pack.c
In particular, pushing the "path_name()" call _into_ the show() function
would seem to allow
- more clarity into who "owns" the name (ie now when we free the name in
the show_object callback, it's because we generated it ourselves by
calling path_name())
- not calling path_name() at all, either because we don't care about the
name in the first place, or because we are actually happy walking the
linked list of "struct name_path *" and the last component.
Now, I didn't do that latter optimization, because it would require some
more coding, but especially looking at "builtin-pack-objects.c", we really
don't even want the whole pathname, we really would be better off with the
list of path components.
Why? We use that name for two things:
- add_preferred_base_object(), which actually _wants_ to traverse the
path, and now does it by looking for '/' characters!
- for 'name_hash()', which only cares about the last 16 characters of a
name, so again, generating the full name seems to be just unnecessary
work.
Anyway, so I didn't look any closer at those things, but it did convince
me that the "show_object()" calling convention was crazy, and we're
actually better off doing _less_ in list-objects.c, and giving people
access to the internal data structures so that they can decide whether
they want to generate a path-name or not.
This patch does that, and then for people who did use the name (even if
they might do something more clever in the future), it just does the
straightforward "name = path_name(path, component); .. free(name);" thing.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Here's a less trivial thing, and slightly more dubious one.
I was looking at that "struct object_array objects", and wondering why we
do that. I have honestly totally forgotten. Why not just call the "show()"
function as we encounter the objects? Rather than add the objects to the
object_array, and then at the very end going through the array and doing a
'show' on all, just do things more incrementally.
Now, there are possible downsides to this:
- the "buffer using object_array" _can_ in theory result in at least
better I-cache usage (two tight loops rather than one more spread out
one). I don't think this is a real issue, but in theory..
- this _does_ change the order of the objects printed. Instead of doing a
"process_tree(revs, commit->tree, &objects, NULL, "");" in the loop
over the commits (which puts all the root trees _first_ in the object
list, this patch just adds them to the list of pending objects, and
then we'll traverse them in that order (and thus show each root tree
object together with the objects we discover under it)
I _think_ the new ordering actually makes more sense, but the object
ordering is actually a subtle thing when it comes to packing
efficiency, so any change in order is going to have implications for
packing. Good or bad, I dunno.
- There may be some reason why we did it that odd way with the object
array, that I have simply forgotten.
Anyway, now that we don't buffer up the objects before showing them
that may actually result in lower memory usage during that whole
traverse_commit_list() phase.
This is seriously not very deeply tested. It makes sense to me, it seems
to pass all the tests, it looks ok, but...
Does anybody remember why we did that "object_array" thing? It used to be
an "object_list" a long long time ago, but got changed into the array due
to better memory usage patterns (those linked lists of obejcts are
horrible from a memory allocation standpoint). But I wonder why we didn't
do this back then. Maybe there's a reason for it.
Or maybe there _used_ to be a reason, and no longer is.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* sb/format-patch-patchname:
format_sanitized_subject: Don't trim past initial length of strbuf
log-tree: fix patch filename computation in "git format-patch"
format-patch: --numbered-files and --stdout aren't mutually exclusive
format-patch: --attach/inline uses filename instead of SHA1
format-patch: move get_patch_filename() into log-tree
format-patch: pass a commit to reopen_stdout()
format-patch: construct patch filename in one function
pretty.c: add %f format specifier to format_commit_message()
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
Conflicts:
t/t7700-repack.sh
Currently when format-patch is used with --attach or --inline the patch
attachment has the SHA1 of the commit for its filename. This replaces
the SHA1 with the filename used by format-patch when outputting to
files.
Fix tests relying on the SHA1 output and add a test showing how the
--suffix option affects the attachment filename output.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This option to pack-objects/rev-list was created to improve the -A and -a
options of repack. It was found to be lacking in that it did not provide
the ability to differentiate between local and non-local kept packs, and
found to be unnecessary since objects residing in local kept packs can be
filtered out by the --honor-pack-keep option.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Simplify is_kept_pack()
Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
git-repack: resist stray environment variable
Now is_kept_pack() is just a member lookup into a structure, we can write
it as such.
Also rewrite the sole caller of has_sha1_kept_pack() to switch on the
criteria the callee uses (namely, revs->kept_pack_only) between calling
has_sha1_kept_pack() and has_sha1_pack(), so that these two callees do not
have to take a pointer to struct rev_info as an argument.
This removes the header file dependency issue temporarily introduced by
the earlier commit, so we revert changes associated to that as well.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This removes --unpacked=<packfile> parameter from the revision parser, and
rewrites its use in git-repack to pass a single --kept-pack-only option
instead.
