In a path-limited bisection, when the $bad commit is not
changing the limited path, and the number of suspects is 1, the
code miscounted and returned $bad from find_bisection(), which
is not marked with TREECHANGE. This is of course filtered by
the output routine, resulting in an empty output, in turn
causing git-bisect driver to say "$bad was both good and bad".
Illustration. Suppose you have these four commits, and only C
changes path P. You know D is bad and A is good.
A---B---C*--D
git-bisect driver runs this to find a bisection point:
$ git rev-list --bisect A..D -- P
which calls find_bisection() with B, C and D. The set of
commits that is given to this function is the same set of
commits as rev-list without --bisect option and pathspec
returns. Among them, only C is marked with TREECHANGE. Let's
call the set of commits given to find_bisection() that are
marked with TREECHANGE (or all of them if no path limiter is in
effect) "the bisect set". In the above example, the size of the
bisect set is 1 (contains only "C").
For each commit in its input, find_bisection() computes the
number of commits it can reach in the bisect set. For a commit
in the bisect set, this number includes itself, so the number is
1 or more. This number is called "depth", and computed by
count_distance() function.
When you have a bisect set of N commits, and a commit has depth
D, how good is your bisection if you returned that commit? How
good this bisection is can be measured by how many commits are
effectively tested "together" by testing one commit.
Currently you have (N-1) untested commits (the tip of the bisect
set, although it is included in the bisect set, is already known
to be bad). If the commit with depth D turns out to be bad,
then your next bisect set will have D commits and you will have
(D-1) untested commits left, which means you tested (N-1)-(D-1)
= (N-D) commits with this bisection. If it turns out to be good, then
your next bisect set will have (N-D) commits, and you will have
(N-D-1) untested commits left, which means you tested
(N-1)-(N-D-1) = D commits with this bisection.
Therefore, the goodness of this bisection is is min(N-D, D), and
find_bisection() function tries to find a commit that maximizes
this, by initializing "closest" variable to 0 and whenever a
commit with the goodness that is larger than the current
"closest" is found, that commit and its goodness are remembered
by updating "closest" variable. The "the commit with the best
goodness so far" is kept in "best" variable, and is initialized
to a commit that happens to be at the beginning of the list of
commits given to this function (which may or may not be in the
bisect set when path-limit is in use).
However, when N is 1, then the sole tree-changing commit has
depth of 1, and min(N-D, D) evaluates to 0. This is not larger
than the initial value of "closest", and the "so far the best
one" commit is never replaced in the loop.
When path-limit is not in use, this is not a problem, as any
commit in the input set is tree-changing. But when path-limit
is in use, and when the starting "bad" commit does not change
the specified path, it is not correct to return it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Fix copy'n'paste error in commit c9d193df which caused that "next"
link for merge commits in "commit" view
(merge: _commit_ _commit_ ...)
was to "commitdiff" view instead of being to "commit" view.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The branch you are on while bisecting is always "bisect", and
checking for "refs/heads/bisect*" is wrong. Only check if it is
exactly "refs/heads/bisect".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
After "git reset" moves the HEAD around, it reports which commit
you are on, which gives the user a warm fuzzy feeling of
assurance. Give the same assurance from git-checkout when
moving the detached HEAD around.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This idea was suggested by Bill Lear
(Message-ID: <17920.38942.364466.642979@lisa.zopyra.com>)
and I think it is a very good one.
This patch adds a new test file for "git bisect run", but there
is currently only one basic test.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Without this the rev could be (e.g.) a tag and then the condition to end the
bisect might fail and you have to check the already known to be bad revision
once more.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Elias Pipping:
> I'm on a mac, hence /usr/bin/sed is not gnu sed, which makes
> t4118 fail.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Ack'd-by: Elias Pipping <pipping@macports.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When we write out the result of patch application, we sometimes
need to munge the data (e.g. under core.autocrlf). After doing
so, what we should free is the temporary buffer that holds the
converted data returned from convert_to_working_tree(), not the
original one.
This patch also moves the call to open() up in the function, as
the caller expects us to fail cheaply if leading directories
need to be created (and then the caller creates them and calls
us again). For that calling pattern, attempting conversion
before opening the file adds unnecessary overhead.
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The HEAD reflog is updated as well as the reflog for the branch pointed
to by HEAD whenever it is referenced with "HEAD".
There are some cases where a specific branch may be modified directly.
