* ab/remove-implicit-use-of-the-repository:
libs: use "struct repository *" argument, not "the_repository"
post-cocci: adjust comments for recent repo_* migration
cocci: apply the "revision.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "rerere.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "refs.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "promisor-remote.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "packfile.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "pretty.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "object-store.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "diff.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "commit.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "commit-reach.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: apply the "cache.h" part of "the_repository.pending"
cocci: add missing "the_repository" macros to "pending"
cocci: sort "the_repository" rules by header
cocci: fix incorrect & verbose "the_repository" rules
cocci: remove dead rule from "the_repository.pending.cocci"
In preceding commits we changed many calls to macros that were
providing a "the_repository" argument to invoke corresponding repo_*()
function instead. Let's follow-up and adjust references to those in
comments, which coccinelle didn't (and inherently can't) catch.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apply the part of "the_repository.pending.cocci" pertaining to
"commit-reach.h".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Apply the part of "the_repository.pending.cocci" pertaining to
"cache.h".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is one step towards making strbuf.c not depend upon cache.h.
Additional steps will follow in subsequent commits.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Dozens of files made use of gettext functions, without explicitly
including gettext.h. This made it more difficult to find which files
could remove a dependence on cache.h. Make C files explicitly include
gettext.h if they are using it.
However, while compat/fsmonitor/fsm-ipc-darwin.c should also gain an
include of gettext.h, it was left out to avoid conflicting with an
in-flight topic.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 52d59cc645 (branch: add a --copy (-c) option to go with --move
(-m), 2017-06-18) we can copy a branch to make a new branch with the
'-c' (copy) option or to overwrite an existing branch using the '-C'
(force copy) option. A no-op possibility is considered when we are
asked to copy a branch to itself, to follow the same no-op introduced
for the rename (-M) operation in 3f59481e33 (branch: allow a no-op
"branch -M <current-branch> HEAD", 2011-11-25). To check for this, in
52d59cc645 we compared the branch names provided by the user, source
(HEAD if omitted) and destination, and a match is considered as this
no-op.
Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout: implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th
last branch, 2009-01-17) a branch can be specified using shortcuts like
@{-1}. This allows this usage:
$ git checkout -b test
$ git checkout -
$ git branch -C test test # no-op
$ git branch -C test @{-1} # oops
$ git branch -C @{-1} test # oops
As we are using the branch name provided by the user to do the
comparison, if one of the branches is provided using a shortcut we are
not going to have a match and a call to git_config_copy_section() will
happen. This will make a duplicate of the configuration for that
branch, and with this progression the second call will produce four
copies of the configuration, and so on.
Let's use the interpreted branch name instead for this comparison.
The rename operation is not affected.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
When deleting a branch, "git branch -d" has a safety check that ensures
the branch is merged to its upstream (if any), or to HEAD. To do that,
naturally we try to resolve HEAD to a commit object. If we're on an
orphan branch (i.e., HEAD points to a branch that does not yet exist),
that will fail, and we'll bail with an error:
$ git branch -d to-delete
fatal: Couldn't look up commit object for HEAD
This usually isn't that big of a deal. The deletion would fail anyway,
since the branch isn't merged to HEAD, and you'd need to use "-D" (or
"-f"). And doing so skips the HEAD resolution, courtesy of 67affd5173
(git-branch -D: make it work even when on a yet-to-be-born branch,
2006-11-24).
But there are still two problems:
1. The error message isn't very helpful. We should give the usual "not
fully merged" message, which points the user at "branch -D". That
was a problem even back in 67affd5173.
2. Even without a HEAD, these days it's still possible for the
deletion to succeed. After 67affd5173, commit 99c419c915 (branch
-d: base the "already-merged" safety on the branch it merges with,
2009-12-29) made it OK to delete a branch if it is merged to its
upstream.
We can fix both by removing the die() in delete_branches() completely,
leaving head_rev NULL in this case. It's tempting to stop there, as it
appears at first glance that the rest of the code does the right thing
with a NULL. But sadly, it's not quite true.
