This is another step towards letting us remove the include of cache.h in
strbuf.c. It does mean that we also need to add includes of abspath.h
in a number of C files.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Dozens of files made use of gettext functions, without explicitly
including gettext.h. This made it more difficult to find which files
could remove a dependence on cache.h. Make C files explicitly include
gettext.h if they are using it.
However, while compat/fsmonitor/fsm-ipc-darwin.c should also gain an
include of gettext.h, it was left out to avoid conflicting with an
in-flight topic.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The config option (as documented) for rebase.autoSquash has a capital S,
whereas the command line option has a small case s.
Cf. <20220617100309.3224-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangyi Zhou <me@fangyi.io>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When the "strategy_opts" member was added in ba1905a5fe (builtin
rebase: add support for custom merge strategies, 2018-09-04) the
corresponding free() for it at the end of cmd_rebase() wasn't added,
let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Similar to the existing "squash_onto_name" added in [1] we need to
free() the xstrdup()'d "options.onto.name" added for "--keep-base" in
[2]..
1. 9dba809a69 (builtin rebase: support --root, 2018-09-04)
2. 414d924beb (rebase: teach rebase --keep-base, 2019-08-27)
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make the replay_opts_release() function added in the preceding commit
non-static, and use it for freeing the "struct replay_opts"
constructed for "rebase" and "revert".
To safely call our new replay_opts_release() we'll need to stop
calling it in sequencer_remove_state(), and instead call it where we
allocate the "struct replay_opts" itself.
This is because in e.g. do_interactive_rebase() we construct a "struct
replay_opts" with "get_replay_opts()", and then call
"complete_action()". If we get far enough in that function without
encountering errors we'll call "pick_commits()" which (indirectly)
calls sequencer_remove_state() at the end.
But if we encounter errors anywhere along the way we'd punt out early,
and not free() the memory we allocated. Remembering whether we
previously called sequencer_remove_state() would be a hassle.
Using a FREE_AND_NULL() pattern would also work, as it would be safe
to call replay_opts_release() repeatedly. But let's fix this properly
instead, by having the owner of the data free() it.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use a "goto cleanup" pattern in do_interactive_rebase(). This
eliminates some duplicated free() code added in 53bbcfbde7 (rebase
-i: implement the main part of interactive rebase as a builtin,
2018-09-27), and sets us up for a subsequent commit which'll make
further use of the "cleanup" label.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When config which selects the merge backend (currently,
rebase.autosquash=true or rebase.updateRefs=true) conflicts with other
options on the command line (such as --whitespace=fix), make the error
message specifically call out the config option and specify how to
override that config option on the command line.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-rebase manual noted several sets of incompatible options, but
we were missing tests for a few of these. Further, we were missing
code checks for one of these, which could result in command line
options being silently ignored.
Also, note that adding a check for autosquash means that using
--whitespace=fix together with the config setting rebase.autosquash=true
will trigger an error. A subsequent commit will improve the error
message.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--[no-]reapply-cherry-picks was traditionally only supported by the
sequencer. Support was added for the apply backend, when --keep-base is
also specified, in commit ce5238a690 ("rebase --keep-base: imply
--reapply-cherry-picks", 2022-10-17). Make the code error out when
--[no-]reapply-cherry-picks is specified AND the apply backend is used
AND --keep-base is not specified. Also, clarify a number of comments
surrounding the interaction of these flags.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, we flagged options which implied --apply as being
incompatible with options which implied --merge. But if both options
were given explicitly, then we didn't flag the incompatibility. The
same is true with --apply and --interactive. Add the check, and add
some testcases to verify these are also caught.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--update-refs is built in terms of the sequencer, which requires the
merge backend. It was already marked as incompatible with the apply
backend in the git-rebase manual, but the code didn't check for this
incompatibility and warn the user. Check and error now.
While at it, fix a typo in t3422...and fix some misleading wording
(most options which used to be am-specific have since been implemented
in the merge backend as well).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When handling "--exec" rebase collects the commands into a struct
string_list, then prepends "exec " to each command creating a multi line
string and finally splits that string back into a list of commands. This
is an artifact of the scripted rebase and the need to support "rebase
--preserve-merges". Now that "--preserve-merges" no-longer exists we can
cleanup the way the argument is handled. There is no need to add the
"exec " prefix to the commands as that is added by todo_list_to_strbuf().
