Clear the "boundary_commits" object_array in release_revisions(). This
makes a few more tests pass under SANITIZE=leak, including
"t/t4126-apply-empty.sh" which started failed as an UNLEAK() in
cmd_format_patch() was removed in a preceding commit.
This also re-marks the various tests relying on "git format-patch" as
passing under "SANITIZE=leak", in the preceding "revisions API users:
use release_revisions() in builtin/log.c" commit those were marked as
failing as we removed the UNLEAK(rev) from cmd_format_patch() in
"builtin/log.c".
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change the default behavior of git-format-patch to generate numbered
sequence of 0/1 and 1/1 when generating both a cover-letter and a single
patch. This standardizes the cover letter to have 0/N which helps
distinguish the cover letter from the patch itself. Since the behavior
is easily changed via configuration as well as the use of -n and -N this
should be acceptable default behavior.
Add tests for the new default behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide
failures from earlier commands in the chain.
Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or
test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Exercise format-patch's --signoff, --in-reply-to and --start-number long
options.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <bebarino@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Let a command-line --keep-subject (-k) override a config-specified
format.numbered (--numbered (-n)), rather than provoking the
"-n and -k are mutually exclusive" failure.
* t4021-format-patch-numbered.sh: Test for the above
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
format-patch is most commonly used for multiple patches at once when
sending a patchset, in which case we want to number the patches; on
the other hand, single patches are not usually expected to be
numbered.
In other words, the typical behavior expected from format-patch is the
one obtained by enabling autonumber, so we set it to be the default.
Users that want to disable numbering for a particular patchset can do
so with the existing -N command-line switch. Users that want to
change the default behavior can use the format.numbering config key.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Test-updates-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Just because there wasn't a test for --numbered isn't a good reason
not to test format.numbered. So now we test both.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