We end up feeding the NULL to repo_is_descendant_of(). In the
traditional code path there, we call repo_in_merge_bases_many(). It
feeds the NULL to repo_parse_commit(), which is smart enough to return
an error, and we immediately return "no, it's not a descendant".
But there's an alternate code path: if we have a commit graph with
generation numbers, we end up in can_all_from_reach(), which does
eventually try to set a flag on the NULL commit and segfaults.
So instead, we'll teach the local branch_merged() helper to treat a NULL
as "not merged". This would be a little more elegant in in_merge_bases()
itself, but that function is called in a lot of places, and it's not
clear that quietly returning "not merged" is the right thing everywhere
(I'd expect in many cases, feeding a NULL is a sign of a bug).
There are four tests here:
a. The first one confirms that deletion succeeds with an orphaned HEAD
when the branch is merged to its upstream. This is case (2) above.
b. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Even if it is merged to
upstream, we still check head_rev so that we can say "deleting
because it's merged to upstream, even though it's not merged to
HEAD". Without the second hunk in branch_merged(), this test would
segfault in can_all_from_reach().
c. The third one confirms that we correctly say "not merged to HEAD"
when we can't resolve HEAD, and reject the deletion.
d. Same, but with commit graphs enabled. Without the first hunk in
branch_merged(), this one would segfault.
Reported-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
"git branch --edit-description" can exit with status -1 which is
not a good practice; it learned to use 1 as everybody else instead.
* rj/branch-do-not-exit-with-minus-one-status:
branch: error code with --edit-description
Since c2d17ba3db (branch --edit-description: protect against mistyped
branch name, 2012-02-05) we return -1 on error editing the branch
description.
Let's change to 1, which follows the established convention and it is
better for portability reasons.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In c847f53712 (Detached HEAD (experimental), 2007-01-01) an error
condition was introduced in rename_branch() to prevent renaming, later
also copying, a detached HEAD.
The condition used was checking for NULL in oldname, the source branch
to rename/copy. That condition cannot be satisfied because if no source
branch is specified, HEAD is going to be used in the call.
The error issued instead is:
fatal: Invalid branch name: 'HEAD'
Let's remove the condition in copy_or_rename_branch() (the current
function name) and check for HEAD before calling it, dying with the
original intended error if we're in a detached HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch --edit-description @{-1}" is now a way to edit branch
description of the branch you were on before switching to the
current branch.
* rj/branch-edit-description-with-nth-checkout:
branch: support for shortcuts like @{-1}, completed
"git branch --edit-description" on an unborh branch misleadingly
said that no such branch exists, which has been corrected.
* rj/branch-edit-desc-unborn:
branch: description for non-existent branch errors
"GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description" resulted in failure,
which has been corrected.
* jc/branch-description-unset:
branch: do not fail a no-op --edit-desc
branch command with options "edit-description", "set-upstream-to" and
"unset-upstream" expects a branch name. Since ae5a6c3684 (checkout:
implement "@{-N}" shortcut name for N-th last branch, 2009-01-17) a
branch can be specified using shortcuts like @{-1}. Those shortcuts
need to be resolved when considering the arguments.
We can modify the description of the previously checked out branch with:
$ git branch --edit--description @{-1}
We can modify the upstream of the previously checked out branch with:
$ git branch --set-upstream-to upstream @{-1}
$ git branch --unset-upstream @{-1}
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the repository does not yet have commits, some errors describe that
there is no branch:
$ git init -b first
$ git branch --edit-description first
error: No branch named 'first'.
$ git branch --set-upstream-to=upstream
fatal: branch 'first' does not exist
$ git branch -c second
error: refname refs/heads/first not found
fatal: Branch copy failed
That "first" branch is unborn but to say it doesn't exists is confusing.
Options "-c" (copy) and "-m" (rename) show the same error when the
origin branch doesn't exists:
$ git branch -c non-existent-branch second
error: refname refs/heads/non-existent-branch not found
fatal: Branch copy failed
$ git branch -m non-existent-branch second
error: refname refs/heads/non-existent-branch not found
fatal: Branch rename failed
Note that "--edit-description" without an explicit argument is already
considering the _empty repository_ circumstance in its error. Also note
that "-m" on the initial branch it is an allowed operation.