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Various leak fixes.
* ab/various-leak-fixes:
built-ins: use free() not UNLEAK() if trivial, rm dead code
revert: fix parse_options_concat() leak
cherry-pick: free "struct replay_opts" members
rebase: don't leak on "--abort"
connected.c: free the "struct packed_git"
sequencer.c: fix "opts->strategy" leak in read_strategy_opts()
ls-files: fix a --with-tree memory leak
revision API: call graph_clear() in release_revisions()
unpack-file: fix ancient leak in create_temp_file()
built-ins & libs & helpers: add/move destructors, fix leaks
dir.c: free "ident" and "exclude_per_dir" in "struct untracked_cache"
read-cache.c: clear and free "sparse_checkout_patterns"
commit: discard partial cache before (re-)reading it
{reset,merge}: call discard_index() before returning
tests: mark tests as passing with SANITIZE=leak
Fix a leak in the recent 6159e7add4 (rebase --abort: improve reflog
message, 2022-10-12). Before that commit we'd strbuf_release() the
reflog message we were formatting, but when that code was refactored
to use "ropts.head_msg" the strbuf_release() was omitted.
Ideally the three users of "ropts" in cmd_rebase() should use
different "ropts" variables, in practice they're completely separate,
as this and the other user in the "switch" statement will "goto
cleanup", which won't touch "ropts".
The third caller after the "switch" is then unreachable if we take
these two branches, so all of them are getting a "{ 0 }" init'd
"ropts".
So it's OK that we're leaving a stale pointer in "ropts.head_msg",
cleaning it up was our responsibility, and it won't be used again.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Fix various leaks in built-ins, libraries and a test helper here we
were missing a call to strbuf_release(), string_list_clear() etc, or
were calling them after a potential "return".
Comments on individual changes:
- builtin/checkout.c: Fix a memory leak that was introduced in [1]. A
sibling leak introduced in [2] was recently fixed in [3]. As with [3]
we should be using the wt_status_state_free_buffers() API introduced
in [4].
- builtin/repack.c: Fix a leak that's been here since this use of
"strbuf_release()" was added in a1bbc6c017 (repack: rewrite the shell
script in C, 2013-09-15). We don't use the variable for anything
except this loop, so we can instead free it right afterwards.
- builtin/rev-parse: Fix a leak that's been here since this code was
added in 21d4783538 (Add a parseopt mode to git-rev-parse to bring
parse-options to shell scripts., 2007-11-04).
- builtin/stash.c: Fix a couple of leaks that have been here since
this code was added in d4788af875 (stash: convert create to builtin,
2019-02-25), we strbuf_release()'d only some of the "struct strbuf" we
allocated earlier in the function, let's release all of them.
- ref-filter.c: Fix a leak in 482c119186 (gpg-interface: improve
interface for parsing tags, 2021-02-11), we don't use the "payload"
variable that we ask parse_signature() to populate for us, so let's
free it.
- t/helper/test-fake-ssh.c: Fix a leak that's been here since this
code was added in 3064d5a38c (mingw: fix t5601-clone.sh,
2016-01-27). Let's free the "struct strbuf" as soon as we don't need
it anymore.
1. c45f0f525d (switch: reject if some operation is in progress,
2019-03-29)
2. 2708ce62d2 (branch: sort detached HEAD based on a flag,
2021-01-07)
3. abcac2e19f (ref-filter.c: fix a leak in get_head_description,
2022-09-25)
4. 962dd7ebc3 (wt-status: introduce wt_status_state_free_buffers(),
2020-09-27).
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Apply "index-compatibility.pending.cocci" rule to "builtin/*", but
exclude those where we conflict with in-flight changes.
As a result some of them end up using only "the_index", so let's have
them use the more narrow "USE_THE_INDEX_VARIABLE" rather than
"USE_THE_INDEX_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS".
