The Makefile rule in contrib/subtree for building documentation
learned to honour USE_ASCIIDOCTOR just like the main documentation
set does.
* aw/contrib-subtree-doc-asciidoctor:
subtree: honour USE_ASCIIDOCTOR when set
The split index code did not honor core.sharedrepository setting
correctly.
* cc/shared-index-permfix:
t1700: make sure split-index respects core.sharedrepository
t1301: move modebits() to test-lib-functions.sh
read-cache: use shared perms when writing shared index
Fix a recent regression to "git rebase -i" and add tests that would
have caught it and others.
* pw/rebase-i-regression-fix-tests:
t3420: fix under GETTEXT_POISON build
rebase: add more regression tests for console output
rebase: add regression tests for console output
rebase -i: add test for reflog message
sequencer: print autostash messages to stderr
"git add -p" were updated in 2.12 timeframe to cope with custom
core.commentchar but the implementation was buggy and a
metacharacter like $ and * did not work.
* jk/add-p-commentchar-fix:
add--interactive: quote commentChar regex
add--interactive: handle EOF in prompt_yesno
The code to pick up and execute command alias definition from the
configuration used to switch to the top of the working tree and
then come back when the expanded alias was executed, which was
unnecessarilyl complex. Attempt to simplify the logic by using the
early-config mechanism that does not chdir around.
* js/alias-early-config:
alias: use the early config machinery to expand aliases
t7006: demonstrate a problem with aliases in subdirectories
t1308: relax the test verifying that empty alias values are disallowed
help: use early config when autocorrecting aliases
config: report correct line number upon error
discover_git_directory(): avoid setting invalid git_dir
The pretty-format specifiers like '%h', '%t', etc. had an
optimization that no longer works correctly. In preparation/hope
of getting it correctly implemented, first discard the optimization
that is broken.
* rs/pretty-add-again:
pretty: recalculate duplicate short hashes
An example in documentation that does not work in multi worktree
configuration has been corrected.
* ah/doc-gitattributes-empty-index:
doc: do not use `rm .git/index` when normalizing line endings
"git mergetool" learned to work around a wrapper MacOS X adds
around underlying meld.
* da/mergetools-meld-output-opt-on-macos:
mergetools/meld: improve compatibiilty with Meld on macOS X
The 'diff-highlight' program (in contrib/) has been restructured
for easier reuse by an external project 'diff-so-fancy'.
* jk/diff-highlight-module:
diff-highlight: split code into module
After "git branch --move" of the currently checked out branch, the
code to walk the reflog of HEAD via "log -g" and friends
incorrectly stopped at the reflog entry that records the renaming
of the branch.
* jk/reflog-walk-maint:
reflog-walk: include all fields when freeing complete_reflogs
reflog-walk: don't free reflogs added to cache
reflog-walk: duplicate strings in complete_reflogs list
reflog-walk: skip over double-null oid due to HEAD rename
The "collission-detecting" implementation of SHA-1 hash we borrowed
from is replaced by directly binding the upstream project as our
submodule. Glitches on minority platforms are still being worked out.
* ab/sha1dc:
sha1collisiondetection: automatically enable when submodule is populated
sha1dc: optionally use sha1collisiondetection as a submodule
Code refactoring.
* pw/unquote-path-in-git-pm:
t9700: add tests for Git::unquote_path()
Git::unquote_path(): throw an exception on bad path
Git::unquote_path(): handle '\a'
add -i: move unquote_path() to Git.pm
An old message shown in the commit log template was removed, as it
has outlived its usefulness.
* ks/commit-assuming-only-warning-removal:
commit-template: distinguish status information unconditionally
commit-template: remove outdated notice about explicit paths
Sun's C compiler errors out on this pattern:
void foo() { ... }
void bar() { return foo(); }
Signed-off-by: Alejandro R. Sedeño <asedeno@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Reported-by: Andre Hinrichs <andre.hinrichs@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The undefined behavior sanitizer complains about unaligned
loads, even if they're OK for a particular platform in
practice. It's possible that they _are_ a problem, of
course, but since it's a known tradeoff the UBSan errors are
just noise.
Let's quiet it automatically by building with
NO_UNALIGNED_LOADS when SANITIZE=undefined is in use.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The ASan manual recommends disabling this optimization, as
it can make the backtraces produced by the tool harder to
follow (and since this is a test-debug build, we don't care
about squeezing out every last drop of performance).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
You can already build and test with ASan by doing:
make CFLAGS=-fsanitize=address test
but there are a few slight annoyances:
1. It's a little long to type.
2. It override your CFLAGS completely. You'd probably
still want -O2, for instance.
