Shifting 'unsigned char' or 'unsigned short' left can result in sign
extension errors, since the C integer promotion rules means that the
unsigned char/short will get implicitly promoted to a signed 'int' due to
the shift (or due to other operations).
This normally doesn't matter, but if you shift things up sufficiently, it
will now set the sign bit in 'int', and a subsequent cast to a bigger type
(eg 'long' or 'unsigned long') will now sign-extend the value despite the
original expression being unsigned.
One example of this would be something like
unsigned long size;
unsigned char c;
size += c << 24;
where despite all the variables being unsigned, 'c << 24' ends up being a
signed entity, and will get sign-extended when then doing the addition in
an 'unsigned long' type.
Since git uses 'unsigned char' pointers extensively, we actually have this
bug in a couple of places.
I may have missed some, but this is the result of looking at
git grep '[^0-9 ][ ]*<<[ ][a-z]' -- '*.c' '*.h'
git grep '<<[ ]*24'
which catches at least the common byte cases (shifting variables by a
variable amount, and shifting by 24 bits).
I also grepped for just 'unsigned char' variables in general, and
converted the ones that most obviously ended up getting implicitly cast
immediately anyway (eg hash_name(), encode_85()).
In addition to just avoiding 'unsigned char', this patch also tries to use
a common idiom for the delta header size thing. We had three different
variations on it: "& 0x7fUL" in one place (getting the sign extension
right), and "& ~0x80" and "& 0x7f" in two other places (not getting it
right). Apart from making them all just avoid using "unsigned char" at
all, I also unified them to then use a simple "& 0x7f".
I considered making a sparse extension which warns about doing implicit
casts from unsigned types to signed types, but it gets rather complex very
quickly, so this is just a hack.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* ar/unlink-err:
print unlink(2) errno in copy_or_link_directory
replace direct calls to unlink(2) with unlink_or_warn
Introduce an unlink(2) wrapper which gives warning if unlink failed
You might end up with a situation where you have tons of pack files, e.g.
when using hg2git. In this situation, all kinds of operations may
end up with a "too many files open" error. Let's recover gracefully from
that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Looks-right-to-me-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Essentially; s/type* /type */ as per the coding guidelines.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This helps to notice when something's going wrong, especially on
systems which lock open files.
I used the following criteria when selecting the code for replacement:
- it was already printing a warning for the unlink failures
- it is in a function which already printing something or is
called from such a function
- it is in a static function, returning void and the function is only
called from a builtin main function (cmd_)
- it is in a function which handles emergency exit (signal handlers)
- it is in a function which is obvously cleaning up the lockfiles
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"Unreliable hardlinks" is a misleading description for what is happening.
So rename it to something less misleading.
Suggested by Linus Torvalds.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It seems that accessing NTFS partitions with ufsd (at least on my EeePC)
has an unnerving bug: if you link() a file and unlink() it right away,
the target of the link() will have the correct size, but consist of NULs.
It seems as if the calls are simply not serialized correctly, as single-stepping
through the function move_temp_to_file() works flawlessly.
As ufsd is "Commertial software" (sic!), I cannot fix it, and have to work
around it in Git.
At the same time, it seems that this fixes msysGit issues 222 and 229 to
assume that Windows cannot handle link() && unlink().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/shared-literally:
t1301: loosen test for forced modes
set_shared_perm(): sometimes we know what the final mode bits should look like
move_temp_to_file(): do not forget to chmod() in "Coda hack" codepath
Move chmod(foo, 0444) into move_temp_to_file()
"core.sharedrepository = 0mode" should set, not loosen
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
pack-objects: don't loosen objects available in alternate or kept packs
t7700: demonstrate repack flaw which may loosen objects unnecessarily
Remove --kept-pack-only option and associated infrastructure
pack-objects: only repack or loosen objects residing in "local" packs
git-repack.sh: don't use --kept-pack-only option to pack-objects
t7700-repack: add two new tests demonstrating repacking flaws
Conflicts:
t/t7700-repack.sh
adjust_shared_perm() first obtains the mode bits from lstat(2), expecting
to find what the result of applying user's umask is, and then tweaks it
as necessary. When the file to be adjusted is created with mkstemp(3),
however, the mode thusly obtained does not have anything to do with user's
umask, and we would need to start from 0444 in such a case and there is no
point running lstat(2) for such a path.
This introduces a new API set_shared_perm() to bypass the lstat(2) and
instead force setting the mode bits to the desired value directly.
adjust_shared_perm() becomes a thin wrapper to the function.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now move_temp_to_file() is responsible for doing everything that is
necessary to turn a tempfile in $GIT_DIR into its final form, it must make
sure "Coda hack" codepath correctly makes the file read-only.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing out a loose object or a pack (index), move_temp_to_file() is
called to finalize the resulting file. These files (loose files and packs)
should all have permission mode 0444 (modulo adjust_shared_perm()).
