In particular, sparse issues the following warnings:
compat/obstack.c:176:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:224:17: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:324:16: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:329:16: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:347:16: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:362:19: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:379:29: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
compat/obstack.c:399:1: error: symbol 'print_and_abort' redeclared with \
different type (originally declared at compat/obstack.c:95) \
- different modifiers
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extract the helper function and the type definition of the iterator
function it uses out of builtin/fetch.c into a separate source and a
header file.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We will be using the same "rev-list --verify-objects" logic to add a
sanity check to the receiving end of "git push" in the same way, but the
list of commits that are checked come from a structure with a different
shape over there.
Update the function to take an iterator to make it easier to reuse it in
different contexts.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git fetch" command works in two phases. The remote side tells us what
objects are at the tip of the refs we are fetching from, and transfers the
objects missing from our side. After storing the objects in our repository,
we update our remote tracking branches to point at the updated tips of the
refs.
A broken or malicious remote side could send a perfectly well-formed pack
data during the object transfer phase, but there is no guarantee that the
given data actually fill the gap between the objects we originally had and
the refs we are updating to.
Although this kind of breakage can be caught by running fsck after a
fetch, it is much cheaper to verify that everything that is reachable from
the tips of the refs we fetched are indeed fully connected to the tips of
our current set of refs before we update them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It makes no sense to do the - possibly very expensive - call to "rev-list
<new-ref-sha1> --not --all" in check_for_new_submodule_commits() when
there aren't any submodules configured.
Leave check_for_new_submodule_commits() early when no name <-> path
mappings for submodules are found in the configuration. To make that work
reading the configuration had to be moved further up in cmd_fetch(), as
doing that after the actual fetch of the superproject was too late.
Reported-by: Martin Fick <mfick@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"branch -v" without other options or parameters still works in the list
mode, but that is not because there is "-v" but because there is no
parameter nor option.
Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The %(body) placeholder returns the whole body of a tag or
commit, including the signature. However, callers may want
to get just the body without signature, or just the
signature.
Rather than change the meaning of %(body), which might break
some scripts, this patch introduces a new set of
placeholders which break down the %(contents) placeholder
into its constituent parts.
[jk: initial patch by mg, rebased on top of my refactoring
and with tests by me]
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Generally the format of a git tag or commit message is:
subject
body body body
body body body
However, we occasionally see multiline subjects like:
subject
with multiple
lines
body body body
body body body
The rest of git treats these multiline subjects as something
to be concatenated and shown as a single line (e.g., "git
log --pretty=format:%s" will do so since f53bd74). For
consistency, for-each-ref should do the same with its
"%(subject)".
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The find_subpos function was a little hard to use, as well
as to read. It would sometimes write into the subject and
body pointers, and sometimes not. The body pointer sometimes
could be compared to subject, and sometimes not. When
actually duplicating the subject, the caller was forced to
figure out again how long the subject is (which is not too
big a deal when the subject is a single line, but hard to
extend).
The refactoring makes the function more straightforward, both
to read and to use. We will always put something into the
subject and body pointers, and we return explicit lengths
for them, too.
This lays the groundwork both for more complex subject
parsing (e.g., multiline), as well as splitting the body
into subparts (like the text versus the signature).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The current tests don't actually check parsing commit and
tag messages that have both a subject and a body (they just
have single-line messages).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Other test scripts may want to look at or verify signed
tags, and the setup is non-trivial. Let's factor this out
into lib-gpg.sh for other tests to use.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When it needs to compare and add an alt object path to the
alt_odb_list, we normalize this path first since comparing normalized
path is easy to get correct result.
Use strbuf to replace some string operations, since it is cleaner and
safer.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <Hui.Wang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A few more parts of this document is stale that needs updating
to reflect the reality, but I do not regularly rebase topics that
are only in "pu" anymore, which may be noteworthy for a commit.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This reverts commit ffa69e61d3, reversing
changes made to 4a13c4d148.