3. It's a good idea to also turn off "recovery", which
lets the program keep running after a problem is
detected (with the intention of finding as many bugs as
possible in a given run). Since Git's test suite should
generally run without triggering any problems, it's
better to abort immediately and fail the test when we
do find an issue.
With this patch, all of that happens automatically when you
run:
make SANITIZE=address test
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
By default, ASan will exit with code 1 when it sees an
error. This means we'll notice a problem when we expected
git to succeed, but not in a test_must_fail block.
Let's ask it to actually raise SIGABRT instead. That will
give us a signal death that test_must_fail will notice. As a
bonus, it may also leave a coredump, which can be handy for
digging into a failure.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We turn off ASan's leak detection by default in the test
suite because it's too noisy. But we don't do so until
part-way through test-lib. This is before we've run any
tests, but after we do our initial "./git" to see if the
binary has even been built.
When built with clang, this seems to work fine. However,
using "gcc -fsanitize=address", the leak checker seems to
complain more aggressively:
$ ./git
...
==5352==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 2 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7f120e7afcf8 in malloc (/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasan.so.3+0xc1cf8)
#1 0x559fc2a3ce41 in do_xmalloc /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:60
#2 0x559fc2a3cf1a in do_xmallocz /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:100
#3 0x559fc2a3d0ad in xmallocz /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:108
#4 0x559fc2a3d0ad in xmemdupz /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:124
#5 0x559fc2a3d0ad in xstrndup /home/peff/compile/git/wrapper.c:130
#6 0x559fc274535a in main /home/peff/compile/git/common-main.c:39
#7 0x7f120dabd2b0 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x202b0)
This is a leak in the sense that we never free it, but it's
in a global that is meant to last the whole program. So it's
not really interesting or in need of fixing. And at any
rate, mentioning leaks outside of the test_expect blocks is
certainly unwelcome, as it pollutes stderr.
Let's bump the setting of ASAN_OPTIONS higher in test-lib.sh
to catch our initial "can we even run git?" test. While
we're at it, we can add a comment to make it a bit less
inscrutable.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The first illustration of the "RECOVERING FROM UPSTREAM REBASE"
section in the 'git-rebase' documentation meant to depict that
there are number of commits on the 'master' branch, but it is
longer than the 'master' branch in the following illustrations
by one commit, even though there is no resetting of 'master' to
lose that commit.
Correct it.
Signed-off-by: Kaartic Sivaraam <kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Store the pointer to the string allocated by shorten_unambiguous_ref in
a dedicated variable, short_base, and keep base unchanged. A non-const
variable is more appropriate for such an object. It avoids having to
cast const away on free and stops redefining the meaning of base, making
the code slightly clearer.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When doing a reflog walk, we use the commit's date to
do any date limiting. In earlier versions of Git, this could
lead to nonsense results, since a skipped commit would
truncate the traversal. So a sequence like:
git commit ...
git checkout week-old-branch
git checkout -
git log -g --since=1.day.ago
would stop at the week-old-branch, even though the "git
commit" entry further back is still interesting.
As of the prior commit, which uses a parent-less traversal
of the reflog, you get the whole reflog minus any commits
whose dates do not match the specified options. This is
arguably useful, as you could scan the reflogs for commits
that originated in a certain range.
But more likely a user doing a reflog walk wants to limit
based on the reflog entries themselves. You can simulate
--until with:
git log -g @{1.day.ago}
but there's no way to ask Git to traverse only back to a
certain date. E.g.:
# show me reflog entries from the past day
git log -g --since=1.day.ago
This patch teaches the revision machinery to prefer the
reflog entry dates to the commit dates when doing a reflog
walk. Technically this is a change in behavior that affects
plumbing, but the previous behavior was so buggy that it's
unlikely anyone was relying on it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog-walk system works by putting a ref's tip into the
pending queue, and then "traversing" the reflog by
pretending that the parent of each commit is the previous
reflog entry.
This causes a number of user-visible oddities, as documented
in t1414 (and the commit message which introduced it). We
can fix all of them in one go by replacing the fake-reflog
system with a much simpler one: just keeping a list of
reflogs to show, and walking through them entry by entry.
The implementation is fairly straight-forward, but there are
a few items to note:
1. We obviously must skip calling add_parents_to_list()
when we are traversing reflogs, since we do not want to
walk the original parents at all. As a result, we must call
try_to_simplify_commit() ourselves.
