Earlier logic was discarding hunks that has difference from only
one parent or the same difference from all but one parent. This
changes it to check if the differences on all lines are from the
same sets of parents. This discards more uninteresting hunks
and seems to match expectations more naturally.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When dealing with an insanely large Octopus, it is possible to
optimize by noticing that more than one parents have the same
blob and avoid running diff between a parent and the merge
result by reusing an earlier result.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This ports the "combined diff" to diff-files so that differences
to the working tree files since stage 2 and stage 3 are shown
the same way as combined diff output from diff-tree for the
merge commit would be shown if the current working tree files
are committed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It considered an otherwise unchanged line that had line removals
in front of it an interesting line, which caused hunks to have
one extra the trailing context line.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Earlier round showed the commit log header and "diff --combined"
header even for paths that had no interesting hunk under --cc
flag. Move the header display logic around to squelch them.
With this, a merge that does not have any interesting merges
will not be shown with --cc option, unless -m is used at the
same time.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Santi Bejar points out that a hunk that changes from all the
same common parents except one is uninteresting. The earlier
round marked changes from only one parent uninteresting, but
this also marks hunks that have the same change from all but one
parent uninteresting, which is a natural extension of the
original idea to Octopus merges.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Remove extra whitespace between the change indicators and the
body text. That is more in line with the uncombined unified
diff output (pointed out by Santi Bejar).
When showing --cc, say so instead of saying just --combined.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
... and use the established pattern of tail initialized to point
at the head pointer for an empty list, and updated to point at
the next pointer field of the item at the tail when appending.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Building on the previous '-c' (combined) option, '--cc' option
squelches the output further by omitting hunks that consist of
difference with solely one parent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
A new option '-c' to diff-tree changes the way a merge commit is
displayed when generating a patch output. It shows a "combined
diff" (hence the option letter 'c'), which looks like this:
$ git-diff-tree --pretty -c -p fec9ebf1 | head -n 18
diff-tree fec9ebf... (from parents)
Merge: 0620db3... 8a263ae...
Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: Sun Jan 15 22:25:35 2006 -0800
Merge fixes up to GIT 1.1.3
diff --combined describe.c
@@@ +98,7 @@@
return (a_date > b_date) ? -1 : (a_date == b_date) ? 0 : 1;
}
- static void describe(char *arg)
- static void describe(struct commit *cmit, int last_one)
++ static void describe(char *arg, int last_one)
{
+ unsigned char sha1[20];
+ struct commit *cmit;
There are a few things to note about this feature:
- The '-c' option implies '-p'. It also implies '-m' halfway
in the sense that "interesting" merges are shown, but not all
merges.
- When a blob matches one of the parents, we do not show a diff
for that path at all. For a merge commit, this option shows
paths with real file-level merge (aka "interesting things").
- As a concequence of the above, an "uninteresting" merge is
not shown at all. You can use '-m' in addition to '-c' to
show the commit log for such a merge, but there will be no
combined diff output.
- Unlike "gitk", the output is monochrome.
A '-' character in the nth column means the line is from the nth
parent and does not appear in the merge result (i.e. removed
from that parent's version).
A '+' character in the nth column means the line appears in the
merge result, and the nth parent does not have that line
(i.e. added by the merge itself or inherited from another
parent).
The above example output shows that the function signature was
changed from either parents (hence two "-" lines and a "++"
line), and "unsigned char sha1[20]", prefixed by a " +", was
inherited from the first parent.
The code as sent to the list was buggy in few corner cases,
which I have fixed since then.
It does not bother to keep track of and show the line numbers
from parent commits, which it probably should.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
