In particular, gcc complains as follows:
CC tree-walk.o
tree-walk.c: In function `traverse_trees':
tree-walk.c:347: warning: 'e' might be used uninitialized in this \
function
CC builtin/revert.o
builtin/revert.c: In function `verify_opt_mutually_compatible':
builtin/revert.c:113: warning: 'opt2' might be used uninitialized in \
this function
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jk/argv-array:
run_hook: use argv_array API
checkout: use argv_array API
bisect: use argv_array API
quote: provide sq_dequote_to_argv_array
refactor argv_array into generic code
quote.h: fix bogus comment
add sha1_array API docs
* mg/branch-list:
t3200: clean up checks for file existence
branch: -v does not automatically imply --list
branch: allow pattern arguments
branch: introduce --list option
git-branch: introduce missing long forms for the options
git-tag: introduce long forms for the options
t6040: test branch -vv
Conflicts:
Documentation/git-tag.txt
t/t3200-branch.sh
* jk/for-each-ref:
for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*).
for-each-ref: handle multiline subjects like --pretty
for-each-ref: refactor subject and body placeholder parsing
t6300: add more body-parsing tests
t7004: factor out gpg setup
* jc/receive-verify:
receive-pack: check connectivity before concluding "git push"
check_everything_connected(): libify
check_everything_connected(): refactor to use an iterator
fetch: verify we have everything we need before updating our ref
Conflicts:
builtin/fetch.c
* jc/fetch-verify:
fetch: verify we have everything we need before updating our ref
rev-list --verify-object
list-objects: pass callback data to show_objects()
* rr/revert-cherry-pick-continue:
builtin/revert.c: make commit_list_append() static
revert: Propagate errors upwards from do_pick_commit
revert: Introduce --continue to continue the operation
revert: Don't implicitly stomp pending sequencer operation
revert: Remove sequencer state when no commits are pending
reset: Make reset remove the sequencer state
revert: Introduce --reset to remove sequencer state
revert: Make pick_commits functionally act on a commit list
revert: Save command-line options for continuing operation
revert: Save data for continuing after conflict resolution
revert: Don't create invalid replay_opts in parse_args
revert: Separate cmdline parsing from functional code
revert: Introduce struct to keep command-line options
revert: Eliminate global "commit" variable
revert: Rename no_replay to record_origin
revert: Don't check lone argument in get_encoding
revert: Simplify and inline add_message_to_msg
config: Introduce functions to write non-standard file
advice: Introduce error_resolve_conflict
This option causes check-attr to consider .gitattributes only from
the index, ignoring .gitattributes from the working tree. This allows
the command to be used in situations where a working tree does not exist.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
get_one_patchid() uses a rather dumb heuristic to determine if the
passed buffer is part of the next commit. Whenever the first 40 bytes
are a valid hexadecimal sha1 representation, get_one_patchid() returns
next_sha1.
Once the current line is longer than the fixed buffer, this will break
(provided the additional bytes make a valid hexadecimal sha1). As a result
patch-id returns incorrect results. Instead, use strbuf and read one line
at a time.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Schubert <mschub@elegosoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
With the usual "git" transport, a large-ish transfer with "git fetch" and
"git pull" give progress eye-candy to avoid boring users. However, not
when they are reading from a bundle. I.e.
$ git pull ../git-bundle.bndl master
This teaches bundle.c:unbundle() to give "-v" option to index-pack and
tell it to give progress bar when transport decides it is necessary.
The operation in the other direction, "git bundle create", could also
learn to honor --quiet but that is a separate issue.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git branch" command, while not in listing mode, calls create_branch()
even when the target branch already exists, and it does so even when it is
not interested in updating the value of the branch (i.e. the name of the
commit object that sits at the tip of the existing branch). This happens
when the command is run with "--set-upstream" option.
The earlier safety-measure to prevent "git branch -f $branch $commit" from
updating the currently checked out branch did not take it into account,
and we no longer can update the tracking information of the current branch.
Minimally fix this regression by telling the validation code if it is
called to really update the value of a potentially existing branch, or if
the caller merely is interested in updating auxiliary aspects of a branch.
Reported-and-Tested-by: Jay Soffian
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
What should happen if you run this command?