Adding a new command line option to receive-pack and feed it from
send-pack is not an acceptable way to add features, as there is no
guarantee that your updated send-pack will be talking to updated
receive-pack. New features need to be added via the capability mechanism
negotiated over the protocol.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add tests for the new fetch.fsckobjects, and also tests for
receive.fsckobjects we have had for quite some time.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This single variable can be used to set instead of setting fsckobjects
variable for fetch & receive independently.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This corresponds to receive.fsckobjects configuration variable added (a
lot) earlier in 20dc001 (receive-pack: allow using --strict mode for
unpacking objects, 2008-02-25).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* tr/maint-format-patch-empty-output:
Document negated forms of format-patch --to --cc --add-headers
t4014: "no-add-headers" is actually called "no-add-header"
t4014: invoke format-patch with --stdout where intended
t4014: check for empty files from git format-patch --stdout
* fk/use-kwset-pickaxe-grep-f:
obstack: Fix portability issues
Use kwset in grep
Use kwset in pickaxe
Adapt the kwset code to Git
Add string search routines from GNU grep
Add obstack.[ch] from EGLIBC 2.10
* en/merge-recursive-2: (57 commits)
merge-recursive: Don't re-sort a list whose order we depend upon
merge-recursive: Fix virtual merge base for rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest
t6036: criss-cross + rename/rename(1to2)/add-dest + simple modify
merge-recursive: Avoid unnecessary file rewrites
t6022: Additional tests checking for unnecessary updates of files
merge-recursive: Fix spurious 'refusing to lose untracked file...' messages
t6022: Add testcase for spurious "refusing to lose untracked" messages
t3030: fix accidental success in symlink rename
merge-recursive: Fix working copy handling for rename/rename/add/add
merge-recursive: add handling for rename/rename/add-dest/add-dest
merge-recursive: Have conflict_rename_delete reuse modify/delete code
merge-recursive: Make modify/delete handling code reusable
merge-recursive: Consider modifications in rename/rename(2to1) conflicts
merge-recursive: Create function for merging with branchname:file markers
merge-recursive: Record more data needed for merging with dual renames
merge-recursive: Defer rename/rename(2to1) handling until process_entry
merge-recursive: Small cleanups for conflict_rename_rename_1to2
merge-recursive: Fix rename/rename(1to2) resolution for virtual merge base
merge-recursive: Introduce a merge_file convenience function
merge-recursive: Fix modify/delete resolution in the recursive case
...
While it's not a command meant to be used by actual users (hence, not
mentionned in git(1)), this command is a very precious help for
remote-helpers authors.
The best place for such technical doc is the source code, but users may
not find it without a link in a manpage.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Acked-by: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is important for two reasons:
* when two "import" lines follow each other, only one "done" command
should be issued in the fast-import stream, not one per "import".
* The blank line terminating an import command should not be confused
with the one terminating the sequence of commands.
While we're there, illustrate the corresponding explanation for push
batches with an example.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Acked-by: Sverre Rabbelier <srabbelier@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "git fetch" command works in two phases. The remote side tells us what
objects are at the tip of the refs we are fetching from, and transfers the
objects missing from our side. After storing the objects in our repository,
we update our remote tracking branches to point at the updated tips of the
refs.
A broken or malicious remote side could send a perfectly well-formed pack
data during the object transfer phase, but there is no guarantee that the
given data actually fill the gap between the objects we originally had and
the refs we are updating to.
Although this kind of breakage can be caught by running fsck after a
fetch, it is much cheaper to verify that everything that is reachable from
the tips of the refs we fetched are indeed fully connected to the tips of
our current set of refs before we update them.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Often we want to verify everything reachable from a given set of commits
are present in our repository and connected without a gap to the tips of
our refs. We used to do this for this purpose:
$ rev-list --objects $commits_to_be_tested --not --all
Even though this is good enough for catching missing commits and trees,
we show the object name but do not verify their existence, let alone their
well-formedness, for the blob objects at the leaf level.
Add a new "--verify-object" option so that we can catch missing and broken
blobs as well.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The traverse_commit_list() API takes two callback functions, one to show
commit objects, and the other to show other kinds of objects. Even though
the former has a callback data parameter, so that the callback does not
have to rely on global state, the latter does not.
Give the show_objects() callback the same callback data parameter.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
