Currently, the "Did you mean..." message suggests "commit:fullpath"
only. Extend this to show the more convenient "commit:./file" form also.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the current code, it's a "'"'"'" jungle, and we test only 1 line of
the 2 line response. Factor out and test both.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We taught the object name parser to take ":./<path>", ":../<path>", etc.
and understand them to be relative to the current working directory.
Given that ":<path>" is just a short-hand for ":0:<path>" (i.e. "take
stage #0 of that path"), we should allow ":$n:<path>" to interpret them
the same way.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently :path and ref:path can be used to refer to a specific object
in index or ref respectively. "path" component is absolute path. This
patch allows "path" to be written as "./path" or "../path", which is
relative to user's original cwd.
This does not work in commands for which startup_info is NULL
(i.e. non-builtin ones, it seems none of them needs this anyway).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit introduces tests that verify that rev-parse
parses master@{n} correctly for various values of n less
than, equal to and greater than the number of revisions
in the reference log.
In particular, these tests check that rev-parse exits with a
non-zero status code and prints a message of the
following form to stderr.
fatal: Log for [^ ]* only has [0-9][0-9]* entries.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous error message was the same in many situations (unknown
revision or path not in the working tree). We try to help the user as
much as possible to understand the error, especially with the
sha1:filename notation. In this case, we say whether the sha1 or the
filename is problematic, and diagnose the confusion between
relative-to-root and relative-to-$PWD confusion precisely.
The 7 new error messages are tested.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