Therefore, instead of doing chmod(foo, 0444) explicitly from each callsite
(or even forgetting to chmod() at all), do the chmod() call from within
move_temp_to_file().
Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes the behaviour of octal notation to how it is defined in the
documentation, while keeping the traditional "loosen only" semantics
intact for "group" and "everybody".
Three main points of this patch are:
- For an explicit octal notation, the internal shared_repository variable
is set to a negative value, so that we can tell "group" (which is to
"OR" in 0660) and 0660 (which is to "SET" to 0660);
- git-init did not set shared_repository variable early enough to affect
the initial creation of many files, notably copied templates and the
configuration. We set it very early when a command-line option
specifies a custom value.
- Many codepaths create files inside $GIT_DIR by various ways that all
involve mkstemp(), and then call move_temp_to_file() to rename it to
its final destination. We can add adjust_shared_perm() call here; for
the traditional "loosen-only", this would be a no-op for many codepaths
because the mode is already loose enough, but with the new behaviour it
makes a difference.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Increase the size of the die/warning buffer to avoid truncation
close_sha1_file(): make it easier to diagnose errors
avoid possible overflow in delta size filtering computation
A bug report with "unable to write sha1 file" made us realize that we do
not have enough information to guess why close() is failing.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This option to pack-objects/rev-list was created to improve the -A and -a
options of repack. It was found to be lacking in that it did not provide
the ability to differentiate between local and non-local kept packs, and
found to be unnecessary since objects residing in local kept packs can be
filtered out by the --honor-pack-keep option.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/maint-1.6.0-keep-pack:
is_kept_pack(): final clean-up
Simplify is_kept_pack()
Consolidate ignore_packed logic more
has_sha1_kept_pack(): take "struct rev_info"
has_sha1_pack(): refactor "pretend these packs do not exist" interface
git-repack: resist stray environment variable
Now is_kept_pack() is just a member lookup into a structure, we can write
it as such.
Also rewrite the sole caller of has_sha1_kept_pack() to switch on the
criteria the callee uses (namely, revs->kept_pack_only) between calling
has_sha1_kept_pack() and has_sha1_pack(), so that these two callees do not
have to take a pointer to struct rev_info as an argument.
This removes the header file dependency issue temporarily introduced by
the earlier commit, so we revert changes associated to that as well.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This removes --unpacked=<packfile> parameter from the revision parser, and
rewrites its use in git-repack to pass a single --kept-pack-only option
instead.
The new --kept-pack-only option means just that. When this option is
given, is_kept_pack() that used to say "not on the --unpacked=<packfile>
list" now says "the packfile has corresponding .keep file".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This refactors three loops that check if a given packfile is on the
ignore_packed list into a function is_kept_pack(). The function returns
false for a pack on the list, and true for a pack not on the list, because
this list is solely used by "git repack" to pass list of packfiles that do
not have corresponding .keep files, i.e. a packfile not on the list is
"kept".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Its "ignore_packed" parameter always comes from struct rev_info. This
patch makes the function take a pointer to the surrounding structure, so
that the refactoring in the next patch becomes easier to review.
There is an unfortunate header file dependency and the easiest workaround
is to temporarily move the function declaration from cache.h to
revision.h; this will be moved back to cache.h once the function loses
this "ignore_packed" parameter altogether in the later part of the
series.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the callers of this function except only one pass NULL to its last
parameter, ignore_packed.
Introduce has_sha1_kept_pack() function that has the function signature
and the semantics of this function, and convert the sole caller that does
not pass NULL to call this new function.
All other callers and has_sha1_pack() lose the ignore_packed parameter.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Prepare for 1.6.1.4.
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
Conflicts:
RelNotes
* maint-1.6.0:
Make repack less likely to corrupt repository
fast-export: ensure we traverse commits in topological order
Clear the delta base cache if a pack is rebuilt
There is some risk that re-opening a regenerated pack file with
different offsets could leave stale entries within the delta base
cache that could be matched up against other objects using the same
"struct packed_git*" and pack offset.
Throwing away the entire delta base cache in this case is safer,
as we don't have to worry about a recycled "struct packed_git*"
matching to the wrong base object, resulting in delta apply
errors while unpacking an object.
Suggested-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise we may reuse the same memory address for a totally
different "struct packed_git", and a previously cached object from
the prior occupant might be returned when trying to unpack an object
from the new pack.