There are other parts of add_parents_to_list() we skip,
as well, but none of them should matter for a reflog
traversal:
- We do not allow UNINTERESTING commits, nor
symmetric ranges (and we bail when these are used
with "-g").
- Using --source makes no sense, since we aren't
traversing. The reflog selector shows the same
information with more detail.
- Using --first-parent is still sensible, since you
may want to see the first-parent diff for each
entry. But since we're not traversing, we don't
need to cull the parent list here.
2. Since we now just walk the reflog entries themselves,
rather than starting with the ref tip, we now look at
the "new" field of each entry rather than the "old"
(i.e., we are showing entries, not faking parents).
This removes all of the tricky logic around skipping
past root commits.
But note that we have no way to show an entry with the
null sha1 in its "new" field (because such a commit
obviously does not exist). Normally this would not
happen, since we delete reflogs along with refs, but
there is one special case. When we rename the currently
checked out branch, we write two reflog entries into
the HEAD log: one where the commit goes away, and
another where it comes back.
Prior to this commit, we show both entries with
identical reflog messages. After this commit, we show
only the "comes back" entry. See the update in t3200
which demonstrates this.
Arguably either is fine, as the whole double-entry
thing is a bit hacky in the first place. And until a
recent fix, we truncated the traversal in such a case
anyway, which was _definitely_ wrong.
3. We show individual reflogs in order, but choose which
reflog to show at each stage based on which has the
most recent timestamp. This interleaves the output
from multiple reflogs based on date order, which is
probably what you'd want with limiting like "-n 30".
Note that the implementation aims for simplicity. It
does a linear walk over the reflog queue for each
commit it pulls, which may perform badly if you
interleave an enormous number of reflogs. That seems
like an unlikely use case; if we did want to handle it,
we could probably keep a priority queue of reflogs,
ordered by the timestamp of their current tip entry.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When git-rev-list sees no pending commits, it shows a usage
message. This works even when reflog-walking is requested,
because the reflog-walk code currently puts the reflog tips
into the pending queue.
In preparation for refactoring the reflog-walk code, let's
explicitly check whether we have any reflogs to walk. For
now this is a noop, but the existing reflog tests will make
sure that it kicks in after the refactoring. Likewise, we'll
add a test that "rev-list -g" without specifying any reflogs
continues to fail (so that we know our check does not kick
in too aggressively).
Note that the implementation needs to go into its own
sub-function, as the walk code does not expose its innards
outside of reflog-walk.c.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The get_revision_1() function tries to avoid entering its
main loop at all when there are no commits to look at. But
it's perfectly safe to call pop_commit() on an empty list
(in which case it will return NULL). Switching to an early
return from the loop lets us skip repeating the loop
condition before we enter the do-while. That will get more
important when we start pulling reflog-walk commits from a
source besides the revs->commits queue, as that condition
will get much more complicated.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we're doing a reflog walk (instead of walking the
actual parent pointers), we may see commits multiple times.
For this reason, we hold on to the commit buffer for each
commit rather than freeing it after we've showed the commit.
We should do the same for the parent list. Right now this is
just a minor optimization. But once we refactor how reflog
walks are performed, keeping the parents will avoid
confusing us the second time we see the commit.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we're walking reflogs, we leave the commit buffer and
parents in place. A comment explains that this is due to
"cycles". But the interesting thing is the unsaid
implication: that the cycles (plus our clearing of the SEEN
flag) will cause us to show commits multiple times. Let's
spell it out.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The values in struct throughput are only updated every 0.5 seconds. If
we're all done before that time span then the final update will show a
rate of 0 bytes/s, which is misleading if some bytes had been handled.
Remember the start time and show the total throughput instead.
And avoid division by zero by enforcing a minimum time span value of 1
(unit: 1/1024th of a second). That makes the resulting rate an
underestimation, but it's closer to the actual value than the currently
shown 0 bytes/s.
Reported-by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni@jidanni.org>
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Simplify the code by using hex2chr() to convert and check for invalid
characters at the same time instead of doing that sequentially with
one table lookup for each.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't know the length of the C string "another". It could be
shorter than "name", which we compare it to using memchr(3). Call
strcmp(3) instead to avoid running over the end of the former, and
get rid of a strlen(3) call as a bonus.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We set the current and local branch colors at the top of the
build_format() function. Let's do the same for the remote
color. This saves a little bit of repetition, but more
importantly it puts all of the color-setting in the same
place. That makes it easier to see that we are coloring all
possibilities.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 949af0684 (branch: use ref-filter printing APIs,
2017-01-10), git-branch's output is generated by passing a
custom format to the ref-filter code. This format forgot to
pass BRANCH_COLOR_LOCAL, meaning that local branches
(besides the current one) were never colored at all.