The new --kept-pack-only option means just that. When this option is
given, is_kept_pack() that used to say "not on the --unpacked=<packfile>
list" now says "the packfile has corresponding .keep file".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This refactors three loops that check if a given packfile is on the
ignore_packed list into a function is_kept_pack(). The function returns
false for a pack on the list, and true for a pack not on the list, because
this list is solely used by "git repack" to pass list of packfiles that do
not have corresponding .keep files, i.e. a packfile not on the list is
"kept".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Its "ignore_packed" parameter always comes from struct rev_info. This
patch makes the function take a pointer to the surrounding structure, so
that the refactoring in the next patch becomes easier to review.
There is an unfortunate header file dependency and the easiest workaround
is to temporarily move the function declaration from cache.h to
revision.h; this will be moved back to cache.h once the function loses
this "ignore_packed" parameter altogether in the later part of the
series.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, format-patch can only track a single reference (the
In-Reply-To:) for each mail. To ensure proper threading, we should
list all known references for every mail.
Change the rev_info.ref_message_id field to a string_list, so that we
can append references at will, and change the output formatting
routines to print all of them in the References: header. The last
entry in the list is implicitly assumed to be the In-Reply-To:, which
gives output consistent with RFC 2822:
The "References:" field will contain the contents of the parent's
"References:" field (if any) followed by the contents of the
parent's "Message-ID:" field (if any).
Note that this is just preparatory work; nothing uses it yet, so all
"References:" fields in the output are still only one deep.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With this, you can simplify history not by the contents of the tree, but
whether a commit has been named (ie it's referred to by some branch or
tag) or not.
This makes it possible to see the relationship between different named
commits, without actually seeing any of the details.
When used with pathspec, you would get the usual view that is limited to
the commits that change the contents of the tree plus commits that are
named.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We will want to add decorations without necessarily showing them, so add
an explicit revisions info flag as to whether we're showing decorations
or not.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already support decorating commits by tags or branches that point to
them, but especially when we are looking at multiple branches together,
we sometimes want to see _how_ we reached a particular commit.
We can abuse the '->util' field in the commit to keep track of that as
we walk the commit lists, and get a reasonably useful view into which
branch or tag first reaches that commit.
Of course, if the commit is reachable through multiple sources (which is
common), our particular choice of "first" reachable is entirely random
and depends on the particular path we happened to follow.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/filter-branch:
revision --simplify-merges: make it a no-op without pathspec
revision --simplify-merges: do not leave commits unprocessed
revision --simplify-merges: use decoration instead of commit->util field
Documentation: rev-list-options: move --simplify-merges documentation
filter-branch: use --simplify-merges
filter-branch: fix ref rewriting with --subdirectory-filter
filter-branch: Extend test to show rewriting bug
Topo-sort before --simplify-merges
revision traversal: show full history with merge simplification
revision.c: whitespace fix
--reverse did not interact well with --parents, as the included test
case shows: in a history like
A--B.
\ \
`C--M--D
the command
git rev-list --reverse --parents --full-history HEAD
erroneously lists D as having no parents at all. (Without --reverse,
it correctly lists M.)
This is caused by the machinery driving --reverse: it first grabs all
commits through the normal routines, then runs them through the same
routines again, effectively simplifying them twice.
Fix this by moving the --reverse one level up, into get_revision().
This way we can cleanly grab all commits via the normal calls, then
just pop them off the list one by one without interfering with
get_revision_internal().
Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This has been broken in v1.6.0 due to the reorganization of
the revision option parsing code. The "-i" is completely
ignored, but works fine in "git log --grep -i".
What happens is that the code for "-i" looks for
revs->grep_filter; if it is NULL, we do nothing, since there
are no grep filters. But that is obviously not correct,
since we want it to influence the later --grep option. Doing
it the other way around works, since "-i" just impacts the
existing grep_filter option.
Instead, we now always initialize the grep_filter member and
just fill in options and patterns as we get them. This means
that we can no longer check grep_filter for NULL, but
instead must check the pattern list to see if we have any
actual patterns.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The variable show_early_output is defined in revision.c and should be
declared extern in revision.h so that the linker does not complain
about multiply defined variables.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The users of revision walking machinery may want to use the util pointer
for their own use. Use decoration to hold the data needed during merge
simplification instead.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --full-history traversal keeps all merges in addition to non-merge
commits that touch paths in the given pathspec. This is useful to view
both sides of a merge in a topology like this:
A---M---o
/ /
---O---B
even when A and B makes identical change to the given paths. The revision
traversal without --full-history aims to come up with the simplest history
to explain the final state of the tree, and one of the side branches can
be pruned away.