Make the error descriptions for those branch operations with unborn or
non-existent branches, more informative.
This is the result of the change:
$ git init -b first
$ git branch --edit-description first
error: No commit on branch 'first' yet.
$ git branch --set-upstream-to=upstream
fatal: No commit on branch 'first' yet.
$ git branch -c second
fatal: No commit on branch 'first' yet.
$ git branch [-c/-m] non-existent-branch second
fatal: No branch named 'non-existent-branch'.
Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Imagine running "git branch --edit-description" while on a branch
without the branch description, and then exit the editor after
emptying the edit buffer, which is the way to tell the command that
you changed your mind and you do not want the description after all.
The command should just happily oblige, adding no branch description
for the current branch, and exit successfully. But it fails to do
so:
$ git init -b main
$ git commit --allow-empty -m commit
$ GIT_EDITOR=: git branch --edit-description
fatal: could not unset 'branch.main.description'
The end result is OK in that the configuration variable does not
exist in the resulting repository, but we should do better. If we
know we didn't have a description, and if we are asked not to have a
description by the editor, we can just return doing nothing.
This of course introduces TOCTOU. If you add a branch description
to the same branch from another window, while you had the editor
open to edit the description, and then exit the editor without
writing anything there, we'd end up not removing the description you
added in the other window. But you are fooling yourself in your own
repository at that point, and if it hurts, you'd be better off not
doing so ;-).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After b489b9d9aa (branch: use branch_checked_out() when deleting refs,
2022-06-14), we no longer look at our local "worktrees" variable, since
branch_checked_out() handles it under the hood. The compiler didn't
notice the unused variable because we call functions to initialize and
free it (so it's not totally unused, it just doesn't do anything
useful).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is the last current use of find_shared_symref() that can easily be
replaced by branch_checked_out(). The benefit of this switch is that the
code is a bit simpler, but also it is faster on repeated calls.
The remaining uses of find_shared_symref() are non-trivial to remove, so
we probably should not continue in that direction:
* builtin/notes.c uses find_shared_symref() with "NOTES_MERGE_REF"
instead of "HEAD", so it doesn't have an immediate analogue with
branch_checked_out(). Perhaps we should consider extending it to
include that symref in addition to HEAD, BISECT_HEAD, and
REBASE_HEAD.
* receive-pack.c checks to see if a worktree has a checkout for the ref
that is being updated. The tricky part is that it can actually decide
to update the worktree directly instead of just skipping the update.
This all depends on the receive.denyCurrentBranch config option. The
implementation currenty cares about receiving the worktree in the
result, so the current branch_checked_out() prototype is insufficient
currently. This is something to investigate later, though, since a
large number of refs could be updated at the same time and using the
strmap implementation of branch_checked_out() could be beneficial.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch" learned the "--recurse-submodules" option.
* gc/branch-recurse-submodules:
branch.c: use 'goto cleanup' in setup_tracking() to fix memory leaks
branch: add --recurse-submodules option for branch creation
builtin/branch: consolidate action-picking logic in cmd_branch()
branch: add a dry_run parameter to create_branch()
branch: make create_branch() always create a branch
branch: move --set-upstream-to behavior to dwim_and_setup_tracking()
To improve the submodules UX, we would like to teach Git to handle
branches in submodules. Start this process by teaching "git branch" the
--recurse-submodules option so that "git branch --recurse-submodules
topic" will create the `topic` branch in the superproject and its
submodules.
Although this commit does not introduce breaking changes, it does not
work well with existing --recurse-submodules commands because "git
branch --recurse-submodules" writes to the submodule ref store, but most
commands only consider the superproject gitlink and ignore the submodule
ref store. For example, "git checkout --recurse-submodules" will check
out the commits in the superproject gitlinks (and put the submodules in
detached HEAD) instead of checking out the submodule branches.