In those cases, the HEAD reflog should be updated as well if it is a
symref to that branch in order to be consistent.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It was annoying to always have the first email from a project be from
the "Unnamed repository; edit this file to name it for gitweb project";
just because it's so easy to forget to set it.
This patch checks to see if the description file is still default (or
empty) and aborts if so - allowing you to fix the problem before sending
out silly looking emails to every developer.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes git-fetch <URL> && git-merge FETCH_HEAD produce the
same merge message as git-pull <URL>.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When you want to amend the commit message of 3 commits before
the tip of the current branch, say 'master',
A--B--C--D--E(master)
it is sometimes handy to make your head detached at that commit
with:
$ git checkout HEAD~3 ;# check out B
$ git commit --amend ;# without modifying contents...
to create:
.B'(HEAD)
/
A--B--C--D--E(master)
and then rebase 'master' branch onto HEAD with this:
$ git rebase HEAD master
to result in:
.B'-C'-D'-E(master=HEAD)
/
A--B--C--D--E
However, the current code interprets HEAD after it switches to
the branch 'master', which means the rebase will not do
anything. You have to say something unwieldly like this
instead:
$ git rebase $(git rev-parse HEAD) master
This fixes it by expanding the $onto commit name before
switching to the target branch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In addition to optimizing pathspecs that would never match,
which was done earlier, this optimizes pathspecs that would
always match (e.g. "arch/" while the traversal is already in
"arch/i386/" hierarchy).
This patch makes the worst case slightly more palatable, while
improving average case.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If we already know that some of the pathspecs can match later
entries in the tree we are looking at, we do not have to do more
expensive strncmp() upfront before comparing the length of the
match pattern and the path, as a path longer than the match
pattern will not match it, and a path shorter than the match
pattern will match only if the path is a directory-component
wise prefix of the match pattern.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When we are looking at a tree entry with pathspecs, if all the
pathspecs sort strictly earlier than the entry we are currently
looking at, there is no way later entries in the same tree would
match our pathspecs, because the entries are sorted.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes the tree descriptor contain a "struct name_entry" as part of
it, and it gets filled in so that it always contains a valid entry. On
some benchmarks, it improves performance by up to 15%.
That makes tree entry "extract" trivial, and means that we only actually
need to decode each tree entry just once: we decode the first one when
we initialize the tree descriptor, and each subsequent one when doing
"update_tree_entry()". In particular, this means that we don't need to
do strlen() both at extract time _and_ at update time.
Finally, it also allows more sharing of code (entry_extract(), that
wanted a "struct name_entry", just got totally trivial, along with the
"tree_entry()" function).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This removes slightly more lines than it adds, but the real reason for
doing this is that future optimizations will require more setup of the
tree descriptor, and so we want to do it in one place.
Also renamed the "desc.buf" field to "desc.buffer" just to trigger
compiler errors for old-style manual initializations, making sure I
didn't miss anything.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since we have the "tree_entry_len()" helper function these days, and
don't need to do a full strlen(), there's no point in saving the path
length - it's just redundant information.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Preferring git _space_ COMMAND over git _dash_ COMMAND allows the
user to have only git and gitk in their path. e.g. when git and gitk
are symbolic links in a personal bin directory to the real git and gitk.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
The earlier round makes the function return "is it different"
and it does not return a value suitable for sorting anymore. Reverse
the logic to return "are they the same suspect" instead, and rename
it to "same_suspect()".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Don't try to remove the containing directory for every pruned object but
try only once after the directory has been scanned instead.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Change the feedback message if doing 'git checkout foo' when already on
branch "foo".
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When creating a new object, we use "deflate(stream, Z_FINISH)" in a loop
until it no longer returns Z_OK, and then we do "deflateEnd()" to finish
up business.
That should all work, but the fact is, it's not how you're _supposed_ to
use the zlib return values properly:
- deflate() should never return Z_OK in the first place, except if we
need to increase the output buffer size (which we're not doing, and
should never need to do, since we pre-allocated a buffer that is
supposed to be able to hold the output in full). So the "while()" loop
was incorrect: Z_OK doesn't actually mean "ok, continue", it means "ok,
allocate more memory for me and continue"!
- if we got an error return, we would consider it to be end-of-stream,
but it could be some internal zlib error. In short, we should check
for Z_STREAM_END explicitly, since that's the only valid return value
anyway for the Z_FINISH case.
- we never checked deflateEnd() return codes at all.