Manual changes not made by coccinelle, that were squashed in:
* Whitespace-wrap argument lists for repo_hold_locked_index(),
repo_read_index_preload() and repo_refresh_and_write_index(), in cases
where the line became too long after the transformation.
* Change "refresh_cache()" to "refresh_index()" in a comment in
"builtin/update-index.c".
* For those whose call was followed by perror("<macro-name>"), change
it to perror("<function-name>"), referring to the new function.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that struct replay_opts has a reflog_action member we no longer
need to export GIT_REFLOG_ACTION when starting a rebase. If the user
has set GIT_REFLOG_ACTION then we use it when initializing
reflog_action.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Fix some bugs in the reflog messages when rebasing and changes the
reflog messages of "rebase --apply" to match "rebase --merge" with
the aim of making the reflog easier to parse.
* pw/rebase-reflog-fixes:
rebase: cleanup action handling
rebase --abort: improve reflog message
rebase --apply: make reflog messages match rebase --merge
rebase --apply: respect GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
rebase --merge: fix reflog message after skipping
rebase --merge: fix reflog when continuing
t3406: rework rebase reflog tests
rebase --apply: remove duplicated code
"git rebase --keep-base" used to discard the commits that are
already cherry-picked to the upstream, even when "keep-base" meant
that the base, on top of which the history is being rebuilt, does
not yet include these cherry-picked commits. The --keep-base
option now implies --reapply-cherry-picks and --no-fork-point
options.
* pw/rebase-keep-base-fixes:
rebase --keep-base: imply --no-fork-point
rebase --keep-base: imply --reapply-cherry-picks
rebase: factor out branch_base calculation
rebase: rename merge_base to branch_base
rebase: store orig_head as a commit
rebase: be stricter when reading state files containing oids
t3416: set $EDITOR in subshell
t3416: tighten two tests
Treating the action as a string is a hang over from the scripted
rebase. The last commit removed the only remaining use of the action
that required a string so lets convert the other action users to use
the existing action enum instead. If we ever need the action name as a
string in the future the action_names array exists exactly for that
purpose.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When aborting a rebase the reflog message looks like
rebase (abort): updating HEAD
which is not very informative. Improve the message by mentioning the
branch that we are returning to as we do at the end of a successful
rebase so it looks like.
rebase (abort): returning to refs/heads/topic
If GIT_REFLOG_ACTION is set in the environment we no longer omit
"(abort)" from the reflog message. We don't omit "(start)" and
"(finish)" when starting and finishing a rebase in that case so we
shouldn't omit "(abort)".
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The apply backend creates slightly different reflog messages to the
merge backend when starting or finishing a rebase and when picking
commits. These differences make it harder than it needs to be to parse
the reflog (I have a script that reads the finishing messages from
rebase and it is a pain to have to accommodate two different message
formats). While it is possible to determine the backend used for a
rebase from the reflog messages, the differences are not designed for
that purpose. c2417d3af7 (rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for
interactive-based rebases, 2020-02-15) removed the clear distinction
between the reflog messages of the two backends without complaint.
As the merge backend is the default it is likely to be the format most
common in existing reflogs. For that reason the apply backend is changed
to format its reflog messages to match the merge backend as closely as
possible. Note that there is still a difference as when committing a
conflict resolution the apply backend will use "(pick)" rather than
"(continue)" because it is not currently possible to change the message
for a single commit.
In addition to c2417d3af7 we also changed the reflog messages in
68aa495b59 (rebase: implement --merge via the interactive machinery,
2018-12-11) and 2ac0d6273f (rebase: change the default backend from "am"
to "merge", 2020-02-15). This commit makes the same change to "git
rebase --apply" that 2ac0d6273f made to "git rebase" without any backend
specific options. As the messages are changed to use an existing format
any scripts that can parse the reflog messages of the default rebase
backend should be unaffected by this change.