Because of this, this commit introduces a new configuration value,
`submodule.propagateBranches`. The plan is for Git commands to
prioritize submodule ref store information over superproject gitlinks if
this value is true. Because "git branch --recurse-submodules" writes to
submodule ref stores, for the sake of clarity, it will not function
unless this configuration value is set.
This commit also includes changes that support working with submodules
from a superproject commit because "branch --recurse-submodules" (and
future commands) need to read .gitmodules and gitlinks from the
superproject commit, but submodules are typically read from the
filesystem's .gitmodules and the index's gitlinks. These changes are:
* add a submodules_of_tree() helper that gives the relevant
information of an in-tree submodule (e.g. path and oid) and
initializes the repository
* add is_tree_submodule_active() by adding a treeish_name parameter to
is_submodule_active()
* add the "submoduleNotUpdated" advice to advise users to update the
submodules in their trees
Incidentally, fix an incorrect usage string that combined the 'list'
usage of git branch (-l) with the 'create' usage; this string has been
incorrect since its inception, a8dfd5eac4 (Make builtin-branch.c use
parse_options., 2007-10-07).
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Consolidate the logic for deciding when to create a new branch in
cmd_branch(), and save the result for reuse. Besides making the function
more explicit, this allows us to validate options that can only be used
when creating a branch. Such an option does not exist yet, but one will
be introduced in a subsequent commit.
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a dry_run parameter to create_branch() such that dry_run = 1 will
validate a new branch without trying to create it. This will be used in
`git branch --recurse-submodules` to ensure that the new branch can be
created in all submodules.
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is preparation for a future commit that will simplify
create_branch() so that it always creates a branch. This will allow
create_branch() to accept a dry_run parameter (which is needed for "git
branch --recurse-submodules").
create_branch() used to always create a branch, but 4fc5006676 (Add
branch --set-upstream, 2010-01-18) changed it to also be able to set
tracking information without creating a branch.
Refactor the code that sets tracking information into its own functions
dwim_branch_start() and dwim_and_setup_tracking(). Also change an
invocation of create_branch() in cmd_branch() in builtin/branch.c to use
dwim_and_setup_tracking(), since that invocation is only for setting
tracking information (in "git branch --set-upstream-to").
As of this commit, create_branch() is no longer invoked in a way that
does not create branches.
Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch -h" incorrectly said "--track[=direct|inherit]",
implying that "--trackinherit" is a valid option, which has been
corrected.
source: <3de40324bea6a1dd9bca2654721471e3809e87d8.1642538935.git.steadmon@google.com>
source: <c3c26192-aee9-185a-e559-b8735139e49c@web.de>
* js/branch-track-inherit:
branch,checkout: fix --track documentation
Document that the accepted variants of the --track option are --track,
--track=direct, and --track=inherit. The equal sign in the latter two
cannot be replaced with whitespace; in general optional arguments need
to be attached firmly to their option.
Put "direct" consistently before "inherit", if only for the reasons
that the former is the default, explained first in the documentation,
and comes before the latter alphabetically.
Mention both modes in the short help so that readers don't have to look
them up in the full documentation. They are literal strings and thus
untranslatable. PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP is inferred due to the pipe
and parenthesis characters, so we don't have to provide that flag
explicitly.
Mention that -t has the same effect as --track and --track=direct.
There is no way to specify inherit mode using the short option, because
short options generally don't accept optional arguments.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git branch -h" incorrectly said "--track[=direct|inherit]",
implying that "--trackinherit" is a valid option, which has been
corrected.
* js/branch-track-inherit:
branch,checkout: fix --track usage strings
As Ævar pointed out in [1], the use of PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP with a
list of allowed parameters is not recommended. Both git-branch and
git-checkout were changed in d311566 (branch: add flags and config to
inherit tracking, 2021-12-20) to use this discouraged combination for
their --track flags.
Fix this by removing PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGHELP, and changing the arghelp
to simply be "mode". Users may discover allowed values in the manual
pages.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/220111.86a6g3yqf9.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar message templates have been consolidated so that
translators need to work on fewer number of messages.