$ git ls-remote -h
It does not give a short-help for the command. Instead because "-h" is a
synonym for "--heads", it runs "git ls-remote --heads", and because there
is no remote specified on the command line, we run it against the default
"origin" remote, hence end up doing the same as
$ git ls-remote --heads origin
Fix this counter-intuitive behaviour by special casing a lone "-h" that
does not have anything else on the command line and calling usage().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It probably is not such a good idea to use ":/<pattern>" to specify which
commit to merge, as ":/<pattern>" can often hit unexpected commits, but
somebody tried it and got a nonsense error message:
fatal: ':/Foo bar' does not point to a commit
So here is a for-the-sake-of-consistency update that is fairly useless
that allows users to carefully try not shooting in the foot.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We were using a similar ad-hoc rev_list_args structure, but
this saves some code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Running a hook has to make complex set-up to establish web of
communication between child process and multiplexer, which is common
regardless of what kind of data is fed to the hook. Refactor the parts
that is specific to the data fed to the particular set of hooks from the
part that runs the hook, so that the code can be reused to drive hooks
that take different kind of data.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
commit c9bfb953 (want_color: automatically fallback to color.ui,
2011-08-17) introduced a regression where format-patch produces colorized
patches when color.ui is set to "always".
In f3aafa4 (Disable color detection during format-patch, 2006-07-09),
git_format_config was taught to intercept diff.color to avoid passing it
down to git_log_config and later, git_diff_ui_config.
Teach git_format_config to intercept color.ui in the same way.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Pang Yan Han <pangyanhan@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Asking fwrite() to write one item of size bytes results in fwrite()
reporting "I wrote zero item", when size is zero. Instead, we could
ask it to write "size" items of 1 byte and expect it to report that
"I wrote size items" when it succeeds, with any value of size,
including zero.
Noticed and reported by BJ Hargrave.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extract the helper function and the type definition of the iterator
function it uses out of builtin/fetch.c into a separate source and a
header file.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We will be using the same "rev-list --verify-objects" logic to add a
sanity check to the receiving end of "git push" in the same way, but the
list of commits that are checked come from a structure with a different
shape over there.
Update the function to take an iterator to make it easier to reuse it in
different contexts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git fetch" command works in two phases. The remote side tells us what
objects are at the tip of the refs we are fetching from, and transfers the
objects missing from our side. After storing the objects in our repository,
we update our remote tracking branches to point at the updated tips of the
refs.
A broken or malicious remote side could send a perfectly well-formed pack
data during the object transfer phase, but there is no guarantee that the
given data actually fill the gap between the objects we originally had and
the refs we are updating to.
Although this kind of breakage can be caught by running fsck after a
fetch, it is much cheaper to verify that everything that is reachable from
the tips of the refs we fetched are indeed fully connected to the tips of
our current set of refs before we update them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It makes no sense to do the - possibly very expensive - call to "rev-list
<new-ref-sha1> --not --all" in check_for_new_submodule_commits() when
there aren't any submodules configured.
Leave check_for_new_submodule_commits() early when no name <-> path
mappings for submodules are found in the configuration. To make that work
reading the configuration had to be moved further up in cmd_fetch(), as
doing that after the actual fetch of the superproject was too late.
Reported-by: Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"branch -v" without other options or parameters still works in the list
mode, but that is not because there is "-v" but because there is no
parameter nor option.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The %(body) placeholder returns the whole body of a tag or
commit, including the signature. However, callers may want
to get just the body without signature, or just the
signature.
Rather than change the meaning of %(body), which might break
some scripts, this patch introduces a new set of
placeholders which break down the %(contents) placeholder
into its constituent parts.
[jk: initial patch by mg, rebased on top of my refactoring
and with tests by me]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Generally the format of a git tag or commit message is:
subject
body body body
body body body
However, we occasionally see multiline subjects like:
subject
with multiple
lines
body body body
body body body
The rest of git treats these multiline subjects as something
to be concatenated and shown as a single line (e.g., "git
log --pretty=format:%s" will do so since f53bd74). For
consistency, for-each-ref should do the same with its
"%(subject)".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The find_subpos function was a little hard to use, as well
as to read. It would sometimes write into the subject and
body pointers, and sometimes not. The body pointer sometimes
could be compared to subject, and sometimes not. When
actually duplicating the subject, the caller was forced to
figure out again how long the subject is (which is not too
big a deal when the subject is a single line, but hard to
extend).
The refactoring makes the function more straightforward, both
to read and to use. We will always put something into the
subject and body pointers, and we return explicit lengths
for them, too.
This lays the groundwork both for more complex subject
parsing (e.g., multiline), as well as splitting the body
into subparts (like the text versus the signature).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit ffa69e61d3, reversing
changes made to 4a13c4d148.
Adding a new command line option to receive-pack and feed it from
send-pack is not an acceptable way to add features, as there is no
guarantee that your updated send-pack will be talking to updated
receive-pack. New features need to be added via the capability mechanism
negotiated over the protocol.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This single variable can be used to set instead of setting fsckobjects
variable for fetch & receive independently.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This corresponds to receive.fsckobjects configuration variable added (a
lot) earlier in 20dc001 (receive-pack: allow using --strict mode for
unpacking objects, 2008-02-25).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