We can add it in the %(if) block where we decide whether the
branch is "current" or merely "local". Note that this means
the current/local coloring is either/or. You can't set:
[color "branch"]
local = blue
current = bold
and expect the current branch to be "bold blue". This
matches the pre-949af0684 behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When assembling the ref-filter format to show "git branch"
output, we put the "%(if)%(HEAD)" conditional at the start
of the overall format. But there's no point in checking
whether a remote branch matches HEAD, as it never will.
The check should go inside the local conditional; we
assemble that format inside the "local" strbuf.
By itself, this is just a minor optimization. But in a
future patch, we'll need this refactoring to fix
local-branch coloring.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog-walk code doesn't work with limit_list(). That
function traverses down the real history graph, not the fake
reflog history that get_revision() returns. So it's not
going to actually examine all of the commits we're going to
show, because we'd add them to the pending list only during
the actual traversal.
In practice this limitation doesn't really matter, because
the options that require list-limiting generally need
UNINTERESTING endpoints or symmetric ranges, which already
are forbidden for reflog walks. Still, there are likely some
corner cases that would behave oddly. We're better off to
warn the user that we can't fulfill their request than to
generate potentially wrong output.
This will also make it easier to refactor the reflog-walking
code, because it eliminates a whole area of corner cases
we'd have to consider (that already don't work anyway).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since its inception, the general strategy of the reflog-walk
code has been to start with the tip commit for the ref, and
as we traverse replace each commit's parent pointers with
fake parents pointing to the previous reflog entry.
This lets us traverse the reflog as if it were a real
history, but it has some user-visible oddities. Namely:
1. The fake parents are used for commit selection and
display. So for example, "--merges" or "--no-merges"
are not useful, because the history appears as a linear
string of commits. Likewise, pathspec limiting is based
on the diff between adjacent entries, not the changes
actually introduced by a commit.
These are often the same (e.g., because the entry was
just running "git commit" and the adjacent entry _is_
the true parent), but it may not be in several common
cases. For instance, using "git reset" to jump around
history, or "git checkout" to move HEAD.
2. We reverse-map each commit back to its reflog. So when
it comes time to show commit X, we say "a-ha, we added
X because it was at the tip of the 'foo' reflog, so
let's show the foo reflog". But this leads to nonsense
results when you ask to traverse multiple reflogs: if
two reflogs have the same tip commit, we only map back
to one of them. Instead, we should show both.
3. If the tip of the reflog and the ref tip disagree on
the current value, we show the ref tip but give no
indication of the value in the reflog. This situation
isn't supposed to happen (since any ref update should
touch the reflog). But if it does, given that the
requested operation is to show the reflog, it makes
sense to prefer that.
This commit adds a new script with several expect_failure
tests to demonstrate the problems. This could be part of
the existing t1411, but it's a bit easier to start from a
fresh state, where we know exactly what will be in the log.
Since the new multiple-reflog tests are checking the actual
output, we can drop the "make sure we don't segfault" tests
from t1411, which are a strict subset of what we're doing
here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/reflog-walk-maint:
reflog-walk: include all fields when freeing complete_reflogs
reflog-walk: don't free reflogs added to cache
reflog-walk: duplicate strings in complete_reflogs list
reflog-walk: skip over double-null oid due to HEAD rename
When we encounter an error adding reflogs for a walk, we try
to free any logs we have read. But we didn't free all
fields, meaning that we could in theory leak all of the
"items" array (which would consitute the bulk of the
allocated memory).
This patch adds a helper which frees all of the entries and
uses it as appropriate.
As it turns out, the leak seems impossible to trigger with
the current code. Of the three error paths that free the
complete_reflogs struct, two only kick in when the items
array is empty, and the third was removed entirely in the
previous commit.
So this patch should be a noop in terms of behavior, but it
fixes a potential maintenance headache should anybody add a
new error path and copy the partial-free code. Which is
what happened in 5026b47175 (add_reflog_for_walk: avoid
memory leak, 2017-05-04), though its leaky call was the
third one that was recently removed.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