* ja/i18n-similar-messages:
i18n: turn even more messages into "cannot be used together" ones
i18n: ref-filter: factorize "%(foo) atom used without %(bar) atom"
i18n: factorize "--foo outside a repository"
i18n: refactor "unrecognized %(foo) argument" strings
i18n: factorize "no directory given for --foo"
i18n: factorize "--foo requires --bar" and the like
i18n: tag.c factorize i18n strings
i18n: standardize "cannot open" and "cannot read"
i18n: turn "options are incompatible" into "cannot be used together"
i18n: refactor "%s, %s and %s are mutually exclusive"
i18n: refactor "foo and bar are mutually exclusive"
"git -c branch.autosetupmerge=inherit branch new old" makes "new"
to have the same upstream as the "old" branch, instead of marking
"old" itself as its upstream.
* js/branch-track-inherit:
config: require lowercase for branch.*.autosetupmerge
branch: add flags and config to inherit tracking
branch: accept multiple upstream branches for tracking
It can be helpful when creating a new branch to use the existing
tracking configuration from the branch point. However, there is
currently not a method to automatically do so.
Teach git-{branch,checkout,switch} an "inherit" argument to the
"--track" option. When this is set, creating a new branch will cause the
tracking configuration to default to the configuration of the branch
point, if set.
For example, if branch "main" tracks "origin/main", and we run
`git checkout --track=inherit -b feature main`, then branch "feature"
will track "origin/main". Thus, `git status` will show us how far
ahead/behind we are from origin, and `git pull` will pull from origin.
This is particularly useful when creating branches across many
submodules, such as with `git submodule foreach ...` (or if running with
a patch such as [1], which we use at $job), as it avoids having to
manually set tracking info for each submodule.
Since we've added an argument to "--track", also add "--track=direct" as
another way to explicitly get the original "--track" behavior ("--track"
without an argument still works as well).
Finally, teach branch.autoSetupMerge a new "inherit" option. When this
is set, "--track=inherit" becomes the default behavior.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180927221603.148025-1-sbeller@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Storing the worktrees list in a static variable meant that
find_shared_symref() had to rebuild the list on each call (which is
inefficient when the call site is in a loop), and also that each call
invalidated the pointer returned by the previous call (which is
confusing).
Instead, make it the caller’s responsibility to pass in the worktrees
list and manage its lifetime.
Signed-off-by: Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The for-each-ref family of commands invoke parsers immediately when
it sees each --sort=<atom> option, and die before even seeing the
other options on the command line when the <atom> is unrecognised.
Instead, accumulate them in a string list, and have them parsed into
a ref_sorting structure after the command line parsing is done. As
a consequence, "git branch --sort=bogus -h" used to fail to give the
brief help, which arguably may have been a feature, now does so,
which is more consistent with how other options work.
The patch is smaller than the actual extent of the "damage" to the
codebase, thanks to the fact that the original code consistently
used OPT_REF_SORT() macro to handle command line options. We only
needed to replace the variable used for the list, and implementation
of the callback function used in the macro.
The old rule was for the users of the API to:
- Declare ref_sorting and ref_sorting_tail variables;
- OPT_REF_SORT() macro will instantiate ref_sorting instance (which
may barf and die) and append it to the tail;
- Append to the tail each ref_sorting read from the configuration
by parsing in the config callback (which may barf and die);
- See if ref_sorting is null and use ref_sorting_default() instead.
Now the rule is not all that different but is simpler:
- Declare ref_sorting_options string list.
- OPT_REF_SORT() macro will append it to the string list;
- Append to the string list the sort key read from the
configuration;
- call ref_sorting_options() to turn the string list to ref_sorting
structure (which also deals with the default value).
As side effects, this change also cleans up a few issues:
- 95be717c (parse_opt_ref_sorting: always use with NONEG flag,
2019-03-20) muses that "git for-each-ref --no-sort" should simply
clear the sort keys accumulated so far; it now does.
- The implementation detail of "struct ref_sorting" and the helper
function parse_ref_sorting() can now be private to the ref-filter
API implementation.