There are existing tests for the messages from both backends which are
adjusted to ensure that they do not get out of sync in the future.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog messages when finishing a rebase hard code "rebase" rather
than using GIT_REFLOG_ACTION.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message for every pick after running "rebase --skip" looks
like
rebase (skip) (pick): commit subject line
Fix this by not appending " (skip)" to the reflog action.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reflog message for a conflict resolution committed by "rebase
--continue" looks like
rebase (continue): commit subject line
Unfortunately the reflog message each subsequent pick look like
rebase (continue) (pick): commit subject line
Fix this by setting the reflog message for "rebase --continue" in
sequencer_continue() so it does not affect subsequent commits. This
introduces a memory leak similar to the one leaking GIT_REFLOG_ACTION
in pick_commits(). Both of these will be fixed in a future series that
stops the sequencer calling setenv().
If we fail to commit the staged changes then we error out so
GIT_REFLOG_ACTION does not need to be reset in that case.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use move_to_original_branch() when reattaching HEAD after a fast-forward
rather than open coding a copy of that code. move_to_original_branch()
does not call reset_head() if head_name is NULL but there should be no
user visible changes even though we currently call reset_head() in that
case. The reason for this is that the reset_head() call does not add a
message to the reflog because we're not changing the commit that HEAD
points to and so lock_ref_for_update() elides the update. When head_name
is not NULL then reset_head() behaves like "git symbolic-ref" and so the
reflog is updated.
Note that the removal of "strbuf_release(&msg)" is safe as there is an
identical call just above this hunk which can be seen by viewing the
diff with -U6.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Given the name of the option it is confusing if --keep-base actually
changes the base of the branch without --fork-point being explicitly
given on the command line.
The combination of --keep-base with an explicit --fork-point is still
supported even though --fork-point means we do not keep the same base
if the upstream branch has been rewound. We do this in case anyone is
relying on this behavior which is tested in t3431[1]
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200715032014.GA10818@generichostname/
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As --keep-base does not rebase the branch it is confusing if it
removes commits that have been cherry-picked to the upstream branch.
As --reapply-cherry-picks is not supported by the "apply" backend this
commit ensures that cherry-picks are reapplied by forcing the upstream
commit to match the onto commit unless --no-reapply-cherry-picks is
given.
Reported-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Separate out calculating the merge base between 'onto' and 'HEAD' from
the check for whether we can fast-forward or not. This means we can skip
the fast-forward checks when the rebase is forced and avoid calculating
the merge-base between 'HEAD' and 'onto' when --keep-base is given.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge_base is not a very descriptive name, the variable always holds
the merge-base of 'branch' and 'onto' which is commit at the base of
the branch being rebased so rename it to branch_base.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using a struct commit rather than a struct oid to hold orig_head means
that we error out straight away if the branch being rebased does not
point to a commit. It also simplifies the code that handles finding
the merge base and fork point as it no longer has to convert from an
oid to a commit.
To avoid changing the behavior of "git rebase <upstream> <branch>" we
keep the existing call to read_ref() and use lookup_commit_object()
on the oid returned by that rather than calling
lookup_commit_reference_by_name() which applies the ref dwim rules to
its argument.
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The state files for 'onto' and 'orig_head' should contain a full hex
oid, change the reading functions from get_oid() to get_oid_hex() to
reflect this. They should also name commits and not tags so add and use
a function that looks up a commit from an oid like
lookup_commit_reference() but without dereferencing tags.
Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous change added the --update-refs command-line option. For
users who always want this mode, create the rebase.updateRefs config
option which behaves the same way as rebase.autoSquash does with the
--autosquash option.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When working on a large feature, it can be helpful to break that feature
into multiple smaller parts that become reviewed in sequence. During
development or during review, a change to one part of the feature could
affect multiple of these parts. An interactive rebase can help adjust
the multi-part "story" of the branch.
However, if there are branches tracking the different parts of the
feature, then rebasing the entire list of commits can create commits not
reachable from those "sub branches". It can take a manual step to update
those branches.
Add a new --update-refs option to 'git rebase -i' that adds 'update-ref
<ref>' steps to the todo file whenever a commit that is being rebased is
decorated with that <ref>. At the very end, the rebase process updates
all of the listed refs to the values stored during the rebase operation.
Be sure to iterate after any squashing or fixups are placed. Update the
branch only after those squashes and fixups are complete. This allows a
--fixup commit at the tip of the feature to apply correctly to the sub
branch, even if it is fixing up the most-recent commit in that part.