Now, admittedly, none of these issues should ever happen, unless there is
some internal bug in zlib. So this patch should make zero difference, but
it seems to be the right thing to do.
We should probablybe anal and check the return value of "deflateInit()"
too!
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Looking at the SHA1 validation code due to the corruption that Alexander
Litvinov is seeing under Cygwin, I notice that one of the most central
places where we read objects, we actually do end up verifying the SHA1 of
the result, but then we happily parse it anyway.
And using "printf" to write the error message means that it not only can
get lost, but will actually mess up stdout, and cause other strange and
hard-to-debug failures downstream.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When appending objects to a pack, make sure the appended data is really
what we expect instead of simply loading potentially corrupted objects
and legitimating them by computing a SHA1 of that corrupt data.
With this the sha1_object() can lose its test_for_collision parameter
which is now redundent.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Use hash_sha1_file() instead of duplicating code to compute object SHA1.
While at it make it accept a const pointer.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Waaaaaaay back Git was considered to be secure as it never overwrote
an object it already had. This was ensured by always unpacking the
packfile received over the network (both in fetch and receive-pack)
and our already existing logic to not create a loose object for an
object we already have.
Lately however we keep "large-ish" packfiles on both fetch and push
by running them through index-pack instead of unpack-objects. This
would let an attacker perform a birthday attack.
How? Assume the attacker knows a SHA-1 that has two different
data streams. He knows the client is likely to have the "good"
one. So he sends the "evil" variant to the other end as part of
a "large-ish" packfile. The recipient keeps that packfile, and
indexes it. Now since this is a birthday attack there is a SHA-1
collision; two objects exist in the repository with the same SHA-1.
They have *very* different data streams. One of them is "evil".
Currently the poor recipient cannot tell the two objects apart,
short of by examining the timestamp of the packfiles. But lets
say the recipient repacks before he realizes he's been attacked.
We may wind up packing the "evil" version of the object, and deleting
the "good" one. This is made *even more likely* by Junio's recent
rearrange_packed_git patch (b867092f).
It is extremely unlikely for a SHA1 collisions to occur, but if it
ever happens with a remote (hence untrusted) object we simply must
not let the fetch succeed.
Normally received packs should not contain objects we already have.
But when they do we must ensure duplicated objects with the same SHA1
actually contain the same data.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The configured refspecs are printed almost verbatim, i.e. both the local
and the remote branch name separated by a colon are printed; only the
prefix 'refs/heads/' is removed, like this:
Local branch(es) pushed with 'git push'
master refs/tags/*:refs/tags/* next:next
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This fixes the single force (+) when fetched with fetch_per_ref.
Also use $LF as separator because IFS is $LF.
Signed-off-by: Santi Béjar <sbejar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We already have -q in git clone. So for those who care to suppress
the noise during an http based clone, make -q actually do a quiet
http fetch.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Cc: Fernando Herrera <fherrera@onirica.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The thing is, if the output buffer is empty, we should *still* actually
use the zlib routines to *unpack* that empty output buffer.
But we had a test that said "only unpack if we still expect more output".
So we wouldn't use up all the zlib stream, because we felt that we didn't
need it, because we already had all the bytes we wanted. And it was
"true": we did have all the output data. We just needed to also eat all
the input data!
We've had this bug before - thinking that we don't need to inflate()
anything because we already had it all..
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is a simple but powerful continuous integration build system
for Git. It works by receiving push events from repositories
through the post-receive hook, aggregates them on a per-branch
basis into a first-come-first-serve build queue, and lets a
background build daemon perform builds one at a time.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There has not been any work on the shallow stuff lately, so it is hard
to find out what it does, and how. This document describes the ideas
as well as the current problems, and can serve as a starting point for
shallow people.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Setting up a git-daemon came up the other day on IRC, and it is slightly
non trivial for the uninitiated.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since in at least one use case, xdl_hash_record() takes over 15% of the
CPU time, it makes sense to even micro-optimize it. For many cases, no
whitespace special handling is needed, and in these cases we should not
even bother to check for whitespace in _every_ iteration of the loop.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The commit structures are guaranteed their uniqueness by the object
layer, so we can check their address and see if they are the same
without going down to the object sha1 level.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This provides a smoother degradation in performance when the cache
gets trashed due to the delta_base_cache_limit being reached. Limited
testing with really small delta_base_cache_limit values appears to confirm
this.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