- If you set branch.sort to a bogus value, the any "git branch"
invocation, not only the listing mode, would abort with the
original code; now it doesn't
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use a ref_sorting_release() in branch.c to free the memory from the
ref_sorting_options(). This plugs the final in-tree memory leak of
that API.
In the preceding commit the "sorting" variable was left in the
cmd_branch() scope, even though that wasn't needed anymore. Move it to
the "else if (list)" scope instead. We can also move the "struct
string_list" only used for that branch to be declared in that block
That "struct ref_sorting" does not need to be "static" (and isn't
re-used). The "ref_sorting_options()" will return a valid one, we
don't need to make it "static" to have it zero'd out. That it was
static was another artifact of the pre-image of the preceding commit.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Of the ref-filter callers, for-each-ref and git-branch both set the
INCLUDE_BROKEN flag (but git-tag does not, which is a weird
inconsistency). But now that GIT_REF_PARANOIA is on by default, that
produces almost the same outcome for all three.
The one exception is that GIT_REF_PARANOIA will omit dangling symrefs.
That's a better behavior for these tools, as they would never include
such a symref in the main output anyway (they can't, as it doesn't point
to an object). Instead they issue a warning to stderr. But that warning
is somewhat useless; a dangling symref is a perfectly reasonable thing
to have in your repository, and is not a sign of corruption. It's much
friendlier to just quietly ignore it.
And in terms of robustness, the warning gains us little. It does not
impact the exit code of either tool. So while the warning _might_ clue
in a user that they have an unexpected broken symref, it would not help
any kind of scripted use.
This patch converts for-each-ref and git-branch to stop using the
INCLUDE_BROKEN flag. That gives them more reasonable behavior, and
harmonizes them with git-tag.
We have to change one test to adapt to the situation. t1430 tries to
trigger all of the REF_ISBROKEN behaviors from the underlying ref code.
It uses for-each-ref to do so (because there isn't any other mechanism).
That will no longer issue a warning about the symref which points to an
invalid name, as it's considered dangling (and we can instead be sure
that it's _not_ mentioned on stderr). Note that we do still complain
about the illegally named "broken..symref"; its problem is not that it's
dangling, but the name of the symref itself is illegal.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git branch only allows deleting branches that point to valid commits.
Skip that check if --force is given, as the caller is indicating with
it that they know what they are doing and accept the consequences.
This allows deleting dangling branches, which previously had to be
reset to a valid start-point using --force first.
Reported-by: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we use `git for-each-ref`, every ref will allocate
its own output strbuf and error strbuf. But we can reuse
the final strbuf for each step ref's output. The error
buffer will also be reused, despite the fact that the git
will exit when `format_ref_array_item()` return a non-zero
value and output the contents of the error buffer.
The performance for `git for-each-ref` on the Git repository
itself with performance testing tool `hyperfine` changes from
23.7 ms ± 0.9 ms to 22.2 ms ± 1.0 ms. Optimization is relatively
minor.
At the same time, we apply this optimization to `git tag -l`
and `git branch -l`.
This approach is similar to the one used by 79ed0a5
(cat-file: use a single strbuf for all output, 2018-08-14)
to speed up the cat-file builtin.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When removing many branches and tags, the code used to do so one
ref at a time. There is another API it can use to delete multiple
refs, and it makes quite a lot of performance difference when the
refs are packed.
* ph/use-delete-refs:
use delete_refs when deleting tags or branches
'git tag -d' accepts one or more tag refs to delete, but each deletion
is done by calling `delete_ref` on each argv. This is very slow when
removing from packed refs. Use delete_refs instead so all the removals
can be done inside a single transaction with a single update.
Do the same for 'git branch -d'.
Since delete_refs performs all the packed-refs delete operations
inside a single transaction, if any of the deletes fail then all
them will be skipped. In practice, none of them should fail since
we verify the hash of each one before calling delete_refs, but some
network error or odd permissions problem could have different results
after this change.
Also, since the file-backed deletions are not performed in the same
transaction, those could succeed even when the packed-refs transaction
fails.