This change update the documentation and builtin to accept the
--update-refs option as well as updating the todo file with the
'update-ref' commands. Tests are added to ensure that these todo
commands are added in the correct locations.
This change does _not_ include the actual behavior of tracking the
updated refs and writing the new ref values at the end of the rebase
process. That is deferred to a later change.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Various error messages that talk about the removal of
"--preserve-merges" in "rebase" have been strengthened, and "rebase
--abort" learned to get out of a state that was left by an earlier
use of the option.
* po/rebase-preserve-merges:
rebase: translate a die(preserve-merges) message
rebase: note `preserve` merges may be a pull config option
rebase: help users when dying with `preserve-merges`
rebase.c: state preserve-merges has been removed
This is a user facing message for a situation seen in the wild.
Translate it.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `--preserve-merges` option was removed by v2.34.0. However
users may not be aware that it is also a Pull configuration option,
which is still offered by major IDE vendors such as Visual Studio.
Extend the `--preserve-merges` die message to also direct users to
the possible use of the `preserve` option in the `pull.rebase` config.
This is an additional 'belt and braces' information statement.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Git would die if a "rebase --preserve-merges" was in progress.
Users could neither --quit, --abort, nor --continue the rebase.
Make the `rebase --abort` option available to allow users to remove
traces of any preserve-merges rebase, even if they had upgraded
during a rebase.
One trigger case was an unexpectedly difficult to resolve conflict, as
reported on the `git-users` group.
(https://groups.google.com/g/git-for-windows/c/3jMWbBlXXHM)
Other potential use-cases include git-experts using the portable
'Git on a stick' to help users with an older git version.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since feebd2d256 (rebase: hide --preserve-merges option, 2019-10-18)
this option is now removed as stated in the subsequent release notes.
Fix and reflow the option tip.
Signed-off-by: Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.email>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--keep-base rebases onto the merge base of the given upstream and the
current HEAD regardless of whether a branch is given. This is contrary
to the documentation and to the option's intended purpose. Instead,
rebase onto the merge base of the given upstream and the given branch.
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is an if statement where both if and else have the same
assignment of options.type to REBASE_MERGE. Simplify
it by getting that assigmnent out of the if.
Signed-off-by: Edmundo Carmona Antoranz <eantoranz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase A B" where B is not a commit should behave as if the
HEAD got detached at B and then the detached HEAD got rebased on top
of A. A bug however overwrites the current branch to point at B,
when B is a descendant of A (i.e. the rebase ends up being a
fast-forward). See [1] for the original bug report.
The callstack from checkout_up_to_date() is the following:
cmd_rebase()
-> checkout_up_to_date()
-> reset_head()
-> update_refs()
-> update_ref()
When B is not a valid branch but an oid, rebase sets the head_name
of rebase_options to NULL. This value gets passed down this call
chain through the branch member of reset_head_opts also getting set
to NULL all the way to update_refs().
Then update_refs() checks ropts.branch to decide whether or not to switch
branches. If ropts.branch is NULL, it calls update_ref() to update HEAD.
At this point however, from rebase's point of view, we want a detached
HEAD. But, since checkout_up_to_date() does not set the RESET_HEAD_DETACH
flag, the update_ref() call will deference HEAD and update the branch its
pointing to. We want the HEAD detached at B instead.
Fix this bug by adding the RESET_HEAD_DETACH flag in
checkout_up_to_date if B is not a valid branch, so that once
reset_head() calls update_refs(), it calls update_ref() with
REF_NO_DEREF which updates HEAD directly intead of deferencing it
and updating the branch that HEAD points to.
Also add a test to ensure the correct behavior.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/YiokTm3GxIZQQUow@newk/
Reported-by: Michael McClimon <michael@mcclimon.org>
Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Unify more messages to help l10n.
* ja/i18n-common-messages:
i18n: fix some misformated placeholders in command synopsis
i18n: remove from i18n strings that do not hold translatable parts
i18n: factorize "invalid value" messages
i18n: factorize more 'incompatible options' messages