Found-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The size of the content we are adding may be larger than
2.1G (i.e., "git add gigantic-file"). Most of the code-path
to do so uses size_t or unsigned long to record the size,
but write_loose_object uses a signed int.
On platforms where "int" is 32-bits (which includes x86_64
Linux platforms), we end up passing malloc a negative size.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This function is only used from "sha1_file.c".
And as we want to add a "replace_object" hook in "read_sha1_file",
we must not let people bypass the hook using something other than
"read_sha1_file".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
R. Tyler Ballance reported a mysterious transient repository corruption;
after much digging, it turns out that we were not catching and reporting
memory allocation errors from some calls we make to zlib.
This one _just_ wraps things; it doesn't do the "retry on low memory
error" part, at least not yet. It is an independent issue from the
reporting. Some of the errors are expected and passed back to the caller,
but we die when zlib reports it failed to allocate memory for now.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes us able to properly index symlinks even on filesystems where
st_size doesn't match the true size of the link.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Especially on Windows where an opened file cannot be replaced, make
sure pack-objects always close packs it is about to replace. Even on
non Windows systems, this could save potential bad results if ever
objects were to be read from the new pack file using offset from the old
index.
This should fix t5303 on Windows.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Tested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> (MinGW)
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* bc/maint-keep-pack:
repack: only unpack-unreachable if we are deleting redundant packs
t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects
pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too
sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB
builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence
repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A]
repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file
pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep
packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
* maint:
sha1_file.c: resolve confusion EACCES vs EPERM
sha1_file: avoid bogus "file exists" error message
git checkout: don't warn about unborn branch if -f is already passed
bash: offer refs instead of filenames for 'git revert'
bash: remove dashed command leftovers
git-p4: fix keyword-expansion regex
fast-export: use an unsorted string list for extra_refs
Add new testcase to show fast-export does not always exports all tags
An earlier commit 916d081 (Nicer error messages in case saving an object
to db goes wrong, 2006-11-09) confused EACCES with EPERM, the latter of
which is an unlikely error from mkstemp().
Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam@vilain.net>
This avoids the following misleading error message:
error: unable to create temporary sha1 filename ./objects/15: File exists
mkstemp can fail for many reasons, one of which, ENOENT, can occur if
the directory for the temp file doesn't exist. create_tmpfile tried to
handle this case by always trying to mkdir the directory, even if it
already existed. This caused errno to be clobbered, so one cannot tell
why mkstemp really failed, and it truncated the buffer to just the
directory name, resulting in the strange error message shown above.
Note that in both occasions that I've seen this failure, it has not been
due to a missing directory, or bad permissions, but some other, unknown
mkstemp failure mode that did not occur when I ran git again. This code
could perhaps be made more robust by retrying mkstemp, in case it was a
transient failure.
Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This avoids the following misleading error message:
error: unable to create temporary sha1 filename ./objects/15: File exists
mkstemp can fail for many reasons, one of which, ENOENT, can occur if
the directory for the temp file doesn't exist. create_tmpfile tried to
handle this case by always trying to mkdir the directory, even if it
already existed. This caused errno to be clobbered, so one cannot tell
why mkstemp really failed, and it truncated the buffer to just the
directory name, resulting in the strange error message shown above.
Note that in both occasions that I've seen this failure, it has not been
due to a missing directory, or bad permissions, but some other, unknown
mkstemp failure mode that did not occur when I ran git again. This code
could perhaps be made more robust by retrying mkstemp, in case it was a
transient failure.
Signed-off-by: Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the case of bad packed object CRC, unuse_pack wasn't called after
check_pack_crc which calls use_pack.
Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* np/pack-safer:
t5303: fix printf format string for portability
t5303: work around printf breakage in dash
pack-objects: don't leak pack window reference when splitting packs
extend test coverage for latest pack corruption resilience improvements
pack-objects: allow "fixing" a corrupted pack without a full repack
make find_pack_revindex() aware of the nasty world
make check_object() resilient to pack corruptions
make packed_object_info() resilient to pack corruptions
make unpack_object_header() non fatal
better validation on delta base object offsets
close another possibility for propagating pack corruption
* bc/maint-keep-pack:
t7700: test that 'repack -a' packs alternate packed objects
pack-objects: extend --local to mean ignore non-local loose objects too
sha1_file.c: split has_loose_object() into local and non-local counterparts
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of loose objects in an alternate ODB
builtin-gc.c: use new pack_keep bitfield to detect .keep file existence
repack: do not fall back to incremental repacking with [-a|-A]
repack: don't repack local objects in packs with .keep file
pack-objects: new option --honor-pack-keep
packed_git: convert pack_local flag into a bitfield and add pack_keep
t7700: demonstrate mishandling of objects in packs with a .keep file