After deleting branches, remove the branch config only if the branch
ref was removed and was not subsequently added back in.
A manual test deleting 24,000 tags took about 30 minutes using
delete_ref. It takes about 5 seconds using delete_refs.
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phil Hord <phil.hord@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the ref-filter sorting of detached HEAD to check the
FILTER_REFS_DETACHED_HEAD flag, instead of relying on the ref
description filled-in by get_head_description() to start with "(",
which in turn we expect to ASCII-sort before any other reference.
For context, we'd like the detached line to appear first at the start
of "git branch -l", e.g.:
$ git branch -l
* (HEAD detached at <hash>)
master
This doesn't change that, but improves on a fix made in
28438e84e0 (ref-filter: sort detached HEAD lines firstly, 2019-06-18)
and gives the Chinese translation the ability to use its preferred
punctuation marks again.
In Chinese the fullwidth versions of punctuation like "()" are
typically written as (U+FF08 fullwidth left parenthesis), (U+FF09
fullwidth right parenthesis) instead[1]. This form is used in both
po/zh_{CN,TW}.po in most cases where "()" is translated in a string.
Aside from that improvement to the Chinese translation, it also just
makes for cleaner code that we mark any special cases in the ref_array
we're sorting with flags and make the sort function aware of them,
instead of piggy-backing on the general-case of strcmp() doing the
right thing.
As seen in the amended tests this made reverse sorting a bit more
consistent. Before this we'd sometimes sort this message in the
middle, now it's consistently at the beginning or end, depending on
whether we're doing a normal or reverse sort. Having it at the end
doesn't make much sense either, but at least it behaves consistently
now. A follow-up commit will make this behavior under reverse sorting
even better.
I'm removing the "TRANSLATORS" comments that were in the old code
while I'm at it. Those were added in d4919bb288 (ref-filter: move
get_head_description() from branch.c, 2017-01-10). I think it's
obvious from context, string and translation memory in typical
translation tools that these are the same or similar string.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_punctuation#Marks_similar_to_European_punctuation
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the reverse/ignore_case/version sort flags in the ref_sorting
struct into a bitfield. Having three of them was already a bit
unwieldy, but it would be even more so if another flag needed a
function like ref_sorting_icase_all() introduced in
76f9e569ad (ref-filter: apply --ignore-case to all sorting keys,
2020-05-03).
A follow-up change will introduce such a flag, so let's move this over
to a bitfield. Instead of using the usual '#define' pattern I'm using
the "enum" pattern from builtin/rebase.c's b4c8eb024a (builtin
rebase: support --quiet, 2018-09-04).
Perhaps there's a more idiomatic way of doing the "for each in list
amend mask" pattern than this "mask/on" variable combo. This function
doesn't allow us to e.g. do any arbitrary changes to the bitfield for
multiple flags, but I think in this case that's fine. The common case
is that we're calling this with a list of one.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There has never been a "git branch --local", this is just a typo for
"--list". Fixes a comment added in 23e714df91 (branch: roll
show_detached HEAD into regular ref_list, 2015-09-23).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Our users are going to be trained to prepare for future change of
init.defaultBranch configuration variable.
* js/init-defaultbranch-advice:
init: provide useful advice about init.defaultBranch
get_default_branch_name(): prepare for showing some advice
branch -m: allow renaming a yet-unborn branch
init: document `init.defaultBranch` better
In one of the next commits, we would like to give users some advice
regarding the initial branch name, and how to modify it.
To that end, it would be good if `git branch -m <name>` worked in a
freshly initialized repository without any commits. Let's make it so.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We will extend the flexibility of the config API. Before doing so, let's
take an existing 'int multi_replace' parameter and replace it with a new
'unsigned flags' parameter that can take multiple options as a bit field.
Update all callers that specified multi_replace to now specify the
CONFIG_FLAGS_MULTI_REPLACE flag. To add more clarity, extend the
documentation of git_config_set_multivar_in_file() including a clear
labeling of its arguments. Other config API methods in config.h require
only a change of the final parameter from 'int' to 'unsigned'.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