The behaviour to keep all merges however is inconvenient if neither A nor
B touches the paths we are interested in. --full-history reduces the
topology to:
---O---M---o
in such a case, without removing M.
This adds a post processing phase on top of --full-history traversal to
remove needless merges from the resulting history.
The idea is to compute, for each commit in the "full history" result set,
the commit that should replace it in the simplified history. The commit
to replace it in the final history is determined as follows:
* In any case, we first figure out the replacement commits of parents of
the commit we are looking at. The commit we are looking at is
rewritten as if the replacement commits of its original parents are its
parents. While doing so, we reduce the redundant parents from the
rewritten parent list by not just removing the identical ones, but also
removing a parent that is an ancestor of another parent.
* After the above parent simplification, if the commit is a root commit,
an UNINTERESTING commit, a merge commit, or modifies the paths we are
interested in, then the replacement commit of the commit is itself. In
other words, such a commit is not dropped from the final result.
The first point above essentially means that the history is rewritten in
the bottom up direction. We can rewrite the parent list of a commit only
after we know how all of its parents are rewritten. This means that the
processing needs to happen on the full history (i.e. after limit_list()).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to set the TOPOSORT flag of commits during the topological
sorting, but we can just as well use the member "indegree" for it:
indegree is now incremented by 1 in the cases where the commit used
to have the TOPOSORT flag.
This is the same behavior as before, since indegree could not be
non-zero when TOPOSORT was unset.
Incidentally, this fixes the bug in show-branch where the 8th column
was not shown: show-branch sorts the commits in topological order,
assuming that all the commit flags are available for show-branch's
private matters.
But this was not true: TOPOSORT was identical to the flag corresponding
to the 8th ref. So the flags for the 8th column were unset by the
topological sorting.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ph/parseopt-step-blame:
revisions: refactor handle_revision_opt into parse_revision_opt.
git-shortlog: migrate to parse-options partially.
git-blame: fix lapsus
git-blame: migrate to incremental parse-option [2/2]
git-blame: migrate to incremental parse-option [1/2]
revisions: split handle_revision_opt() from setup_revisions()
parse-opt: add PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 parser option.
parse-opt: fake short strings for callers to believe in.
parse-opt: do not print errors on unknown options, return -2 intead.
parse-opt: create parse_options_step.
parse-opt: Export a non NORETURN usage dumper.
parse-opt: have parse_options_{start,end}.
git-blame --reverse
builtin-blame.c: allow more than 16 parents
builtin-blame.c: move prepare_final() into a separate function.
rev-list --children
revision traversal: --children option
* jc/report-tracking:
branch -r -v: do not spit out garbage
stat_tracking_info(): clear object flags used during counting
git-branch -v: show the remote tracking statistics
git-status: show the remote tracking statistics
Refactor "tracking statistics" code used by "git checkout"
It seems we're using handle_revision_opt the same way each time, have a
wrapper around it that does the 9-liner we copy each time instead.
handle_revision_opt can be static in the module for now, it's always
possible to make it public again if needed.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add two fields to struct rev_info:
- .def to store --default argument; and
- .show_merge 1-bit field.
handle_revision_opt() is able to deal with any revision option, and
consumes them, and leaves revision arguments or pseudo arguments
(like --all, --not, ...) in place.
For now setup_revisions() does a pass of handle_revision_opt() again
so that code not using it in a parse-opt parser still work the same.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reading rev-list parameters from the command line can be reused by
commands other than rev-list. Move this function to more "library-ish"
place to promote code reuse.
Signed-off-by: Adam Brewster <asb@bu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When left-right traversal counts the commits in a diverged history, it
leaves the flags in the commits smudged, and we need to clear them before
we return. Otherwise the caller cannot inspect other branches with this
function again.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This new option causes a text-based representation of the history to be
printed to the left of the normal output.
Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This change allows parent rewriting to be performed without causing
the log and rev-list commands to print the parents.
Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <adam@adamsimpkins.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds a new --children option to the revision machinery. In addition
to the list of parents, child commits of each commit are computed and
stored as a decoration to each commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This attached patch introduces a single bit "use_terminator" in "struct
rev_info", which is normally false (i.e. most formats use separator
semantics) but by flipping it to true, you can ask for terminator
semantics just like oneline format does.
The function get_commit_format(), which is what parses "--pretty=" option,
now takes a pointer to "struct rev_info" and updates its commit_format and
use_terminator fields. It used to return the value of type "enum
cmit_fmt", but all the callers assigned it to rev->commit_format.
There are only two cases the code turns use_terminator on. Obviously, the
traditional oneline format (--pretty=oneline) is one of them, and the new
case is --pretty=tformat:... that acts like --pretty=format:... but flips
the bit on.
With this, "--pretty=tformat:%H %s" acts like --pretty=oneline.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* db/cover-letter:
Improve collection of information for format-patch --cover-letter
Add API access to shortlog
t4014: Replace sed's non-standard 'Q' by standard 'q'
Support a --cc=<email> option in format-patch
Combine To: and Cc: headers
Fix format.headers not ending with a newline
Add tests for extra headers in format-patch
Add a --cover-letter option to format-patch
Export some email and pretty-printing functions
Improve message-id generation flow control for format-patch
Add more tests for format-patch
Conflicts:
builtin-log.c
builtin-shortlog.c
pretty.c
It's really not very easy to visualize the commit walker, because - on
purpose - it obvously doesn't show the uninteresting commits!
This adds a "--show-all" flag to the revision walker, which will make
it show uninteresting commits too, and they'll have a '^' in front of
them (it also fixes a logic error for !verbose_header for boundary
commits - we should show the '-' even if left_right isn't shown).
A separate patch to gitk to teach it the new '^' was sent
to paulus. With the change in place, it actually is interesting
even for the cases that git doesn't have any problems with, ie
for the kernel you can do:
gitk -d --show-all v2.6.24..
and you see just how far down it has to parse things to see it all. The
use of "-d" is a good idea, since the date-ordered toposort is much better
at showing why it goes deep down (ie the date of some of those commits
after 2.6.24 is much older, because they were merged from trees that
weren't rebased).
So I think this is a useful feature even for non-debugging - just to
visualize what git does internally more.
When it actually breaks out due to the "everybody_uninteresting()"
case, it adds the uninteresting commits (both the one it's looking at
now, and the list of pending ones) to the list
This way, we really list *all* the commits we've looked at.
Because we now end up listing commits we may not even have been parsed
at all "show_log" and "show_commit" need to protect against commits
that don't have a commit buffer entry.
That second part is debatable just how it should work. Maybe we shouldn't
show such entries at all (with this patch those entries do get shown, they
just don't get any message shown with them). But I think this is a useful
case.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of warning the user that it is expecting git log output from
the standard input (and waiting for the user to type the log from
the keyboard, which is a silly thing to do), default to traverse from
HEAD when there is no rev parameter given and the standard input is
a tty.
This factors out a useful helper "add_head()" from builtin-diff.c to a
more appropriate place revision.c while renaming it to more descriptive
name add_head_to_pending(), as that is what the function is about.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We cannot tell a node that has been checked and found not to be
interesting (which does not have the TREECHANGE flag) from a
node that hasn't been checked if it is interesting or not,
without relying on something else, such as object->parsed.
But an object can get the "parsed" flag for other reasons.
Which means that "TREECHANGE" has the wrong polarity.
This changes the way how the path pruning logic marks an
uninteresting commits. From now on, we consider a commit
interesting by default, and explicitly mark the ones we decided
to prune. The flag is renamed to "TREESAME".
Then, this fixes the logic to show the early output with
incomplete pruning. It basically says "a commit that has
TREESAME set is kind-of-UNINTERESTING", but obviously in a
different way than an outright UNINTERESTING commit. Until we
parse and examine enough parents to determine if a commit
becomes surely "kind-of-UNINTERESTING", we avoid rewriting
the ancestry so that later rounds can fix things up.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This removes the unnecessary indirection of "revs->prune_fn",
since that function is always the same one (or NULL), and there
is in fact not even an abstraction reason to make it a function
(i.e. its not called from some other file and doesn't allow us
to keep the function itself static or anything like that).
It then just replaces it with a bit that says "prune or not",
and if not pruning, every commit gets TREECHANGE.
That in turn means that
- if (!revs->prune_fn || (flags & TREECHANGE))
- if (revs->prune_fn && !(flags & TREECHANGE))
just become
- if (flags & TREECHANGE)
- if (!(flags & TREECHANGE))
respectively.
Together with adding the "single_parent()" helper function, the "complex"
conditional now becomes
if (!(flags & TREECHANGE) && rev->dense && single_parent(commit))
continue;
Also indirection of "revs->dense" checking is thrown away the
same way, because TREECHANGE bit is set appropriately now.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
